Laboratory Evaluation for Male Infertility

  • Ryan Mori
  • Edmund SabaneghJr.


The diagnosis and treatment options for male infertility have recently undergone a sea of change as advancements in technology and understanding in the fields of molecular biology, genetics, and laboratory medicine have grown. Further, advancements in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have rendered previously subfertile and infertile couples with various options for pregnancy. Such changes in the understanding and treatment of fertility and infertility have necessitated a much more detailed assessment of the couple presenting with infertility. At the basis of this assessment is a sophisticated and methodological evaluation of male factor infertility including laboratory assessment of urine, serum, and semen, as well as radiological and genetic studies.


Male infertility evaluation Assisted reproductive technologies Laboratory evaluation Semen analysis Cryptorchidism Varicocele Macroscopic assessment Computer-assisted semen analysis 



The authors would like to thank Eric Klein, MD, Chairman, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, for his support.


  1. 1.
    The Optimal Evaluation of the Infertile Male: American Urological Society Best Practice Statement. American Urological Society, Education and Research Inc. 2010.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Said TM, Agarwal A, Sharma RK, Thomas AJ, Sikka SC. Impact of sperm morphology on DNA damage caused by oxidative stress induced by beta-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:95–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Slama R, et al. Time to pregnancy and semen parameters: a cross-sectional study among fertile couples from four European Cities. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(2):503–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moskovtsev SI, Willis J, White J, Mullen JB. Leukocytospermia: relationship to sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity in patients evaluated for male factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(3):737–40. Epub 6 Mar 2007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tomlinson MJ, Barratt CL, Cooke ID. Prospective study of leukocytes and leukocyte subpopulations in semen suggests they are not a cause of male infertility. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:1069–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kolettis PN, Sabanegh ES. Significant medical pathology discovered during a male infertility evaluation. J Urol. 2001;166(1):178–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Franca LR, Avelar GF, Almeida FFL. Spermatogenesis and sperm transit through the epididymis with emphasis on pigs. Theriogenology. 2005;63:300–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mortimer D, Leslie EE, Kelly RW, Templeton AA. Morphological selection of human spermatozoa in vivo and in vitro. J Reprod Fertil. 1982;64:391–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clermont Y, Heller C. Spermatogenesis in man: an estimate of its duration. Science. 1963;140:184–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wolff H. The biologic significance of white blood cells in semen. Fertil Steril. 1995 Jun;63(6):1143–57. Review.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Verma A, Kanwar KC. Effect of vitamin E on human sperm motility and lipid peroxidation in vitro. Asian J Androl. 1999;1(3):151–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Cocuzza M, Short RA, Evenson DP. Effect of vaginal lubricants on sperm motility and chromatin integrity: a prospective comparative study. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(2):375–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, et al. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:112–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cendron M, Keating MA, Huff DS, et al. Cryptorchidism, orchiopexy and infertility: a critical long-term retrospective analysis. J Urol. 1989;142:559–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Charny CW. The spermatogenic potential of the undescended testis before and after treatment. J Urol. 1960;83:697.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Misell LM, Holochwost D, Boban D, et al. A stable isotope/mass spectrometric method for measuring the kinetics of human spermatogenesis in vivo. J Urol. 2006;175:242–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carlsen E, et al. Effects of ejaculatory frequency and season on variations in semen quality. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(2):358–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bjorndahl L, Kvist U. Sequence of ejaculation affects the spermatozoon as a carrier and its message. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7(4):440–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(3):231–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zini A, Blumenfield A, Libman J, Willis J. Beneficial effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on human sperm DNA integrity. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1018–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    World Health Organization. World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 1999.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jouannet P, Ducot B, Feneux D, Spira A. Male factors and the likelihood of pregnancy in infertile couples. I. Study of sperm characteristics. Int J Androl. 1988 Oct;11(5):379–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Spira A. Epidemiology of human reproduction. Hum Reprod. 1986;1:111–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Andersen AG, Jensen TK, Carlsen E, Jørgensen N, Andersson AM, Krarup T, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE. High frequency of sub-optimal semen quality in an unselected population of young men. Hum Reprod. 2000 Feb;15(2):366–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fedder J. Nonsperm cells in human semen: with special reference to seminal leukocytes and their possible influence on fertility. Arch Androl. 1996;36(1):41–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sigma M, Jarow J. Male infertility. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2007.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Agarwal A, Saleh RA, Bedaiwy MA. Role of reactive oxygen species in the pathophysiology of human reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:829–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zini A, Libman J. Sperm DNA damage: importance in the era of assisted reproduction. Curr Opin Urol. 2006;16(6):428–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Athayde KS, et al. Development of normal reference values for seminal reactive oxygen species and their correlation with leukocytes and semen parameters in a fertile population. J Androl. 2007;28(4):613–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fredricsson B, Bjork G. Morphology of postcoital spermatozoa in the cervical secretion and its clinical significance. Fertil Steril. 1977;28:841–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mosher WD, Pratt WF. Fecundity and infertility in the United States: incidence and trends. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Marks JL, McMahon R, Lipshultz LI. Predictive parameters of successful varicocele repair. J Urol. 1986;136:609–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gandini L, Lombardo F, Paoli D, Caponecchia L, Familiari G, Verlengia C, Dondero F, Lenzi A. Study of apoptotic DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(4): 830–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lee JD, Kamiguchi Y, Yanagimachi R. Analysis of chromosome constitution of human spermatozoa with normal and aberrant head morphologies after injection into mouse oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1996 Sep;11(9):1942–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Brazil CK, Nakajima ST, Coutifaris C, Carson SA, Cisneros P, Steinkampf MP, Hill JA, Xu D, Vogel DL, National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1388–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Oates RD, Silber S, Brown LG, Page DC. Clinical characterization of 42 oligospermic or azoospermic men with microdeletion of the AZFc region of the Y chromosome, and of 18 children conceived via ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(11):2813–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Agarwal A, Said TM. Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9(4):331–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sanocka D, et al. Male genital tract inflammation: The role of selected interleukins in regulation of pro-oxidant and antioxidant enzymatic substances in seminal plasma. J Androl. 2003;24:448–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Evenson DP, Wixon R. Clinical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation detection and male infertility. Theriogenology. 2006;65:979–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Evenson DP, Larson KL, Jost LK. Sperm chromatin structure assay: Its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparisons with other techniques. J Androl. 2002;23:25–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Li Z, Wang L, Cai J, Huang H. Correlation of sperm DNA damage with IVF and ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006;23(9–10):367–76. Epub 4 Oct 2006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Griveau JF, Grizard G, Boucher D, Le Lannou D. Influence of oxygen tension on function of isolated spermatozoa from ejaculates of oligozoospermic patients and normozoospermic fertile donors. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(11):3108–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    O’Flaherty C, de Lamirande E, Gagnon C. Positive role of reactive oxygen species in mammalian sperm capacitation: triggering and modulation of phosphorylation events. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;41(4):528–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Camejo MI, Segnini A, Proverbio F. Intgerleukin-6 in seminal plasma of infertile men, and lipid peroxidation in their sperm. Arch Androl. 2001;47:97–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Martinez P, Proverbio F, Camejo MI. Sperm lipid peroxidation and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Asian J Androl. 2007;9:102–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Silver EW, et al. Effect of antioxidant intake on sperm chromatin stability in healthy non-smoking men. J Androl. 2005;26:550–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Keskes-Ammar L, Feki-Chakroun N, Rebai T, et al. Sperm oxidative stress and the effect of an oral vitamin E and selenium supplement on semen quality in infertile men. Arch Androl. 2003;49: 83–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Köksal IT, Tefekli A, Usta M, Erol H, Abbasoglu S, Kadioglu A. The role of reactive oxygen species in testicular dysfunction associated with varicocele. BJU Int. 2000 Sep;86(4):549–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Allamaneni SS, Naughton CK, Sharma RK, Thomas Jr AJ, Agarwal A. Increased seminal reactive oxygen species levels in patients with varicoceles correlate with varicocele grade but not with testis size. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(6):1684–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mostafa T, et al. Varicocelectomy reduces reactive oxygen species levels and increases antioxidant activity of seminal plasma from infertile men with varicocele. Int J Androl. 2001;24:261–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Evers JLH, Collins JA. Assessment of efficacy of varicocele repair for male subfertility: A systematic review. Lancet. 2003;361: 1849–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Baker MA, Aitken RJ. Reactive oxygen species in spermatozoa: methods for monitoring and significance for the origins of genetic disease and infertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005;3:67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Report on optimal evaluation of the infertile male. AUA Best Practice Policy and ASRM Practice Committee Report, Volume 1, 2001. Accessed 20 Dec 2009.
  54. 54.
    Lipshultz LI, Corriere Jr JN. Progressive testicular atrophy in the varicocele patient. J Urol. 1977 Feb;117(2):175–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Turek PJ, Kim M, Gilbaugh 3rd JH, Lipshultz LI. The clinical characteristics of 82 patients with Sertoli cell-only testis histology. Fertil Steril. 1995;64(6):1197–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tiepolo L, Zuffardi O. Localization of factors controlling spermatogenesis in the nonfluorescent portion of the human Y chromosome long arm. Hum Genet. 1976;34:119–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Vogt PH. Human chromosome deletions in Yq11, AZF candidate genes and male infertility: history and update. Mol Hum Reprod. 1998;4(8):739–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Griveau JF, Renard P, Le Lannou D. Superoxide anion production by human spermatozoa as a part of the ionophore-induced acrosome reaction process. Int J Androl. 199;18(2):67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kefer JC, Agarwal A, Sabanegh EC. Role of antioxidants in the treatment of male infertility. Int J Urol. 2009;16:449–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kutteh WH, Chao CH, Ritter JO, et al. Vaginal lubricants of the infertile couple: effect on sperm activity. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1996;41:400–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lampiao F, du Plessis SS. TNF-alpha and IL-6 affect human sperm function by elevating nitric oxide production. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(5):628–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Liu DY, Baker HW. Morphology of spermatozoa bound to the zona pellucida of human oocytes that failed to fertilize in vitro. J Reprod Fertil. 1992;94:71–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. McLachlan RI, et al. Semen analysis: its place in modern reproductive medical practice. Pathology. 2003;35(1):25–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Munuce MJ, Berta CL, Pauluzzi F, Caille AM. Relationship between antisperm antibodies, sperm movement, and semen quality. Urol Int. 2000;65(4):200–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sakkas D, Mariethoz E, Manicardi G, Bizzaro D, Bianchi PG, Bianchi U. Origin of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa. Rev Reprod. 1999;4(1):31–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Shekarriz M, Sharma RK, Thomas Jr AJ, Agarwal A. Positive myeloperoxidase staining (Endtz test) as an indicator of excessive reactive oxygen species formation in semen. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12(2):70–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Simmons FA. Human infertility. New Engl J Med. 1956;255:1140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, et al. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988–1989). Hum Reprod. 1991;6:811–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tur-Kaspa I, Maor Y, Levran D, et al. How often should infertile men have intercourse to achieve conception? Fert Steril. 1994;62(2):370–5.Google Scholar
  13. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. New Engl J Med. 1995;333(23):1517–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 5th edn. 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan Mori
    • 1
  • Edmund SabaneghJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Department of UrologyGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland ClinicClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations