New Perspectives on Industrial Organization pp 241-282 | Cite as

# Quantity and Price Competition in Static Oligopoly Models

Chapter

First Online:

## Abstract

We saw in the previous chapter that there are two types of oligopoly models, those that assume cooperative behavior and those that assume noncooperative behavior. In Chaps. 10 and 11, we develop the classic models of oligopoly where firms behave noncooperatively. These models represent the most abstract material that is found in the book. Here you will see how some of the great figures in history have thought about the oligopoly problem.

### Keywords

Transportation Assure Nash Rosen Undercut### References

- Athey S, Schmutzler A (2001) Investment and market dominance. Rand J Econ 32(1):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bertrand J (1883) Review of Théorie Mathématique de la Richesse Sociale and Recherches sur les Principles Mathématique de la Théorie des Richesses. Journal des Savants 68:499–508Google Scholar
- Choi CJ, Shin HS (1992) A comment on a model of vertical product differentiation. J Ind Econ 40:229–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cournot A (1838) Researches into the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth. L. Hachette, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Fisher I (1898) Cournot and mathematical economics. Quart J Econ 12(2):119–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Häckner J (2000) A note on price and quantity competition in differentiated oligopolies. J Econ Theory 93(2):233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green J (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Shy O (1995) Industrial organization: theory and applications. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Singh N, Vives X (1984) Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. Rand J Econ 15(4):546–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- von Stackelberg H (1934) Marktform und Gleichgewicht. Julius Springer, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Tremblay CH, Tremblay VJ (2011a) The Cournot-Bertrand Model and the degree of product differentiation. Econ Lett 111(3):233–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012