Advertisement

Mouse Models for Cone Degeneration

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 801)

Abstract

Loss of cone vision has devastating effects on everyday life. Even though much effort has been made to understand cone physiology and pathophysiology, no successful therapies are available for patients suffering from cone disorders. As complex retinal interactions cannot be studied in vitro, utilization of different animal models is inevitable. Due to recent advances in transgenesis, mice became the most popular animal model to study human diseases, also in ophthalmology. While there are similarities in retinal anatomy and pathophysiology between mice and humans, there are also differences, most importantly the lack of a cone-rich macula in mice. Instead, cones in mice are rare and distributed over the whole retina, which makes the analysis of cone pathophysiology very difficult in these animals. This hindrance is one of the reasons why our understanding of rod pathophysiological processes is much more advanced. Recently, however, the sparseness of cones was overcome by the generation of the Nrl / mouse that expresses only cone photoreceptors in the retina. This paper will give a brief overview of some of the known mouse models to study cone degeneration and discuss the current knowledge gained from the analysis of these models.

Keywords

Retina Photoreceptors Cones Nrl Dystrophy Blindness Degeneration Mouse model 

References

  1. 1.
    Won J, Shi LY, Hicks W, Wang J, Hurd R, Naggert JK, Chang B, Nishina PM (2011) Mouse model resources for vision research. J Ophthalmol 2011:391384PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang JS, Estevez ME, Cornwall MC, Kefalov VJ (2009) Intra-retinal visual cycle required for rapid and complete cone dark adaptation. Nat Neurosci 12:295–302PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang JS, Kefalov VJ (2009) An alternative pathway mediates the mouse and human cone visual cycle. Curr Biol 19:1665–1669PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curcio CA, Allen KA, Sloan KR, Lerea CL, Hurley JB, Klock IB, Milam AH (1991) Distribution and morphology of human cone photoreceptors stained with anti-blue opsin. J Comp Neurol 312:610–624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berger W, Kloeckener-Gruissem B, Neidhardt J (2010) The molecular basis of human retinal and vitreoretinal diseases. Prog Retin Eye Res 29:335–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hamel CP (2007) Cone rod dystrophies. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2:7PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Samardzija M, Neuhauss SCF, Joly S, Kurz-Levin M, Grimm C (2010) Animal models for retinal degeneration. Neuromethods 46:51–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ramkumar HL, Zhang J, Chan CC (2010) Retinal ultrastructure of murine models of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Prog Retin Eye Res 29:169–190PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang B, Grau T, Dangel S, Hurd R, Jurklies B, Sener EC, Andreasson S, Dollfus H, Baumann B, Bolz S, Artemyev N, Kohl S, Heckenlively J, Wissinger B (2009) A homologous genetic basis of the murine cpfl1 mutant and human achromatopsia linked to mutations in the PDE6C gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:19581–19586PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trifunovic D, Dengler K, Michalakis S, Zrenner E, Wissinger B, Paquet-Durand F (2010) cGMP-dependent cone photoreceptor degeneration in the cpfl1 mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 518:3604–3617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chang B, Dacey MS, Hawes NL, Hitchcock PF, Milam AH, Atmaca-Sonmez P, Nusinowitz S, Heckenlively JR (2006) Cone photoreceptor function loss-3, a novel mouse model of achromatopsia due to a mutation in Gnat2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:5017–5021PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alexander JJ, Umino Y, Everhart D, Chang B, Min SH, Li Q, Timmers AM, Hawes NL, Pang JJ, Barlow RB, Hauswirth WW (2007) Restoration of cone vision in a mouse model of achromatopsia. Nat Med 13:685–687PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Biel M, Seeliger M, Pfeifer A, Kohler K, Gerstner A, Ludwig A, Jaissle G, Fauser S, Zrenner E, Hofmann F (1999) Selective loss of cone function in mice lacking the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel CNG3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:7553–7557PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hawes N, Wang X, Hurd RE, Wang J, Davisson MT, Nusinowitz S, Heckenlively JR, Chang B (2006) A point mutation in the Cnga3 gene causes cone photoreceptor function loss (cpfl5) in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47: E-Abstr 4579Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu J, Morris LM, Michalakis S, Biel M, Fliesler SJ, Sherry DM, Ding XQ (2012) CNGA3 deficiency affects cone synaptic terminal structure and function and leads to secondary rod dysfunction and degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:1117–1129PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khan NW, Wissinger B, Kohl S, Sieving PA (2007) CNGB3 achromatopsia with progressive loss of residual cone function and impaired rod-mediated function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:3864–3871PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kohl S, Varsanyi B, Antunes GA, Baumann B, Hoyng CB, Jagle H, Rosenberg T, Kellner U, Lorenz B, Salati R, Jurklies B, Farkas A, Andreasson S, Weleber RG, Jacobson SG, Rudolph G, Castellan C, Dollfus H, Legius E, Anastasi M, Bitoun P, Lev D, Sieving PA, Munier FL, Zrenner E, Sharpe LT, Cremers FP, Wissinger B (2005) CNGB3 mutations account for 50 % of all cases with autosomal recessive achromatopsia. Eur J Hum Genet 13:302–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ding XQ, Harry CS, Umino Y, Matveev AV, Fliesler SJ, Barlow RB (2009) Impaired cone function and cone degeneration resulting from CNGB3 deficiency: down-regulation of CNGA3 biosynthesis as a potential mechanism. Hum Mol Genet 18:4770–4780PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thapa A, Morris L, Xu J, Ma H, Michalakis S, Biel M, Ding XQ (2012) Endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated cone photoreceptor degeneration in cyclic nucleotide-gated channel deficiency. J Biol Chem 287:18018–18029PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Radu RA, Hu J, Yuan Q, Welch DL, Makshanoff J, Lloyd M, McMullen S, Travis GH, Bok D (2011) Complement system dysregulation and inflammation in the retinal pigment epithelium of a mouse model for Stargardt macular degeneration. J Biol Chem 286:18593–18601PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weng J, Mata NL, Azarian SM, Tzekov RT, Birch DG, Travis GH (1999) Insights into the function of Rim protein in photoreceptors and etiology of Stargardt’s disease from the phenotype in abcr knockout mice. Cell 98:13–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Agbaga MP, Brush RS, Mandal MN, Henry K, Elliott MH, Anderson RE (2008) Role of Stargardt-3 macular dystrophy protein (ELOVL4) in the biosynthesis of very long chain fatty acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:12843–12848PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ambasudhan R, Wang X, Jablonski MM, Thompson DA, Lagali PS, Wong PW, Sieving PA, Ayyagari R (2004) Atrophic macular degeneration mutations in ELOVL4 result in the intracellular misrouting of the protein. Genomics 83:615–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karan G, Lillo C, Yang Z, Cameron DJ, Locke KG, Zhao Y, Thirumalaichary S, Li C, Birch DG, Vollmer-Snarr HR, Williams DS, Zhang K (2005) Lipofuscin accumulation, abnormal electrophysiology, and photoreceptor degeneration in mutant ELOVL4 transgenic mice: a model for macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:4164–4169PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vasireddy V, Jablonski MM, Mandal MN, Raz-Prag D, Wang XF, Nizol L, Iannaccone A, Musch DC, Bush RA, Salem NJ, Sieving PA, Ayyagari R (2006) Elovl4 5-bp-deletion knock-in mice develop progressive photoreceptor degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:4558–4568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McMahon A, Butovich IA, Mata NL, Klein M, Ritter R, Richardson J, Birch DG, Edwards AO, Kedzierski W (2007) Retinal pathology and skin barrier defect in mice carrying a Stargardt disease-3 mutation in elongase of very long chain fatty acids-4. Mol Vis 13:258–272PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Raz-Prag D, Ayyagari R, Fariss RN, Mandal MN, Vasireddy V, Majchrzak S, Webber AL, Bush RA, Salem NJ, Petrukhin K, Sieving PA (2006) Haploinsufficiency is not the key mechanism of pathogenesis in a heterozygous Elovl4 knockout mouse model of STGD3 disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:3603–3611PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li W, Chen Y, Cameron DJ, Wang C, Karan G, Yang Z, Zhao Y, Pearson E, Chen H, Deng C, Howes K, Zhang K (2007) Elovl4 haploinsufficiency does not induce early onset retinal degeneration in mice. Vision Res 47:714–722PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harkewicz R, Du H, Tong Z, Alkuraya H, Bedell M, Sun W, Wang X, Hsu YH, Esteve-Rudd J, Hughes G, Su Z, Zhang M, Lopes VS, Molday RS, Williams DS, Dennis EA, Zhang K (2012) Essential role of ELOVL4 protein in very long chain fatty acid synthesis and retinal function. J Biol Chem 287:11469–11480PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mears AJ, Kondo M, Swain PK, Takada Y, Bush RA, Saunders TL, Sieving PA, Swaroop A (2001) Nrl is required for rod photoreceptor development. Nat Genet 29:447–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yetemian RM, Brown BM, Craft CM (2010) Neovascularization, enhanced inflammatory response, and age-related cone dystrophy in the Nrl−/−Grk1−/− mouse retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:6196–6206PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lab for Retinal Cell Biology, Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations