Technology Integration in Multicultural Settings



This chapter presents an exposition of how multicultural factors influence the design of electronic learning systems to support educational goals and improve learning outcomes for students from diverse cultures. The chapter reviews the specialized literature related to the intersection of the disciplines of multicultural education and instructional design to show how to make best use of instructional settings to support and respect the many cultures that are represented within the modern classroom. The chapter concludes with some suggested future directions for research with a specific recommendation that instructional designers embrace the powerful user configuration features now available in digital and social media to empower learners to modify both technologies and learning environments to support their own cultural learning needs to utilize the affordances available.


Culture Multicultural Multicultural learning Individual and group differences Innovative technologies 


  1. Chisholm, I. M. (1998). Six elements for technology integration in multicultural classrooms. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 7(2), 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Day, D. L. (1996, August 20–23). Cultural bases of interface acceptance: Foundations. In People and computers XI. Proceedings, HCI’96 (pp. 35–47). London: Imperial College.Google Scholar
  3. *Cardoso de Castro Salgado, L., de Souza, C. S., & Leitão, C. F. (2011). Using metaphors to explore cultural perspectives in cross-cultural design, internationalization, design and global development. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6775, 94–103. doi:  10.1007/978-3-642-21660-2_11
  4. *Drabinski, E., Clark, J. E., & Roberts, S. T. (2011) Introduction: Shaped or shaping? The role for radical teachers in teaching with technology. The Radical Teacher, 90, 3–8.Google Scholar
  5. Eteokleous, N. (2011). Developing youth’s cultural and social skills through a social–virtual curriculum. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 5, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Faculty Focus. (2010). Twitter in higher education 2010: Usage habits and trends of today’s college faculty. Faculty Focus 2nd Annual Survey. Madison, WI: Magna Publications.Google Scholar
  7. *Ferdig, R. E., Coutts, J., DiPietro, J., Lok, B., & Davis, N. (2007). Innovative technologies for multicultural education needs. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 1, 47–63Google Scholar
  8. Ferdon, C., & Hertz, M. (2007). Electronic media, violence, and adolescents: An emerging public health problem. The Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 41(6), S1–S5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. *Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Multicultural Education Series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gibson, J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. ISBN 0-470-99014-7.Google Scholar
  11. Gonzalez, Y. A., & Jinyu, Z. (2011). A study on gesture-based input in multi-touch enabled mobile devices. 7th International Visual Communication Design Conference Audience, Participation, Intervention into Aesthetics: The Interaction of the Technical Media and Cultural Creative Industry. Kun Shan University Institutional Repository, Taiwan. Retrieved from
  12. Lazzari, M. (2009). Creative use of podcasting in higher education and its effect on competitive agency. Computers & Education, 52(1), 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Looi, C., Wong, L., So, H., Seow, P., Toh, Y., Chen, W., et al. (2009). Anatomy of a mobilized lesson: Learning my way. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1120–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marinetti A., & Dunn P. (2002). The challenge of cultural adaptation: A question of approach. Training Journal, pp. 20–24.Google Scholar
  15. McShay, J. (2005). Double infusion: Toward a process of articulation between critical multicultural education and technology education in a teacher preparation program. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(4), 429–445.Google Scholar
  16. Morgan, K. (2006). Cultural considerations for international markets. In C. Lattemann & T. Kohler (Eds.), Multimedia technology (pp. 12–22). Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang. ISBN 3-631-54961-X.Google Scholar
  17. Morgan, K., & Morgan, M. (2003, April 21–25). Cultural considerations for computer interface design. Proceedings of the Western Decision Science Institute 2003 (Vol. 2, pp. 234–240). Kauai Marriott, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  18. Munoz, J. S. (2002). [Dis]integrating: Multiculturalism with technology. Multicultural Education, 10(2), 19–24.Google Scholar
  19. Norman, D. (1999). Affordances, conventions and design. Interactions 6(3):38–43. New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  20. Price, S., & Rogers, Y. (2004). Let’s get physical: The learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces. Computers & Education, 43(1–2), 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Savin-Baden, M., Gourlay, L., Tombs, C., Steils, N., Tombs, G., & Mawer, M. (2010). Situating pedagogies, positions and practices in immersive virtual worlds. Educational Research, 52(2), 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information and Management, 44, 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Simons, G. F. (2000). Intercultural aspects of online training using games. Keynote speech presented at the ISAGA Conference, Tartu, Estonia.Google Scholar
  24. Squire, K., & Klopfer, E. (2007). Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 371–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stafford-Levy, M., & Wiburg, K. M. (2001). Multicultural technology integration—the winds of change amid the sands of time. Computers in the Schools, 16(3), 121–134.Google Scholar
  26. Tiernan, P. (2010). Enhancing the learning experience of undergraduate technology students with labVIEW™ software. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1579–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tynes, B. M., Garcia, E. L., Giang, M. T., & Coleman, N. E. (2011). Symposium: youth and social media: The racial landscape of social networking sites: Forging identity, community, and civic engagement. Journal of Law & Policy for the Information Society, 2011.Google Scholar
  28. Verner, I., Cuperman, D., Klein, Y., Polishuk, A., Wertheim, I., & Mir, R. (2010, April 4–6). Focusing a robotics education program on scientific and humane challenges: A museum case study. 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)—Learning Environments and Ecosystems in Engineering Education. Amman, Jordan.Google Scholar
  29. Yen, J., & Lee, C. (2011). Exploring problem solving patterns and their impact on learning achievement in a blended learning environment. Computers & Education, 56(1), 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eduvate LimitedHavantUK

Personalised recommendations