Synthesis of Recent Literature on Educational Technologies in Medical Curricula

  • Tiffany A. Koszalka
  • John W. Epling
  • Jennifer Lynn Reece-Barnes

Abstract

A recent call for medical school reform in the USA has sparked a renewed interest in the use of educational technologies to help enhance and standardize the complex medical curriculum. Medical school goals focus on preparing medical students to be physicians who connect multiple knowledge bases to clinical experiences, develop professional competencies, and continually self-assess knowledge and learning needs. Educational technology has been suggested as a critical factor in meeting these goals. Although there is a growing presence of technologies in medical schools, recent educational technology studies in medical education outlets overwhelmingly appear to be solo pilot efforts that are evaluative in nature and primarily describe uses and perceived value of technology. Few report widely studied technology phenomena and produce evidence-based results powerful enough to support uses of technology to inform curricular reform. Medical education scholars have suggested that more interdisciplinary and rigorous empirical studies are required to determine how educational technologies may enhance the efficiency and quality of medical curricula. This chapter describes the evolving process of educating physicians and provides a synthesis of recent themes in the medical school educational technology literature covering areas of adoption of educational technology innovations, technology support structures, design and development challenges, and recent research. Conclusions suggest future research that by nature is collaborative, interdisciplinary, multi-institutional, and aligns with curriculum enhancement themes.

Keywords

Medical education Technology integration Medical school reform Instructional design 

References

  1. Adams, E., Rodgers, C., Harrington, R., Young, D., & Sieber, V. (2011). How we created virtual patient cases for primary care-based learning. Medical Teacher, 33, 273–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AK, S. (2011). The effects of computer supported problem based learning on students’ approaches to learning. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/712
  3. Ally, M. (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Edmonton, Canada: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar
  4. *Association of American Medical Colleges Institute for Improving Medical Education-AAMC-IIME. (2008). Effective use of educational technology in medical education, Colloquium on medical technology: Recommendations and guidelines for medical educators. Retrieved from https://services.aamc.org/Publications/showfile.cfm?file-version80.pdf&prd_id-184&prv_id-224&pdf_id-80
  5. Bates, A. W., & Poole, G. (2003). Effective teaching with technology in higher education: Foundations for success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Berman, N., Fall, I., Chessman, A., Dell, M., Lang, V., Leong, S. T., et al. (2011). Collaborative model for developing and maintaining virtual patients for medical education. Medical Teacher, 33, 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berman, N., Fall, L., Smith, S., Levine, D., Maloney, C., Potts, M., et al. (2009). Integration strategies for using virtual patients in clinical clerkships. Academic Medicine, 84(7), 942–949. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a8c668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Bowdish, B. E., Chauvin, S. W., Kreisman, N., & Britt, M. (2003). Travels towards problem based learning in medical education (VPBL). Instructional Science, 31, 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Candler, C., & Andrews, M. D. (2004). Technology in Medical Education: How the OU College of Medicine has used technology to enhance the medical education experience. The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association, 97(1), 8–10.Google Scholar
  11. Carney, P. A., Nierenberg, D. W., Pipas, C. F., Brooks, W. B., Stukel, T. A., & Keller, A. M. (2004). Educational epidemiology. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(9), 1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carraccio, C., & Englander, R. (2004). Evaluating competence using a portfolio: A literature review and web-based application to the ACGME competencies. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 16(4), 381–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. *Chen, F. M., Bauchner, H., & Burstin, H. (2004). A call for outcomes research in medical education. Academic Medicine, 79(10), 955.Google Scholar
  14. Chu, L. F., Zamora, A. K., Young, C. A., Kurup, V., & Macario, A. (2010). The role of social networking application in the medical academic environment. International Anesthesiology Clinics, 48(3), 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook, D. (2005). Learning and cognitive styles in web-based learning: Theory, evidence and application. Academic Medicine, 80(3), 266–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cook, D. (2006). Where we are with web-based learning in medical education? Medical Teacher, 38(7), 594–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cook, D., & Dupas, D. (2006). A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19, 698–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cook, D., Hatala, R., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J., Wang, A., et al. (2011). Technology-enhanced simulations for healthcare professions education. Journal of the American Medical Association, 306(9), 978–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. *Cook, D., Levinson, A., & Garside, S. (2008). Internet-based learning in health professions: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 300(10), 1181–1196.Google Scholar
  21. *Cooke, M., Irby, D. M., & O’Brien, B. C. (2010). Educating physicians: A call for reform of medical school and residency. (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching). Stanford, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Cuban, L. (2012). How new technologies can end age-graded schools (Part 3). Retrieved from http://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2012/02/07/how-new-technologies-can-end-age-graded-schools-part-3/.
  23. Dansky, K., Gamm, L., Vasey, J., & Barsukiewicz, C. (1999). Electronic medical records: Are physicians prepared? Journal of Healthcare Management, 44(6), 454–455.Google Scholar
  24. Dror, I., Schmidt, P., & O’Connor, L. (2011). A cognitive perspective on technology enhanced learning in medical training: Great opportunities, pitfalls, and challenges. Medical Teacher, 33, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Edelbring, S., Broström, O., Henriksson, P., Vassiliou, D., Spaak, J., Dahlgren, L. O., et al. (2012). Integrating virtual patients into courses: Follow-up seminars and perceived benefit. Medical Education, 46, 417–425. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04219.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ellaway, R. (2010). eMedical teacher. Medical Teacher, 32(8), 705–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellaway, R. (2011). E-learning: Is the revolution over? Medical Teacher, 33, 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. *Ellaway, R., Gray, A., Harden, R. M., McDonald, J., Pippard, M. J., Pringle, S. D., et al. (2011). Integration of e-learning resources into a medical school curriculum. Medical Teacher, 33, 311–318.Google Scholar
  29. Ely, D. P. (1999). Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations. Educational Technology, 39(6), 23–27.Google Scholar
  30. Eysenbach, G. (2008). Medicine 2.0: Social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(3), e22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fall, L. H., Berman, N. B., Smith, S., White, C., Woodhead, J., & Olson, A. (2005). Multi-institutional development and utilization of a computer-assisted learning program for the pediatrics clerkship: The CLIPP project. Academic Medicine, 80(9), 847–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fryer-Edwards, K., Arnold, R. M., Baile, W., Tulsky, J. A., Petracca, F., & Back, A. (2006). Reflective teaching practices: An approach to teaching communication skills in a small-group setting. Academic Medicine, 81(7), 638–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gagnon, M. P., Legare, F., Labrecque, M., Fremont, P., Pluye, P., Gagnon, J., et al. (2009). Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professions. The Cochrane Library, 2, 1–32.Google Scholar
  34. Gattoni, A., & Tenzek, K. E. (2010). The practice: An analysis of factors influencing the training of health care participants through innovative technology. Communication Education, 59(3), 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gerhardus, D. (2003). Robot-assisted surgery. Journal of Healthcare Management, 48(4), 242–251.Google Scholar
  36. Gogus, A., Koszalka, T., & Spector, J. M. (2009). Assessing conceptual representations of ill defined problems. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 7(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  37. Grabowski, B., McCarthy, M., & Koszalka, T. (1998). Web-based instruction and learning: Analysis and needs assessment. NASA/TP-1998-206547. Hanover, MD: NASA Center for Aerospace Information. Retrieved from http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19980137582_1998162573.pdf.
  38. Halbert, C., Kriebel, R., Cuzzolino, R., Coughlin, P., & Fresa-Dillon, K. (2011). Self-assessed learning style correlates to use of supplemental learning material in an online course management system. Medical Teacher, 33, 331–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. * Harden, R. M., Gessner, L. H., Gunn, M., Issenberg, S. B., Pringle, S. D., & Stewart, A. (2011). Creating an e-learning module from learning objects using a commentary or ‘personal learning assistant.’ Medical Teacher, 33, 286–290.Google Scholar
  40. *Hoff, T., Pohl, H., & Bartfield, J. (2004). Creating learning environments to produce competent residents: The roles of culture and context. Academic Medicine, 79(6), 532–540.Google Scholar
  41. Hoffman, K., Hosokawa, M., Blake, R., Headrick, L., & Johnson, G. (2006). Problem-based learning outcomes: Ten years of experience at the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine. Academic Medicine, 81(7), 617–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hsu, P. S., & Sharma, P. (2006). A systemic plan of technology integration. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 9(4), 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Issenberg, S. (2006). The scope of simulation-based health care education. Simulation in Healthcare, 1(4), 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jonassen, D. (2005). Modeling with technology: Mindtools for conceptual change. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Jonassen, D., Campbell, J., & Davidson, M. (1994). Learning with media: Restructuring the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jonassen, D., Carr, C., & Yueh, H. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends, 43(2), 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. *Kern, D., Thomas, P., Howard, D., & Bass, F. (1998). Curriculum development for medical education. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Khogali, S. E. O., Davies, D. A., Donnan, P. T., Fray, A., Harden, R. M., Mcdonald, J., et al. (2011). Integration of e-learning resources into a medical school curriculum. Medical Teacher, 33, 311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  50. Knowles, M. S., & Associates. (1984). Andragogy in action. Applying modern principles of adult education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. A collection of chapters examining different aspects of Knowles’ formulation.Google Scholar
  51. Koszalka, T. (2000). The validation of a measurement instrument: Teachers’ attitudes toward the use of web resources in the classroom. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 1(2), 139–144.Google Scholar
  52. Koszalka, T. (2003). Reflection as a critical component of the technology adoption process. ERIC Digest. EDO-IR-2003-04.Google Scholar
  53. *Koszalka, T., & Epling, J. (2010). A methodology for assessing elicitation of knowledge in complex domains: Identifying conceptual representations of ill-structured problems in medical diagnostics. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Drummer, & N. M. Seel (Eds.), Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge (pp. 311–344). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Koszalka, T., & Ntloedibe-Kuswani, G. S. (2010). Literature on the safe and disruptive learning potential of mobile-technologies. Distance Education, 31(2), 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. *Koszalka, T., & Olson, B. (2009). Transforming a Pediatrics Lecture Series to online instruction: A new blended online-classroom pediatrics residency lecture series. In A. A. Lazakidou & K. M. Siassiakos (Eds.), Handbook of research on distributed medical informatics and E-health (pp. 410–424). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  56. Larsen, A. K., Visser-Rotgans, R., & Hole, G. O. (2011). Teaching and learning community work online: Can e-learning promote competencies for future practice? Journal of Technology in Human Services, 29(1), 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lawless, K., & Pellegrino, J. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, 575–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leong, S. L., Baldwin, C. D., Usatine, R. P., Adelman, A. M., & Gjerde, C. L. (2000). Web-based education in family medicine predoctoral programs. Family Medicine, 32(10), 696–700.Google Scholar
  59. Majumdar, S. (Ed.), Anderson, J., Wai-Kong, N., Barnhart, S., Majundar, S., Koszalka, T., et al. (2005). Regional guidelines on teacher development for pedagogy-technology integration. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education. http://www.unescobkk.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ict/Regional_Guideline.pdf.
  60. *McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R., & Scalese, R. J. (2009). A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Medical Education, 44, 50–63.Google Scholar
  61. McGee, J., & Kanter, S. (2011). How we develop and sustain innovation in medical education technology: Keys to success. Medical Teacher, 33(4), 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Miflin, B., Campbell, C., & Price, D. (2000). A conceptual framework to guide the development of self-directed, lifelong learning in problem-based medical curricula. Medical Education, 34(4), 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Moser, F. (2007). Faculty adoption of educational technology: Educational technology support plays a critical role in helping faculty add technology to their teaching. Educause Quarterly, 30(1), 66–69.Google Scholar
  64. *Mostaghimi, A., Levison, J. H., Leffert, R., Ham, W., Nathoo, A., Halamka, J., et al. (2006). The doctor’s new black bag: Instructional technology and the tools of the 21st century physician. Medical Education Online, 2006: 11. Google Scholar
  65. National Institutes of Health NIH. (2012). Interdisciplinary research. Retrieved from http://commonfund.nih.gov/interdisciplinary/.
  66. National Science Foundation NSF. (2011). NSF launches sustainability research networks competition. Retrieved from http://www.cccblog.org/2011/08/18/nsf-launches-sustainability-research-networks-competition/.
  67. Olson, B., Mata, M., & Koszalka, T. (2013). Implementing an online curriculum for medical education: Examining the critical factors for success. International Journal on E-Learning, 12(2), 197–208.Google Scholar
  68. Orchard, C. A., Curran, V., & Kabene, S. (2005). Creating a culture for interdisciplinary collaborative professional practice. Medical Education Online, 2005, 10–11.Google Scholar
  69. Pinkwart, N., Harrer, A., & Kuhn, A. (2010). Process support for collaborative inquiry learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 5(3), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Poldoja, H., Valjataga, T., Tammets, K., & Laanpere, M. (2011). Web-based self- and peer-assessment of teachers’ educational technology competencies. Lecture notes in computer science, 7048, 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reiser, R., & Duffy, T. (2007). Trends and issues in educational change. In R. Reiser & J. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed., pp. 209–220). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person.Google Scholar
  72. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  73. Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., Leipzig, R. M., & Rosanne, M. (2006). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 81, 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. *Sandars, J. (2011). It appeared to be a good idea at the time but … a few steps closer to understanding how technology can enhance teaching and learning in medical education. Medical Teacher, 33, 266–267.Google Scholar
  75. Sanders, J., & Lafferty, N. (2010). Twelve tips on usability testing to develop effective e-learning in medical education. Medical Teacher, 32, 956–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Snasel, V., Platos, J., & El-Qawasmeh, E. (2011). Digital information processing and communications. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  77. Stead, G. (2006). Mobile technologies: Transforming the future of learning. In A. Pinder (Eds.) Emerging Technologies for Learning, British Educational Communications and Technology Agency - ICT Research Coventry (pp. 6–15). UK: Becta ICT Research. Retrieved from http://publications.becta.org.uk/display.cfm?resID=25940&page=1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. *Souza, K. H., Kamin, C., O’Sullivan, P., Moses, A., & Heestand, D. (2008). Organizational models of educational technology in U.S. and Canadian medical schools. Academic Medicine, 83(7), 691–699.Google Scholar
  79. ten Care, O., Snell, L., Mann, K., & Vermunt, J. (2004). Orienting teaching toward the learning process. Academic Medicine, 79(3), 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wald, H., Dube, C., & Anthony, D. (2007). Untangling the web: The impact of internet use on healthcare and the physician-patient relationship. Patient Education and Counseling, 68(3), 218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang, Q. (2008). A generic model for guiding the integration of ICT into teaching and learning. Innovative Education and Teaching International, 45, 411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wiley, D. A. (Ed.). (2002). The instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington, IN: Association of Educational Technology.Google Scholar
  83. *Willcockson, I. U., & Phelps, C. L. (2010). Keeping learning central: A model for implementing emerging technologies. Medical Education Online, 15, 4275.Google Scholar
  84. Wu, Y., & Koszalka, T. (2011). Instructional design of an Advanced Interactive Discovery Environment: Exploring team communication and technology use in collaborative engineering problem solving. In G. Vincenti & J. Braman (Eds.), Multi-user virtual environments for the classroom: Practical approaches to teaching in virtual worlds (pp. 366–385). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zayim, N., Yildirim, S., & Saka, O. (2006). Technology adoption of medical faculty in teaching: Differentiating factors in adopter categories. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 213–222.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tiffany A. Koszalka
    • 1
  • John W. Epling
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jennifer Lynn Reece-Barnes
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Instructional Design Development and EvaluationSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Department of Family MedicineState University of New York Upstate Medical UniversitySyracuseUSA
  3. 3.Department of Public Health and Preventive MedicineState University of New York Upstate Medical UniversitySyracuseUSA
  4. 4.Department of Instructional Design, Development and EvaluationSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations