Advertisement

Open Educational Resources: A Review of the Literature

Abstract

This chapter begins by reviewing the many definitions of the term open educational resources and concludes by discussing challenges and opportunities for the approach. Open educational resources (OER) are educational materials either licensed under an open copyright license or in the public domain. Neither the term “open educational resources” nor the term “open” itself has an agreed upon definition in the literature. Research regarding open educational resources focuses on methods of producing OER, methods of sharing OER, and the benefits of OER. Significant issues relating to OER remain unresolved, including business model and discovery problems.

Keywords

Open educational resources Reuse Remix Affordability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dean Richard Young of the David O. McKay School of Education and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation for their support of this work.

References

  1. Abelson, H. (2008). The creation of opencourseware at MIT. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(2), 164–174. doi: 10.1007/s10956-007-9060-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. *Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Report to the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation (pp. i–84). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/Resources/AReviewoftheOpenEducationalRes/162444
  3. Baraniuk, R. G., & Burrus, C. S. (2008). Viewpoint—global warming toward open educational resources. Communications of the ACM, 51, 30–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase’s penguin, or, linux and “The nature of the firm”. The Yale Law Journal, 112, 369–446. Retrieved from http://www.benkler.org/CoasesPenguin.html
  5. *Benkler, Y. (2005). Common wisdom: Peer production of educational materials. In: D. Wiley (Ed.), Advancing the effectiveness and sustainability of open education, Instructional Technology Institute (p. 28). Utah State University, COSL Press.Google Scholar
  6. Benkler, Y. (2007). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bethard, S., Wetzer, P., Butcher, K., Martin, J., & Sumner, T. (2009). Automatically characterizing resource quality for educational digital libraries. In F. Heath, M. L. Rice-Lively, & R. Furuta (Eds.), JCDL ’09: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CSK Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 221–230). Austin, TX: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  8. *Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review, 43, 16–32.Google Scholar
  9. Burgos, J. V., & Ramirez, M. S. (2011). Academic knowledge mobilization to promote culture change towards openness in education. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  10. Carson, S. (2006). 2005 program evaluation findings report. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  11. Carson, S., & Forward, M. (2010). Development of the OCW Consortium. Education Engineering (EDUCON), 2010 IEEE, 1657–1660. doi:  10.1109/EDUCON.2010.5492401
  12. Caudill, J. (2011). Using OpenCourseWare to enhance on-campus educational programs. TCC Worldwide Online Conference Refereed Proceedings (pp. 43–47). Retrieved from http://etec.hawaii.edu/proceedings/2011/
  13. Conole, G., McAndrew, P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2010). The role of CSCL pedagogical patterns as mediating artefacts for repurposing Open Educational Resources. In F. Pozzi & D. Persico (Eds.), Techniques for fostering collaboration in online learning communities: Theoretical and practical perspectives (pp. 206–223). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Creative Commons Corporation. (2011). The power of open. Retrieved from http://thepowerofopen.org/
  15. Custard, M., & Sumner, T. (2005). Using machine learning to support quality judgments. D-Lib Magazine, 11(10). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october05/custard/10custard.html doi: 10.1045/october2005-custard
  16. D’Antoni, S. (2009). Open educational resources: Reviewing initiatives and issues. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24(1), 3–10. doi: 10.1080/02680510802625443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Rosnay, M. D. (2010). Creative commons licenses legal pitfalls: Incompatibilities and solutions. Amsterdam: Institute for Information Law. Retrieved from http://www.ivir.nl/creativecommons/CC_Licenses_Legal_Pitfalls_2010.pdf
  18. Dholakia, U., King, J., & Baraniuk, R. (2006). What makes an open education program sustainable? The case of connexions. Connexions/OECD. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/3/6/36781781.pdf
  19. Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, pp. 29–44. http://www.ijello.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p029-044Downes.pdf
  20. Duffin, J., & Muramatsu, B. (2008). OER recommender: linking nsdl pathways and opencourseware repositories. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Pittsburgh, PA. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1378889.1378994
  21. Duncan, S. M. (2009). Patterns of learning object reuse in the Connexions repository. PhD Thesis, Utah State University, USA. Retrieved January 6, 2010, from http://www.archive.org/details/PatternsOfLearningObjectReuseInTheConnexionsRepository
  22. Educause. (2010). 7 things you should know about open educational resources. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/Resources/7ThingsYouShouldKnowAboutOpenE/205913
  23. Geser, G. (2007). Open educational practices and resources: OLCOS roadmap 2012 (pp. 1–149). Retrieved from http://www.olcos.org/english/roadmap/download/
  24. Gurell, S., & Wiley, D. (2008). OER handbook for educators (pp. 1–284). Retrieved from http://wikieducator.org/OER_Handbook/educator_version_one
  25. Helsdingen, A., Janssen, B., & Schuwer, S. (2010). Business models in OER, a contingency approach. Paper presented at the Open Ed 2010 Conference, Barcelona, Spain. http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/handle/10609/5039
  26. Hilton III, J. L., & Wiley, D. (2011). Open access textbooks and financial sustainability: A case study on Flat World Knowledge. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/960/1869
  27. Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2010). Benefits and challenges of OER for higher education institutions. Paper presented at the Open Educational Resources (OER) Workshop for Heads of Commonwealth Universities, Capetown, South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/OER_BenefitsChallenges_presentation.pdf
  28. *Hylén, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. Paper presented at the Open Education 2006: Community, Culture, and Content, Logan, UT.Google Scholar
  29. Ivins, T. Z. (2011). Localization of Open Educational Resources (OER) in Nepal: Strategies of Himalayan Knowledge-Workers. Brigham Young University. Retrieved from http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/ETD/id/2651/rec/1
  30. *Johansen, J., & Wiley, D. (2010). A sustainable model for OpenCourseWare development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 369–382. doi: 10.1007/s11423-010-9160-7.Google Scholar
  31. Kalz, M., Drachsler, H., van Bruggen, J., & Hummel, H. (2008). Wayfinding services for open educational practices. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 3(2), 24–28. Retrieved from http://online-journals.org/i-jet/issue/view/11 Google Scholar
  32. Kelty, C., Burrus, C., & Baraniuk, R. (2008). Peer review anew: Three principles and a case study in postpublication quality assurance. Proceedings of the IEEE, special issue on Educational Technology, 96(6), 1000–1011. Retrieved from http://cnx.org/news/news/peer-review-anew-ProcIEEE-june08.pdf, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2008.921613
  33. Koohang, A., & Harman, K. (2007). Advancing sustainability of open educational resources. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 4, 535–544. Retrieved from http://www.oercommons.org/community/advancing-sustainability-of-open-educational-resources/view
  34. Lane, A. (2006). From pillar to post: Exploring the issues involved in re-purposing distance learning materials for use as Open Educational Resources. OpenLearn working paper. Retrieved from http://kn.open.ac.uk/public/document.cfm?docid=9724
  35. Lane, A., & McAndrew, P. (2010). Are open educational resources systematic or systemic change agents for teaching practice? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 952–962. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01119.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lessig, L. (2003). Dunwody distinguished lecture in law: The creative commons. Florida Law Review, 55, 763–777.Google Scholar
  37. LRMI. (2011). Learning resource metadata initiative. Retrieved from http://www.lrmi.net/
  38. MacKenzie, N., Postgate, R., & Scupham, J. (1975). Open learning—systems and problems in post-secondary education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  39. Minguillón, J., & Rodríguez, M. (2010). Extending learning objects by means of social networking. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6483(2010), 220–229. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-17404-0_23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MIT OCW. (2011a). About MIT OCW. Retrieved from http://ocw.mit.edu/about/
  41. MIT OCW. (2011b). Why Donate? Retrieved from http://ocw.mit.edu/donate/why-donate/
  42. Mulder, F. (2007). The advancement of Lifelong Learning through Open Educational Resources in an open and flexible (self) learning context. Accessed on March. Retrieved from http://www.ou.nl/Docs/Campagnes/SCOP/OER_paper_by_Fred_Mulder.pdf
  43. *OECD. (2007). Giving knowledge for free: The emergence of open educational resources. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/7/38654317.pdf
  44. Parry, M. (2009). Utah State U.’s OpenCourseWare closes because of budget woes. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/utah-state-us-opencourseware-closes-because-of-budget-woes/7913
  45. Patricia, C. C. S., del Rocio, R. M. G., & Elizabeth, R. P. A. (2010). OER’s production cycle with social authorship and semantic tools. Education Engineering (EDUCON), 2010 IEEE, 121–128. doi:  10.1109/EDUCON.2010.5492588
  46. Pegler, C. (2010). Building a manifesto for OER sustainability: UK experiences. Paper presented at the Open Ed Conference 2010, Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10609/5141
  47. Petrides, L., & Jimes, C. (2008). Building open educational resources from the ground up: South Africa’s free high school science texts. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2008(1). Retrieved from http://jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/view/2008-7
  48. Petrides, L., Jimes, C., Middleton-Detzner, C., Walling, J., & Weiss, S. (2010). Open textbook adoption and use: Implications for teachers and learners. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 26(1), 39–49. doi: 10.1080/02680513.2011.538563.Google Scholar
  49. Petrides, L., Nguyen, L., Jimes, C., & Karaglani, A. (2008). Open educational resources: Inquiring into author use and reuse. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1/2), 98–117. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.177.3589, doi: 10.1504/IJTEL.2008.020233
  50. Plotkin, H. (2010). Free to learn: An open educational resources policy development guidebook for community college governance officials. San Francisco, CA: Creative Commons. Retrieved from http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Free_to_Learn_Guide
  51. Rumble, G. (1989). ‘Open learning’, ‘distance learning’, and the misuse of language. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, M. S. (2009). Opening education. Science, 323(5910), 89–93. doi: 10.1126/science.1168018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith, M., & Casserly, C. (2006). The promise of Open Educational Resources. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. Retrieved from http://www.icde.org/The+Promise+of+OER.9UFRzIXH.ips
  54. *Tuomi, I. (2006). Open Educational Resources: What they are and why do they matter (pp. 1–44). OECD. Retrieved from http://www.meaningprocessing.com/personalPages/tuomi/articles/OpenEducationalResources_OECDreport.pdf
  55. *UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries: Final report. Retrieved from www.unesco.org/iiep/eng/focus/opensrc/PDF/OERForumFinalReport.pdf
  56. UNESCO. (2012). 2012 World Open Educational Resources Congress. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/CI_Information_Meetings/2012_world_oer_congress_en.pdf
  57. Washington State Board for Community & Technical Colleges. (2010). Open licensing on competitive grants (Resolution 10-06-30). Retrieved from www.sbctc.edu/general/admin/Tab_9_Open_Licensing_Policy.pdf
  58. Wenk, B. (2010). Open educational resources (OER) inspire teaching and learning. Paper presented at the IEEE EDUCON Education Engineering 2010—The Future of Global Learning Engineering Education, Madrid, Spain. Retrieved from http://www.ieec.uned.es/Investigacion/Educon2010/SearchTool/EDUCON2010/papers/2010S02G04.pdf
  59. Wiley, D. (2006b). Open source, openness, and higher education. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(1). Retrieved from http://innovateonline.info/
  60. *Wiley, D. (2010). Openness as catalyst for an educational reformation. Educause Review, 45(4), 15–20. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume45/OpennessasCatalystforanEducati/209246 Google Scholar
  61. Wiley, D. (2011). Utah moves to open textbooks. Retrieved from http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/2134

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations