Web 2.0 Applications and Practices for Learning Through Collaboration

  • Yu-Chang Hsu
  • Yu-Hui Ching
  • Barbara L. Grabowski

Abstract

This chapter provides a review of the theoretical bases and international research on the uses of Web 2.0 applications for learning through collaboration. Web 2.0 applications empower users with a venue for personal expression, sharing, communicating, and collaborating with others, thus offering enriched opportunities for learning. In our review, we found evidence of engaging and effective uses of Web 2.0 applications such as blogs, wikis, collaborative documents and concept mapping, VoiceThread, video sharing applications (e.g., YouTube), microblogging (e.g., Twitter), social networking sites, and social bookmarking that applied contemporary and foundational educational theory. We also identified opportunities and challenges associated with learning through collaboration with Web 2.0 applications, which can inform research directions and areas to explore for ECT researchers.

Keywords

Web 2.0 Learning through collaboration (LtC) Affordances 

References

  1. Augustsson, G. (2010). Web 2.0, pedagogical support for reflexive and emotional social interaction among Swedish students. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., & Squire, K. (2001). Constructing virtual worlds: Tracing the historical development of learner practices. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 47–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. *Bell, P., & Winn, W. (2000). Distributed cognitions, by nature and by design. In D. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environment (pp. 123–145). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Bower, M., Woo, K., Roberts, M., & Watters, P. A. (2006). Wiki pedagogy—A tale of two wikis. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET 06), Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke, S. C., & Snyder, S. L. (2008). YouTube: An innovative learning resource for college health education courses. The International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 11, 39–46.Google Scholar
  7. Burnett, M. (2008). Integrating interactive media into the classroom: YouTube raises the bar on student performance. Paper presented at the Allied Academies International Conference, Reno, NV. Retrieved June 23, 2012, from http://208.106.163.107/Public/Proceedings/Proceedings23/AMS%20Proceedings.pdf.
  8. *Ching, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2011). Design-grounded assessment: A framework and a case study of Web 2.0 practices in higher education. In J. Waycott & J. Sheard (Eds.), Assessing students’ Web 2.0 activities in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(Special issue, 5), 781–797.Google Scholar
  9. Chuang, H. (2010). Weblog-based electronic portfolios for student teachers in Taiwan. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole, M. (2009). Using wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches. Computer & Education, 52, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. *Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.). (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  12. *Dohn, N. B. (2009). Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 343–363.Google Scholar
  13. Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). Tweeting the night away: Using Twitter to enhance social presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2).Google Scholar
  14. Elgort, I., Smith, A. G., & Toland, J. (2008). Is wiki an effective platform for group course work? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 195–210.Google Scholar
  15. Ellison, N. B., & Wu, Y. (2008). Blogging in the classroom: A preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact on comprehension. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 99–122.Google Scholar
  16. Facebook. (2012). Statistics: People on Facebook. Retrieved June 23, 2012, from http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreald=22.
  17. Ferdig, R., & Trammell, K. (2004). Content delivery in the ‘blogosphere.’ T.H.E. Journal. Retrieved June 23, 2012, from http://www.thejournal.com/articles/16626.
  18. Fessakis, G., Tatsis, K., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2008). Supporting “learning by design” activities using group blogs. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 199–212.Google Scholar
  19. Grant, L. (2009). ‘I DON’T CARE DO UR OWN PAGE!’ A case study of using wikis for collaborative work in a UL secondary school. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greeno, J., & the Middle School Mathematics Through Applications Project Group. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gunawardena, C. N., Hermans, M. B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M., & Tuttle, R. (2009). A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haase, D. (2009). The YouTube makeup class. The Physics Teacher, 47(5), 272–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. System Sciences, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
  24. Hsu, Y.-C., & Ching, Y.-H. (2011). Microblogging for strengthening a virtual learning community in an online course. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 3(4), 375–388.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 horizon report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  26. Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karasavvidis, I. (2010). Wiki uses in higher education: Exploring barriers to successful implementation. Interactive Learning Environment, 18(3), 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kear, K., Woodthorpe, J., Robertson, S., & Hutchinson, M. (2010). From forums to wikis: Perspectives on tools for collaboration. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 218–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kerawalla, L., Minocha, S., Kirkuk, G., & Conole, G. (2009). An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ladyshewsky, R. K., & Gardner, P. (2008). Peer assisted learning and blogging: A strategy to promote reflective practice during clinical fieldwork. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(3), 241–257.Google Scholar
  31. Lave, J. (1985). Introduction: Situationally specific practice. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 16, 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. *Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. *Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lin, H., & Kelsey, K. D. (2009). Building a networked environment in wikis: The evolving phases of collaborative learning in a wikibook project. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(2), 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16-year-old students. Learning Media and Technology, 34(2), 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luehmann, A. L., & Tinelli, L. (2008). Teacher professional identity development with social networking technologies: Learning reform through blogging. Educational Media International, 45(4), 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MacBride, R., & Luehmann, A. L. (2008). Capitalizing on emerging technologies: A case study of classroom blogging. School Science and Mathematics, 108(5), 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved June 23, 2012, from http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/6228.
  39. Pauschenwein, J., & Sfiri, A. (2009). Adult learner’s motivation for the use of micro-blogging during online training courses. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 5(1), 22–25.Google Scholar
  40. *Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligences and design for education. In G. Solomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Pfaffman, J. A. (2007). Computer-mediated communications technologies. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 226–230). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  42. Philip, R., & Nicholls, J. (2009). Group blogs: Documenting collaborative drama processes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 683–699.Google Scholar
  43. Rebertson, I. (2008). Learners’ attitudes to wiki technology in problem based, blended learning for vocational teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 425–441.Google Scholar
  44. Schunk, D. H. (2008). Learning theories: An educational perspective (5th ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Sharma, P., & Xie, Y. (2008). Student experiences of using weblogs: An exploratory study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 12, 137–156.Google Scholar
  46. Shoffner, M. (2009). Personal attitudes and technology: Implications for pre-service teacher reflective practice. Teacher Educational Quarterly, 36(2), 143–161.Google Scholar
  47. *Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tan, Y. H., Teo, E. H., Aw, W. L., & Lim, W. Y. (2005). Portfolio building in Chinese language learning using blogs. Proceedings of the BlogTalk Downunder 2005 Conference, Sydney, Australia, May 19–22. Retrieved June 23, 2012, from http://iresearch.edumall.sg/iresearch/slot/u110/pubs/blogtalk.pdf.
  49. Tu, C.-H., Blocher, M., & Ntoruru, J. (2008). Integrate Web 2.0 technology to facilitate online professional community: EMI special editing experiences. Educational Media International, 45(4), 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tudge, J., & Scrimsher, S. (2003). Lev S. Vygotsky on education: A cultural-historical, interpersonal, and individual approach to development. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 207–228). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  51. Vratulis, V., & Dobson, T. M. (2008). Social negotiations in a wiki ­environment: A case study with pre-service teachers. Educational Media International, 45, 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 987–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wikipedia. (2012). Twitter. Retrieved April 1, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter
  54. Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students’ reflective learning processes. The Internet and Higher Education, 11, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zorko, V. (2009). Factors affecting the way students collaborate in a wiki for English language learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 645–665.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu-Chang Hsu
    • 1
  • Yu-Hui Ching
    • 1
  • Barbara L. Grabowski
    • 2
  1. 1.Boise State UniversityBoiseUSA
  2. 2.Pennsylvania State UniversityHerefordUSA

Personalised recommendations