Web 2.0 Applications and Practices for Learning Through Collaboration
This chapter provides a review of the theoretical bases and international research on the uses of Web 2.0 applications for learning through collaboration. Web 2.0 applications empower users with a venue for personal expression, sharing, communicating, and collaborating with others, thus offering enriched opportunities for learning. In our review, we found evidence of engaging and effective uses of Web 2.0 applications such as blogs, wikis, collaborative documents and concept mapping, VoiceThread, video sharing applications (e.g., YouTube), microblogging (e.g., Twitter), social networking sites, and social bookmarking that applied contemporary and foundational educational theory. We also identified opportunities and challenges associated with learning through collaboration with Web 2.0 applications, which can inform research directions and areas to explore for ECT researchers.
KeywordsWeb 2.0 Learning through collaboration (LtC) Affordances
- *Bell, P., & Winn, W. (2000). Distributed cognitions, by nature and by design. In D. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environment (pp. 123–145). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Bower, M., Woo, K., Roberts, M., & Watters, P. A. (2006). Wiki pedagogy—A tale of two wikis. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET 06), Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
- Burke, S. C., & Snyder, S. L. (2008). YouTube: An innovative learning resource for college health education courses. The International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 11, 39–46.Google Scholar
- Burnett, M. (2008). Integrating interactive media into the classroom: YouTube raises the bar on student performance. Paper presented at the Allied Academies International Conference, Reno, NV. Retrieved June 23, 2012, from http://18.104.22.168/Public/Proceedings/Proceedings23/AMS%20Proceedings.pdf.
- *Ching, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2011). Design-grounded assessment: A framework and a case study of Web 2.0 practices in higher education. In J. Waycott & J. Sheard (Eds.), Assessing students’ Web 2.0 activities in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(Special issue, 5), 781–797.Google Scholar
- *Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.). (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- *Dohn, N. B. (2009). Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 343–363.Google Scholar
- Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). Tweeting the night away: Using Twitter to enhance social presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2).Google Scholar
- Elgort, I., Smith, A. G., & Toland, J. (2008). Is wiki an effective platform for group course work? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 195–210.Google Scholar
- Ellison, N. B., & Wu, Y. (2008). Blogging in the classroom: A preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact on comprehension. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 99–122.Google Scholar
- Facebook. (2012). Statistics: People on Facebook. Retrieved June 23, 2012, from http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreald=22.
- Ferdig, R., & Trammell, K. (2004). Content delivery in the ‘blogosphere.’ T.H.E. Journal. Retrieved June 23, 2012, from http://www.thejournal.com/articles/16626.
- Fessakis, G., Tatsis, K., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2008). Supporting “learning by design” activities using group blogs. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 199–212.Google Scholar
- Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. System Sciences, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
- Hsu, Y.-C., & Ching, Y.-H. (2011). Microblogging for strengthening a virtual learning community in an online course. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 3(4), 375–388.Google Scholar
- Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 horizon report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
- Ladyshewsky, R. K., & Gardner, P. (2008). Peer assisted learning and blogging: A strategy to promote reflective practice during clinical fieldwork. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(3), 241–257.Google Scholar
- *Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- *Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved June 23, 2012, from http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/6228.
- Pauschenwein, J., & Sfiri, A. (2009). Adult learner’s motivation for the use of micro-blogging during online training courses. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 5(1), 22–25.Google Scholar
- *Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligences and design for education. In G. Solomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pfaffman, J. A. (2007). Computer-mediated communications technologies. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 226–230). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Philip, R., & Nicholls, J. (2009). Group blogs: Documenting collaborative drama processes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 683–699.Google Scholar
- Rebertson, I. (2008). Learners’ attitudes to wiki technology in problem based, blended learning for vocational teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 425–441.Google Scholar
- Schunk, D. H. (2008). Learning theories: An educational perspective (5th ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Sharma, P., & Xie, Y. (2008). Student experiences of using weblogs: An exploratory study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 12, 137–156.Google Scholar
- Shoffner, M. (2009). Personal attitudes and technology: Implications for pre-service teacher reflective practice. Teacher Educational Quarterly, 36(2), 143–161.Google Scholar
- *Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tan, Y. H., Teo, E. H., Aw, W. L., & Lim, W. Y. (2005). Portfolio building in Chinese language learning using blogs. Proceedings of the BlogTalk Downunder 2005 Conference, Sydney, Australia, May 19–22. Retrieved June 23, 2012, from http://iresearch.edumall.sg/iresearch/slot/u110/pubs/blogtalk.pdf.
- Tudge, J., & Scrimsher, S. (2003). Lev S. Vygotsky on education: A cultural-historical, interpersonal, and individual approach to development. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 207–228). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Wikipedia. (2012). Twitter. Retrieved April 1, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter
- Zorko, V. (2009). Factors affecting the way students collaborate in a wiki for English language learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 645–665.Google Scholar