Skip to main content

Policies Governing Educational Technology Practice and Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is initially to examine the nature and characteristics of US federal policy regarding uses of technology for instruction in public elementary and secondary education. As a centering document the authors use Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology, the US National Educational Technology Plan 2010, issued November 9, 2010. Subsequently they use this examination to frame a discussion of policy and technology from an international perspective. A key question concerns the multiple roles of research. Thus, the authors broadly survey US federal policy on educational technology and support for research on such technology as identified in policy. This discussion is then extended to sample international viewpoints on policy, research, and practice in various nations. Included in this discussion is consideration of English as the de facto language of technology and how English dominance affects teaching and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American University in Cairo (AUC). (2010, September 22). AUC inaugurates technology transfer offices at Egyptian universities. Press release. Retrieved October 11, 2011, from http://www.aucegypt.edu/news/Pages/NewsRelease.aspx?rid=181.

  • *Bakia, M., Means, B., Gallagher, L. Chen, E., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of the Enhancing Education Through Technology program: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/netts/finalreport.pdf.

  • Bakia, M., Mitchell, K., & Yang, E. (2007). State strategies and practices for educational technology: Volume IExamining the Enhancing Education Through Technology program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/netts/netts-vol1.pdf.

  • Bakia, M., Yang, E., & Mitchell, K. (2008). National educational technology trends study local-level data summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/netts/netts-local.pdf.

  • Carter, J. (1978, December 6). Remarks at a White House meeting commemorating the 30th anniversary of the signing of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=30264.

  • CBS News. (2009, February 11). Jiang Zemin talks with Mike Wallace (60 Minutes). Interview. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com.

  • Chang, I.-H., Chin, J. M., & Hsu, C.-M. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of the dimensions and implementation of technology leadership of principals in Taiwanese elementary schools. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 229–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicin-Šain, M., Vukmirovic, S., Cicin-Šain, M. (2008). The influence of secondary school education on the success of infomatics education in university. International Journal of Emerging Technologies (iJET) 3(Special Issue): 5–9. Retrieved from http://www.i-jet.org.

  • Contractor, F. J., & Sagafi-Nejad, T. (1981). International technology transfer: Major issues and policy responses. Journal of International Business Studies, 12(2), 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Department of Education (ED). (2010). Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed-Tech) state program. Retrieved November 16, 2010, from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/edtech/index.html.

  • Dillon, S. (2010, March 13). Obama calls for major change in education law. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/14/education/14child.html.

  • Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (2010, September 23). FCC enables high-speed, affordable broadband for schools and libraries. News release. Retrieved from http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2010/db0923/DOC-301649A1.pdf.

  • Kadah, M. M. (2003). Foreign direct investment and international technology transfer in Egypt. Working paper 0317. Cairo, Egypt: Economic Research Forum. Retrieved from http://www.erf.org.

  • Kazu, I. Y., & Yavuzalp, N. (2008). An analysis of the primary school teachers’ usage of instructional software. International Journal of Emerging Technologies (iJET), 3(1), 45–53. http://www.i-jet.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerachsky, S. (2009, April 28). National assessment of educational progress: NAEP 2008 trends in academic progress. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences (IES), National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/whatsnew/commissioner/remarks2009/4_28_2009.asp.

  • Li, T.-b., & Moreira, G. (2009). English language teaching in China today. Journal of English as an International Language, 4, 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Librenjak, S., Vučković, K., & Dovedan, Z. (2010). Internet for the youngest: Computer usage and web design for the early school age children. International Journal of Emerging Technologies (iJET) 5 (Special Issue 2): 17–22. Retrieved from http://www.i-jet.org.

  • Miyake, T. (2004). International technology transfer: Efforts by UNIDO and other agencies. Tech-Monitor, 21(3), 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, K.-C., Park, J.-B., Choi, C.-H., & Chae, S.-H. (2004). Obstacles to technology transfer: What the practitioners want from the government. Tech-Monitor, 21(3), 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, A. R. (2009, February 20). Stimulus package to quickly impact education technology. Edutopia. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/economic-stimulus-education-school-technology.

  • Nixon, R. M. (1970, March 3). Address to Congress. In the American Presidency Project: Public Papers of the Presidents. Retrieved from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=2895

  • Norris, P. (2003). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Office of Educational Technology (OET). (2010, November). Transforming American education: Powered by technology. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, OET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillen, I. (2010, November 9). U.S. releases national Ed-Tech action plan. Education Week 30 (12). Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/.

  • Redish, T., & Williamson, J. (2009). ISTE’s technology facilitation and leadership standards. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strategy for American innovation: Executive summary. (2011). Washington, DC: White House. Retrieved February 15, 2011, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/innovation/strategy/executive-summary.

  • Tang, E. (2009). A cultural framework of “Chinese learn English”: a critical review of and reflections on research. Journal of English as an International Language, 4, 7–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.H.E. Journal. (2010, November). 2020 vision: Experts forecast what the digital revolution will bring next. Retrieved November 17, 2010, from http://thejournal.com/Articles/2010/11/01/Talkin-about-a-Revolution.aspx?Page=1.

  • Tilfarlioğlu, F. (2011). An international dimension of the student’s attitudes towards the use of English in Web 2.0 technology. 11th International Educational Technology Conference (Conference proceedings), Turkey: Istanbul University, 25–27 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toppo, G. (2004, February 11). States fight no child left behind, calling it intrusive. USA Today. Retrieved November 17, 2010, from http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2004-02-11-no-child-usat_x.htm.

  • Wang, Z. (2008). In Sputnik’s shadow: The president’s science advisory committee and Cold War America. Piscataway, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. I. (2010, November 15). Letter to Secretary of Education Arne Duncan. Link in A. Klein. NEA asks Education Department for regulatory relief. Education Week. http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2010/11/nea_asks_dept_for_regulatory_r.html?qs=NEA+NCLB.

  • Wolk, R. M. (2004). The effects of English language dominance of the Internet and the digital divide. 2004 Symposium on Technology and Society (Conference proceedings), Massachusetts: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, June 17–19, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donovan R. Walling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harris, P., Walling, D.R. (2014). Policies Governing Educational Technology Practice and Research. In: Spector, J., Merrill, M., Elen, J., Bishop, M. (eds) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_50

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics