Policies Governing Educational Technology Practice and Research

Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is initially to examine the nature and characteristics of US federal policy regarding uses of technology for instruction in public elementary and secondary education. As a centering document the authors use Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology, the US National Educational Technology Plan 2010, issued November 9, 2010. Subsequently they use this examination to frame a discussion of policy and technology from an international perspective. A key question concerns the multiple roles of research. Thus, the authors broadly survey US federal policy on educational technology and support for research on such technology as identified in policy. This discussion is then extended to sample international viewpoints on policy, research, and practice in various nations. Included in this discussion is consideration of English as the de facto language of technology and how English dominance affects teaching and learning.

Keywords

Connected teaching Educational technology Research funding Technology transfer Transformative policy 

References

  1. American University in Cairo (AUC). (2010, September 22). AUC inaugurates technology transfer offices at Egyptian universities. Press release. Retrieved October 11, 2011, from http://www.aucegypt.edu/news/Pages/NewsRelease.aspx?rid=181.
  2. *Bakia, M., Means, B., Gallagher, L. Chen, E., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of the Enhancing Education Through Technology program: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/netts/finalreport.pdf.
  3. Bakia, M., Mitchell, K., & Yang, E. (2007). State strategies and practices for educational technology: Volume IExamining the Enhancing Education Through Technology program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/netts/netts-vol1.pdf.
  4. Bakia, M., Yang, E., & Mitchell, K. (2008). National educational technology trends study local-level data summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/netts/netts-local.pdf.
  5. Carter, J. (1978, December 6). Remarks at a White House meeting commemorating the 30th anniversary of the signing of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=30264.
  6. CBS News. (2009, February 11). Jiang Zemin talks with Mike Wallace (60 Minutes). Interview. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com.
  7. Chang, I.-H., Chin, J. M., & Hsu, C.-M. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of the dimensions and implementation of technology leadership of principals in Taiwanese elementary schools. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 229–245.Google Scholar
  8. Cicin-Šain, M., Vukmirovic, S., Cicin-Šain, M. (2008). The influence of secondary school education on the success of infomatics education in university. International Journal of Emerging Technologies (iJET) 3(Special Issue): 5–9. Retrieved from http://www.i-jet.org.
  9. Contractor, F. J., & Sagafi-Nejad, T. (1981). International technology transfer: Major issues and policy responses. Journal of International Business Studies, 12(2), 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. *Department of Education (ED). (2010). Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed-Tech) state program. Retrieved November 16, 2010, from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/edtech/index.html.
  11. Dillon, S. (2010, March 13). Obama calls for major change in education law. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/14/education/14child.html.
  12. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (2010, September 23). FCC enables high-speed, affordable broadband for schools and libraries. News release. Retrieved from http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2010/db0923/DOC-301649A1.pdf.
  13. Kadah, M. M. (2003). Foreign direct investment and international technology transfer in Egypt. Working paper 0317. Cairo, Egypt: Economic Research Forum. Retrieved from http://www.erf.org.
  14. Kazu, I. Y., & Yavuzalp, N. (2008). An analysis of the primary school teachers’ usage of instructional software. International Journal of Emerging Technologies (iJET), 3(1), 45–53. http://www.i-jet.org.Google Scholar
  15. Kerachsky, S. (2009, April 28). National assessment of educational progress: NAEP 2008 trends in academic progress. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences (IES), National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/whatsnew/commissioner/remarks2009/4_28_2009.asp.
  16. Li, T.-b., & Moreira, G. (2009). English language teaching in China today. Journal of English as an International Language, 4, 181–194.Google Scholar
  17. Librenjak, S., Vučković, K., & Dovedan, Z. (2010). Internet for the youngest: Computer usage and web design for the early school age children. International Journal of Emerging Technologies (iJET) 5 (Special Issue 2): 17–22. Retrieved from http://www.i-jet.org.
  18. Miyake, T. (2004). International technology transfer: Efforts by UNIDO and other agencies. Tech-Monitor, 21(3), 16–27.Google Scholar
  19. Moon, K.-C., Park, J.-B., Choi, C.-H., & Chae, S.-H. (2004). Obstacles to technology transfer: What the practitioners want from the government. Tech-Monitor, 21(3), 30–35.Google Scholar
  20. Moses, A. R. (2009, February 20). Stimulus package to quickly impact education technology. Edutopia. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/economic-stimulus-education-school-technology.
  21. Nixon, R. M. (1970, March 3). Address to Congress. In the American Presidency Project: Public Papers of the Presidents. Retrieved from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=2895
  22. Norris, P. (2003). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. *Office of Educational Technology (OET). (2010, November). Transforming American education: Powered by technology. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, OET.Google Scholar
  24. Quillen, I. (2010, November 9). U.S. releases national Ed-Tech action plan. Education Week 30 (12). Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/.
  25. Redish, T., & Williamson, J. (2009). ISTE’s technology facilitation and leadership standards. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
  26. Strategy for American innovation: Executive summary. (2011). Washington, DC: White House. Retrieved February 15, 2011, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/innovation/strategy/executive-summary.
  27. Tang, E. (2009). A cultural framework of “Chinese learn English”: a critical review of and reflections on research. Journal of English as an International Language, 4, 7–43.Google Scholar
  28. T.H.E. Journal. (2010, November). 2020 vision: Experts forecast what the digital revolution will bring next. Retrieved November 17, 2010, from http://thejournal.com/Articles/2010/11/01/Talkin-about-a-Revolution.aspx?Page=1.
  29. Tilfarlioğlu, F. (2011). An international dimension of the student’s attitudes towards the use of English in Web 2.0 technology. 11th International Educational Technology Conference (Conference proceedings), Turkey: Istanbul University, 25–27 May 2011.Google Scholar
  30. Toppo, G. (2004, February 11). States fight no child left behind, calling it intrusive. USA Today. Retrieved November 17, 2010, from http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2004-02-11-no-child-usat_x.htm.
  31. Wang, Z. (2008). In Sputnik’s shadow: The president’s science advisory committee and Cold War America. Piscataway, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wilson, J. I. (2010, November 15). Letter to Secretary of Education Arne Duncan. Link in A. Klein. NEA asks Education Department for regulatory relief. Education Week. http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2010/11/nea_asks_dept_for_regulatory_r.html?qs=NEA+NCLB.
  33. Wolk, R. M. (2004). The effects of English language dominance of the Internet and the digital divide. 2004 Symposium on Technology and Society (Conference proceedings), Massachusetts: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, June 17–19, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Association for Educational Communications and TechnologyBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Center for Civic EducationBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations