Advertisement

Change Agency in Learning, Instruction, and Performance

Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to describe the state of research and theory in the area of Change Agency in instructional and organization systems. The study of the diffusion and adoption of innovations arguably began with a need to understand how external change agents could encourage relatively passive users of an innovation to accept the need for change and implementation of the desired change. The change agents’ frustrations with the lack of relevant useful results led to more collaborative efforts to design, develop, implement and benefit from research, processes and products. The last few decades have seen research on change and change agency that is focused more on how to engage users in the change process through change agents who are internal and external to the system.

We begin this chapter with a brief history of research and theory from diffusion and adoption processes to a more inclusive and collaborative look at organization and system change. This is followed by a discussion of the latest research in business/corporate and nonprofit organization change focused on leadership in change management and communication modes and messages. We finally consider what the overall research tells us and what gaps remain to be filled in order to continue a robust agenda for effective change agency research and practice.

Keywords

Change agent Organizational change System change Change management 

References

  1. Ackoff, R. L. (1981). Creating the corporate future. New York, NY, John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfes, K., Truss, C., & Gill, J. (2010). The HR manager as change agent: Evidence from the public sector. Journal of Change Management, 10(1), 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  4. Balogun, J. (2006). Managing change: Steering a course between intended strategies and unanticipated outcomes. Long Range Planning, 39, 29–49.Google Scholar
  5. Banathy, B. H. (1991). Systems design of education: a journey to create the future. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Banathy, B. H. (1992). A systems view of education: Concepts and principles for effective practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Banathy, B. H. (2000). Guided evolution of society: A systems view. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barge, J. K., Lee, M., Maddux, K., Nabring, R., & Townsend, B. (2008). Managing dualities in planned change initiatives. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(4), 364–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beckhard, R., & Pritchard, W. (1992). Changing the essence: The art of creating and leading fundamental change in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beer, M. (1980). Organization change and development. A system view. Santa Monica, CA. Goodyear.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, R. (2010) A change agent’s guide to organisational sustainability. NZ Business, 24(4), 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Business Dictionary. (2010). BusinessDictionary.com. July 12, 2010, from http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/champion.html
  13. Carmen, R. (1990). Communication, education and empowerment (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED362649). Manchester, UK: Centre for Adult and Higher Education, Manchester University.Google Scholar
  14. Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2007). User design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. *Carr-Chellman, A. A., & Savoy, M. (2004). User-Design Research. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Education, Communications and Technology (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Cawsey, T., & Deszca, G. (2007). Toolkit for organizational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Chreim, S., Williams, B. E., Janz, L., & Dastmalchian, A. (2010). Change agentry in a primary health care context: The case of distributed leadership. Health Care Management Review, 35(2), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Croft, L., & Cochrane, N. (2005). Communicating change effectively. Management Services, 49(1).Google Scholar
  19. Duffy, F. M., Rogerson, L. G., & Blick, C. (2000). Redesigning America’s schools: A systems approach to improvement. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc..Google Scholar
  20. Ely, D. P. (1999). Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations. Educational Technology, 23–27.Google Scholar
  21. Evans, R. (1996). The human side of change: Reform, resistance, and the real-life problems of innovation. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Fliegel, F. C., & Kivlin, J. E. (1962). Farm practice attributes and adoption rates. Social Forces, 40(4), 364–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ford, J. D. (1999). Organizational change as shifting conversations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(6), 480–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. *Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (2008). Conversational profiles: A tool for altering the conversational patters of change managers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(4), 445–467.Google Scholar
  25. Frambach, R. T., & Schillewaert, N. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-­level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 163–176.Google Scholar
  26. Freire, P. (1998). Teachers as cultural workers. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  27. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depth of educational reform. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer.Google Scholar
  28. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership & sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  30. *Fullan, M., Cuttress, C., & Kilcher, A. (2005). Eight forces for leaders of change: Presence of the core concepts does not guarantee success, but their absence ensures failure. Journal of Staff Development, 26(4), 54–58, 64.Google Scholar
  31. Fullan, M., & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education: Teachers College Press Teachers College Columbia University.Google Scholar
  32. *Goddard, J. T., & Bohac-Clarke, V. (2007). The cycles of school change: Toward an intergrated developmental model. The Journal of Educational Thought, 41(2), 105–123.Google Scholar
  33. Hall, G. E. (1974). The concerns-based adoption model: A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions. Chicago: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  34. Hamel, G. (2009). Natural Leaders. Leadership Excellence, 26(9), 3–4. Google Scholar
  35. Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (2001). Reengineering the corporation. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  36. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2000). Mentoring in the new millennium. Theory Into Practice, 39(1), 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Havelock, R. G., & Zlotolow, S. (1995). The change agent’s guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.Google Scholar
  38. Hutchins, C. L. (1996). Systemic thinking: Solving complex problems. St. Louis, MO: Professional Development Systems.Google Scholar
  39. Irgens, E. J. (2009). Institutional bridging: Change projects as creators and carriers of knowledge. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 7, 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. *Jabri, M. (2010). Utterance as a tool for change agents. Journal of Management Development, 29(6), 535–544.Google Scholar
  41. Jenlink, P. M., Reigeluth, C. M., Carr, A. A., & Nelson, L. M. (1998). Guidelines for facilitating systemic change in school districts. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 15, 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. *Kearney, W. S., & Smith, P. A. (2010). Principal influence and school change orientation in elementary schools: The importance of campus leadership. Ben Sheppard Journal of Leadership, 5(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
  43. Killon, J. & Harrison, C. (2006). Taking the Lead: New Roles for Teachers and School–based Coaches. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.Google Scholar
  44. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  45. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  46. Lane, S., Lacefield-Parachini, N., & Isken, J. (2003). Developing novice teachers as change agents: Student teacher palcements “against the grain”. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(2), 55–68.Google Scholar
  47. LeTourneau, B. (2004). Communicate for change. Journal of Healthcare Management, 49(6), 354–357.Google Scholar
  48. Lewis, L. K., & Seibold, D. R. (1998). Reconceptualizing organizational change implementation as a communication problem: A review of literature and research agenda. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication yearbook 21, 93–151. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Lukacs, K. (2009). Quantifying “the ripple in the pond”: The develoment and initial validation of the teacher change agent scale. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 3(12), 25–37.Google Scholar
  50. Lukacs, K., Horak, A., & Galluzzo, G. (2011). Does teaching how to make a different make a different? A pre/post study of an “educational change” course. Focus on Teacher Education, 10(3).Google Scholar
  51. McLaughlin, L., & Hyle, A. E. (2001). The School Principal as Change Agent: An Explanatory Case Study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (pp10–14) Seattle: WA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 456 516).Google Scholar
  52. Monge, P., & Poole, M. S. (2008). The evolution of organizational communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 679–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mosby. (2009). Mosby’s Medical Dictionary (8th ed.). Elsevier, Maryland Heights, MO.Google Scholar
  54. Mueller, J. (2009). Maxims of maximizing organizational change effectiveness. The Business Review, Cambridge, 14(1), 70–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nelson, M. & Brice Jr., J. (2008). Emotional and informational social support: Exploring contrasting influences on human resource management innovation. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 12, 71–82.Google Scholar
  56. Nelson, M., Brice, J., & Gunby, N. W. (2010). Innovation adoption decisions: The effect of problem solving styles and social support. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 14(1), 73–88.Google Scholar
  57. Nelson, L. M., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1995). Professional development in systemic educational change. In P. Jenlink (Ed.), Systemic change: Touchstones for the future school (pp. 105–116). Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight Professional Development.Google Scholar
  58. Palmer, I., & Dunford, R. (2008). Organizational change and the importance of embedded assumptions. British Journal of Management, 19(1), 20–32.Google Scholar
  59. Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2004). Introduction. In M. S. Poole & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation (pp. xi–xvi). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  60. Process Excellence Network. (2010). Process Excellence Network. July 12, 2010, from http://www.processexcellencenetwork.com/glossary/change-agent/#VRC
  61. Reigeluth, C. M., & Garfinkle, R. J. (Eds.). (1994). Systemic change in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  62. Reigeluth, C. M., & Squire, K. (2000). The many faces of systemic change. Educational Horizons, 78(3), 143–152.Google Scholar
  63. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
  64. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free.Google Scholar
  65. Ryan, B. (1996). Managing Change in the Public Sector. Journal for Quality and Participation, Vol. 19, p 42.Google Scholar
  66. Ryan, B., & Gross, N. C. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8, 15–24.Google Scholar
  67. Salvo, M. J. (2001). Ethics of engagement: User-centered design and rhetorical methodology. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10(3), 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sande, T. (2009). Taking charge of change with confidence. Strategic Communication Management, 13(1), 28–31.Google Scholar
  69. Sarason, S. (1995). Parental involvement and the political principle. San Francisco, CA: Josseey Bass.Google Scholar
  70. Schlechty, P. C. (2001). Shaking up the schoolhouse. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.Google Scholar
  71. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: DoubleDay.Google Scholar
  72. Spector, B. (1989). From bogged down to fired up: Inspiring organizational change. Sloan Management Review, 30(4), 32–46.Google Scholar
  73. Spiering & Erickson. (2006). Study abroad as innovation: Applying the diffusion model to international education. International Education Journal, 7(3), 314–322.Google Scholar
  74. Stensaker, I., & Langley, A. (2010). Change management choices and trajectories in a multidivisional firm. British Journal of Managment, 21, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ulrich, D. (1997). Human resource champions. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Valente, T. W., & Davis, R. L. (1999). Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders. Annuals of the American Academy of the Political and Social Sciences, 566, 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. *Wagner, T., Kegan, R., Lahey, L., Lemons, R. W., Garnier, J., Helsing, D., et al. (2006). Change leadership: A practical guide to transforming our schools. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  78. Whittle, A., Suhomlinova, O., & Mueller, F. (2010). Funnel of interests: The discursive translation of organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 46(1), 16–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Williams, B. R. (1997). Twelve roles of facilitators of school change. Arlington Heights, IL: IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yapa, L. (1996). Innovation diffusion and paradigms of development. In C. Earle, K. Mathewson, & M. Kenzer (Eds.), Concepts in human geography (pp. 231–270). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  81. Zaltman, G., & Duncan, R. (1977). Strategies for planned change. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  82. Zorn, T. E., Page, D. J., & Cheney, G. (2000). Nuts about change. Multiple perspectives on change-oriented communication in a public sector organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(4), 515–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Ramon Savoy
    • 1
  • Alison A. Carr-Chellman
    • 2
  1. 1.Pearson/School Achievement ServicesWashington, DCUSA
  2. 2.Learning and Performance Systems, College of EducationThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations