Game-Based Learning

  • Sigmund Tobias
  • J. Dexter Fletcher
  • Alexander P. Wind

Abstract

This chapter reviews a rapidly growing body of empirical evidence on the effectiveness of using video and computer games to provide instruction. Evidence of their effectiveness is drawn from existing results and data. The topics covered here are transfer from computer games to external tasks, enhancing cognitive processes, guidance and animated agents, playing time and integration with curricular objectives, effects on game players, attitudes toward games, cost-effectiveness, and, finally, the use of games for evaluation. Areas where the evidence base is particularly weak are identified in the discussion section. Findings and recommendations for the design of games used in instruction are summarized in a table. The chapter concludes with a call for development of tools and technology for integrating the motivating aspects of games with good instructional design. People do learn from games. Missing are generally effective design processes that ensure that learners will acquire the specific knowledge and skills the games are intended to impart.

Keywords

Video games Computer games Serious games Transfer of learning Cognitive processes Evaluation 

References

  1. Adams, P. C. (1998). Teaching and learning with SimCity 2000. Journal of Geography, 97, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73, 277–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  4. *Anderson, A. F., & Bavelier, D. (2011). Action game play as a tool to enhance perception, attention and cognition. In S. Tobias & J.D. Fletcher (Eds.) Computer Games and Instruction (pp. 307–330). Charllotte, NC: Information AgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, C. A., Berkowitz, L., Donnerstein, E., Huesmann, R. L., Johnson, J. D., Linz, D., et al. (2003). The influence of media violence on youth. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 81–110.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12, 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson, C. A., & Dill, K. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 772–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. *Anderson, C. A., Shibuya, A., Ihori, N, Swing, E. L., Bushman, B. J., Sakamoto, A., Rothstein, H. R., & Saleem, M. (2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 151–173.Google Scholar
  9. Atkinson, R. K., Mayer, R. E., & Merrill, M. M. (2005). Fostering social agency in multimedia learning. Examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bailey, K., West, R., & Anderson, C. A. (2010). A negative association between video game experience and proactive cognitive control. Psychophysiology, 47, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  12. Barab, S., Gresalfi, M., & Ingramp-Noble, A. (2010). Tranformational play: Using games to position person, content, and context. Educational Researcher, 39(7), 525–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barnet, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy of far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baylor, A. L. (2002). Expanding preservice teachers’ metacognitive awareness of instructional planning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Belanich, J. & Orvis, K. A. (2006). Training games and instructional systems design. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Applied Learning Technology meeting, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
  16. Betz, J. A. (1995–1996). Computer games: Increase learning in an interactive multidisciplinary environment. Journal of Technological Systems, 24, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bickley, W. R. (1980). Training Device Effectiveness: Formulation and Evaluation of a Methodology (Research Report 1291). Alexandria, VA: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, S. J., Lieberman, D. A., Gemeny, B. A., Fan, Y. C., Wilson, D. M., & Pasta, D. J. (1997). Educational video games for juvenile diabetes: Results for a controlled trial. Medical Informatics, 22, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. *Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C., & Procci, K. (2011). Using video games as educational tools in healthcare. In S. Tobias & Fletcher, J.D. (Eds.) Computer games and instruction (pp. 47–72). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  20. Coller, B. D., & Shernoff, D. J. (2009). Video game-based education in mechanical engineering: A look at student engagement. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(2), 308–317.Google Scholar
  21. Costabile, M. F., De Angeli, A., Roselli, T., Lanzilotti, R., & Plantamura, P. (2003). Evaluating the educational impact of a tutoring hypermedia for children. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 289–308.Google Scholar
  22. Crandall, B., Klein, G., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). Working minds: A Practitioner’s guide to cognitive task analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dai, D. Y., & Wind, A. P. (2011). Computer games and opportunity to learn: Implications for teaching students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and learning (pp. 447–502). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Dehn, D., & van Mulken, S. (2000). The importance of animated interface agents: A review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Din, F., & Calao, J. (2001). The effects of playing educational video games on kindergarten achievement. Child Study Journal, 31, 95–102.Google Scholar
  26. Donchin, E. (1989). The learning strategies project. Acta Psychologica, 71, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Entertainment Software Association. (2009). Industry facts. Retrieved April 25, 2009, from http://www.theesa.com/facts/index.asp
  28. Everson, H. T. (2011). Video games to assess learning. ADL Newsletter for Educators and Educational Researchers. http://research.adlnet.gov/newsletter/academic/201103.htm
  29. Ferguson, C. J. (2007). Evidence for publication bias in video game violence effects literature: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(4), 470–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ferguson, C. J., & Rueda, S. M. (2010). The hitman study: Violent video game exposure effects on aggressive behavior, hostile feelings, and depression. European Psychologist, 15(2), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferguson, C. J., Rueda, S. M., Cruz, A. M., Ferguson, D. E., Fritz, S., & Smith, S. M. (2008). Violent video games and aggression: Causal relationship or byproduct of family violence and intrinsic violence motivation? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(3), 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fery, Y. A., & Ponserre, S. (2001). EnhanCing the control of force in putting by video game training. Ergonomics, 44, 1025–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fisher, C. W., & Berliner, D. C. (Eds.). (1985). Perspectives on instructional time. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  34. Fletcher, J. D. (2004). Technology, the Columbus effect, and the third revolution in learning. In M. Rabinowitz, F. C. Blumberg, & H. Everson (Eds.), The design of instruction and evaluation: Affordances of using media and technology (pp. 139–157). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  35. *Fletcher, J. D. (2010). Cost Analysis in Evaluation Studies. In E. Baker, B. McGaw, & P. Peterson (Eds.) International Encyclopedia of Education, Third Edition (pp. 585–591). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  36. *Fletcher, J. D. (2011). Cost analysis in assessing games for learning. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer Games and Learning (pp. 417–434). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Fletcher, J. D., & Chatham, R. E. (2010). Measuring return on investment in military training and human performance. In P. E. O’Connor & J. V. Cohn (Eds.), Human performance enhancements in high-risk environments (pp. 106–128). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger/ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  38. Fletcher, J. D., Hawley, D. E., & Piele, P. K. (1990). Costs, effects, and utility of microcomputer assisted instruction in the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 783–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fletcher, J. D., & Tobias, S. (2005). The multimedia principle. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 117–133). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fletcher, J. D., & Tobias, S. (2006). Using computer games and simulations for instruction: A research review. Society for Applied Learning Technology Meeting New Learning Technologies (pp. 1–34).Google Scholar
  41. Fontana, L. & Beckerman, A. (2004). Childhood violence prevention education using video games. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 16, 49–62.Google Scholar
  42. Fraas, J. W. (1982). The influence of student characteristics on the effectiveness of simulations in the principles course. The Journal of Economic Education, 13, 56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Games, A., & Squire, K. D. (2011). Searching for the fun in learning: A historical perspective on the evolution of educational video games. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 17–46). Charlotte, NC: Information.Google Scholar
  44. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy? New York City, NY: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  45. *Gee, J. P. (2011) Reflections on empirical evidence on games and learning. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer Games and Learning (pp. 223–232). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  46. Gee, J. P., & Shaffer, D. W. (2010). Looking where the light is bad: Video games and the future of assessment. Epistemic Game Group Working Paper No. 2010–02. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  47. Gentile, D. A. (2005). Examining the effects of video games from a psychological perspective: Focus on violent games and a new synthesis. Ames IA: Iowa State University. http://www.mediafamily.org/research/Gentile_NIMF_Review_2005.pdf. Accessed March 22, 2007.
  48. Gentile, D. (2009). Pathological video-game use among youth ages 8 to 18. A national study. Psychological Science, 20, 594–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gentile, D. A. (2011). The multiple dimensions of video game effects. Child Development Perspectives, 5, 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. *Gentile, D. A., Lynch, P. J., Linder, J. R., & Walsh, D. A. (2004). The effects of violent video game habits on adolescent hostility, aggressive behaviors, and school performance. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 5–22.Google Scholar
  51. Gopher, D., Weil, M., & Bareket, T. (1994). Transfer of skill from a computer game trainer to flight. Human Factors, 36, 387–405.Google Scholar
  52. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Greenfield, P. M. (1998). The cultural evolution of IQ. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related ­measures (pp. 81–123). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Greenfield, P. M., Brannon, c., & Lohr, D. (1994). Two-dimensional representation of movement through three-dimensional space: The role of video game expertise. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 75, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Greenfield, P. M., Camaioni, L., Ercolani, P., Weiss, L., & Lauber, B. A. (1994). Cognitive socialization by computer games in two cultures: Inductive discovery or mastery of an iconic code. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 75, 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Greenfield, P. M., deWinstanley, P., Kilpatrick, H., & Kaye, D. (1994). Action video games and informal education: Effects on strategies for dividing visual attention. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 75, 195–223.Google Scholar
  57. Greitemeyer, T., & Oswald, S. (2010). Effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gremmen, H., & Potters, J. (1997). Assessing the efficacy of gaming in economic education. Journal of Economic Education, 28(4), 291–303.Google Scholar
  59. Grubišić, A. AC-Ware Tutor. (Still unpublished). Split, Croatia: Faculty of Science.Google Scholar
  60. Gustafsson, J.-E., & Undheim, J. O. (1996). Individual differences in cognitive functions. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 186–242). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  61. Harris, M. B., & Williams, R. (1985). Video games and school performance. Education, 105, 306–309.Google Scholar
  62. Hart, S. G., & Battiste, V. (1992). Flight test of a video game trainer. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 1291–1295). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.Google Scholar
  63. Hays, R. T. (2005). The effectiveness of Instructional games: A literature review and discussion (Technical report 2005004). Orlando, Fl: Naval Air Warfare Center.Google Scholar
  64. Henderson, L., Klemes, J., & Eshet, Y. (2000). Just playing a game? Educational simulation software and cognitive outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22, 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Honey, M. A., & Hilton, M. (Eds.). (2011). Committee on science learning: Computer games, simulations, and education. Washington, DC: National Research Council.Google Scholar
  66. Hoover, A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2011). The Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFQT) as a leading indicator in distributed learning performance. In, Proceedings of the 79th Military Operations Research Society Symposium, Alexandria, VA: Military Operations Research Society.Google Scholar
  67. Jackson, G.T., & McNamara, D. (2011). Natural language assessment within game-based practice. Paper delivered at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April.Google Scholar
  68. Jayakanthan, R. (2002). Application of computer games in the field of education. Electronic Library, 20, 98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kamill, M. L., & Taitague, C. (2011). Developing an electronic game for vocabulary learning: A case study. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 331–352). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  71. Karle, J. W., Watter, S., & Shedden, J. M. (2010). Task switching in video game players: Benefits of selective attention but resistance to proactive interference. Acta Psychologica, 134, 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kato, P. M., Cole, S. W., Bradlyn, A. S., & Pollock, B. H. (2008). A video game improves behavioral outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer: A randomized trial. Pediatrics, 122, 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ke, F. (2008). A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay? Computers & Education, 51, 1609–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kearsley, G. (1982). Costs, benefits, & productivity in training systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  75. Kirkley, S. E., Tomblin, S., & Kirkley, J. (2005). Instructional design authoring support for the development of serious games and mixed reality training. Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference.Google Scholar
  76. Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimally guided learning does not work: An analysis of the failure of discovery learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning and inquiry-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 41(2).Google Scholar
  77. Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T., & Frey, A. (2007). Effectance and control as determinants of video game enjoyment. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10, 845–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Knapp, M.I., & Orlansky, J. (1983). A cost element structure for defense training (IDA Paper P-1709). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses. (AD A139 164).Google Scholar
  79. Laffey, J. M., Espinosa, L., Moore, J., & Lodree, A. (2003). Supporting learning and behavior of at-risk young children: Computers in urban education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 423–440.Google Scholar
  80. Lee, J. (1999). Effectiveness of computer-based instructional simulation: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(1), 71–85.Google Scholar
  81. Lepper, M. R., & Malone, T. W. (1987). Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction (Cognitive and Affective Process Analyses, Vol. 3, pp. 255–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  82. Leutner, D. (1993). Guided discovery learning with computer-based instruction games: Effects of adaptive and non-adaptive instructional support. Learning and Instruction, 3, 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Levin, H. A. (1983). Cost-effectiveness: a primer. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  84. Levin, H. M., & McEwan, P. J. (2001). Cost-effectiveness analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  85. Mestre, J. P. (2005). Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  86. Malone, T. W. (1981a). What makes computer games fun? Byte, 6, 258–277.Google Scholar
  87. Malone, T. W. (1981b). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Malone, T. w., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivation for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction (Cognitive and affective process analyses, Vol. 3, pp. 223–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  89. Mane, A., & Donchin, E. (1989). The space fortress game. Acta Psycholgica, 71, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Martin, B. L., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Affective education and the affective domain: Implications for instructional-design theories and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: a new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol 2) (pp. 485–510). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  91. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Mayer, R. E. (2006). Ten research-based principles of multimedia learning. In H. F. O’Neil Jr. & R. S. Perez (Eds.), Web-based learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 371–390). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Associates.Google Scholar
  94. *Mayer, R. E. (2011). Multimedia learning and games. In S. Tobias & J.D. Fletcher (Eds.) Computer games and instruction (pp. 281–306). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  95. Mayer, R. E., Mautone, P., & Prothero, W. (2002). Pictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York, NY: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  97. *Moreno, R. (2005). Multimedia learning with animated pedagogical agents. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 507–523). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Moreno, R., & Flowerday, T. (2006). Students’ choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 186–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 724–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2005). Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, H. A. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19, 177–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. O’Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. The Curriculum Journal, 16, 455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Okagaki, L., & Frensch, P. A. (1994). Effects of video game playing on measures of spatial performance: Gender effects in late adolescence. Journal of Applied Development Psychology, 15, 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Orlansky, J., & String, J. (1977). Cost-effectiveness of flight simulators for military training (IDA paper P-1275). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.Google Scholar
  106. Phillips, J. J. (2003). Return on investment in training and performance improvement programs (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  107. Prensky, M. (2011). Comments on research comparing games to other instructional methods. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 251–278). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  108. *Randel, J. M., Morris B. A., Wetzle, C. D., & Whitehead, B. V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation and Gaming, 23, 261–276.Google Scholar
  109. Rieber, L. P. (2005). Multimedia learning in games, simulations, and microworlds. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (p. 549567). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  110. Rodrigo, M. M. T., Baker, R. S. J. D., D’Mello, S, Gonzalez, M. C. T., Lagud, M. C. V., Lim,... Viehland, N.J.B. (2008). Comparing learners’ affect while using an intelligent tutoring system and a simulation problem solving game. In B. P. Woolf, E. Aïmeur, R. Nkambou, & S. Lajoie (Eds.), Proceeding ITS08 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 40–49). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. (http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~rsbaker/RBDetal2008.pdf). Retrieved 2 11, 2009
  111. Roe, K., & Muijs, D. (1998). Children and computer games: A profile of the heavy user. European Journal of Communication, 13, 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Ronen, M., & Eliahu, M. (1999). Simulation as a home learning environment- Students’ views. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Ronen, M., & Eliahu, M. (2000). Simulation — a bridge between theory and reality: the case of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Ross, J. A., Barkaoui, K., & Scott, G. (2007). Evaluations that consider the cost of educational programs: The contribution of high quality studies. American Journal of Evaluation, 28, 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Rosser, J. C., Jr., Lynch, P. J., Cuddihy, L., Gentile, D. A., Klonsky, J., & Merrell, R. (2007). The impact of video games on training surgeons in the 21st century. Archives of Surgery, 142, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Rossi, P., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2003). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  117. Schraagen, M., Chipman, S., & Shalin, V. (Eds.). (2000). Cognitive task analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  118. *Shute, V. J. (2011). Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. In S. Tobias & Fletcher, J.D. (Eds.) Computer games and instruction (pp. 503–524). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  119. Sims, V. K., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Domain specificity of spatial expertise: The case of video game players. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 489–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2009). A meta-analytic examination of the effectiveness of computer-based simulation games (Advanced Distributed Learning Technical Report). Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
  122. Spicer, J. I., & Stratford, J. (2001). Student perceptions of a virtual field trip to replace a real field trip. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Squire, K. (2005). Game-based leaning: Present and future state of the field. Masie Center e-Learning Consortium, February, 2005. Retrieved on May 22, 2006, from http://www.masie.com/xlearn/Game-Based_Learning.pdf
  124. Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experiences. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. M. (1994). Effect of video game practice on spatial skills in girls and boys. Special Issue: Effects of interactive entertainment technologies on development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Lee, M.-D. (2008). Designing multimedia games for young children’s taxonomic concept development. Computers & Education, 50(3), 1037–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Suppes, P., Fletcher, J. D., & Zanotti, M. (1975). Performance models of American Indian students on computer-assisted instruction in elementary mathematics. Instructional Science, 4, 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Suppes, P., Fletcher, J. D., & Zanotti, M. (1976). Models of individual trajectories in computer-assisted instruction for deaf students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Swaak, J., & de Jong, T. (2001). Discovery simulations and the assessment of intuitive knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 284–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Sweller, J. (2006). The worked example effect and human cognition. Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Tobias, S. (1973). Review of the response mode issue. Review of Educational Research, 43, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Tobias, S. (1976). Achievement treatment interactions. Review of Educational Research, 46, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Tobias, S. (1982). When do instructional methods make a difference? Educational Researcher, 11(4), 4–9.Google Scholar
  135. Tobias, S. (1989). Another look at research on the adaptation of instruction to student characteristics. Educational Psychologist, 24, 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Tobias, S. (1992). The impact of test anxiety on cognition in school learning. In K. Hagtvet (Ed.), Advances in test anxiety research (Vol. 7, pp. 18–31). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  137. Tobias, S. (2009). An eclectic appraisal of the success or failure of constructivist instruction. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivism. Success or failure? (pp. 335–350). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  138. Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. D. (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  139. Tobias, S., & Fletcher, J. D. (2007). What research has to say about designing computer games for learning. Educational Technology., 47(5), 20–29.Google Scholar
  140. Tobias, S., & Fletcher, J. D. (2011). Introduction. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 3–16). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  141. *Tobias, S., & Fletcher, J. D. (2011b). Computer games, present and future. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.) Computer Games and Instruction (pp. 525–545). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  142. *Tobias, S., Fletcher, J. D., Dai, D. Y., & Wind, A. P. (2011). Review of research on computer games. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer Games and Learning (pp. 127–222). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  143. Tompson, G. H., & Dass, P. (2000). Improving students’ self-efficacy in strategic management: The relative impact of cases and simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 31, 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Virvou, M., & Katsionis, G. (2008). On the usability and likeability of virtual reality games for education: The case of VR-ENGAGE. Computers and Education, 50(1), 154–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Vos, N., van der Meijden, H., & Denessenm, E. (2011). Effects of constructing versus playing an educational game on student motivation and deep learning strategy use. Computers & Education, 56, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Wise, A. F., & O’Neil, H. F. (2009). Beyond more versus less. A reframing of the debate on instructional guidance. In S. Tobias & T. D. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivism. Success or failure? (pp. 84–115). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  147. Wishart, J. (1990). Cognitive factors related to user involvement with computers and their effects upon learning from an educational computer game. Computers and Education, 15(1–3), 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2008). Why instructional explanations often do not work: A framework for understanding the effectiveness of instructional explanations. Educational Psychologist, 43, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sigmund Tobias
    • 1
  • J. Dexter Fletcher
    • 2
  • Alexander P. Wind
    • 1
  1. 1.University at Albany, State University of New YorkAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Defense AnalysesAlexandriaUSA

Personalised recommendations