Advertisement

Action Research for Educational Communications and Technology

Chapter

Abstract

Action research refers to the formalized, self-reflective research of practitioners. According to Cochran-Smith and Lytle (Inside and outside: Teacher research and knowledge. NY: Teachers College Press, 1993) action research is “systematic and intentional inquiry” (p. 7). It is often conducted collaboratively in research groups that meet in person or at a distance via communication technologies. Action research transforms the traditional “outside-in” relationship between practitioners and the educational community. It can provide a powerful means for bridging the divide between theory and practice and encouraging practitioners to engage in innovative practices. Action research includes a cyclical process of posing questions, collecting data, reflecting on findings, and reporting results. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of action research and its history in the USA, Great Britain, and Australia. It also describes the epistemological and ontological differences between practical and critical action research. To inspire future action research in our field, we detail the action research method, including data collection and analysis techniques and provide example studies from the field of educational communications and technology. More specifically, we demonstrate the manner in which action research has already been used to better understand the impact of the integration of technology in classrooms and social settings. At the same time, we describe how action researchers have used educational communications and technology to conduct action research and to teach this research method through online or hybrid classes. Technology can be both the focus and part of the method of the action research.

Keywords

Action research Participatory action research Technological pedagogical content knowledge 

References

  1. Allan, K., & Miller, S. M. (1990). Teacher-research collaboratives: Cooperative professional development. Theory into Practice, 29(3), 196–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. *Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2008). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to action research across the professions(2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bargal, D. (2006). Personal and intellectual influences leading to Lewin’s paradigm of action research. Action Research, 4(4), 367–38.Google Scholar
  4. Bay Area Writing Project. (1979). Bay area writing project, California writing project, national writing project: An overview. ED 184123. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  5. Berthoff, A. (1987). The teacher as RE-searcher. In D. Goswami & P. Stillman (Eds.), Reclaiming the classroom: Teacher research as an agency for change (pp. 22–38). Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton & Cook.Google Scholar
  6. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  7. Borko, H., Whitcomb, J. A., & Byrnes, K. (2008). Genres of research in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. L. Lytle, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. J. McIntyre (Eds.) & K. E. Demers (Assoc. Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 1017–1049). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Brause, R. S., & Mayher, J. S. (Eds.). (1991). Search and re-search: What the inquiring teacher needs to know. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, T., & Jones, L. (2001). Action research and postmodernism: Congruence and critique. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brydon-Miller, M., & Greenwood, D. (2006). A re-examination of the relationship between action research and human subjects review processes. Action Research, 4(1), 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caro-Bruce, C., Flessner, R., Klehr, M., & Zeichner, K. (2007). Creating equitable classrooms through action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  12. *Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carroll, F., Jenkins, A., Woodward, C., Kop, R., & Jenkins, E. (2012). Exploring how social media can enhance the teaching of action research. Action Research, 10(2), 170–188.Google Scholar
  14. Cavanaugh, C., & Dawson, K. (2008). Technology, professional development and action research in EETT middle school classrooms. Florida League of Middle Schools Journal.Google Scholar
  15. Cavanaugh, C., Dawson, K., White, S., Valdes, N., Ritzhaupt, A., & Payne, D. (2007). Leveraging laptops: Effective models for enhancing student achievement. Project Research Report 200607. Florida Center for Instructional Technology. Retrieved from http://etc.usf.edu/laptops4learning/resources/reports/Final_Report.pdf Google Scholar
  16. Chang, Y., Liao, R., Wang, T., & Chang, Y. (2010). Action research as a bridge between two worlds: Helping the NGOs and humanitarian agencies adapt technology to their needs. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1995). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes. New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1990). Teacher research and research on teaching: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–11.Google Scholar
  19. *Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside and outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  20. *Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.Google Scholar
  21. *Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  22. *Corey, S. M. (1953). Action research to improve school practices. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  23. Cornelissen, F., vanSwet, J., Beijaard, D., & Bergen, T. (2010). Aspects of school-university research networks that play a role in developing, sharing and using knowledge based on teacher research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cunningham, A., Foulger, T., Hansen, R., Kim, M., Schmidt, D., Smith, A., et al. (2011). TPACK in teacher education: Innovative models that work. Presentation abstract for the ISTE annual conference. Retrieved April 1, 2011, from http://www.isteconference.org/
  25. Dawson, K. (2007). The role of teacher inquiry in helping prospective teachers untangle the complexities of technology use in classrooms. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(1), 5–14.Google Scholar
  26. Dawson, K., Cavanaugh, C., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2008). Florida’s leveraging laptops initiative and its impact on teaching practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(2), 143–159.Google Scholar
  27. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Chicago, IL: Regnery.Google Scholar
  28. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
  29. *Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Elwood, S., Feliciano, R., Gems, K., Gulasingam, N., Howard, W., Mackin, R., et al. (2007). Participatory GIS: The Himboldt/West Humboldt Park community GIS project, Chicago, USA. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place (pp. 170–178). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Falk, B., & Blumenreich, M. (2005). The power of questions: A guide to teacher and student research. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  32. Feldman, A. (1993). Teachers learning from teachers: Knowledge and understanding in collaborative action research. Unpublished dissertation. Stanford University.Google Scholar
  33. Feldman, A. (1996). Enhancing the practice of physics teachers: Mechanisms for the generation and sharing of knowledge and understanding in collaborative action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 513–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ferrance, E. (2000). Action research. Providence, RI: LAB at Brown University. Retrieved from http://www.alliance.brown.edu/pubs/themes_ed/act_research.pdf
  35. Foulger, T. S., Williams, M. K., & Wetzel, K. (2008). We innovate: The role of collaboration in exploring new technologies. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 28–38. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/current.cfm Google Scholar
  36. Foulger, T. S., & Williams, M. K. (2007). Filling the gap with technology innovations: Standards, curriculum, collaboration, success! Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(3), 107–115.Google Scholar
  37. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  38. Gall, J. P., Gall, M. D., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Applying educational research: A practical guide (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  39. Gitlin, A., & Haddon, J. (1997). Educational research: Acting on power relations in the classroom. In S. Hollingsworth (Ed.), International action research (pp. 70–84). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  40. Glanz, J. (1998). Action research: An educational leader’s guide to school improvement. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.Google Scholar
  41. Glanz, J. (1999). A primer on action research for the school administrator. Clearing House, 72, 301–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded ­theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  43. Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  44. Goodson, I. (1999). The educational researcher as a public intellectual. British Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Greenwood, D., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. *Grimmett, P., & MacKinnon, A. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 385–456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  47. *Grundy, S. (1997). Participatory action research in Australia: The first wave—1976 to 1986. In R. McTaggart (Ed.), Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences (pp. 125–149). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  48. Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interest. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  49. Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In C. D. Maddux (Ed.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2009 (pp. 99–108). Chesapeake, VA: Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education (SITE).Google Scholar
  50. Hatch, T. (2006). Improving schools in turbulent times. The New Educator, 2, 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hatch, T., & Shulman, L. S. (2005). Into the classroom: Developing the scholarship of teaching and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  52. Hechter, R., & Phyfe, L. (2011). TPACK in the science methods classroom: Focusing on the space between. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 4115–4121). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar
  53. *Hendricks, C. (2009). Improving schools through action research: A comprehensive guide (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  54. Hollingsworth, S., & Sockett, H. (1994). Positioning teacher research in educational reform: An introduction. In S. Hollingsworth & H. Sockett (Eds.), Teacher research and educational reform (pp. 1–21). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Hollingsworth, S. (1994). Teacher research and urban literacy: Lessons and conversations in a feminist key. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  56. Hyland, N., & Noffke, S. (2005). Understanding diversity through social and community inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(4), 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Johnston, M. (2005). The lamp and the mirror: Action research and self studies in the social studies. In K. Barton (Ed.), Research methods in social studies education: Contemporary issues and perspectives (pp. 57–83). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Judah, M., & Richardson, G. H. (2006). Between a rock and a (very) hard place: The ambiguous promise of action research in the context of state mandated teacher professional development. Action Research, 4(1), 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kemmis, S., & Grundy, S. (1997). Educational action research in Australia: Organization and practice. In S. Hollingsworth (Ed.), International Action Research: A casebook for educational reform (pp. 40–48). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  60. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Victoria: Deakin University.Google Scholar
  61. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–603). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Kim, P. (2009). Action research approach on mobile learning design for the underserved. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(3), 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kincheloe, J. (1991). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  64. Kincheloe, J. (1995). Meet me behind the curtain: The struggle for a critical post modern action research. In P. L. McLaren & J. M. Giarelli (Eds.), Critical theory and educational research (pp. 71–90). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  65. Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (Eds.). (2007). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  67. Lampert, M. (2000). Knowing teaching: The intersection of research on teaching and qualitative research. In B. M. Brizeula., J. P. Stewart, R. G. Carrillo, & J. G. Berger (Eds.), Acts of inquiry in qualitative research (pp. 61–72). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review.Google Scholar
  68. Levin, B. B., & Rock, T. C. (2003). The effects of collaborative action research on preservice and experienced teacher partners in professional development schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(2), 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lewis, C., Guerrero, M., Makikana, L., & Armstrong, M. (2002). Exploring language, identity, and the power of narrative (pp. 8–10). Network Magazine: Bread Loaf Teachers.Google Scholar
  70. Lytle, S., Portnoy, D., Waff, D., & Buckley, M. (2009). Teacher research in urban Philadelphia: Twenty years working within, against, and beyond the system. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lytle, S. L., & Cochran-Smith, M. (1994). Inquiry, knowledge, and practice. In N. S. Hollingsworth & H. Sockett (Eds.), Teacher research and educational reform (Vol. 93, pp. 22–51). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  72. MacLean, M. S., & Mohr, M. (1999). Teacher-researchers at work. Berkeley, CA: The National Writing Project.Google Scholar
  73. Manfra, M. M. (2009a). Action research: Exploring the theoretical divide between practical and critical approaches. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 3(1), 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Manfra, M. M. (2009b). Critical inquiry in the social studies classroom: Portraits of critical teacher research. Theory and Research in Social Education, 37(2), 298–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McCutcheon, G., & Jung, B. (1990). Alternative perspectives on action research. Theory into Practice, 29(3), 144–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. McKernan, J. (1991). Curriculum action research. London: Kogan.Google Scholar
  77. *McKernan, J. L. (1996). Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner. London: Kogan.Google Scholar
  78. McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2002). Action research: Principles and practices (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  79. *McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2010). You and your action research project (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. McTaggart, R. (1991a). Action research: A short modern history. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  81. McTaggart, R. (1991b). Principles for participatory research action research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. *McTaggart, R. (Ed.). (1997). Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences. Albany, NY: State University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Mills, G. (2011). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  84. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Mohr, M., Rogers, C., Sanford, B., Nocerino, M. A., MacLean, M. S., & Clawson, S. (2004). Teacher research for better schools. New York: Teachers College Press and the National Writing Project.Google Scholar
  86. Nguyen, Q. T. (2007). Understanding high school black male students’ achievement and school experience. In C. Caro-Bruce, R. Flessner, M. Klehr, & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Creating equitable classrooms through action research (pp. 78–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  87. Noffke, S. E. (1997). Professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. In M. W. Apple (Ed.), Review of research in ­education (Vol. 22, pp. 305–343). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  88. Ostorga, A. N. (2010). Technology integration in teaching action research. International Journal of Instructional Media, 37(2), 131–139.Google Scholar
  89. Pierson, M. (2008). Teacher candidates reflect together on their own development of TPCK: Edited teaching videos as data for inquiry. In K. McFerrin et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2008 (pp. 5305–5309). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
  90. Price, J. N. (2001). Action research, pedagogy, and change: The transformative potential of action research in pre-service teacher education. Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Price, J. N., & Valli, L. (2005). Preservice teachers becoming agents of change: Pedagogical implications for action research. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(1), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2006). Handbook of action research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  93. Richardson, V. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Richards, S. (2007). What strategies can I incorporate so that the English language learners in my classroom will better understand oral directions? In C. Caro-Bruce, R. Flessner, M. Klehr, & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Creating equitable classrooms through action research (pp. 59–77). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  95. Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (2004). Experimental research methods. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 1021–1044). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  96. Savenye, W. C., & Robinson, R. S. (2004). Qualitative research issues and methods: An introduction for educational technologists. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 1045–1071). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  97. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  98. Shager, E. J. (2007). Been there, done that: Student inquiry about high school dropouts. In C. Caro-Bruce, R. Flessner, M. Klehr, & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Creating equitable classrooms through action research (pp. 29–58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  99. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  100. *Stenhouse, L. (1985). Research as the basis for teaching. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  101. Stoecker, R. (2008). Challenging institutional barriers to community-based research. Action Research, 6, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Strieb, L. Y. (1993). Visiting and revisiting the trees. In M. Cochran-Smith & S. L. Lytle (Eds.), Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge (pp. 121–130). NY: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
  103. Stringer, E. L. (2007). Action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  104. Taba, H. (1955). School culture: Studies of participation and leadership. Washington: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  105. van Manen, M. (1990). Beyond assumptions: Shifting the limits of action research. Theory into Practice, 29, 152–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Williams, M. K., Foulger, T. S., & Wetzel, K. (2009). Preparing preservice teachers for 21st century classrooms: Transforming attitudes and behaviors about innovative technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(3), 393–418.Google Scholar
  107. Wetzel, K., Foulger, T. S., & Williams, M. K. (2008–2009). The evolution of the required educational technology course. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(2), 67–71.Google Scholar
  108. Zeichner, K. M. (1994). Personal renewal and social construction through teacher research. In S. Hollingsworth & H. Sockett (Eds.), Teacher research and educational reform (Vol. 93, pp. 66–87). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meghan McGlinn Manfra
    • 1
  • Daniel Kelvin Bullock
    • 2
  1. 1.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Durham Public Schools and North Carolina UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations