Skip to main content

Digital Knowledge Mapping as an Instructional Strategy to Enhance Knowledge Convergence: A Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Digital Knowledge Maps in Education

Abstract

This chapter discusses the effectiveness of digital knowledge mapping as an instructional strategy in an online graduate-level course at a North American university. Digital concept mapping tools would help students in constructivist online learning settings to collect ideas and generate and organize knowledge. The creation of digital knowledge maps enhances the cognitive processes, management, structuring, and restructuring of knowledge. Concept maps have proven to be a valuable cognitive tool in a variety of learning and instructional settings. An online course was designed using a knowledge-building Community of Practice (CoP) learning environment. A community is defined as a group of individuals who share experiences, learn together, and engage in regular interaction though discussion and knowledge sharing activities relevant to their domain. An online CoP may foster a high level of student interaction through group discussions and collaborative activities (Draper, The instructional effects of knowledge based communities of practice learning environments on student achievement and knowledge convergence. Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 2010). In a moderated online instructional setting, graduate students collaborated and shared information to construct digital knowledge maps of instructional technology theories and concepts, which represent a shared meaning of complex theoretical concepts and content. This newly shared meaning represented knowledge convergence. This chapter begins by describing knowledge management, digital knowledge maps, communities of practice, and facilitator best practices, and then provides a document review and content analysis approach to evaluate the artifacts to determine common themes. Finally, suggestions and future research are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: Social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cañas, A. J., Hill, G., & Lott, J. (2003). Support for constructing knowledge models in Cmap Tools. (Technical report No. IHMC Cmap Tools 2003-02). Pensacola, FL: Institute for Human Machine Cognition.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lisi, R., & Goldbeck, S. L. (1999). Implication of Piagetian theory for peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 3–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external representation tools. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(3), 405–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H., & Chi, M. (2007). Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 34, 287–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T., Silkorski, E., Mendenhall, A., Khalil, M., & Lee, Y. (2010). Selection of team interventions based on mental models sharedness levels measured by the Team Assessment and Diagnostic Instrument (TADI). In D. Ifenthaler et al. (Eds.), Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-14419-5662-0_17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimble, C., & Hildreth, P. (2005). Dualities, distributed communities of practice and knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, J., & Ziemke, T. (2003). Social situatedness of natural and artificial intelligence: Vygotsky and beyond. Adaptive Behavior, 11(2), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monereo, C. (2009). Knowledge convergence. State of the Art. Internal report. Retrieved from http://cat-cscl.eu

  • Norberg, A., Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (2011). A time-based blended learning model. On the Horizon, 19(3), 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D. (1977). A theory of education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC Cmap Tools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Musconda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Reasearch Journal, 28(1), 117–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probst, G., Raub, S., & Romhardt, K. (2002). Mapping knowledge. London: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, J., Khoo, H. M., & Powers, C. (2000). Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams. IEEE transaction on professional communication, 3(3), 384–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, M., & Lambropoulos, N. (2011). Internal and external regulation to support knowledge construction and convergence in computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(1), 309–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society. Chicago, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwen, T., & Hara, N. (2003). Community of practice: A metaphor for online design? The Information Society, 19(3), 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teasley, S. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 361–384). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1928). The problem of the cultural development of the child II. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 36, 415–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1934). Thought and language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1979). The genesis of higher mental function. In T. V. Wertsch (Trans.) (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. New York, NY: M E Sharpe, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative l

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998a). Communities of practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998b). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., & Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B., Ludwig-Hardman, S., Thornam, C. L., & Dunlap, J. C. (2004). Bounded Community: Designing and facilitating learning communities in formal courses The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5, 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darryl C. Draper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Draper, D.C., Amason, R.F. (2014). Digital Knowledge Mapping as an Instructional Strategy to Enhance Knowledge Convergence: A Case Study. In: Ifenthaler, D., Hanewald, R. (eds) Digital Knowledge Maps in Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3178-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics