Abstract
A growing body of research shows that deeper understanding of complex systems can be achieved when students construct causal maps to articulate, explore, and refine their understanding. However, to what extent is students’ maps an actual measure of their causal understanding versus the efficacy of different processes used by students to construct their map? To address this question, a set of methods was developed and implemented in this study to mine data from the causal mapping tool, jMAP; sequentially analyze the mined data; and construct transitional state diagrams to visualize, model, and compare students’ causal mapping behaviors to identify differences in action sequences performed by students that created maps of high versus low accuracy. The causal maps of 17 graduate students enrolled in an online course on collaborative learning at Florida State University (USA) were sequentially analyzed and used to illustrate how the proposed methods can be implemented to capture, analyze, model, and identify causal mapping and reasoning processes that produce deeper causal understanding. Identifying and validating the most effective processes will enable software developers to create causal mapping software that can standardize the map construction process, control for individual differences in mapping skills, enable students to produce causal maps that accurately reflect their causal understanding (and/or help students to produce more accurate causal maps), and thus enable instructors to use such mapping tools to conduct automated large-scale assessments of students’ causal understanding and systems thinking skills.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barenholz, H., & Tamir, P. (1992). A comprehensive use of concept mapping in design instruction and assessment. Research in Science and Technological Education, 10, 37–52.
Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Mien, S., & Kirschner, P. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Small Group Research, 37(5), 490–521.
Bryson, J. M., Ackerman, F., Eden, C., & Finn, C. B. (2004). Visible thinking: Unlocking causal mapping for practical business results. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Clarkson, G. P., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2005). Introducing Cognizer(TM): A comprehensive computer package for the elicitation and analysis of cause maps. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 317–344.
Decision Systems, Inc. (2012). Root cause analysis using REASON. Retrieved July 2012 from http://www.rootcause.com.
Fisher, K. (1990). Semantic networking: The new kid on the block. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 1001–1018.
Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Relational, structural, and semantic analysis of graphical representations and concept maps. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(1), 81–97.
Ifenthaler, D., Masdsuki, I., & Seel, N. (2011). The mystery of cognitive structure and how we can detect it: tracking the development of cognitive structures over time. Instructional Science, 39(1), 41–61.
Jeong, A. (2009). Superimposing individual and group causal maps to trigger critical discourse and change in learners’ causal models. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association conference, San Diego, CA.
Jeong, A. (2010). Assessing change in learner’s causal understanding: using sequential analysis and causal maps. In V. Shute & B. Becker (Eds.), Innovative assessment for the 21st century: Supporting educational needs. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Jeong, A. (2012). DAT software. Retrieved 21 July, 2012 from http://myweb.fsu.edu/ajeong/dat.
Jeong, A., & Lee, W. J. (2012). Developing causal understanding with causal maps: The impact of total links, temporal flow, and lateral position of outcome nodes. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 60(2), 325–340.
Jeong. A. (2010). jMAP. Retrieved 14 July, 2010 from http://cscl.wikispaces.com/jmap.
Jonassen, D. H., & Ionas, I. G. (2008). Designing effective supports for causal reasoning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 287–308.
Kali, Y., & Linn, M. (2007). Technology-enhanced support strategies for inquiry learning. In M. Spector & P. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McClure, J., & Bell, P. (1990). Effects of an environmental education-related STS approach instruction on cognitive structures of pre-service science teachers. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 341 582).
Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448.
Plate, R. (2010). Assessing individuals’ understanding of nonlinear causal structures in complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 26(1), 19–33.
Ruiz-Primo, M., & Shavelson, R. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569–600.
Ruiz-Primo, M., Shavelson, R., & Schulz, S. (1997). On the validity of concept map-base assessment interpretations: An experiment testing the assumption of hierarchical concept maps in science (CSE Technical Report 455). Los Angeles, CA: University of California.
Scavarda, A. J., Bouzdine-Chameeva, T., Goldstein, S. M., Hays, J. M., & Hill, A. V. (2006). A methodology for constructing collective causal maps. Decision Sciences Journal, 37(2), 263–284.
Wilson, J. (1994). Network representations of knowledge about chemical equilibrium: Variations with achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1133–1147.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jeong, A. (2014). Sequentially Analyzing and Modeling Causal Mapping Processes that Support Causal Understanding and Systems Thinking. In: Ifenthaler, D., Hanewald, R. (eds) Digital Knowledge Maps in Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3178-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3178-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3177-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3178-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)