Grounding Language through Evolutionary Language Games

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter introduces a new experimental paradigm for studying issues in the grounding of language and robots, and the integration of all aspects of intelligence into a single system. The paradigm is based on designing and implementing artificial agents so that they are able to play language games about situations they perceive and act upon in the real world. The agents are not pre-programmed with an existing language but with the necessary cognitive functions to self-organize communication systems from scratch, to learn them from human language users if there are sufficiently frequent interactions, and to participate in the on-going cultural evolution of language.

Key words

robotics computational linguistics whole systems AI integrated AI evolutionary language games semiotic cycle 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin J (1975) How To Do Things with Words. OUP, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baronchelli A, Felici M, Loreto V, Caglioti E, Steels L (2006) Sharp transition towards shared vocabularies in multi-agent systems. Journal of Statistical Mechanics P06014Google Scholar
  3. Bleys J (2012) Language strategies for color. In: Steels L (ed) Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution, John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. de Boer B (1999) Self-organisation in vowel systems. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  5. Brighton H, Kirby S, Smith K (2005) Cultural selection for learnability: Three principles underlying the view that language adapts to be learnable. In: Tallerman M (ed) Language Origins: Perspectives on Evolution, OUP, Oxford, p Chapter 13Google Scholar
  6. Frank S, Bod R (2011) Insensitivity of the human sentence-processing system to hierarchical structure. Psychological Science 22(6):829–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galantucci B (2005) An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science 29(5):737–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galantucci B, Garrod S (2010) Experimental semiotics: A new approach for studying the emergence and the evolution of human communication. Interaction Studies 11(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garrod S, Anderson A (1987) Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptualGoogle Scholar
  10. and semantic coordination. Cognition 27:181–218Google Scholar
  11. Gerasymova K, Steels L, van Trijp R (2009) Aspectual morphology of Russian verbs in Fluid Construction Grammar. In: Taatgen N, van Rijn H (eds) Proceedings of the 31th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Cognitive Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
  12. Heine B (1997) The Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Hurford J, Studdert-Kennedy M, Knight C (eds) (1998) Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  14. Klatt D (1990) Review of the arpa speech understanding project. In: Klatt D (ed) Readings in Speech Recognition, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CaGoogle Scholar
  15. Lakoff G (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Levelt W (1989) Speaking. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  17. Lyon C, Nehaniv C, Cangelosi A (eds) (2007) Emergence of Language and Communication. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. McIntyre A, Steels L, Kaplan F (1999) Net-mobile embodied agents. In: Proceedings of Sony Research Forum 1999, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  19. Minett JW, Wang WSY (2005) Language Acquisition, Change and Emergence: Essays in Evolutionary Linguistics. City University of Hong Kong Press, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  20. Mufwene S (2001) Competition and selection in language evolution. Selection 3(1)Google Scholar
  21. Nilsson N (1984) Shakey the robot. In: SRI Technical note 323, SRI International, Menlo Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  22. Nolfi S, Miroli M (eds) (2010) Evolution of Communication and Language in EmbodiedGoogle Scholar
  23. Agents. Springer Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  24. Oudeyer PY (2005) The self-organization of speech sounds. Journal of Theoretical Biology 233(3):435–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pauw S, Hilferty J (2012) The emergence of quantification. In: Steels L (ed) Experiments in Language Evolution, John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  26. Quine W (1960) Word and Object. MIT Press, Cambridge MaMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Rizzolatti G, ArbibMA (1998) Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences 21(5)Google Scholar
  28. Searle J (1969) Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MaGoogle Scholar
  29. Spranger M, Loetzsch M (2009) The semantics of sit, stand, and lie embodied in robots. In: Cognitive Science 2009Google Scholar
  30. Steels L (1995) A self-organizing spatial vocabulary. Artificial Life 2(3):319–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steels L (1998) Synthesising the origins of language and meaning using coevolution, self-organisation and level formation. In: Hurford J, Studdert-KennedyGoogle Scholar
  32. M, Knight C (eds) Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 384–404Google Scholar
  33. Steels L (2008) The symbol grounding problem has been solved. so what’s next? In:Google Scholar
  34. Glenberg A, Graesser A, de Vega M (eds) Symbols, Embodiment and Meaning, OUP, Oxford, pp 506–557Google Scholar
  35. Steels L (2011) Modeling the cultural evolution of language. Physics of Life Reviews doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.014Google Scholar
  36. Steels L (ed) (2012a) Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution. John Benjamins Pub., AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  37. Steels L (2012b) Self-organization and selection in language evolution. In: Steels L (ed) Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution, John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  38. Steels L, Kaplan F (1998a) Spontaneous lexicon change. In: Proceedings COLINGACL 1998, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, pp 1243–1250Google Scholar
  39. Steels L, Kaplan F (1998b) Stochasticity as a source of innovation in language games. In: Adami C, Belew RK, Kitano H, Taylor CE (eds) Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Life, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Steels L, Kaplan F (2001) Aibo’s first words: The social learning of language and meaning. Evolution of Communication 4(1):3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Steels L, Kaplan F (2002) Bootstrapping grounded word semantics. In: Briscoe T (ed) Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 53–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Steels L, LoetzschM(2008) Perspective alignment in spatial language. In: CoventryGoogle Scholar
  43. K, Tenbrink T, Bateman J (eds) Spatial Language and Dialogue, OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  44. Steels L, Loetzsch M (2012) The grounded naming game. In: Steels L (ed) Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution, John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  45. Steels L, Spranger M (2012) Emergent mirror systems for body language. In: Steels L (ed) Experiments in Language Evolution, John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  46. Steels L, Vogt P (1997) Grounding adaptive language games in robotic agents. In: Husbands P, Harvey I (eds) Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Artificial Life, The MIT Press, Brighton, U.K., pp 473–484Google Scholar
  47. Steels L, Kaplan F, McIntyre A, Van Looveren J (2002) Crucial factors in the origins of word-meaning. In: Wray A (ed) The Transition to Language, OUP, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  48. Talmy L (2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Concept Structuring Systems, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  49. van Trijp R (2012) The emergence of case marking systems for marking event structure. In: Steels L (ed) Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution, John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  50. Walhster W (ed) (2000) Verbmobil: Foundations of Speech-to-Speech Translation. Berlin, Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  51. Wellens P, Loetzsch M (2012) An adaptive flexible strategy for lexicon formation. In: Steels L (ed) Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution, John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  52. Winograd T (1972) A procedural model of language understanding. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical Investigations. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICREA Institute for Evolutionary Biology (UPF-CSIC)BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Sony Computer Science Laboratory ParisParisFrance

Personalised recommendations