Advertisement

Some Considerations of Boundary Conditions in Dynamic Testing

  • Julie Harvie
  • Peter Avitabile
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

Often times, tests are performed on structures to attempt to simulate a built in condition at the attachment point on the structure – or at least some type of fixity is desired. The actual implementation of this type of connection is not always easy to achieve. The use of a “large attachment stiffness” is one approach and is a possibility when only the lower order, first few modes are of interest and the fixture/attachment stiffness is much higher than the lower order modes of interest. But when this is not possible, then the use of a “large mass attachment” is another approach but when the structure does not have a low center of gravity (such as wind turbine blade applications), the mass inertia can be significant to simulate a built in fixed condition.

Several conditions are studied for the simulation of a built in condition using a large mass approach for a simple beam type structure. Models are presented to show the need for careful evaluation of the test set up so that the proper boundary conditions are achieved; in addition, tests are performed to confirm the model results obtained. Models are extended to consider wind turbine blades to understand the importance of identifying the proper test set up to achieve a particular boundary condition of interest; several test results are also included.

Keywords

Mode Shape Beam Element Beam Model Mass Inertia Test Article 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

Some of the work presented herein was partially funded by NSF Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (CMMI) Grant No. 0900534 entitled “Dynamic Stress–strain Prediction of Vibrating Structures in Operation”. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the particular funding agency. The authors are grateful for the support obtained.

References

  1. 1.
    MATLAB – Matrix analysis software. The MathWorks, Natick, 2007Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berry DS (2007) CX-100 manufacturing final project report, TPI CompositesGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marinone T, LeBlanc B, Carr J, Harvey E, Avitabile P (2011) Impact testing of CX-100 wind turbine blades (modal data). SDASL Report # L111966-1. Test ReportGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marinone T, LeBlanc B, Harvie J, Niezrecki C, Avitabile P (2012) Modal testing of 9 m CX-100 turbine blades. Paper accepted for the 30th international modal analysis conference, Jacksonville, FLGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griffith T, Carne T (2010) Experimental modal analysis of 9-meter research-sized wind turbine blades. Proceedings of the 28th international modal analysis conferenceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2012 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Structural Dynamics and Acoustic Systems LaboratoryUniversity of Massachusetts LowellLowellUSA

Personalised recommendations