Discussion on Strategy Dilemmas
This chapter discusses five main strategy or solution dilemmas that educators might encounter in asynchronous online discussion environments. Strategy dilemmas refer to those strategies where previous empirical research shows mixed results when they are implemented. Acknowledging the dilemmas is essential for educators and researchers to make informed decisions about the discussion strategies they are considering implementing. The five strategy dilemmas include the following: use of grades or marks, use of number of posting guideline and posting deadlines, use of message labels or sentence openers (online scaffolds), extending the duration of the online discussion, and instructor/facilitation.
KeywordsAsynchronous online discussion Strategies for online discussion Solutions for online discussions Mixed results Dilemmas Use of grades Use of marks Posting guideline Posting deadlines Message labels Sentence openers Instructor facilitation Duration of discussion
- Arend, B. (2009). Encouraging critical thinking in online threaded discussions. The Journal of Educators Online, 6(1). Retrieved on February 15, 2012 from http://www.thejeo.com/Archives/Volume6Number1/Arendpaper.pdf.
- Bai, H. (2009). Facilitating students’ critical thinking in online discussion: An instructor’s experience. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 156–164.Google Scholar
- Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 31–63). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Baron, J., & Keller, M. (2003). Use of rubrics in online assessment. In the Evaluations and Assessment Conference 2003. Adelaide: University of South Australia.Google Scholar
- Beaudin, B. P. (1999). Keeping online asynchronous discussions on topic. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 3(2), 41–53.Google Scholar
- Berge, Z. L. (1995). Facilitating computer conferencing: Recommendations from the field. Educational Technology, 35(1), 22–30.Google Scholar
- Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2). Retrieved on February 23, 2012 from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/140/394.
- Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2005). Factors affecting learners’ satisfaction on the use of asynchronous online discussion in a hypermedia design environment. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 5(1&2), 56–70.Google Scholar
- Cifuentes, L., Murphy, K. L., Segur, R., & Kodali, S. (1997). Design considerations for computer conferences. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(2), 177–201.Google Scholar
- Correia, A. P., & Baran, E. (2010). Lessons learned on facilitating asynchronous discussions for online learning. Educacao, Formacao & Tecnologias, 3(1), 59–67.Google Scholar
- Correia, A. P., & Davis, N. E. (2007). The design of collaboration in the virtual classroom. In M. Simonson (Ed.), 30th annual proceedings of selected papers on the practice of educational communications and technology (pp. 84–87). Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.Google Scholar
- Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.Google Scholar
- Gerbic, P. (2006). To post or not to post: Undergraduate student perceptions about participating in online discussions. In Who’s learning? Whose technology? Proceedings Ascilite Sydney 2006. Retrieved on January 27, 2012 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p124.pdf.
- Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2009). Participation in student-facilitated discussion forums: An empirical analysis of facilitators’ habits of mind. In B. H. Tan & S. R. Galea (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Thinking 2009 (pp. 268–279). Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Putra Malaysia.Google Scholar
- Hew, K. F., Cheung, W. S., & Jumain, S. N. (2010a). Critical thinking in asynchronous online discussions: Examining the role of the student facilitator. In Z. Abas, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of global learn Asia Pacific 2010 (pp. 4210–4215). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
- Hiltz. R. S. (1988). Learning in a virtual classroom. Final evaluation report (Vol. 25). Newark, N.J.: Computerized Conferencing and Communications Centre.Google Scholar
- Ikpeze, C. (2007). Small group collaboration in peer-led electronic discourse: An analysis of group dynamics and interactions involving preservice and inservice teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 383–407.Google Scholar
- Jackson, K. (2010). What value assessment rubrics in shaping students’ engagement in asynchronous online discussions? In C. H. Steel, M. J. Keppel, P. Gerbic & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp. 454–458). Retrieved on January 27, 2012 from http://ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney10/procs/crisp-symposium.pdf.
- Jeong, A., & Joung, S. (2007). Scaffolding collaborative argumentation in asynchronous discussions with message constraints and message labels. Computers & Education, 48, 427–445.Google Scholar
- Klemm, W. R. (1998). Eight ways to get students more engaged in online conferences. T.H.E. Journal, 26(1), 62–64.Google Scholar
- Lang, D. (2000). Critical thinking in web courses. Syllabus, 9, 20–24.Google Scholar
- Lewis, K. O. (2006). Evaluation of online group activities: Intra-group member peer evaluation. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning. Retrieved on February 16, 2012 from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/06_4136.pdf.
- McNamara, J., & Burton, K. (2010). Assessment of online discussion forums for law students. Journal of University Teaching and Learning, 6(2). Retrieved on August 12, 2011 from http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol6/iss2/6.
- Murphy, E., & Coleman, E. (2004). Graduate students’ experiences of challenges in online asynchronous discussions. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 30(2). Retrieved on August 5, 2011 from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/128/122.
- O’ Grady, G. K. (2001). Maximising the potential of computer mediated discussion: guidelines for facilitation. Centre for Development of Teaching and Learning (CDTL) Brief, 4(4). Retrieved on September 1, 2011 from http://www.cdtl.nus.sg/Brief/v4n4/sec3.asp.
- Oliver, M., & Shaw, G. P. (2003). Asynchronous discussion in support of medical education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 56–67.Google Scholar
- Paulsen, M. F. (1995). Moderating educational computer conferences. In Z. L. Berge & M. P. Collins (Eds.), Computer mediated communication and the online classroom: Vol. 3. Distance Learning (pp. 81–89). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.Google Scholar
- Pena-Shaff, J. B., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42(3), 243–265.Google Scholar
- Poole, D. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 162–177.Google Scholar
- Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002). Using peer teams to lead online discussions. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. Retrieved on August 31, 2011 from http://jime.open.ac.uk/article/2002-1/80.
- Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Salter, G. (2000). Making use of online discussion groups. Australian Educational Computing, 15(2), 5–10.Google Scholar
- Winiecki, D. J., & Chyung, Y. (August, 1998). Keeping the thread: Helping distance education students and instructors keep track of asynchronous discussions. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, 98 (pp. 451–460). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
- Yeh, H. T., & Buskirk, E. V. (2005). An instructor’s methods of facilitating students’ participation in asynchronous online discussion. In C. Crawford, D. A. Willis, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, & R. Weber (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2005 (pp. 682–688). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar
- Yeh, H.-T., & Lahman, M. (2007). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of asynchronous online discussion on Blackboard. The Qualitative Report, 12(4), 680–704.Google Scholar
- Zhao, N., & McDougall, D. (2005). Cultural factors affecting Chinese students’ participation in asynchronous online learning. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of world conference on E-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2005 (pp. 2723–2729). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar