This chapter presents the basic concepts that characterize asynchronous online discussion environments from the standpoint of collaborative learning. Collaborative learning essentially focuses on the negotiation or discussion of ideas among participants. Traditionally, discussion occurs in face-to-face learning classroom environments. However, face-to-face classroom discussions are typically limited by several factors. In this chapter, the various limitations of face-to-face discussions are first discussed. Then, the role of asynchronous online discussion, its potential benefits to student learning, and an actual example of how asynchronous online discussion can be integrated into a blended learning course are presented.
KeywordsCollaborative learning Discussion Asynchronous online discussion Face-to-face discussion Blended learning Learning Integration Negotiation Online discussion Classroom discussions
- Almasi, J. F. (1996). A new view of discussion. In L. B. Gambrell & J. F. Almasi (Eds.), Lively discussions: Fostering engaged reading (pp. 2–24). Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
- Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy of learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
- Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is larry cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51). Retrieved on July 11, 2005 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n51/
- Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper’s World 3. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 21–23.Google Scholar
- Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. S. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–272). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Burt, M.T., Grady, M. & McMann, G. (1994). Interaction analysis of an inter-university computer conference. Paper presented at the Distance Learning Research Conference, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
- Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2006). Examining Students’ Creative and Critical Thinking and Student to Student Interactions in An Asynchronous Online Discussion Environment: A Singapore Case Study. Asia-Pacific Cybereducation Journal, 2(2). Retrieved June 11, 2010 from http://www.acecjournal.org/current_issue_current_issue.php.
- Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2011). Design and evaluation of two blended learning approaches: Lessons learned. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8), 1319–1337.Google Scholar
- Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning?’ In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Amsterdam: Pergamon Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G., et al. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12(2), 412–433. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00331.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gaspar, A., Langevin, S., Boyer, N., & Armitage, W. (2010). Students’ activity focus in online asynchronous peer learning forums. Informatics in Education, 9(1), 1–36.Google Scholar
- Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104–137.Google Scholar
- Guzdial, M. (1997). Information ecology of collaborations in educational settings: Influence of tool. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 83–90). Toronto: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2003). Evaluating the participation and quality of thinking of pre-service teachers in an asynchronous online discussion environment: Part I. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(3), 247–262.Google Scholar
- Hewitt, J. (2001). Beyond threaded discourse. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3), 207–221.Google Scholar
- Hewitt, J., & Teplovs, C. (1999). An analysis of growth patterns in computer conferencing threads. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference, Dec. 12–15. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
- Hsu, J. F., Chen, D., & Hung, D. (2000). Learning theories and IT: The computer as a tutor. In M. D. Williams (Ed.), Integrating technology into teaching and learning (pp. 71–92). Singapore: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Jamaludin, A., & Quek, C. L. (2006). Using asynchronous online discussions in primary school project work. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 64–87.Google Scholar
- Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1998). Online Social Interchange, Discord, and Knowledge Construction. The Journal of Distance Education, 13(1). Retrieved September 30, 2008 from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/137/412.
- Kearsley, G. (2000). Online Education: Learning and Teaching in cyberspace. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Kucuk, M., Genc-Kumtepe, E., & Tasci, D. (2010). Support services and learning styles influencing interaction in asynchronous online discussions. Educational Media International, 47(1), 39–56.Google Scholar
- Lim, S. C. R., Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2011). Critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: An investigation of student facilitation techniques. New Horizons in Education, 59(1), 52–65.Google Scholar
- Maor, D. (2010). Examining cognitive attributes in student-teacher and student–student online interactions. In Proceedings of Global Learn Asia Pacific 2010 (pp. 4247–4252). AACE.Google Scholar
- McLoughlin, C. & Luca, J. (2000). Cognitive engagement and higher order thinking through computer conferencing: We know why but do we know how? In A. Herrmann and M.M. Kulski (Eds), Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 2–4 February 2000. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. Retrieved on November 7, 2008 from http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2000/mcloughlin.html.
- Murphy, E., & Coleman, E. (2004). Graduate students’ experiences of challenges in online asynchronous discussions. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 30(2). Retrieved August 5, 2011 from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/128/122.
- Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., Harland, J., & Warburton, G. (2011). How active are students in online discussion forums. In J. Hamer & M. de Raadt. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Computing Education Conference 2011 (Vol. 114, pp. 125–134). Perth, Australia: Australia Computer Society.Google Scholar
- Ng, C. S. L. (2011). The influence of peer facilitation techniques and other factors on online forum interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Institute of Education, Singapore.Google Scholar
- Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.Google Scholar
- Roehler, L. R., & Cantlon, D. J. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning (pp. 6–42). Cambridge: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
- Romiszowski, A., & Mason, R. (2004). Computer-Mediated Communication. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 397–431). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
- Rovai, A. & Jordan, H. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: a comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5, 2. Retrieved January 27, 2012, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/192/795.
- Ruhleder, K., Jordan, B., & Elmes, M. B. (1996). Wiring the “new organization”: Integrating collaborative technologies and team-based work. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management.Google Scholar
- Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Stahl, G., Koshmann, T. & Suthers, D.D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In R.K.Sawyer, (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of sciences (pp. 409-425). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wan, D., & Johnson, P. M. (1994). Computer supported collaborative learning using CLARE: The approach and experimental findings. In R. Furuta & C. Neuwirth (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCW’94 (pp. 187–198). Chapel Hill, NC: ACM.Google Scholar
- Wu, A. (2003). Supporting electronic discourse: Principles of design from a social constructivist perspective. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(2), 167–184.Google Scholar
- Yukselturk, E. (2010). An investigation of factors affecting student participation level in an online discussion forum. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2). Retrieved August 11, 2011 from http://tojet.net/articles/923.pdf.