Advertisement

Carbon Capture pp 219-229 | Cite as

Cryogenic Distillation and Air Separation

Chapter

Abstract

Various advanced coal conversion-to-electricity processes are discussed in Chap. 1 that depend on the use of a gas stream comprised primarily of oxygen; therefore, air separation into its primary components, i.e., nitrogen (N2), oxygen (O2), and argon (Ar) are discussed within the context to CO2 capture. One of the dominant processes used for air distillation is cryogenic distillation. Cryogenic separation may also be used as a polishing step to enhance the purity of a gas stream predominantly comprised of CO2.

Keywords

Distillation Column Pressure Swing Adsorption Integrate Gasification Combine Cycle Chemical Loop Combustion Carbon Molecular Sieve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith AR, Klosek J (2001) A review of air separation technologies and their integration with energy conversion processes. Fuel Process Technol 70(2): 115–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker R (2004) Membrane technology and applications, 2nd Edn. Reprinted with permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Figure Courtesy of Giampaolo Pelliccia, Decarbonized Electricity Production from the OxyCombustion of Coal and Heavy Oils, Dipartimento di Energetica, Politecnico Di Milano, (2006) Advisor: Stefano ConsonniGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lide DR (2008) CRC handbook of Chemistry and Physics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 2736Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Allam RJ (2009) Improved oxygen production technologies. Energy Procedia 1(1):461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pelliccia G (2006) Decarbonized electricity production from the Oxycombustion of coal and heavy oils. Thesis (PhD) Politecnico Di MilanoGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ruthven DM (1997) Encyclopedia of separation technology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koros WJ, Mahajan R (2000) Pushing the limits on possibilities for large scale gas separation: which strategies? J Membrane Sci 175(2):181–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coombe HS, Nieh S (2007) Polymer membrane air separation performance for portable oxygen enriched combustion applications. Energy Convers Manag 48(5):1499–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hashim SM, Mohamed AR, Bhatia S (2010) Current status of ceramic-based membranes for oxygen separation from air. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 160:88–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sunarso J, Baumann S, Serra JM, Meulenberg WA, Liu S, Lin YS, Diniz da Costa JC (2008) Mixed ionic-electronic conducting (MIEC) ceramic-based membranes for oxygen separation. J Membrane Sci 320(1–2):13–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mancini ND, Mitsos A (2011) Ion transport membrane reactors for oxy-combustion-Part I: intermediate-fidelity modeling. Energy, 36(8):4701–4720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stiegel GJ, Bose A, Armstrong P (2006) Development of ion transport membrane (ITM) oxygen technology for integration in IGCC and other advanced power generation systems. National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), U.S. Department of EnergyGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hashim S S, Mohamed AR, Bhatia S (2011) Oxygen separation from air using ceramic-based membrane technology for sustainable fuel production and power generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(2):1284–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bloch ED, Murray LJ, Queen WL, Chavan S, Maximoff SN, Bigi JP, Krishna R, Peterson VK, Grandjean F, Long GJ, Smit B, Bordiga S, Brown CM, Long JR (2011) Selective binding of O2 over N2 in a redox-active metal-organic framework with open iron(II) coordination sites. J Am Chem Soc 133(37):14814–14822CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Energy Resources EngineeringStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations