Abstract
The idea of identity is one of the most important organizing principles of modernity—and, certainly, postmodernity. It has provided an overarching conceptual framework to understand larger areas of social life. However, the traditional essentialist concept of identity, which tends to conceive a single aspect of identity as the fundamental essence of an individual’s experience, has come under attack because of its inability to capture the dynamic, processual, and fluid nature of identities. Identities are constituted differently in different historical and social contexts. Identity is always in context. For example, although “Chinese” identity functions as a socially constructed category, it can be argued that it is not a genuine ethnicity. Chineseness is not an inert fact of nature, just like any other racial collectivity, it is not merely there, but is a bundle of ideas that have histories and tradition of thoughts, imageries, and vocabularies that have given it “reality” and presence in and for the West (Said, 1978). Similar to other overseas work on the Chinese diaspora such as Tong and co-author Chan’s (2001b) volume on the Chinese in Thailand, Leung’s (2004) research in Germany, Man’s (2004) work in Canada, Greif’s (1974) and Ip’s (2003) studies in New Zealand, the diasporic Chinese in Australia, like any other Chinese community overseas, are embedded in complex communal relationships constructed along divisions of birthplace, language, gender, generation, birth cohort, occupation, and political and religious affiliation. These divisions change in time and space across the life course, carving out dynamic sociocultural spaces for different members of the Chinese diaspora, which in turn form their sometimes common, at other times dissimilar, experiences and self-perceptions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
By “personal history” we include factors such as length of residence, place of birth, and ethnic background.
- 2.
The peak period of immigration from Hong Kong to Australia was around the late 1980s to early 1990s, before its handover to China in 1997. Many Hong Kong immigrants migrated as family units whereby one or both parents along with their children settled permanently in Australia. In many cases the father returned to Hong Kong for work purposes, while the rest of the family remained in Australia. The terms “astronaut family” and “parachute children” describe the family arrangement of these Hong Kong migrants in Australia (Pe-Pua, Mitchell, Iredale, & Castles, 1996).
- 3.
Generalized notions of masculinity and femininity have implication not only in the way identity is negotiated but also in social research and public policies. In the public arena, gender implications can be highlighted by the perusal of equal access—whether it is gender, language, or culture—to government services and programs. However, simply applying fair treatment to all groups is insufficient as different gender groups may need more assistance to ensure more equitable outcomes because they have been historically disadvantaged—e.g., women trying to break into a traditionally male industry.
References
Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. G. Fox & S. Santa Fe (Eds.), Recapturing anthropology. New Mexico: School of American Research Press.
Alba, R., & Nee, V. (1999). Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration. In C. Hischman, P. Kasinitz, & J. DeWind (Eds.), The handbook of international migration (pp. 137–160). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Alcoff, L. M., & Mohanty, S. P. (2006). Reconsidering identity politics: An introduction. In L. M. Alcoff, M. Hames-Garica, S. P. Mohanty, & P. Moya (Eds.), Identity politics reconsidered (pp. 1–9). New York: Palgrave.
Alwin, D. F., & McCammon, R. J. (2003). Generations, cohorts and social change. In A. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 23–50). New York: Springer.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
Anderson, M. (1999). Children in-between: Constructing identities in the bicultural family. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 5, 13–23.
Ang, I. (1998). Can one say no to Chineseness? Pushing the limits of the diasporic paradigm. Boundary, 2, 223–242.
Ang, I. (2001). On not speaking Chinese: Living between Asia and the West. London: Routledge.
Anthias, F. (2001). New hybridities, old concepts: The limits of ‘culture’. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24, 619–641.
Appadurai, A. (1997). The production of locality. Modernity at large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bauman, Z. (1998). On glocalization: Or globalization for some, localization for some others. Thesis Eleven, 57(1), 37–49.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Berger, P. (1984). And our faces, my heart, brief as photos. London: Writers and Readers.
Bhabha, H. (1991). The third space: Interview with Homi K. Bhabha. In J. Eutherford (Ed.), Identity: community, culture, difference (pp. 207–221). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. K. (1986). The social psychology of Chinese people. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 213–266). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carter, N. A. (2004). Strategies of study: Approaching the analysis of identity. International Politics, 41, 430–439.
Chambers, I. (1994). Migrancy, culture, identity. London: Routledge.
Chan, H. (2001). Ears attuned to two cultures. In J. M. T. Khu (Ed.), Cultural curiosity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chan, K. B. (2011). Hybridity: Promises and limits. Toronto: de Sitter Publications.
Charney, M. W., Yeoh, B. S. A., & Tong, C. K. (Eds.). (2003). Chinese migrants abroad: Cultural educational and social dimensions of the Chinese diaspora. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Choi, C. Y. (1975). Chinese migration and settlement in Australia. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
Chow, R. (1991). Woman and Chinese modernity: The politics of reading between West and East. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Chow, R. (1998). Introduction: On Chineseness as a theoretical problem. Boundary, 2, 1–24.
Chun, A. (1996). Fuck Chineseness: On the ambiguities of ethnicity as culture as identity. Boundary, 2(23), 111–138.
Cohen, M. L. (1994). Being Chinese: The peripheralization of traditional identity. In W. M. Tu (Ed.), The living tree: The changing meaning of being Chinese today (pp. 88–108). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Cornell, S., & Hartmann, D. (1998). Ethnicity and race: Making identities in a changing world. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Davidson, A. (1991). Rethinking household and livelihood strategies. In D. Clay & H. K. Schwarzweller (Eds.), Research in rural sociology and development: Household survival strategies. London: JAI Press.
Davidson, A. (2004). Transnational spaces and sociocultural networks: Chinese women migrants in Sydney. In K. E. Kuah-Pearce (Ed.), Chinese women and their cultural and network capitals (pp. 21–43). Singapore: Marshall Cavendish.
Dunn, R. G. (1998). Identity crises: A social critique of postmodernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Elder, G. H., Jr., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In A. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 3–22). New York: Springer.
Elvin, M. (1994). The inner world of 1830. In W. M. Tu (Ed.), The living tree: The changing meaning of being Chinese today (pp. 35–63). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. California: Stanford University Press.
Gilbert, H., Lo, J., & Khoo, T. (Eds.). (2000). Diaspora: negotiating Asian-Australia. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
Gilroy, P. (1994). The Black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gilroy, P. (2004). Between camps: Nations, culture and the allure of race. London: Routledge.
Greif, S. W. (1974). The overseas Chinese in New Zealand. Singapore: Asia Pacific Press.
Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs identity? In S. Hall & P. D. Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). London: Sage.
Hames-Gracia, M. R. (2000). “Who are our own people?” Challenges for a theory of social identity. In P. M. L. Moya & M. R. Hames-Gracia (Eds.), Reclaiming identity: Realist theory and the predicament of postmodernism (pp. 102–132). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hareven, T. K. (1996). Introduction: Aging and generational relations over the life course. In Aging and generational relations over the life course. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Hawkes, T. (1992). Structuralism and semiotics. London: Routledge.
Hibbins, R. (2006). Sexuality and constructions of gender identity among Chinese male migrants in Australia. Asian Studies Review, 30, 289–303.
Ho, E., Ip, M., & Bedford, R. (2001). Transnational Hong Kong Chinese families in the 1990s. New Zealand Journal of Geography.
Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift. New York: Avon Books.
Hockey, J., & James, A. (2003). Social identities across the life course. China: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hsu, C. Y. (1994). A reflection on marginality. In W. M. Tu (Ed.), The living tree: The changing meaning of being Chinese today (pp. 239–241). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Huddart, D. (2006). Homi K. Bhabha. London: Routledge.
Hutnyk, J. (1999). Hybridity saves? Authenticity and/or the critique of appropriation. Amerasia Journal, 25, 39–58.
Ip, M. (2002). Chinese female migration: From exclusion to transnationalism. In L. Fraser & K. Pickles (Eds.), Shifting centres: Women and migration in New Zealand history (pp. 149–166). Otago: Otago University Press.
Ip, M. (2003). Unfolding history, evolving identity: The Chinese in New Zealand. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
Kibria, N. (1998). The contested meaning of ‘Asian American’: Racial dilemmas in the contemporary US. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21, 935–958.
Kuah-Pearce, K. E. (2006). Transnational self in the Chinese diaspora: A conceptual framework. Asian Studies Review, 30(3), 223–239.
Kuah-Pearce, K. E., & Davidson, A. (Eds.). (2008). At home in the Chinese diaspora: Memories, identity and belonging. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lee, R. G. (1999). Orientals: Asian Americans in popular culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Leung, M. W. H. (2004). Chinese migration in Germany: Making home in transnational space. Frankfurt: IKO.
Levitt, P. (2002). The ties that change: Relations of the ancestral home over the life cycle. In P. Levitt & M. C. Waters (Eds.), The changing face of home: The transnational lives of the second generation (pp. 123–144). New York: Russell Sage.
Levitt, P., & Glick-Schiller, N. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38, 1002–1039.
Ma, L. J. C. (2003). Space, place and transnationalism in the Chinese diaspora. In L. J. C. Ma & C. Cartier (Eds.), Chinese diaspora: Space, place, mobility (pp. 1–50). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Man, G. C. (2004). Chinese immigrant women in Canada: Examining local and transnational networks. In K. E. Kuah-Pearce (Ed.), Chinese women and their cultural and network capitals (pp. 44–69). Singapore: Marshall Cavendish International.
Markus, A. (2001). Race: John Howard and the remaking of Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Martin, J. (1978). The migrant presence, Australian responses 1947–1977. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Mathews, G. (2000). Global culture/individual identity: Searching for home in the cultural supermarket. London: Routledge.
Mohanty, S. P. (2000). The epistemic status of cultural identity: On beloved and the postcolonial condition. In P. M. L. Moya & M. R. Hames-Gracia (Eds.), Reclaiming identity: Realist theory and the predicament of postmodernism (pp. 29–66). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Moya, P. M. L. (2000a). Introduction: Reclaiming identity. In P. M. L. Moya & M. R. Hames-Gracia (Eds.), Reclaiming identity: Realist theory and the predicament of postmodernism (pp. 1–28). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Moya, P. M. L. (2000b). Postmodernism, “realism,” and the politics of identity: Cherrie Moraga and Chicana feminism. In P. M. L. Moya & M. R. Hames-Gracia (Eds.), Reclaiming identity: Realist theory and the predicament of postmodernism (pp. 67–101). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Nagata, J. (1979). Malaysian mosaic. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Nagel, J. (1994). Constructing ethnicity: Creating and recreating ethnic identity and culture. Social Problems, 41, 152–170.
Nguyen, M. T. (2000). “It matters to get the facts straight”: Joy Kogawa, realism and objectivity of values. In P. M. L. Moya & M. R. Hames-Gracia (Eds.), Reclaiming identity: Realist theory and the predicament of postmodernism (pp. 171–204). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Papastergiadis, N. (2000). The turbulence of migration: Globalization, deterritoralization and hybridity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pe-Pua, R., Mitchell, C., Iredale, R., & Castles, S. (1996). Astronaut families and parachute children: The cycle of migration between Hong Kong and Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Pickering, M. (2001). Stereotyping: The politics of representation. New York: Palgrave.
Riley, M. W., Abeles, R. R., & Teitelbaum, M. S. (1982). Aging from birth to death: Volume II: Sociotemporal perspectives. Colorado: Westview.
Rivas, E. E., & Torres-Gil, F. M. (1992). Politics, diversity, and minority ageing. In E. P. Stanford & F. M. Torres-Gil (Eds.), Diversity: New approaches to ethnic minority aging (pp. 91–111). Amityville: Baywood.
Ryan, J. (2003). Chinese women as transnational migrants: Gender and class in global migration narratives. International Migration, 40, 93–116.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. London: Penguin.
Sax, W. S. (1998). The hall of mirrors: Orientalism, anthropology and the other. American Anthropologist, 100, 292–301.
Skeldon, R. (1995a). Australia, Hong Kong and 1997: The population connection. People and Place, 3, 9–15.
Smith, R. C. (2002). Life course, generation and social location as factors shaping second-generation. In P. Levitt & M. Waters (Eds.), The changing face of home: The transnational lives of the second generation (pp. 145–168). New York: Russell Sage.
Tan, C. (2004a). Chinese inscriptions: Australian-born Chinese lives. School of Languages and Comparative Cultural Studies, PhD thesis. Brisbane: University of Queensland.
Tan, C. B. (2004b). Chinese overseas: Comparative cultural issues. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Tejapira, K. (2001). Pigtail: A prehistory of Chineseness in Siam. In C. K. Tong & K. B. Chan (Eds.), Alternate identities: The Chinese of contemporary Thailand (pp. 41–66). Singapore: Times Academic Press.
Tham, M. (2001). Travels afar. In J. M. T. Khu (Ed.), Cultural curiosity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Tong, C. K., & Chan, K. B. (Eds.). (2001a). Alternate identities: The Chinese of contemporary Thailand. Singapore: Times Academic Press.
Tong, C. K., & Chan, K. B. (2001c). Rethinking assimilation and ethnicity: The Chinese of Thailand. In C. K. Tong & K. B. Chan (Eds.), Alternate identities: The Chinese of contemporary Thailand (pp. 9–40). Singapore: Times Academic Press.
Trinh, M. (1991). When the moon waxes red. London: Routledge.
Tu, W. M. (1994a). Cultural China: The periphery as the center. In W. M. Tu (Ed.), The living tree: The changing meaning of being Chinese today (pp. 1–34). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Tu, W. M. (Ed.). (1994b). The living tree: The changing meaning of being Chinese today. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Uhlenberg, P., & Mueller, M. (2003). Family context and individual well-being: Patterns and mechanisms in life course perspectives. In A. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 123–148). New York: Springer.
Urray, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.
Wang, G. (1991a). Among non-Chinese. In W. M. Tu (Ed.), The living tree: The changing meaning of being Chinese today (pp. 127–147). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Wang, G. (1991b). Introduction. In G. Wang (Ed.), The Chineseness of China (pp. 1–10). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Wang, G. (1991c). Power, rights and duties in Chinese history. In G. Wang (Ed.), The Chineseness of China (pp. 165–186). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Wang, G. (2000). The Chinese overseas: From earthbound China to the quest for autonomy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Weber, M. (1951). The religion of China. New York: The Free Press.
Werbner, P. (1997). Introduction: The dialectics of cultural hybridity. In P. Werbner & T. Modood (Eds.), Debating cultural hybridity: Multi-cultural identities and the politics of anti-racism (pp. 1–25). London: Zen Books.
Willaims, M. (1999). Chinese history in New South Wales: A thematic history. Sydney: Heritage Office of New South Wales.
Wilton, J., & Bosworth, R. (1984). Old worlds and New Australia: The post war migrant experience. Victoria: Penguin Books Australia.
Wolf, D. L. (1997). Family secrets: Transnational struggles among children of Filipino immigrants. Sociological Perspectives, 40, 457–483.
Young, R. (1995). Colonial desire: Hybridity in theory, culture and practice. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ngan, L.LS., Kwok-bun, C. (2012). Constructing and Performing Chineseness. In: The Chinese Face in Australia. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2131-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2131-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2130-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2131-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)