A Framework for Multimodal Imaging Biomarker Extraction with Application to Brain MRI
The crucial role of imaging biomarkers is sparsely mentioned in the literature due to the complex nature of medical images, the interpretation variability and the multidisciplinary approach needed to extract, validate, and translate such biomarkers to the clinical setting. In the case of cancer, imaging biomarkers can play an important role in understanding the stage of the disease as well as the response (or not) to initial treatment as early as possible. In neurodegenerative diseases, imaging biomarkers can assist the early detection and diagnosis, before substantial symptoms appear. In this chapter, we describe the clinical importance of establishing robust imaging biomarkers as well as the limitations that need to be addressed. Then, we propose a clinically driven/ assisted image-analysis-based framework for extracting and assessing temporal image biomarkers comprising of geometrical normalization and image-information extraction. The proposed biomarker image discovery framework including a number of clinically useful tools developed by our group has been integrated in a platform called ‘DoctorEye’, a novel, open access and easy to use clinical multimodal image analysis environment. Based on this clinical platform, we describe three examples of imaging biomarker discovery involving our recent work for the case of brain MRI.
KeywordsMigration Covariance Dementia Shrinkage Gadolinium
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work is supported by the European Commission under the project “TUMOR: Transatlantic Tumour Model Repositories” (FP7-ICT-2009.5.4-247754). The authors would like to thank C. Farmaki, E. Skounakis, A. Roniotis and K. Mavrigiannakis for their scientific work contributions to the presented implemented methods and tools.
- 1.Contracancrum project.Google Scholar
- 2.R. Cárdenes, M. Bach, Y. Chi, I. Marras, R. De Luis, M. Anderson, P. Cashman, and M. Bultelle. Multimodal evaluation for medical image segmentation. In Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, pages 229–236. Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
- 4.G. Clapworthy, M. Viceconti, PV Coveney, and P. Kohl. The virtual physiological human: building a framework for computational biomedicine. Phil. Trans. R. Soc, 366:2975–2978, 2008.Google Scholar
- 7.C. Farmaki, K. Mavrigiannakis, K. Marias, M. Zervakis, and V. Sakkalis. Assessment of automated brain structures segmentation based on the mean-shift algorithm: Application in brain tumor. In ITAB2010, Corfu, Greece, November 2–5, 2010.Google Scholar
- 8.Cristina Farmaki, Konstantinos Marias, Vangelis Sakkalis, and Norbert Graf. Spatially adaptive active contours: a semi-automatic tumor segmentation framework. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 5:369–384, 2010. 10.1007/s11548-010-0477-9.Google Scholar
- 9.C. Harris and M. Stephens. A combined corner and edge detector. In Alvey vision conference, volume 15, page 50. Manchester, UK, 1988.Google Scholar
- 10.R. Highnam and M. Brady. Mammographic image analysis, volume 14. Springer Netherlands, 1999.Google Scholar
- 12.G. Manikis, D. Emmanouilidou, V. Sakkalis, N. Graf, and K. Marias. A fully automated image analysis framework for quantitative assessment of temporal tumor changes. International Conference on e-Health and Bioengineering (EHB 2011), Iaşi, Romania, November 24–26, 2011.Google Scholar
- 14.K. Marias, V. Sakkalis, A. Roniotis, C. Farmaki, G. Stamatakos, D. Dionysiou, S. Giatili, N. Uzunoglou, N. Graf, R. Bohle, et al. Clinically oriented translational cancer multilevel modeling: The contracancrum project. In World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7–12, 2009, Munich, Germany, pages 2124–2127. Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
- 16.S. Mussurakis, DL Buckley, AM Coady, LW Turnbull, and A. Horsman. Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced mri of the breast. British journal of radiology, 69(827):1009, 1996.Google Scholar
- 19.E.M. Reiman, K. Chen, G.E. Alexander, R.J. Caselli, D. Bandy, D. Osborne, A.M. Saunders, and J. Hardy. Functional brain abnormalities in young adults at genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer’s dementia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(1):284, 2004.Google Scholar
- 20.A. Rizk-Jackson, D. Stoffers, S. Sheldon, J. Kuperman, A. Dale, J. Goldstein, J. Corey-Bloom, R.A. Poldrack, and A.R. Aron. Evaluating imaging biomarkers for neurodegeneration in pre-symptomatic Huntington’s disease using machine learning techniques. NeuroImage, 2010.Google Scholar
- 22.A. Roniotis, G. Manikis, V. Sakkalis, M. Zervakis, I. Karatzanis, and K. Marias. High grade glioma diffusive modeling using statistical tissue information and diffusion tensors extracted from atlases. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology, (available online: doi:10.1109/TITB.2011.2171190).Google Scholar
- 23.D. Rueckert, L.I. Sonoda, C. Hayes, D.L.G. Hill, M.O. Leach, and D.J. Hawkes. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast mr images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 18(8):712 –721, aug. 1999.Google Scholar
- 24.V. Sakkalis, A. Roniotis, C. Farmaki, I. Karatzanis, and K. Marias. Evaluation framework for the multilevel macroscopic models of solid tumor growth in the glioma case. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE, pages 6809–6812. IEEE, 2010.Google Scholar
- 25.E. Skounakis, C. Farmaki, V. Sakkalis, A. Roniotis, K. Banitsas, N. Graf, and K. Marias. Doctoreye: a clinically driven multifunctional platform, for accurate processing of tumors in medical images. Open Medical Informatics Journal, 4:105–115, 2010.Google Scholar
- 27.P. Viola and W.M. Wells III. Alignment by maximization of mutual information. In Computer Vision, 1995. Proceedings., Fifth International Conference on, pages 16–23. IEEE, 1998.Google Scholar
- 28.C. Xu and J.L. Prince. Gradient vector flow: A new external force for snakes. In cvpr, page 66. Published by the IEEE Computer Society, 1997.Google Scholar
- 29.Jonathan Zepp, Norbert Graf, Emmanouil Skounakis, Rainer Bohle, Eckart Meese, Holger Stenzhorn, Yoo-Jin Kim, Christina Farmaki, Vangelis Sakkalis, Wolfgang Reith, Georgios Stamatakos, and Konstantinos Marias. Tumor segmentation: The impact of standardized signal intensity histograms in glioblastoma. In 4th International Advanced Research Workshop on In Silico Oncology and Cancer Investigation, Athens, Greece, September 8–9, 2010.Google Scholar