Advertisement

Public Policy Support to Triple Helix R&D Collaborations: A European Model for Fourth Pillar Organizations

Chapter
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM)

Abstract

Fourth pillar organization is the name used for independent, not-for-profit, member-based organizations that combine funding from the government and the private sector and are conceived to facilitate the complex collaboration among triple helix participants. This chapter sets out to explore how these organizations are effective tools for governments to boost collaborative innovation. It analyzes four cases of successful fourth pillar organizations in three different European ­countries—namely, Holland, Spain, and Sweden—and uncovers a different model of such organizations to the one found in previous research for Canada and the USA. Particularly, the government has a more proactive and preeminent role, as well as notable participation of the private financial sector. We also found that fourth pillar organizations tend to complement existing industry and R&D capabilities so that they have a more limited or extended role depending on the strengths and weaknesses of the existing triple helix system. This chapter further contributes to understanding better why fourth pillar organizations have been created and how they can contribute to facilitate triple helix collaboration. It, therefore, provides ideas for reflection so that government and industry can better guide their future action and commitments.

Keywords

European Union Triple Helix Innovation Policy European Union Country European Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Audretsch, D., Grimm, H. and Schuetze, S. (2009). Local Strategies within a European Policy Framework. European Planning Studies, 17, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. CANARIE Incorporated, CMC (Canadian Microelectronics Corporation) and Precarn Incorporated, (2003). Accelerating Canadian Productivity Growth: Stimulating Innovation through 4th Pillar Organizations. Brief to House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance.Google Scholar
  3. Carayannis, E.G. and D.F.J. Campbell (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 46, Nos. 3/4: pp. 201–234.Google Scholar
  4. Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. and Brazcyk, H.J. (Eds) (2004). Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World, London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dalziel, Margaret, fourth pillar Organizations in Canada (September 15, 2005). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1518863.
  6. European Commission (2009). Policy Highlights Overview, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/index_en.htm.
  7. Garofoli, G. and Musyck, B. (2001). Innovation policies for SMEs in Europe: Towards an interactive model? Regional Studies, 35, 9, 869–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garofoli, G. and Musyck, B. (2003). Innovation policies for SMEs. An overview of policy instruments, in: B. Asheim, A. Isaaksen, C. Nauwelaers & F. Todtling (Eds). Regional Innovation Policy for Small-Medium Enterprises, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  9. Holbrook, A. (2002). The Federal Government Role in the National System of Innovation, available at: http://www.innovation.cc/salon/2002/2002-09-06-holbrook-slides.htm.
  10. Johnson, W.H.A. (2008). Roles, resources and benefits of intermediate organizations supporting Triple helix collaborative R&D: The case of Precarn. Technovation, 28, 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson, W.H.A. (2009). Intermediates in Triple helix collaboration: the roles of fourth pillar ­organizations in public to private technology transfer. Int. J. Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 8, 2,142–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liljemark, T. (2004). Innovation Policy in Canada. Strategy and Realities. Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  13. MacGregor, S.P, Marques-Gou, P. and Simon-Villar, A. (2010) Gauging Readiness for the Quadruple Helix: A Study of 16 European Organizations. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 1:173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Musyck, B. and Reid, A. (2007). Innovation and regional development, do European structural funds make a difference? European Planning Studies, 15, 7, 962–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Stark, M. and Wolf, C. (2007). From idea to innovation. Success factors and challenges in the innovation process. Fraudenberg New Technologies, available at: http://www.fnt-kg.com/pdf/brochures/FNT_03_2007_en.pdf
  17. Yin, R.K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 166.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business OrganizationUniversitat de GironaGironaSpain

Personalised recommendations