Abstract
The ethics of protection sets the theoretical basis for an applied form of protective bioethics, which develops as an adjunct to the interpersonal realm of clinical ethics, concentrating on the values involved in the collective agenda of public health and ecology. The duality of proposing an ethical framework for both individual and collective actions is of special interest since traditional population-based public health has given way to prevention in the singular clinical encounter currently emphasizing personal health care responsibility.
At the individual level, protection is a voluntary, irreversible, continuous and open-ended commitment, to be served as long as the ward lacks autonomy and empowerment to obtain personal care. Protecting the disempowered must be restricted to areas where autonomous decision-making and empowerment are lacking, and reduce its intervention whenever and wherever protégés gain the capabilities of caring for themselves. At the collective level where public health operates, protection is required to engage in specific problems that require urgent attendance, presenting technically effective, sustainable and fairly distributed remedial solutions. Risk of unwanted side-effects should not burden specific groups or individuals, but be randomly distributed. By fulfilling these conditions, public health gains legitimacy to impose disciplined participation and reject individual claims for exemption.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Annas, G. J. (2002). Bioterrorism, public health, and civil liberties. The New England Journal of Medicine, 346(17), 1337–1342.
Dufourmantelle, A., & Derrida, J. (1997). De l’hospitalité. Paris: Calman-Lévi.
Forde, I., & Raine, R. (2008). Placing the individual within a social determinants approach to health inequity. Lancet, 372(9650), 1694–1696.
McKinlay, J. B. (1998). Paradigmatic obstacles to improving the health of populations—Implications for health policy. Salud Pública de México, 40(4), 369–379.
Milio, N. (2004). The dangers of “spin”: Information, science, security, and welfare. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(8), 631–632.
Rhodes, R. (2004). Justice in allocations for terrorism, biological warfare, and public health. In M. Boylan (Ed.), Public health policy and ethics (pp. 73–90). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Starfield, B., Hyde, J., Gérvas, J., & Heath, I. (2008). The concept of prevention: A good idea gone astray? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62(7), 580–583.
Touraine, A. (1985). An introduction to the study of social movements. Social Research, 52, 749–787.
Verweij, M. (1999). Medicalization as a moral problem for preventative medicine. Bioethics, 13(2), 89–113.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Miguel Kottow
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kottow, M. (2012). Protective Bioethics. In: From Justice to Protection. SpringerBriefs in Public Health, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2026-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2026-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2025-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2026-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)