High School Reform and Student Engagement

Abstract

This chapter describes how internal high school reforms can be aimed at six different dimensions of student motivation and engagement. Students will respond to more accessible immediate rewards such as good grades and teacher praise when high schools improve with focused extra help for needy students and other interventions to narrow skill gaps or recognize individual progress. Students will benefit from embedded intrinsic interest in their school program when innovations are introduced to challenge their minds and creativity. Students will find more functional relevance in their studies when high schools integrate academic and career education. Students will enjoy a more positive interpersonal climate for learning when high schools use smaller learning communities with teacher teams and advisors. Students will find opportunities to exercise their own personal nonacademic talents when schools provide more diverse electives and extracurricular activities. Students will feel more connected to shared communal norms when high schools practice fair disciplinary procedures and provide for some shared decision-making. Different combinations and sequences of high school reforms are discussed in terms of implementation strategies and the interactions of the six dimensions of student motivation and engagement. High school reform can be aimed at either the external constraints and incentives for school improvement or the internal conditions for student engagement and learning. This chapter puts reforms of the internal conditions in the context of alternative strategies for improving American high schools and examines six different aspects of student engagement in high school and how specific internal reform efforts can activate and maximize each component.

Keywords

Income Posit Doyle Reformer 

References

  1. American Youth Policy Forum. (2000). High schools of the millennium. Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum.Google Scholar
  2. Anderman, L. H. (1999). Classroom goal orientation, school belonging and social goals as predictors of students’ positive and negative affect following the transition to middle school. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 131–147.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, J., Terry, T., Bridger, R., & Winsor, A. (1997). Schools as caring communities: A relational approach to school reform. School Psychology Review, 26, 586–602.Google Scholar
  4. Balfanz, R., Herzog, L., & Mac Iver, D. J. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balfanz, R., Legters, N., & Jordon, W. (2004). Catching up: Effects of the Talent Development ninth-grade instructional interventions in reading and mathematics in high-poverty high schools. NASSP Bulletin, 88, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balfanz, R., McPartland, J., & Shaw, A. (2002). Re-conceptualizing extra help for high school students in a high standards era. Journal of Vocational Special Needs Education, 25, 24–41.Google Scholar
  7. Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monograph, 4(1, Pt. 2), 1–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloom, H. S., Thompson, S. L., & Unterman, R. (2010). Transforming the high school experience: How New York City’s new small schools are boosting student achievement and graduation rates. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
  10. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, S. D. (2009). History circles: The doing of teaching history. The History Teacher, 42(2), 191–203.Google Scholar
  12. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Burris, C. C., Wiley, E., Welner, K. G., & Murphy, J. (2008). Accountability, rigor, and detracking: Achievement effects of embracing a challenging curriculum as a universal good for all students. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 571–607.Google Scholar
  14. Cameron, J., Banko, K. M., & Pierce, W. D. (2001). Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues. Behavior Analyst, 24(1), 1–44.Google Scholar
  15. Cameron, J., Pierce, W. D., Banko, K. M., & Gear, A. (2005). Achievements-based rewards and intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 641–655.Google Scholar
  16. Chambers, T. T. V., Hugins, K. S., & Scheurich, J. J. (2009). To track or not to track: Curricular differentiation and African American students at Highview High School. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 12(1), 38–50.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, D. (Ed.). (2009). Improving No Child Left Behind: Linking world-class education standards to America’s economic recovery. The Aspen Institute Congressional Program: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  18. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital and the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cordova, D., & Lepper, M. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coyle, D. (2009). The talent code: Greatness isn’t born. It’s grown. Here’s how. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  21. Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. J. (2008). Formulating, identifying and estimating the technology of cognitive and non-cognitive skill formation. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 738–782.Google Scholar
  22. Davis, M. H., & McPartland, J. (2009). Supporting high school teachers to close adolescent literacy gaps. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  23. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duffy, H. (2007). Meeting the needs of significantly struggling learners in high school: A look at approaches to tiered intervention. Washington, DC: National High School Center.Google Scholar
  26. Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (1999). Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band: What kind of extracurricular involvement matters? Journal of Adolescent Research, 14(1), 10–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  30. Fine, M., Valenzuela, A., & Bowditch, C. (1993). Getting rid of troublemakers: High school disciplinary procedures and the production of dropouts. Social Problems, 40, 493–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Finn, J. D., & Voelkl, K. E. (1993). School characteristics related to student engagement. The Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Developmental benefits of extracurricular involvement. Do peer characteristics mediate the link between activities and youth outcomes? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 507–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gamoran, A. (1992). The variable effects of high school tracking. American Sociological Review, 57, 812–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gamoran, A. (1993). Alternative uses of ability grouping in secondary schools: Can we bring high-quality instruction to low-ability classes? American Journal of Education, 102, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gamoran, A., Nystrand, M., Berends, M., & LePore, P. C. (1995). An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 687–715.Google Scholar
  38. Gamoran, A., Porter, A. C., Smithson, J., & White, P. A. (1997). Upgrading high school mathematics instructions: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low-income youth. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 325–338.Google Scholar
  39. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  40. Gardner, H. (1999). Are there additional intelligences? In J. Kane (Ed.), Education, information, and transformation: Essays on learning and thinking (pp. 111–131). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  41. Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., et al. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 922–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gilman, R., Meyers, J., & Perez, L. (2004). Structured extracurricular activities among adolescents: Findings and implications for school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gottfredson, G. D., Gottfredson, D. C., Czeh, E. R., Cantor, D., Crosse, S. B., & Hantman, I. (2000). National study of delinquency prevention in schools. Ellicott City, MD: Gottfredson Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gottfredson, G. D., Gottfredson, D. C., Czeh, E. R., Cantor, D., Crosse, S. B., & Hantman, I. (2004). Toward safe and orderly schools – The national study of delinquency prevention in schools. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  45. Gottfredson, L. S. (1986). Occupational Aptitude Patterns Map: Development and implications for a theory of job aptitude requirements. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 254–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Grubb, W. N. (1995). Coherence for all students: High schools with career clusters and majors. In W. N. Grubb (Ed.), Education through occupations in American high schools: Approaches to integrating academic and vocational education: Vol. I (pp. 97–113). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  47. Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hallinan, M. (2005). The normative culture of a school and student socialization. In L. V. Hedges & B. Schneider (Eds.), The social organization of schooling (pp. 129–146). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Hallinan, M. T. (1990). The effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A response to Slavin’s best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 501–504.Google Scholar
  50. Heller, R., & Greenleaf, C. L. (2007). Literacy instruction in the content areas. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.Google Scholar
  51. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  52. Jencks, C. S. (1975). Effects of high schools on their students. Harvard Educational Review, 45(3), 273–324.Google Scholar
  53. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1985). Motivational process in cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning situations. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research motivation in education: Vol. II. The classroom milieu (pp. 249–286). Orlando, FL: Academic.Google Scholar
  54. Kemple, J., & Snipes, J. (2000). Career academies: Impacts on student engagement and performance in high school. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
  55. Kemple, J. J., Herlihy, C. M., & Smith, T. J. (2005). Making progress toward graduation: Evidence from the Talent Development High School model. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
  56. Kemple, J. J., & Willner, C. J. (2008). Career academies: Long-term impacts on labor market outcomes, educational attainment, and transitions to adulthood. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
  57. Kilpatrick, J. (2001). Where’s the evidence? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(4), 421–427.Google Scholar
  58. Lam, S., Cheng, R. W.-Y., & Ma, W. Y. K. (2009). Teacher and student intrinsic motivation in project-based learning. Instructional Science, 37(6), 565–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lattimer, H. (2008). Challenging history: Essential questions in the social studies classroom. Social Education, 72(6), 326–329.Google Scholar
  60. Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.Google Scholar
  61. Lee, V., Bryk, A., & Smith, J. (1993). The organization of effective secondary schools. Review of Research in Education, 19, 171–268.Google Scholar
  62. Lee, V. E. (2000). School size and the organization of secondary schools. In M. T. Hallan (Ed.), Handbook of sociology of education (pp. 327–344). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  63. Lee, V. E., & Ready, D. D. (2007). Schools within schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  64. Legters, N. E., Balfanz, R., Jordan, W. J., & McPartland, J. M. (2002). Comprehensive reform for urban high school: A Talent Development approach. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  65. Louis, K., & Marks, H. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106, 532–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  67. Maxwell, N., & Rubin, V. (2000). High school career academies: A pathway to educational reform in urban school districts. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute.Google Scholar
  68. Mark, S. F. (1983). To succeed or not to succeed: A critical review of issues in learned helplessness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McPartland, J., Balfanz, R., Jordan, W., & Legters, N. (1998). Improving school climate and achievement in a troubled urban high school through the Talent Development Model. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 3(4), 337–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Midgley, C. (2001). A goal theory perspective on the current status of middle level schools. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.), Adolescence and education: Vol. I (pp. 33–59). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  71. National Association of Secondary School Principals. (1996). Breaking ranks: Changing an American institution. Reston, VA: NASSP.Google Scholar
  72. National Association of Secondary School Principals. (2002). What the research shows: Breaking ranks in education. Reston, VA: NASSP.Google Scholar
  73. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2009). Focus in high school mathematics: Reasoning and sense making. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  74. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching people to read. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Google Scholar
  75. National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, Expanded edition. In J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  76. National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine. (2004). Engaging Schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Committee on Increasing High School Students’ Engagement and Motivation to Learn. Board on Children, Youth and Families, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  77. Neild, R., Byrnes, V., & Sweet, T. (2010, March). Early results from a randomized trial of two sequences for helping underprepared students to master algebra. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  78. Newman, F. (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  79. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1992). Instructional discourse and student engagement. In D. H. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  80. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. (1992). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, outcomes, and meanings. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 570–608). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  81. Osher, D., Bear, G. G., Sprague, J. R., & Doyle, W. (2010). How can we improve school discipline? Educational Researcher, 39, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 3, 323–367.Google Scholar
  83. Pearson, S. S. (2002). Finding common ground: Service learning and education reform. Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum.Google Scholar
  84. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  85. Plank, S. (2001). Career and technical education in the balance: An analysis of high school persistence, academic achievement, and post secondary destinations. Minneapolis, MN: National Research Center for Career and Technical Education.Google Scholar
  86. Pressley, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  87. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vol. III (pp. 545–561). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  88. Resnick, L. B. (2010). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39, 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Roderick, M., & Camburn, E. (1999). Risk and recovery from course failure in the early years of high school. American Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 303–343.Google Scholar
  90. Rosenberg, M. S., & Jackman, L. A. (2003). Development, implementation, and sustainability of comprehensive school-wide behavior management systems. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39(1), 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rottinghaus, P. J., Hees, C. K., & Conrath, J. A. (2009). Enhancing job satisfaction perspectives: Combining Holland themes and basic interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Schneider, B., & Stevenson, D. (1999). The ambitious generation: America’s teenagers, motivated but directionless. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Scott, S. (2007). Do grades really matter? Maclean’s, 120(35/36), 70–74.Google Scholar
  95. Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59.Google Scholar
  96. Shouse, R. D. (1997). Academic press, sense of community, and student achievement. In J. S. Coleman, B. Schneider, S. Plank, K. S. Schiller, R. Shouse, & H. Wang (Eds.), Redesigning American education (pp. 60–86). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  97. Sinclair, M. F., Christenson, S. L., Evelo, D. L., & Hurley, C. M. (1998). Dropout prevention for youth with disabilities: Efficacy of a sustained school engagement procedure. Exceptional Children, 65(1), 7–21.Google Scholar
  98. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  99. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471–499.Google Scholar
  101. Stern, D., Dayton, C., & Raby, M. (2010). Career academies: A proven strategy to prepare high school students for college and careers. Berkeley, CA: Career Academy Support Network.Google Scholar
  102. Stern, D., Raby, M., & Dayton, C. (1992). Career academies: Partnerships for reconstructing American high schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  103. Trumbull, E., & Farr, B. (Eds.). (2000). Grading and reporting student progress in an age of standards. Portland, OR: Christopher-Gordon.Google Scholar
  104. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1993). School linked human services: A comprehensive strategy for aiding students at risk of school failure (Report to the Chairman, Committee on Labor and Human Resources). Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  105. Webb, F. R., Covington, M. V., & Guthrie, J. W. (1993). Carrots and sticks: Can school policy influence student motivation? In T. M. Tomlinson (Ed.), Motivating students to learn (pp. 99–124). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  106. Wehlange, G. G., & Rutter, R. A. (1986). Dropping out: How much do schools contribute to the problem? Teachers College Record, 87(3), 374–392.Google Scholar
  107. Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wentzel, K. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73, 287–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wentzel, K. R. (2009). Students’ relationships with teachers as motivational contexts. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook on motivation at school (pp. 301–322). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  111. Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Social Organization of SchoolsJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations