Allowing Choice and Nurturing an Inner Compass: Educational Practices Supporting Students’ Need for Autonomy

  • Avi AssorEmail author


This chapter focuses on seven practices of autonomy support which are likely to promote two major components of the need for autonomy: (a) lack of coercion and optional choice and (b) formation and realization of an inner compass: authentic, direction-giving values, goals, and interests. A special emphasis is put on research pertaining to three autonomy supportive practices which are assumed to support formation and realization of authentic, direction-giving values, goals, and interests, whose impact on perceived autonomy was not sufficiently examined so far: (a) IVD – intrinsic value demonstration, (b) SVE – support for value/goal/interest examination, and (c) FIV – fostering inner-directed valuing processes. The autonomy supportive practices that foster the development of stable authentic values and goals might be especially important in western countries, in which postmodern moral relativism and the abundance of information and options make it particularly difficult for youth to form stable and authentic values and goals.


Psychological Control Autonomy Support Autonomous Motivation Perspective Taking Academic Engagement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Assor, A. (1999). Value accessibility and teachers’ ability to encourage independent and critical thought in students. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 1–24.Google Scholar
  2. Assor, A. (2010). Two under-emphasized components of autonomy support: Supporting value examination and inner valuing. Paper presented in the 4th international conference on self determination theory, Gent, Belgium.Google Scholar
  3. Assor, A. (2011). Autonomous moral motivation: Consequences, socializing antecedents and the unique role of integrated moral principles. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  4. Assor, A., Cohen-Melayev, M., Kaplan, A., & Friedman, D. (2005). Choosing to stay religious in a modern world: Socialization and exploration processes leading to an integrated internalization of religion among Israeli Jewish youth. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 14, 105–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Assor, A., & Kaplan, H. (2001). Mapping the domain of autonomy support: Five important ways to enhance or undermine students’ experience of autonomy in learning. In A. Efklides, R. Sorrentino, & J. Kuhl (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 99–118). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  6. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teaching behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 27, 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Assor, A., & Roth, G. (2005). Conditional love as a socializing approach: Costs and alternatives. Scientific Annals of the Psychological Society of Northern Greece, 7, 17–34.Google Scholar
  9. Assor, A., Roth, G., & Deci, E. L. (2004). The emotional costs of parents’ conditional regard: A self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Personality, 72, 47–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Assor, A., Roth, G., Israeli, M., & Freed, A. (2007). The harmful costs of parental conditional regard. Paper presented in the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston.Google Scholar
  11. Assor, A., Vansteenkiste, M., & Kaplan, A. (2009). Identified versus introjected-approach and introjected-avoidance motivations in school and in sports: The limited benefits of self-worth strivings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 482–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Aviram, R., & Assor, A. (2010). In defense of personal autonomy as a fundamental educational aim in liberal democracies. Oxford Review of Education, 36, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67, 3296–3319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barber, B. K., Stolz, H., & Olsen, J. (2005). Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: Assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70, 1–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Berlin, I. (1969). Four essays on liberty. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen-Malayev, M. (2009). Religious exploration and identity – The tension between religion and religiosity: Examination of the internalization process of Jewish religious values in modern-orthodox context. Doctoral dissertation, Ben Gurion University, Be’er-Sheva, Israel.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen-Malayev, M., Assor, A., & Kaplan, A. (2009). Religious exploration in a modern world: The case of Modern-Orthodox Jews in Israel. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 9, 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  23. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Pro-social development. In R. M. Lerner, N. Eisenberg, & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional and personality development (pp. 646–718). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2005). Handbook of competence and motivation. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Epley, A., Morewedge, C. K., & Keysar, B. (2004). Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 760–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erikson, E. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Erikson, E. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  28. Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
  29. Gottfried, A. E., Marcoulides, G. A., Gottfried, A. W., Oliver, P. H., & Guerin, D. W. (2007). Multivariate latent change modeling of developmental decline in academic intrinsic math motivation and achievement: Childhood through adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grolnick, W. S., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1997). Internalization within the family: The self-determination theory perspective. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values (pp. 135–161). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 80–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kanat-Maymon, M., & Assor, A. (2010). Perceived Maternal Control and Responsiveness to Distress as Predictors of Young Adults’ Empathic Responses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kanat-Maymon, Y. & Assor, A. (2011). Supporting Value Exploration: Another Important Aspect of Autonomy Support. Ben GUrion University, Israel: Unpublished manuscript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Katz, I., & Assor, A. (2007). When choice motivates and when it does not. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Koestner, R., Ryan, R. M., Bernieri, F., & Holt, K. (1984). Setting limits on children’s behavior: The differential effects of controlling versus informational styles on children’s intrinsic motivation and creativity. Journal of Personality, 54, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Madjar, N., & Assor, A. (in press). Two types of perceived control over learning: Perceived efficacy and perceived autonomy. In J. A. C. Hattie & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), International handbook of student achievement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Madjar, N., Assor, A., & Dotan, L. (2010). Fostering inner valuing processes in adolescents. Paper presented in the convention of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  40. Marcia, J., Waterman, A., Matteson, D., Archer, S., & Orlofsky, J. (1993). Ego identity. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 270–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reeve, J., & Assor, A. (2011). Do social institutions necessarily suppress individuals’ need for autonomy? The possibility of schools as autonomy promoting contexts across the globe (pp. 111–132). In V. Chirkov, A. M. Ryan, & K. Sheldon (Eds.), Personal autonomy in cultural context: Global perspectives on the psychology of freedom and people’s well-being. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reynolds, P. L., & Symons, S. (2001). Motivational variables and children’s text search. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roth, G., & Assor, A. (2000). The effect of conditional parental regard and intrinsic value demonstration on academic and pro-social motivation. Paper presented at the conference of the European Association for Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Malmoe, Sweden.Google Scholar
  47. Roth, G., Assor, A., Niemiec, P. C., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The negative consequences of parental conditional regard: A comparison of positive conditional regard, negative conditional regard, and autonomy support as parenting strategies. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1119–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Soenens, B., Elliot, A. J., Goossens, L., Vansteenkiste, M., Luyten, P., & Duriez, B. (2005). The intergenerational transmission of perfectionism: Parents’ psychological control as an intervening variable. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 358–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30, 74–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zuckerman, M., Porac, J., Lathin, D., Smith, R., & Deci, E. L. (1978). On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically motivated behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 443–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational and School Psychology ProgramBen Gurion UniversityBe’er-ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations