Skip to main content

The Key Roles of Four Experimental Forests in the LTSP International Research Program

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Four Experimental Forests were pivotal in piloting the long-term soil productivity (LTSP) cooperative research program—one of the most successful and extensive collaborative science efforts yet undertaken by the USDA Forest Service. Launched on the Palustris, Challenge, Marcell, and Priest River Experimental Forests, LTSP traces to a seminal discussion during a field tour in central Louisiana in 1986. P. E. Avers, National Soils Program Leader in Washington DC, described to D. H. Alban and R. F. Powers a problem arising from the National Forest Management Act of 1976 (NFMA). That conversation sparked an idea that quickly caught fire. This chapter documents how LTSP came to be and why four Experimental Forests were central to its success. It began with a ripple effect of the NFMA.

Robert F. Powers and Felix Ponder Jr. are deceased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alban DH, Host GB, Eliof JD, Shadis D (1994) Soil and vegetation response to soil compaction and forest floor removal after aspen harvesting. Research Paper NC-315, USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN, 8 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaranthus MP, Page-Dumroese DS, Harvey A, Cazares E, Bednar LF (1996) Soil compaction and organic matter affect conifer seedling nonmycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal root tip abundance and diversity. PNW-RP-494, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, 12 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1995) The certified forest: what makes it green? J For 93:1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Forest Service (1995) Criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests. The Montreal process. Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Quebec, 17 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins A (2009) Impact of soil compaction and organic matter removal on wood decomposition rates in the mineral soil. MSc Thesis. Michigan Technological University, Houghton

    Google Scholar 

  • Craigg TL (2006) Evaluation of methods used to assess changes in forest soil quality. MSc Thesis, University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran JW, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BA (eds) (1994) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Special Publication No. 35, Soil Sci Soc Am, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre FH (1980) Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC, 148 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming RL, Powers RF, Foster NW, Kranabetter JM, Scot DA, Ponder F Jr, Berch S, Chapman WK, Kabzems RD, Ludovici KH, Morris DM, Page-Dumroese DS, Sanborn PT, Sanchez FG, Stone DM, Tiarks AE (2006) Effects of organic matter removal, soil compaction and vegetation control on 5-year seedling performance: a regional comparison of long-term productivity sites. Can J For Res 36:529–550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez A, Powers RF, Singer MJ, Horwath WR (2002a) Soil compaction effects on growth of young ponderosa pine following litter removal in California’s Sierra Nevada. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1334–1343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez GA, Singer MJ, Powers RF (2002b) Soil compaction effects on water status of ponderosa pine assessed through 13C/12C composition. Tree Physiol 22:459–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LR, Page-Dumroese DS, Han H-S (2007) Effects of machine traffic on the physical properties of ash-cap soils. In: Page-Dumroese DS, Miller RE, Mital J, McDaniel P, Miller D (tech eds) Volcanic ash-derived forest soils of the Inland Northwest: properties and implications for management and restoration. RMRS-P-44, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, pp 69–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurgensen M, Reed D, Page-Dumroese D, Laks P, Collins A, Mroz G, Degorski M (2006) Wood strength loss as a measure of decomposition in northern forest mineral soil. Eur J Soil Biol 42:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doran JW, Cline RG, Harris RF, Schuman GE (1997) Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:4–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy G, Firth JG, Skinner MF (2004) Long term impacts of forest harvesting related soil disturbance on log product yield sand economic potential in a New Zealand forest. Silva Fenn 38:279–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambiar EKS (1996) Sustained productivity of forests is a continuing challenge to soil science. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1629–1642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nambiar EKS (2008) Site management and productivity in tropical plantation forests. Proceedings of multiple workshops in Piracicaba (Brazil) 22–26 November 2004 and Bogor (Indonesia) 6–9 November 2006. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1993) Soil and water quality: an agenda for agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 542 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Page-Dumroese DS, Jurgensen MF, Tiarks AE, Ponder F Jr, Sanchez FG, Fleming RO, Kranabetter JM, Powers RF, Stone DM, Elioff JD, Scott DA (2006) Soil physical property changes at the North American Long-Term Soil Productivity sites: 1 and 5 years after compaction. Can J For Res 36:551–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page-Dumroese DS, Miller RE, Mital J, McDaniel P, Miller D (eds) (2007) Volcanic ash-derived forest soils of the inland northwest: properties and implications for management and restoration. RMRS-P-44, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Fort Collins, CO, 220 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers RF (2002) Effects of soil disturbance on fundamental, sustainable productivity of managed forests. In: Verner J (comp.) The kings river sustainable ecosystem project. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-183, USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA, pp 63–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers RF (2006) Long-term soil productivity: Genesis of the concept and principles behind the program. Can J For Res 36:519–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers RF, Fiddler GO (1997) The North American long-term soil productivity study: progress through the first 5 years. In: Cooper SL (comp.) Proceeding of 18th annual forest vegetation conference, University of California Cooperative Extension, Redding, CA, pp 88–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers RF, Alban DH, Ruark GA, Tiarks AE, Goudey CB, Ragus JF, Russell WE (1989) Study plan for evaluating timber management impacts on long-term site productivity: a research and national forest system cooperative study. Unpublished study on file with the USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, 33 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers RF, Alban DH, Miller RE, Tiarks AE, Wells CG, Avers PE, Cline RG, Fitzgerald RO, Loftus NS Jr (1990) Sustaining site productivity in North American forests: problems and prospects. In: Gessel SP, Lacate DS, Weetman GF, Powers RF (eds) Sustained productivity of forest soils. Proceedings of the 7th North American forest soils conference, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, pp 49–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers RF, Tiarks AE, Boyle JR (1998) Assessing soil quality: practicable standards for sustainable forest productivity in the United States. In: Adams MB, Ramakrishna K, Davidson EA (eds) Criteria and indicators of soil quality for sustainable forest productivity. Special Publication 53, Soil Sci Soc Am, Madison, WI, pp 53–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers RF, Scott DA, Sanchez FG, Voldseth RA, Page-Dumroese D, Elioff JD, Stone DM (2005) The North American long-term soil productivity experiment: findings from the first decade of research. For Ecol Manage 220:31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone DM, Elioff JD (1998) Soil properties and aspen development five years after compaction and forest floor removal. Can J Soil Sci 78:51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiarks AE, Kimble MS, Elliott-Smith ML (1991) The first location of a national, long-term forest productivity study: methods of compaction and residue removal. In: Coleman SS, Neary DG (comps.) Proceedings of the 6th Biennial southern silvicultural research conference, vol 1. General Technical Report 70, USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC, pp 431–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiarks A, Nambiar EKS, Cossalter C (1998) Site management and productivity in tropical forestry plantations. CIFOR Occasional paper 16, Center for International Tropical Reseach, Bogor, Indonesia, 11 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiarks A, Elliott-Smith M, Stagg R (2004) Effects of logging residue management on the growth and nutrient distribution of a Pinus taeda plantation in central Louisiana, USA. In: Nambiar EKS, Tanger J, Tiarks A, Toma T (eds) Site management and productivity in tropical plantation forests. Proceedings of workshops in Congo July 2001 and China February 2003.Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia, pp 151–162

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service (1985) Code of Federal Regulations. Evaluation and monitoring. In: Title 36, part 219: Planning. Subpart A: National forest system land resource management planning. Federal Register, 36 CFR 219.12. USDA forest Service, Washington, DC pp 45–71

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service (1987) Soil quality monitoring. In: Soil Management Handboook 2509.18, Chap 2 (October). USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service (1993) The principle laws relating to Forest Service activities. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherspoon CP (2000) A proposed long-term national study of the consequences of fire and fire surrogate treatments. In: Proceedings Joint Fire Science Conference, Boise, ID, June 15–17, 1999. University of Idaho Press, Moscow, ID, pp 117–126

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to P. S. Aune (USDA FS, retired), C. B. Goudey (USDA FS, retired), R. E. Miller (USDA FS Pacific Northwest Research Station, retired), D. A. Scott (USDA FS Southern Research Station), and to R. O. Fleming (Canadian Forest Service) for reviews of early drafts and for their helpful comments. We also owe an immense debt to our colleagues on the ground and in Forest Service administrative offices who expedited installations and measurements and who collectively made this study possible. At several points in the manuscript, trade names are mentioned. The purpose is for accuracy and does not necessarily indicate endorsement by the USDA Forest Service.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard G. Cline .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Powers, R. et al. (2014). The Key Roles of Four Experimental Forests in the LTSP International Research Program. In: Hayes, D., Stout, S., Crawford, R., Hoover, A. (eds) USDA Forest Service Experimental Forests and Ranges. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1818-4_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics