Abstract
Distance education has had a dramatic effect on learning in the last decade. While providers have experienced both academic and financial success, now is not the time to be complacent. Rather, we must begin to determine the direction of the next generation of distance education. In this chapter, three generations of distance education are outlined. The first is characterized by correspondence courses; the second is identified by early internet use; and the newly proposed third generation of distance education is characterized by an emerging technology-enabled learning space that brings to distance education a volume, depth, and breadth that eclipses early internet capacity. Ten principles for the next generation of distance education are offered, including a paradigm for learning experience design that not only incorporates sound instructional design practice but also encourages instructional designers to explore the inherent strengths of the technology-enabled space to design dynamic learning experiences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blizzard. (2010). World of warcraft subscriber base reaches 12 million worldwide. Retrieved November 25, 2010, from http://us.blizzard.com/en-us/company/press/pressreleases.html?101007.
Bomsdorf, B. (2005). Adaptation of learning spaces: Supporting ubiquitous learning in higher education. In Paper presented at the mobile computing and ambient intelligence: The challenge of multimedia, Dahgstuhl, Germany.
Bonk, C. J., & King, K. S. (1998). Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse. New York: Erlbaum.
Braimoh, D., & Lekoko, R. N. (2005). The need for policy framework in maintaining quality in open and distance education programmes in Southern Africa. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education—TOJDE, 6(4), 95–105.
Carlson, N. (2011). Chart of the day: How many users does Twitter really have? Business Insider. Retrieved 31 Mar, 2011 from BusinessInsider.Com website: http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-how-many-users-does-twitter-really-have-2011-3
Czikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
DeMarco, T., & Lister, T. (1987). Peopleware: Productive projects and teams (2nd ed.). New York: Dorset House.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone. (First Touchstone Edition 1997 ed.).
Google Earth. (2011). Google Earth Ancient Rome layer. Retrieved April 21, 2011, from http://earth.google.com/rome/.
Hasson, U., Landesman, O., Knappmeyer, B., Vallines, I., Rubin, N., & Heeger, D. J. (2008). Neurocinematics: The neuroscience of film. Projections, 2(1), 1–26.
Huett, J., Sharp, J., & Huett, K. (2010). What’s all the FOSS? How freedom and openness are changing the face of our educational landscape. International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes, 1(2), 1–14.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1985). Classroom conflict: Controversy versus debate in learning groups. American Educational Research Journal, 22(2), 237–256.
Jonassen, D. H. (2006). Modeling with technology: Mindtools for conceptual change (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Marra, R. M., & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Keller, J. M. (2009). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York: Springer.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Marshall, S. (1997). Creating sustainable learning communities for the twenty-first century. In F. Hesselbein, M. Goldsmith, & R. Beckhard (Eds.), The organization of the future (pp. 177–188). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Morrison, G. R., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Integrating computer technology into the classroom (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. (2011). Designing effective instruction (6th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
Preskill, H., & Torres, R. T. (2000). The learning dimension of evaluation use. New Directions for Evaluation 88(Winter 2000), 25–37.
Project Tomorrow. (2010). Speak up survey data—2009. Retrieved April 21, 2011, from http://www.tomorrow.org/speakup/speakup_your_data.html.
Reich, R. (1992). The work of nations. New York: Vintage Books.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
Rummler, G. A. (2007). Serious performance consulting according to Rummler. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Shedroff, N. (2001). Experience design: A manifesto for the creation of experiences. Indianapolis: New Riders.
Shepard, M. (2011). Creating a culture of digital collaborative in online learning. In L. Moller & J. Huett (Eds.), The next generation of distance education: Unconstrained learning. New York: Springer Press.
US Department of Education. (2005). Toward a new golden age in American education: How the Internet, the law, and today’s students are revolutionizing expectations. Washington: USDE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moller, L., Robison, D., Huett, J.B. (2012). Unconstrained Learning: Principles for the Next Generation of Distance Education. In: Moller, L., Huett, J. (eds) The Next Generation of Distance Education. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1785-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1785-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1784-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1785-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)