Visualizing Open Government: Case Study of the Canadian Recordkeeping Approach

  • Pierre Desrochers


This chapter highlights the necessity of raising societal awareness of what is available to citizens in terms of government information. What is not known cannot be made known. It provides an overview of the organizational structure and information resources context within government organizations as part of linked government data initiatives. It examines some practical approaches used in governments underpinning the persistence and discoverability of information and discusses prodisclosure schemes for government information as a means to facilitate the collection and dissemination of information following linked data principles. The chapter is supported by a case study from the Government of Canada’s implementation of recordkeeping. It provides best practices for an up-front assessment of information resources based on criteria of value that can facilitate the identification, collection and dissemination of government data in a linked form. Visualization techniques are presented as a means to encourage greater understanding of the context for disclosure of information resources of business value through linked government data and information tools and techniques explored in other chapters.


Information Resource Business Process Model Government Information Metadata Scheme Simple Knowledge Organization System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Smith, A. Library of Parliament. The Roles and Responsibilities of Central Agencies. URL
  2. 2.
    Dix, A. and Talis. CSV Meta Description, March 2011. URL
  3. 3.
    Australian Government. Australia To Open Office Of Information From November 2010 | Gov Monitor, a. URL
  4. 4.
    Australian Government. Freedom of Information Act 1982, b. URL C2010C00387.
  5. 5.
    Australian Government. Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010, c. URL C2010A00051.
  6. 6.
    Australian Government. Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010, d. URL C2010A00052.
  7. 7.
    Australian Government. Government Response to the Report of the GovernmentGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Australian Government. Project 7: Whole of Government Information Publication Scheme, f. URL
  10. 10.
    Australian Government. Freedom of Information (FOI) Reform, November 2010. URL
  11. 11.
    Berners-Lee, T. Linked Data - Design Issues. URL
  12. 12.
    Brito, J. and United States. Hearings on ’Transparency Through Technology: Evaluating Federal Open-Government Initiatives’. 112th Congress, 1st session, Friday, March 11, 2011. SubcommitteeGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    on Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and Procurement Reform, [Washington, D.C. :, 2011. URL
  14. 14.
    Brown, R. Macroappraisal in the Twenty-First Century: Towards a New Documentary Framework for Public Memory. In The future of memory: the digital archival heritage, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, November 2010, forthcoming. Arquivo de Galicia.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Canada. Open Data Pilot Project, March 2011a. URL
  16. 16.
    Canada. Government of Canada Open Data Portal - Backgrounder, March 2011b. URL
  17. 17.
    Canada. Speech from the Throne, June 2011c. URL
  18. 18.
    Canada and Lambert, A.T. Final report, Royal Commission on Financial Management & Accountability (Lambert report). Technical report, Canada, Ottawa, 1979.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Canada. Task Force on Government Information and D’Iberville Fortier. To know and be known: the report of the Task Force on Government Information, volume 1. Queen’s Printer,1969.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heting Chu. Information representation and retrieval in the digital age. ASIST monograph series. Published for the American Society for Information Science and Technology by Information Today, Medford, N.J., 2nd ed edition, 2010. ISBN 9781573873932 (hc).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Caron, D.J., Library and Archives Canada. The Recordkeeping Initiative: Findings of Assessment Projects and the Way Forward. URL
  22. 22.
    Caron, D.J., Library and Archives Canada. Shaping our Continuing Memory Collectively: A Representative Documentary Heritage, March 2010. URL
  23. 23.
    Caron, D.J. and Library and Archives Canada. Memory Institutions in the 21st Century: The Need for Convergence and Collaboration. In The War of Independence Reconsidered: Librarians and Archivists – Past, Present and Future., Banff, Alberta, May 2010. Archives Society of Alberta (ASA).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reynolds, D. and Epimorphics. An organization ontology, May 2010. URL
  25. 25.
    Devey, M., Côté, M.-C., Bain, L. and McAvoy, L. Celebrating 10 Years of GovernmentGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    of Canada Metadata Standards. In International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, DC-2010–Pittsburgh Proceedings, 2010. URL
  27. 27.
    Dunleavy, P. and Margetts, H. The second wave of digital era governance. In American Political Science Association Conference, Washington DC, USA., September 2010. American Political Science Association Conference. URL
  28. 28.
    Erickson, J. DOIs, URIs and Cool Resolution, a. URL
  29. 29.
    Erickson, J. The DOI, DataCite and Linked Data: Made for each other!, b. URL
  30. 30.
    Fekete, J. and Plaisant, C. TreeML Specification, a. URL
  31. 31.
    Fekete, J. and Plaisant, C. DTD describing a tree structure for visualization, b. URL
  32. 32.
    Golub, K. and Tudhope, D. Delivering a Terminology Registry. Poster at LIDA conference,Dubrovnik and Mljet, Croatia, 2-7 June 2008, 2008. URL
  33. 33.
    Heer, J., Card, S.K. and Landay, J.A. Prefuse: a toolkit for interactive information visualization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 421–430, 2005.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hudon, M. and Hjartarson, F. Governments meet people: Developing metathesauri in the framework of “government online” initiatives. In Advancing knowledge: Expanding horizons for information science: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science, 30 May-1 June 2002, Toronto, Canada, pages 46–60, 2002.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    ISO 15489-1:2001. Information and documentation – Records management –Part 1 :General. Technical report, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2001.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    ISO/IEC 42010:2007. Systems and software engineering - recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems. Technical report, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2007.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Library and Archives Canada. Disposition. URL government/disposition/index-e.html.
  38. 38.
    Library and Archives Canada. Appraisal Methodology: Macro-Appraisal and Functional Analysis, Part A: Concepts and Theory, October 2001. URL
  39. 39.
    Library and Archives Canada. How to Register a Controlled Vocabulary, March 2006. URL
  40. 40.
    Library and Archives Canada. Government of Canada Core Subject Thesaurus in SKOS/RDF, May 2011. URL
  41. 41.
    Library of Congress. FDsys Helps GPO Provide Access to Federal Digital Publications, March 2011. URL
  42. 42.
    Matte, F. What we learned from Gomery: Managing the scope of document discovery, 2008. URL
  43. 43.
    Miles, A. and Pérez-Agüera, J. SKOS: Simple Knowledge Organisation for the Web. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 43(3):69–83, 2007. doi:  10.1300/J104v43n03_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Obama, B. Remarks by the President in State of Union Address, January 2011. URL
  45. 45.
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Modernising government: the way forward. OECD Publishing, May 2005. ISBN 9789264010499.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Desrochers, P., Smith, S., and Library and Archives Canada. Recordkeeping Directive 101: Everything you wanted to know, but were too afraid to ask. ARMA Conference,2008. URL
  47. 47.
    Brown, R. and Caron, D.J.. The Documentary Moment in the Digital Age: Establishing New Value Propositions for Public Memory. Archivaria, 71:1–20, 2011.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Brown, R., Caron, D.J., and Library and Archives Canada. Creating Documentation Standards for Government Programs, Services and Results: A Developmental Framework and Guide for Business Managers and Information Resource Specialists, March 2008. URL
  49. 49.
    Rusbridge, C. What are the advantages of DOIs as dataset identifiers in citations? URL
  50. 50.
  51. 51.
    Baker, T. and Keizer, J.. Linked Data for Fighting Global Hunger: Experiences in setting standards for Agricultural Information Management. In David Wood, editor, Linking enterprise data, pages 177–201. Springer, New York NY Heidelberg, 2010. ISBN 9781441976642.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. Directive on Recordkeeping, a. URL
  53. 53.
    Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. Canada’s Performance Report 2008-09: The Government of Canada’s Contribution, b. URL
  54. 54.
    Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. Policy Framework for Information and Technology, July 2007a. URL
  55. 55.
    Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. The Management, Resources, and Results Structure Policy: Instructions to Departments for Developing a Management, Resources, and Result Structure, July 2007b. URL 20071123053135/
  56. 56.
    Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. Policy on Access to Information, April 2008. URL
  57. 57.
    Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. Implementation Report No. 112 -Info Source 2009 Requirements, March 2009. URL
  58. 58.
    Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. Canada’s Performance 2009-2010: The Government of Canada’s Contribution, November 2010a. URL
  59. 59.
    Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. Standard on metadata, June 2010b. URL
  60. 60.
    Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. Policy on Management, Resources and Results Structures, February 2010c. URL
  61. 61.
    W3C. SKOS/FAQs, Janu 2010a. URL FAQs.
  62. 62.
    W3C. W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group, June 2010b. URL
  63. 63.
    W3C. Library Linked Data Incubator Group Charter, June 2010c. URL
  64. 64.
    Weber, M. The theory of social and economic organization. Simon and Schuster, July 1997. ISBN 9780684836409.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
  66. 66.
    Zeng, M.L. and Qin, Jian. Metadata. Neal-Schuman Publishers, New York, 2008. ISBN 9781555706357 (pbk. : alk. paper). URL ecip0816/2008015176.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Library and Archives CanadaGatineauCanada

Personalised recommendations