Improved Mussel Control Through Microencapsulated BioBullets

  • Raquel Costa
  • Geoff D. Moggridge
  • David C. Aldridge
Chapter

Abstract

Biofouling control is a major challenge in the operation and management of industrial cooling water systems. Several aquatic organisms are of concern in this context. Amongst them is the freshwater zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha), which has been recognised as one of the world’s most important pests (Ecol Econ 52:273–288, 2005).

Keywords

Toxicity Dioxide Filtration Europe Ozone 

Notes

Acknowledgements

BioBullets are protected under international patents (EP 1251741B, CA 2396938, US-2003-0140862-A1). Financial support from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (PhD scholarship SFRH/BD/18731/2004 and research project POCI/EQU/59305/2004) is acknowledged. The assistance of Thames Water Utilities Ltd is acknowledged.

References

  1. Abel PD (1974) Toxicity of synthetic detergents to fish and aquatic invertebrates. J Fish Biol 6:279–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldridge DC, Elliott P, Moggridge GD (2006) Microencapsulated BioBullets for the control of biofouling zebra mussels. Environ Sci Technol 40:975–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borcherding J, Jantz B (1997) Valve movement of the mussel Dreissena polymorpha—the influence of pH and turbidity on the acute toxicity of pentachlorophenol under laboratory and field conditions. Ecotoxicology 6:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Claudi R, Mackie GL (1994) Practical manual for zebra mussel monitoring and control. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  5. Costa R (2008) Improved solutions for zebra mussel control. Ph.D. thesis, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Durand-Hoffman ME (1995) Analysis of physiological and toxicological effects of potassium on Dreissena polymorpha and toxicological effects on fish. M.S. thesis, Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. Elliott P (2005) The zebra mussel in England: biology, impacts, and control using micro-encapsulated toxins. Ph.D. thesis, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher SW, Stromberg P, Bruner KA, Boulet LD (1991) Molluscicidal activity of potassium to the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha—toxicity and mode of action. Aquat Toxicol 20:219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gloxhuber C (1974) Toxicological properties of surfactants. Arch Toxicol 32:245–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hebert PD, Muncaster BW, Mackie GL (1989) Ecological and genetic studies on Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas): a new mollusc in the Great Lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:1587–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kovalak WP, Longton GD, Smithee RD (1993) Infestation of power plant water systems by the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha Pallas). In: Nalepa TF, Schloesser DW (eds) Zebra mussels: biology, impacts and control. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 359–380Google Scholar
  12. Kryger J, Riisgård HU (1988) Filtration rate capacities in 6 species of European freshwater bivalves. Oecologia 77:34–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lang RW (2002) Spray chilling and spray drying. Microencapsulation and particle coating course manual. Center for Professional Advancement, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  14. Lei J, Payne BS, Wang SY (1996) Filtration dynamics of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. LePage (1993) The impact of Dreissena polymorpha on waterworks operations at Monroe, Michigan: a case history. In: Nalepa TF, Schloesser DW (eds) Zebra mussels: biology, impacts and control. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 333–358Google Scholar
  16. MacIsaac HJ (1996) Potential abiotic and biotic impacts of zebra mussels on the inland waters of North America. Am Zool 36:287–299Google Scholar
  17. Morton B (1971) Studies on the biology of Dreissena polymorpha. 5. Some aspects of filter-feeding and the effect of micro-organisms upon the rate of filtration. P Malac Soc Lond 39:289–301Google Scholar
  18. O’Donnell JM, Durand ME, Robitaille PML, Fisher SW, Stromberg PC (1996) P-31-NMR analysis of lethal and sublethal lesions produced by KCl-intoxication in the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha. J Exp Zool 276:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pires LMD, Jonker RR, Van Donk E, Laanbroek HJ (2004) Selective grazing by adults and larvae of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha): application of flow cytometry to natural seston. Freshwater Biol 49:116–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Post RM, Petrille JC, Lyons LA (2000) A review of freshwater macrobiological control methods for the power industry. Technical paper presented at the 20th Annual Electric Utility Chemistry Workshop of Illinois. University of Illinois, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  22. Rajagopal S, Van Der Velde G, Van der Gaag M, Jenner HA (2002) Sublethal responses of zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha to low-level chlorination: an experimental study. Biofouling 18:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sprecher SL, Getsinger KD (2000) Zebra mussel chemical control guide. Zebra mussel research program ERDC/EL TR-00-1 report. US Army Corps of Engineers, VicksburgGoogle Scholar
  24. Sprung M, Rose U (1988) Influence of food size and food quantity on the feeding of the mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Oecologia 77:526–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ten Winkel EH, Davids C (1982) Food selection by Dreissena polymorpha Pallas (Mollusca, Bivalvia). Freshwater Biol 12:553–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thies C (1996) A survey of microencapsulation processes. In: Benita S (ed) Microencapsulation: methods and industrial applications. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  27. Van Benschoten JE, Jensen JN, Brady TJ, Harrington D, Lewis DP, Sferrazza J (1992) Optimizing the use of chemical oxidants for control of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). (Final report by the State University of New York and Aquatic Sciences Inc)Google Scholar
  28. Waller DL, Rach JJ, Cope WG, Marking LL, Fisher SW, Dabrowska H (1993) Toxicity of candidate molluscicides to zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and selected nontarget organisms. J Great Lakes Res 19:695–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Washington (1996) Drug release from microparticulate systems. In: Benita S (ed) Micro­encapsulation: methods and industrial applications. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 155–181Google Scholar
  30. Wildridge PJ, Werner RG, Doherty FG, Neuhauser EF (1998) Acute effects of potassium on filtration rates of adult zebra mussels, Dreissena polymorpha. J Great Lakes Res 24:629–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raquel Costa
    • 1
  • Geoff D. Moggridge
    • 1
  • David C. Aldridge
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and BiotechnologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Department of Zoology, Aquatic Ecology GroupUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations