Operational and Environmental Issues Relating to Industrial Cooling Water Systems: An Overview

  • Vayalam P. Venugopalan
  • Sanjeevi Rajagopal
  • Henk A. Jenner
Chapter

Abstract

Water is acknowledged to be one of the most essential commodities for almost all kinds of industrial activity. Among the various industrial uses of water, its use as a heat removal fluid is of foremost importance. Thermoelectric generation, which is but one of the several industries that use water, accounts for more than 50% of all such use. The industrial use of water, especially in rapidly developing countries, is expected to grow further and aggravate an already precarious situation concerning availability of and demand for water. Accelerated growth in the power generation industry alone will account for a major share of this demand. A typical thermal power plant of 2,000 MWe capacity, on an average, needs cooling water at the rate of 65 m3/s; the requirement would be about 50% more in the case of a nuclear power plant (Ecological effects of thermal discharges. Elsevier Applied Science, London. 1990, pp. 28–103). Most of this water is used for low-energy steam condensation.

Keywords

Dioxide Filtration Steam Chlorine Microbe 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was partly funded by the European Commission in the Community’s Sixth Framework Programme (INCO project, Contract number: PL510658, TBT Impacts) and Faculty of Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands. It is contribution number 477 of the Centre for Wetland Ecology (CWE).

References

  1. Bamber RN, Seaby RH (2004) The effects of power station entrainment passage on three species of marine planktonic crustacean, Acartia tonsa (Copepoda), Crangon crangon (Decapoda) and Homarus gammarus (Decapoda). Mar Environ Res 57:281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bott TR (1995) Fouling of heat exchangers. Elsevier, New York, p 524Google Scholar
  3. Choi DH, Park JS, Hwang CY, Huh SH, Cho BC (2002) Effects of thermal effluents from a power station on bacteria and heterotrophic nanoflagellates in coastal waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 229:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chuang YL, Yang HH, Lin HJ (2009) Effects of thermal discharge from a nuclear power plant on phytoplankton and periphyton in subtropical coastal waters. J Sea Res 61:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dempsey CH (1988) Ichthyoplankton entrainment. J Fish Biol 33A:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flemming HC (2009) Why micro-organisms live in biofilms and the problem of biofouling. In: Flemming HC, Murthy PS, Venkatesan R, Cooksey K (eds) Marine and industrial biofouling. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flemming HC, Murthy PS, Venkatesan R, Cooksey K (eds) (2009) Marine and industrial biofouling. Springer, Berlin, p 333Google Scholar
  8. Glasstone S, Jordan WH (1980) Nuclear power and its environmental effects. American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, p 395Google Scholar
  9. Greenwood MFD (2008) Fish mortality by impingement on the cooling-water intake screens of Britain’s largest direct-cooled power station. Mar Pollut Bull 56:723–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Israel S, Satheesh R, Venugopalan VP, Munuswamy N, Subramoniam T (2012) Impact of condenser discharge on intertidal fauna: sand crabs as indicator organisms. In: Rajagopal S, Jenner HA, Venugopalan VP (eds) Operational and environmental consequences of large industrial cooling water systems. Springer, New York, pp 353–370Google Scholar
  11. Jenner HA, Whitehouse JW, Taylor CJL, Khalanski M (1998) Cooling water management in European power stations: biology and control of fouling. Hydroecol Appl 10:1–225Google Scholar
  12. Jiang Z, Zeng J, Chen Q, Huang Y, Xu X, Liao Y, Shou L, Liu J (2008) Tolerance of copepods to short-term thermal stress caused by coastal power stations. J Thermal Biol 33:419–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Langford TEL (1990) Ecological effects of thermal discharges. Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp 28–103Google Scholar
  14. Lewis RB, Seegert G (2000) Entrainment and impingement studies at two power plants on the Wabash River in Indiana. Environ Sci Policy 3:S303–S312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Licina GJ, Borenstein SW (1993) Replacing, refurbishing nuclear service-water-system piping. Power 137:60–61Google Scholar
  16. Manefield M, De Nys R, Naresh K, Roger R, Givskov M, Peter S, Kjelleberg S (1991) Evidence that halogenated furanones from Delisea pulchra inhibit acylated homoserine lactone (AHL)-mediated gene expression by displacing the AHL signal from its receptor protein. Microbiology 145:283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mattice JS (1985) Chlorination of power plant cooling waters. In: Jolley RL, Bull RJ, Davis WP, Katz S, Roberts MH Jr, Jacobs VA (eds) Water chlorination, chemistry, environmental impact and health effects, vol 5. Lewis, Chelsea, pp 39–62Google Scholar
  18. Mayhew DA, Jensen LD, Hanson DF, Muessig PH (2000) A comparative review of entrainment survival studies at power plants in estuarine environments. Environ Sci Policy 3:S295–S301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parker FL (1979) Thermal pollution consequences of the implementation of the President’s Energy Message on increased coal utilization. Environ Health Perspect 33:303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pawlik JR (1992) Chemical ecology of the settlement of benthic marine invertebrates. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 30:273–335Google Scholar
  21. Polman HJG, Jenner HA (2002) Pulse-chlorination, the best available technique in macrofouling mitigation using chlorine. Power Plant Chem 4:93–97Google Scholar
  22. Raghavan VR (1996) Fouling of heat exchangers- the still unresolved problem. In: Proc. Symposium on heat exchangers, 14–16 February 1996, Kalpakkam, India, pp IT9.1–IT9.6Google Scholar
  23. Rajagopal S, Venugopalan VP, Nair KVK, Azariah J (1991) Biofouling problems and its control in a tropical coastal power station - a case study. Biofouling 3:325–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ringger TG (2000) Investigations of impingement of aquatic organisms at the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, 1975–1995. Environ Sci Policy 3:S261–S273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schubel JR, Marcy Jr. BC (eds) (1978) Power plant entrainment—a biological assessment. Academic, New York, pp 19–189Google Scholar
  26. Shiner EK, Rumbaugh KP, Williams SC (2005) Interkingdom signalling: deciphering the language of acyl homoserine lactones. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:935–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Swain GW, Schultz MP (1996) The testing and evaluation of non-toxic antifouling coatings. Biofouling 10:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor CJL (2006) The effects of biological fouling control at coastal and estuarine power stations. Mar Pollut Bull 53:30–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Turnpenny AWH, Coughlan J (1992) Power generation on the British coast: thirty years of marine biological research. Hydroecol Appl 1:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Venkatesan R, Murthy PS (2009) Macrofouling control in power plants. In: Flemming H-C, Murthy PS, Venkatesan R, Cooksey K (eds) Marine and industrial biofouling. Springer, Berlin, pp 265–292Google Scholar
  31. Venkateswarlu KS (1996) Water chemistry—industrial and power station water treatment. New Age International, New Delhi, pp 1–138Google Scholar
  32. Venugopalan VP (2002) Response of meroplankton to acute thermal shock: laboratory experiments in the context of power plant entrainment. In: Venkatraraman B, Sukumaran N (eds). Thermal ecology, Proc. DAE-BRNS national symposium on thermal ecology. Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences, Mumbai, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  33. Venugopalan VP, Narasimhan SV (2008) Operational and environmental issues in cooling water treatment: two sides of the same coin? Water Digest 11:12–21Google Scholar
  34. Venugopalan VP, Kuehn M, Hausner M, Springael D, Wilderer PA, Wuertz S (2005) Architecture of a nascent Sphingomonas sp. biofilm under varying hydrodynamic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2677–2686CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vayalam P. Venugopalan
    • 1
  • Sanjeevi Rajagopal
    • 2
  • Henk A. Jenner
    • 3
  1. 1.Biofouling and Biofilm Processes Section, Water and Steam Chemistry DivisionBARC FacilitiesKalpakkamIndia
  2. 2.Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology, Institute for Water and Wetland ResearchRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Aquator BVWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations