Abstract
We consider a set of users served by a single load-serving entity (LSE). The LSE procures capacity a day ahead. When random renewable energy is realized at delivery time, it manages user load through real-time demand response and purchases balancing power on the spot market to meet the aggregate demand. Hence, optimal supply procurement by the LSE and the consumption decisions by the users must be coordinated over two timescales, a day ahead and in real time, in the presence of supply uncertainty. Moreover, they must be computed jointly by the LSE and the users since the necessary information is distributed among them. In this chapter, we present a simple yet versatile user model and formulate the problem as a dynamic program that maximizes expected social welfare. When random renewable generation is absent, optimal demand response reduces to joint scheduling of the procurement and consumption decisions. In this case, we show that optimal prices exist that coordinate individual user decisions to maximize social welfare, and present a decentralized algorithm to optimally schedule a day in advance the LSE’s procurement and the users’ consumptions. The case with uncertain supply is reported in a companion paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
See, however, [19] for a discussion on some implementation issues of real-time pricing for retail markets and a proposal for the Italian market.
- 2.
We abuse notation to use U ia to denote both a function of vector q ia and that of a scalar q ia (t); the meaning should be clear from the context.
References
Gellings CW, Chamberlin JH (1988) Demand-side management: concepts and methods. The Fairmont Press, Lilburn
Albadi MH, El-Saadany EF (2007) Demand response in electricity markets: an overview. In: Proceedings of the IEEE power engineering society general meeting, Tampa, Florida, USA, June 2007
Cohen AI, Wang CC (1988) An optimization method for load management scheduling. IEEE Trans Power Syst 3(2):612–618
Hsu YY, Su CC (1991) Dispatch of direct load control using dynamic programming. IEEE Trans Power Syst 6(3):1056–1061
Wei DC, Chen N (1995) Air conditioner direct load control by multi-pass dynamic programming. IEEE Trans Power Syst 10(1):307–313
Chen J, Lee FN, Breipohl AM, Adapa R (1995) Scheduling direct load control to minimize system operation cost. IEEE Trans Power Syst 10(4):1994–2001
Ng KH, Sheble GB (1998) Direct load control—a profit-based load management using linear programming. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13(2):688–695
Chu W-C, Chen B-K, Fu C-K (1993) Scheduling of direct load control to minimize load reduction for a utility suffering from generation shortage. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8(4):1525–1530
Ramanathan B, Vittal V (2008) A framework for evaluation of advanced direct load control with minimum disruption. IEEE Trans Power Syst 23(4):1681–1688
Ilic MD, Xie L, Joo J-Y (2011) Efficient coordination of wind power and price-responsive demand part I: theoretical foundations; part II: case studies. IEEE Trans Power Syst 99:1
Makarov YV, Loutan C, Ma J, de Mello P (2009) Operational impacts of wind generation on California power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(2):1039–1050
Caramanis MC, Foster JM (2010) Coupling of day ahead and real-time power markets for energy and reserves incorporating local distribution network costs and congestion. In: Proceedings of the 48th annual allerton conference, Monticello, Illinois, USA, September–October 2010
Kirschen D (2003) Demand-side view of electricity market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(2):520–527
Smith JC, Milligan MR, DeMeo EA, Parsons B (2007) Utility wind integration and operating impact: State of the art. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(3):900–908
Ruiz N, Cobelo I, Oyarzabal J (2009) A direct load control model for virtual power plant management. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(2):959–966
Varaiya PP, Wu FF, Bialek JW (2011) Smart operation of smart grid: Risk-limiting dispatch. Proc IEEE 99(1):40 –57
Department of Energy (2006) Benefits of demand response in electricity markets and recommendations for achieving them. Technical Report
Borenstein S (2005) Time-varying retail electricity prices: theory and practice. In: Griffin JM, Puller SL (eds) Electricity deregulation: choices and challenges. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Triki C, Violi A (2009) Dynamic pricing of electricity in retail markets. Quart J Oper Res 7(1):21–36
Ilic MD (2011) Dynamic monitoring and decision systems for enabling sustainable energy services. Proc IEEE 99(1):58–79
Jiang L, Low SH (2011) Optimal demand response: with uncertain supply. Technical Report
Schwarz PM, Taylor TN, Birmingham M, Dardan SL (2002) Industrial response to electricity real-time prices: short run and long run. Econ Inq 40(4):597–610
Goldman C, Hopper N, Bharvirkar R, Neenan B, Boisvert R, Cappers P, Pratt D, Butkins K (2005) Customer strategies for responding to day-ahead market hourly electricity pricing. Technical Report, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, LBNL-57128, Report for CA Energy Commission.
Taylor TN, Schwarz PM, Cochell JE (2005) 24-7 hourly response to real-time pricing with up to eight summers of experience. Journal of Regulatory Economics 27(3):235–262
Borenstein S (2005) The long-run efficiency of real-time electricity pricing. Energy J 26(3):93–116
Braun JE (2003) Load control using building thermal mass. J Sol Energy Eng 125(3):292–301
Xu P, Haves P, Piette MA, Zagreus L (2006) Demand shifting with thermal mass in large commercial buildings: field tests, simulation and audits. Technical Report, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, LBNL-58815
Mohsenian-Rad A, Leon-Garcia A (2010) Optimal residential load control with price prediction in real-time electricity pricing environments. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 1(2):120–133
Pedrasa M, Spooner T, MacGill I (2010) Coordinated scheduling of residential distributed energy resources to optimize smart home energy services. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 1(2):134–143
Caron S, Kesidis G (2010) Incentive-based energy consumption scheduling algorithms for the smart grid. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on smart grid communications, October 2010
Caramanis MC, Foster JM (2009) Management of electric vehicle charging to mitigate renewable generation intermittency and distribution network congestion. In: Proceedings of the 48th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC), December 2009
Ma Z, Callaway D, Hiskens I (2010) Decentralized charging control for large populations of plug-in electric vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 49th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC), December 2010
Clement-Nyns K, Haesen E, Driesen J. (2010) The impact of charging plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on a residential distribution grid. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25(1):371–380
Chen L, Li N, Low SH (2010) Two market models for demand response in power networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on smart grid communications, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, October 2010
Pritchard G, Zakeri G, Philpott A (2010) A single-settlement, energy-only electric power market for unpredictable and intermittent participants. Oper Res 58(4):1210–1219
Neely MJ, Tehrani AS, Dimakis AG (2010) Efficient algorithms for renewable energy allocation to delay tolerant consumers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on smart grid communications, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, October 2010
He M, Murugesan S, Zhang J (2010) Multiple timescale dispatch and scheduling for stochastic reliability in smart grids with wind generation integration. preprint, CoRR, abs/1008.3932
Tan C-W, Varaiya PP (1993) Interruptible electric power service contracts. J Econ Dynam Contr 17(3):495–517
Li N, Chen L, Low SH (2011) Optimal demand response based on utility maximization in power networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE power engineering society general meeting, Detroit, Michigan, USA, July 2011
Bertsekas DP, Tsitsiklis JN (1989) Parallel and distributed computation. Prentice Hall Inc., Old Tappan
Rudin W (1976) Principles of mathematical analysis. 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen, L., Li, N., Jiang, L., Low, S.H. (2012). Optimal Demand Response: Problem Formulation and Deterministic Case. In: Chakrabortty, A., Ilić, M. (eds) Control and Optimization Methods for Electric Smart Grids. Power Electronics and Power Systems, vol 3. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1605-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1605-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1604-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1605-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)