Abstract
This chapter addresses the economic theory of electricity markets, viewed from an idealized competitive equilibrium setting, taking into account volatility and the physical and operational constraints inherent to transmission and generation. In a general dynamic setting, we establish many of the standard conclusions of competitive equilibrium theory: Market equilibria are efficient, and average prices coincide with average marginal costs. However, these conclusions hold only on average. An important contribution of this chapter is the explanation of the exotic behavior of electricity prices. Through theory and examples, we explain why, in the competitive equilibrium, sample-paths of prices can range from negative values, to values far beyond the “choke-up” price—which is usually considered to be the maximum price consumers are willing to pay. We also find that the variance of prices may be very large, but this variance decreases with increasing demand response.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The ISO is an entity independent of the consumers and the suppliers that coordinates, controls and monitors a large electric power transmission grid and its associated electricity markets.
- 2.
Observe that prices may vary by the location. In the language of electricity markets, they are locational prices.
References
Aliprantis CD, Cornet B, Tourky R (2002) Economic equilibrium: optimality and price decentralization. Positivity 6:205–241
Anderson EJ, Philpott AB (2002) Using supply functions for offering generation into an electricity market. Oper Res 50(3):477–489 MR 1910284 (2003f:91069)
Arrow KJ, Hahn F (1971) General competitive analysis. Holden-Day, San Francisco
Baldick R, Grant R, Kahn E (2004) Theory and application of linear supply function equilibrium in electricity markets. J Regul Econ 25(2):143–167
Chen M, Cho I-K, Meyn SP (2006) Reliability by design in a distributed power transmission network. Automatica 42:1267–1281 (invited)
Cho I-K, Meyn SP (2009) A dynamic newsboy model for optimal reserve management in electricity markets. SIAM J Contr Optim (Submitted for publication)
Cho I-K, Meyn SP (2010) Efficiency and marginal cost pricing in dynamic competitive markets with friction. Theoret Econ 5(2):215–239
Chow GC (1997) Dynamic economics: optimization by the lagrange method. Oxford University Press, USA
Chow JH, De Mello W, Cheung KW (2005) Electricity market design: an integrated approach to reliability assurance. Proc IEEE 93(11):1956 –1969
Day CJ, Hobbs BF, Pang J-S (2002) Oligopolistic competition in power networks: a conjectured supply function approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17:597–607
Epstein PR, Buonocore JJ, Eckerle K, Hendryx M, Stout III BM, Heinberg R, Clapp RW, May B, Reinhart NL, Ahern MM, Doshi SK, Glustrom L (2011) Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal. Ann NY Acad Sci 1219(1):73–98
FERC (1998) Staff Report to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on the Causes of Wholesale Electric Pricing Abnormalities in the Midwest During June 1998, FERC study, September 22, 1998
Hobbs BF (2001) Linear complementarity models of Nash–Cournot competition in bilateral and POOLCO power markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16(2):194–202
Hobbs BF, Helman U (2004) Complementarity-Based Equilibrium Modeling for Electric Power Markets. Modeling Prices in Competitive Electricity Markets, Wiley Series in Financial Economics. Wiley, West Sussex, England, pp 69–98
Houston Chronicle Editorial (2011) Rolling blunder statewide blackouts raise the question: who really runs the lone star power grid? www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/7424733.html, Feb. 12, 2011
Hu X, Ralph D (2007) Using EPECs to model bilevel games in restructured electricity markets with locational prices. Oper Res 55(5):809–827. MR MR2360950
Johari R, Tsitsiklis JN (2009) Efficiency of scalar-parameterized mechanisms. Oper Res 57:823–839
Kizilkale AC, Mannor S (2010) Volatility and efficiency in markets with friction. In: 48th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Monticello, Illinois, pp 50–57
Klemperer PD, Meyer MA (1989) Supply function equilibria in oligopoly under uncertainty. Econometrica 57:1243–1277
Kowli A, Meyn SP (2011) Supporting wind generation deployment with demand response. In: IEEE PES 11: power energy society general meeting, Detroit, Michigan
Luenberger DG (1969) Optimization by vector space methods. Wiley, New York
Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, New York
Metzler C, Hobbs B, Pang J-S (2003) Nash–Cournot equilibria in power markets on a linearized DC network with arbitrage: formulations and properties. Network Spatial Econ 3(2):123–150
Meyn S, Negrete-Pincetic M, Wang G, Kowli A, Shafieepoorfard E (2010) The value of volatile resources in electricity markets. In: Proceedings of the 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Atlanta, Georgia, pp 1029–1036
Mookherjee R, Friesz T, Hobbs BF, Ringdon M (2008) Dynamic oligopolistic competition on an electric power network with ramping costs and joint sales constraints. J Ind Manage Org 4(3):425–452
Negrete-Pincetic M, Meyn SP (2011) Intelligence by design for the entropic grid. In: IEEE PES 11: Power energy society general meeting, Invited lecture for PES panel: deploying tomorrow’s electric power systems: low carbon, efficiency and security, Detroit, Michigan
Robinson S (2005) Math model explains volatile prices in power markets. SIAM News
Shanbhag UV, Infanger G, Glynn PW (2011) A complementarity framework for forward contracting under uncertainty. Oper Res 59(4):810–834
Smith JC, Beuning S, Durrwachter H, Ela E, Hawkins D, Kirby B, Lasher W, Lowell J, Porter K, Schuyler K, Sotkiewicz P (2010) The wind at our backs. IEEE Power Energ Mag 8(5):63–71
Wang G, Kowli A, Negrete-Pincetic M, Shafieepoorfard E, Meyn S (2011) A control theorist’s perspective on dynamic competitive equilibria in electricity markets. In: Proceedings of 18th world congress of the international federation of automatic control (IFAC), Milano, Italy
Wang G, Negrete-Pincetic M, Kowli A, Shafieepoorfard E, Meyn S, Shanbhag UV (2012) Real-time prices in an entropic grid. IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. To appear in the Proceedings of the 2012 PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference. (Invited), Jan 2012
Electricity Authority strikes down Genesis price spike. Business Desk Report, New Zealand Herald, May 6, 2011. www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm? c_id=3&objectid=10723856
Wilson R (2002) Architecture of power markets. Econometrica 70(4):1299–1340
Wood AJ, Wollenberg BF (1996) Power generation, operation, and control. Wiley, New York
Yao J, Adler I, Oren S (2008) Modeling and computing two-settlement oligopolistic equilibrium in a congested electricity network. Oper Res 56(1):34–47. MR MR2402216
Zavala VM, Anitescu M (2010) On the dynamic stability of electricity markets. Math Program (submitted for publication)
Acknowledgements
Research supported in part by the Grainger Endowments to the University of Illinois, DOE awards DE-OE0000097 (TCIPG) and DE-SC0003879, and AFOSR Grant FA9550-09-1-0190.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wang, G., Negrete-Pincetic, M., Kowli, A., Shafieepoorfard, E., Meyn, S., Shanbhag, U.V. (2012). Dynamic Competitive Equilibria in Electricity Markets. In: Chakrabortty, A., Ilić, M. (eds) Control and Optimization Methods for Electric Smart Grids. Power Electronics and Power Systems, vol 3. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1605-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1605-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1604-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1605-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)