Injury Severity Scaling

Chapter

Abstract

Injury prevention research often entails describing the severity of injuries or controlling for the severity of injuries when comparing outcomes. Basically, injury severity scores are required to either prioritize interventions at the patient level (e.g., triage, medical care) or population level as well as when evaluating the effectiveness of injury control and prevention interventions. A number of injury severity scales have emerged since the 1960s and share specific characteristics, although they are conceptually different. The goal of this chapter is to describe the most commonly used injury severity scales in injury research and control. A number of dimensions associated with both the development and the usage of the injury scales are proposed to ease the comparison of the scales as well as to improve the understanding of the underlying concepts involved in their origin. Methodological issues related to their use in research environments are also highlighted. To conclude, this chapter discusses some of the existing challenges in injury severity measurement such as the need for further refinement of the concept itself, further methodological work on the scales themselves, and resolution of the debate on whether consensus-based or real-world severity scales are better.

Keywords

Europe 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Dr. Segui-Gomez’s efforts were supported by the European Center for Injury Prevention at Universidad de Navarra and the AAAM AIS Reference Center funding. Dr. Segui-Gomez chaired the AAAM AIS Committee at the time of writing; AIS related contents have been reviewed and approved by the AAAM Board. Mr. Lopez-Valdes’ efforts were supported by the Center for Applied Biomechanics at the University of Virginia. We thank Montserrat Ruiz Perez for her assistance in developing the text.

References

  1. AAAM. American Association for Automotive Medicine (now Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine) (1985) The Abbreviated Injury Scale. Des Plaines, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. AAAM. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (2005) The abbreviated injury scale. In T. Gennarelli, E. Wodzin (Eds.), Barrington, IL, USA: AAAMGoogle Scholar
  3. AAAM. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. (2008) The Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005, updated 2008. In T. Gennarelli, E. Wodzin, (Eds.), Barrington, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Al West, T., Rivara, F. P., Cummings, P., Jurkovich, G. J., & Maier, R. V. (2000). Harborview Assessment of Risk of Mortality: An improved measure of injury severity on the basis of ICD-9-CM. Journal of Trauma, 49, 530–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, S. P., O’Neill, B., Haddon, W., & Long, W. B. (1974). The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. Journal of Trauma, 14, 187–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berger, L. R., & Mohan, C. D. (1996). Injury control: A global overview. India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brenneman, F. D., Boulanger, B. R., McLellan, B. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1998). Measuring injury severity: time for a change? Journal of Trauma, 44(4), 580–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CARE. Community database on Accidents on the Roads in Europe. (2011). http://erso.swov.nl/safetynet/content/wp_1_care_accident_data.htm (Accessed Mar 2011).
  9. Center for Injury Research and Policy of the Johns Hopkins University School of public Health and Tri-Analytics, Inc. ICDMAP-90: A program to Map ICD-9CM diagnoses into AIS and ISS severity scores. Baltimore, Maryland, 1998Google Scholar
  10. Champion, H. R., Sacco, W. J., & Copes, W. S. (1989). A revision of the trauma score. Journal of Trauma, 26, 623–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chawda, M.N., Hildebrand, F., Pape, H.C. & Giannoudis, P.V. (2004). Predicting outcome after multiple trauma: Which scoring system? Injury, 35(4), 277–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Committee on Medical Aspects of Automotive Safety. (1971). Rating the severity of tissue damage. Journal of the American Medical Association, 215(2), 277–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Copes, W. S., Champion, H. R., Sacco, W. J., et al. (1990). Progress in characterizing anatomic injury. Journal of Trauma, 30, 1200–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ETSC (2001) EU transport accident, incident and casualty databases: current status and future needs. Brussels: European Transport Safety Council. Available at: www.etsc.eu (Accessed Mar 2011).
  15. European Center for Injury Prevention. (2006). Algorithm to transform ICD-10 codes into AIS 90. Pamplona, Spain: University of NavarraGoogle Scholar
  16. Giannoudis, P. V. (2003). Surgical priorities in damage control in Polytrauma. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 85B, 478–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guralnik, D. B. (Ed.). (1986). Webster’s new world dictionary of the American language, 2nd College Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. IRTAD (2011). International Traffic Safety Data and Analysis Group. www.internationaltransportforum.org/irtad (Accessed Mar 2011).
  19. Kingma, J., TenVergert, E., & Klasen, H. J. (1994). SHOWICD: a computer program to display ICD-9CM coded injury diagnoses and their corresponding injury severity scores for a particular patient. Perceptual Motor and Skills, 78, 939–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kingma, J., TenVergert, E., Werkman, H. A., Ten Duis, H. J., & Klasen, H. J. (1994). A Turbo Pascal program to convert ICD-9-CM coded injury diagnoses into injury severity scores: ICDTOAIS. Perceptual Motor and Skills, 78, 915–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lavoie, A., Moore, L., LeSage, N., Liberman, M., & Sampalis, J. S. (2004). The new injury severity score: a more accurate predictor of in-hospital mortality than the injury severity score. Journal of Trauma, 56(6), 1312–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacKenzie, E. J. (1984). Injury severity scales: overview and directions for future research. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2(6), 537–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacKenzie, E. J., Steinwachs, D. M., & Shankar, B. (1989). Classifying trauma severity based on hospital discharge diagnoses. Validation of an ICD-9-CM to AIS-85 conversion table. Medical Care, 27, 412–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin, P. G., & Eppinger, R. H. (2003). Ranking of NASS injury codes by survivability. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine Annual Proceedings, 47, 285–300.Google Scholar
  25. Miller, T. R., Pindus, N. M., Douglass, J. G., et al. (1995). Databook on nonfatal injury: incidence, costs and consequences. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  26. NASS CDS. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. National Automotive Sampling System Crashworthiness Data System. (http://www.nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/department/nrd-30/ncsa/CDS.html).
  27. NASS CDS. National Automotive Sampling System Crashworthiness Data System (2009) Coding and editing manual. National highway traffic safety administration. USA: Department of TransportGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Keefe, G., Jurkovich, G. J., (2001). Measurement of injury severity and co-morbidity. In Rivara et al. (Eds.), Injury control: a guide to research and program evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Osler, T., Baker, S. P., & Long, W. (1997). A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. Journal of Trauma, 43, 922–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Osler, T., Rutledge, R., Deis, J., & Bedrick, E. (1996). ICISS. An international classification of disease-9 based injury severity score. Journal of Trauma, 41, 380–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pearson, R. G. (1962). Determinants of injury severity in light plane crashes. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 33, 1407–14.Google Scholar
  32. Petrucelli, E., States, J. D., & Hames, L. N. (1981). The abbreviated injury scale: evolution, usage, and future adaptability. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 13, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sacco, W. J., MacKenzie, E. J., Champion, H. R., Davis, E. G., & Buckman, R. F. (1999). Comparison of alternative methods for assessing injury severity based on anatomic descriptors. Journal of Trauma, 47(3), 441–6. discussion 446–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Segui-Gomez, M., (2007). [Injury Frequency and Severity Measures] In C Arregui et al. (Eds.), [Principles on Motor Vehicle Injury Biomechanics] DGT.Google Scholar
  35. Siegel, A. W. (1972). Automobile collisions, kinematics and related injury patterns. California Medicine, 116, 16–22.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Stevenson, M., Segui-Gomez, M., DiScala, C., Lescohier, J., & McDonald-Smith, G. (2001). An overview of the injury severity score and the new injury severity score. Injury Prevention, 7, 10–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stevenson, M., Seguí-Gómez, M., DiScala, C., Lescohier, J., & McDonald-Smith, G. (2001). An overview of the injury severity score and the new injury severity score. Injury Prevention, 7, 10–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness – a practical scale. Lancet, 7, 81–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Watchko, A. Y., Abajas-Bustillo, R., Segui-Gomez, M., Sochor, M. R., (2011). Current uses of the abbreviated injury scale: a literature review. (Under Review)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Seguí-Gómez
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Francisco J. Lopez-Valdes
    • 4
  1. 1.European Center for Injury Prevention, Facultad de MedicinaUniversidad de NavarraPamplonaSpain
  2. 2.Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  4. 4.Center for Applied BiomechanicsUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations