Abstract
Framing a collective identity is an essential process in a social movement. The identity defines the orientation of public actions to take and establishes an informal interaction network for circulating important information and material resources. While domestic social movements emphasize the coherence of identity in alliance, global or cyber activism is now flexible in its collective identity given the rise of the Internet. A campaign may include diverse social movement organizations (SMOs) with different social agendas. This flexible identity framing encourages personal involvement in direct action. On the other hand, it may damage solidarity within SMOs and make campaigns difficult to control. To assess the sustainability of an SMO, it is important to understand its collective identity and the social codes embedded within its associated cyber societies and cyber-artifacts. In this chapter, we took a cyber-archaeology approach and used the international Falun Gong (FLG) movement as a case study to investigate this identity-framing issue. We employed Social Network Analysis and Writeprint to analyze FLG’s cyber-artifacts from the perspectives of links, web content, and forum content. In the link analysis, FLG’s web sites linked closely to Chinese democracy and human rights SMOs, reflecting FLG’s historical conflicts with the Chinese government after the official ban in 1999. In the web content analysis, we used Writeprint to analyze the writings of Hongzhi Li and his editors, and found that Hongzhi Li’s writings center around the ideological teaching of Falun Dafa while the editors post specific programs to realize Li’s teaching. In the forum content analysis, FLG comprehensively organizes several different concepts on a continuum: from FLG ideology to life philosophy and mysterious phenomena, and from mysterious phenomena to anti-Chinese Communist Party and persecution by conceptualizing the Chinese government as evil. By deploying those cyber-artifacts, FLG seamlessly connects different ideologies and establishes its identity as a Qi-Gong, religious, and activist group.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbasi, A., Chen, H. (2005). “Applying Authorship Analysis to Extremist-Group Web Forum Messages,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20: 1541–1672.
Abbasi, A., Chen, H. (2006). “Visualizing Authorship for Identification,” In: Intelligence and Security Informatics, pp. 60–71.
Ackland, R., O’Neil, M., Bimber, B., Gibson, R.K., Ward, S. (2006). “New Methods for Studying Online Environmental-Activist Networks,” In: 26th International Sunbelt Social Network Conference, Vancouver.
Bell, M.R., Boas, T.C. (2003). “Falun Gong and the Internet: Evangelism, Community, and Struggle for Survival,” Nova Religio, 6: 277–293.
Bennett, W. (2003). “Communicating Global Activism,” Information, Communication and Society, 6: 143–168.
Bennett, W.L. (2005), “Social Movements beyond Borders: Understanding Two Eras of Transnational Activism,” In: Porta Dd and Tarrow S (eds) Transnational Protest and Global Activism, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, INC, New York, pp. 203–226.
Cohen, R., Rai, S.M., eds. (2000), Global Social Movements. Athlone Press, New Brunswick.
Freeman, L.C. (1978/79), “Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks 1: 215–239.
Garrido, M., Halavais, A. (2003), “Mapping Networks of Support for the Zapatista Movement: Applying Social-Network Analysis to Study Contemporary Social Movements,” In: McCaughey M, Ayers MD (eds) Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice. Routledge, New York.
Gerlach, L.P. (2001), “The Structure of Social Movements: Environmental Activism and its Opponents,” In: Arquilla J, Ronfeldt DF (eds) Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy. Rand, Santa Monica, pp. 289–309.
Jones, Q., Rafaeli, S. (2000), “What Do Virtual “Tells” Tell? Placing Cybersociety Research into a Hierarchy of Social Explanation,” In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
Keck, M.E., Sikkink, K. (1998), “Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics,” Cornell University Press, New York.
Langman, L. (2005), “From Virtual Public Spheres to Global Justice: A Critical Theory of Internetworked Social Movements,” Sociological Theory 23: 42–74.
Larana, E., Johnston, H., Gusfield, J.R. (1994), “New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity,” Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
Lu Y (2005), “Entrepreneurial Logics and the Evolution of Falun Gong,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44: 173–185.
McCaughey, M., Ayers, M.D. (2003), “Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice,” Routledge, New York.
Morris, A.D., Mueller CM (1992), “Frontiers in Social Movement Theory,” Yale University Press, New Haven.
Myers, D.J. (1994), “Communication Technology and Social Movements: Contributions of Computer Networks to Activism,” Social Science Computer Review 12: 250–260.
Ong, T.H., Chen, H. (1999), “Updateable PAT-Tree Approach to Chinese Key Phrase Extraction using Mutual Information: A Linguistic Foundation for Knowledge Management,” In: Proceedings of the Second Asian Digital Library Conference, Taipei.
Paccagnella, L. (1997), “Getting the Seats of Your Pants Dirty: Strategies for Ethnographic Research on Virtual Communities,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3.
Penny, B. (2003), “The Life and Times of Li Hongzhi: Falun Gong and Religious Biography,” The China Quarterly 175: 643–661.
Porta, D., Diani, M. (1999), “Social Movements: An Introduction,” Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Malden.
Rahn, P. (2002), “The Chemistry of a Conflict: The Chinese Government and the Falun Gong,” Terrorism and Political Violence 14: 41–65.
Rosenthal, N., Fingrutd, M., Ethier, M., Karant, R., McDonald, D. (1985), “Social Movements and Network Analysis: A Case Study of Nineteenth-Century Women’s Reform in New York State,” The American Journal of Sociology 90: 1022–1054.
Scott, J. (2000), “Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, 2nd edn,” Sage, London.
Tong, J. (2002), “An Organizational Analysis of the Falun Gong: Structure, Communications, Financing,” The China Quarterly 171: 636–660.
Wasserman, S., Faust, K. (1994), “Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications,” Cambridge University Press, New York.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CNS-0709338, “CRI: CRD-Developing a Dark Web Collection and Infrastructure for Computational and Social Sciences.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen, H. (2012). International Falun Gong Movement on the Web. In: Dark Web. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 30. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1557-2_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1557-2_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1556-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1557-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)