Nanotechnology in Turkey

Chapter
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM, volume 14)

Abstract

Turkey is one of the up-and-coming economies in the World. A prerequisite to play for such a role is to have some targeted development strategies that include issues such as science and technology and education. The set of strategies Turkey is currently set on can be summarized under three major headings: become a legitimate partner of an economic Consortium in the World—such as the European Union or Black Sea Economic Federation; set targets for an education policy to concentrate on certain disciplines that are visioned to further economic and societal objectives; and choose and invest in those industries that Turkey could play a competitive role in the foreseeable future. Turkish policy makers and economists as well as universities have been tinkering on these very important strategic aspects of the country’s future. In this chapter, our focus is largely economic to the extent that economic sphere can be separated from the political one. However, one has to note that increasing importance of Turkey’s geopolitical position is well intertwined with its increasing importance as an economic player. Turkey, however, has to live up to this role that history and changing economic balances in the world have tailored for her.

Keywords

Venture Capital Nanotechnology Research Technology Transfer Office Industry Cluster Turkish Economy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aydogan-Duda N, Sener I (2010) Entry barriers to the nano-technology industry in Turkey. Johns Hopkins University, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  2. Bozeman B, Hardin J, Link AN (2008) Barriers to the diffusion of nanotechnology. Econ Innov New Technol 17(7–8):749–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Libaers D, Meyer M, Geuna M (2006) The role of university spinout companies in an emerging technology: the case of nanotechnology. J Technol Transfer 31(4):443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mikel Gómez U, Goio EK, Campàs-Velasco J (2007) The dynamics of commercialization of scientific knowledge in biotechnology and nanotechnology. Eur Plan Stud 15(9):1199–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Niosi J, Reid S (2007) Biotechnology and nanotechnology: science-based enabling technologies as windows of opportunity for LDCs? World Dev 35(3):426–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rothaermel FT, Thursby M (2007) The nanotech vs. the biotech revolution: sources of incumbent productivity in research. Res Policy 36(6):832–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Uranga RM, Mateos MV, Giusto NM, Salvador GA (2007) Activation of phosphoinositide-3 kinase/Akt pathway by FeSO4 in rat cerebral cortex synaptic endings. J Neurosci Res 85:2924–2932Google Scholar
  8. Youtie J, Shapira P (2008) Mapping the nanotechnology enterprise: a multi-indicator analysis of emerging nanodisticts in the US South. J Technol Transfer 33:209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Zucker LG, Darby M, Furner J, Liu RC, Ma H (2007) Minerva Unbound: knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production. Res Policy 36(6):850–863Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Walker Center for Global EntrepreneurshipThunderbird School of Global ManagementGlendaleUSA

Personalised recommendations