Supporting Motivation Based Educational Games Through Web 3.0

  • Ioana Ghergulescu
  • Cristina Hava Muntean


Over the past decade there have been significant technological advantages that gradually brought us towards Web 3.0. Web 3.0 represents the next generation of Web that supports semantic and personalised Web. At the same time, the latest technological developments specific to today’s digital era have contributed to significant changes in the area of e-learning in general and educational games in particular. The latest Adaptive e-Learning Systems (AeLS) personalise the educational content and the learning process to better suit learner’s particular needs. However, keeping students motivated for the entire learning session represents a challenging task and therefore measurement and assessment of learner’s motivation is an important research area in the e-learning field. On another hand, due to the high success of gaming among young people, e-learning systems started to integrate games into the learning process. However, currently the educational games do not follow the same trend that sees games in general becoming more affective. Therefore, educational games are not motivational as they should be. This paper bridges research on motivation measurement and assessment from two areas of e-learning and gaming, and presents how various motivation modelling solutions applied in e-learning can be integrated with educational games. This chapter also presents how learner’s motivation can be specified through Web 3.0 using metadata.


Virtual World Learner Motivation Resource Description Framework Game Play Learning Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This research work is supported by IRCSET Embark Postgraduate Scholarship Scheme, Ireland.


  1. Arroyo, I., Ferguson, K., Johns, J., Dragon, T., Meheranian, H., Fisher, D., Barto, A. (2007). Repairing Disengagement With Non-Invasive Interventions In Rosemary Luckin, Kenneth R. Roedinger, Jim Greer (Eds.) Proceeding of the 2007 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts That Work (pp. 195–202). The Netherlands: IOS Press Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A., 1994. Self-Efficacy. In Encyclopedia of human behaviour(pp. 71-81.) New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Batson, L. & Feinberg, S. (2006). Game designs that enhance motivation and learning for teenagers. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 5, 34–43.Google Scholar
  4. Brut, M., Sedes, F., & Dumitrescu, S. (2010). A Semantic-Oriented Approach for Organizing and Developing Annotation for E-Learning. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on 3(4), 11.Google Scholar
  5. Burgos, D., Torijano, B., Moreno-Ger, P., Torrente, J. (2009). Paniel and the Chocolate-based sauce adventure.
  6. Beck, J.E. (2004). Using response times to model student disengagement. In ITS 2004 Workshop Proceedings on Social and Emotional Intelligence in Learning Environments (pp. 13-20), Maceio, Brazil.Google Scholar
  7. Berger, F. & Müller, W. (2009). Adaptivity in Game-Based Learning: A New Perspective on Story. In Ido A. Iurgel, Nelson Zagalo and Paolo Petta (Eds.) Interactive Storytelling- Second Joint International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling, ICIDS 2009 (pp. 316–319). Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Can, G. & Cagiltay, K. (2006). Turkish Prospective Teachers’ Perceptions Regarding the Use of Computer Games with Educational Features. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 308–321.Google Scholar
  9. Chuang, T. & Chen, W. (2009). Effect of Computer-Based Video Games on Children: An Experimental Study. Educational Technology and Society, 12(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  10. Cocea, M. & Weibelzahl, S. (2009). Log file analysis for disengagement detection in e-Learning environments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19(4), 341–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cocea, M., & Weibelzahl, S. (in press). Disengagement Detection in On-line Learning: Validation Studies and Perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, Retrieved from:∼coceam/publications/2010/IEEE%20TLT.pdf.
  12. Conati, C. & Maclaren, H. (2009). Modeling User Affect from Causes and Effects. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization: formerly UM and AH, 4-15.Google Scholar
  13. Conati, C. & Zhou, X., (2002) Modeling Students’ Emotions from Cognitive Appraisal in Educational Games. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouarderes, F. Paraguacu (Eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 944-954). Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Costagliola, G., De Rosa, M., Fuccella, V., Capuano, N., Ritrovato. P.. 2010. A Novel Approach for Attention Management in E-learning Systems. In Proceedings of the 16 th International Conference on Distributed Multimedia Systems, DSM 2010 (pp. 222-227), USA: Knowledge Systems Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Derbali, L. & Frasson, C. (2010). Players’ Motivation and EEG Waves Patterns in a Serious Game Environment. In Vincent Aleven, Judy Kay and Jack Mostow, Proceeding of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 297-299). Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Baston, L. & Feinberg, S. (2006). Game designs that enhance motivation and learningfor teenagers. Electronic Journal for the integration of Technology in Education, 5, 34–43.Google Scholar
  17. Gee, J.P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy, New York: Palgrave Macmillian.Google Scholar
  18. Ghergulescu, I. & Muntean, C.H. (2010). MoGAME: Motivation based Game Level Adaptation Mechanism. In the 10th Annual Irish Learning Technology Association Conference EdTech 2010(9 pages). Athlone, Ireland, Retrived from
  19. Ghergulescu, I. & Muntean, C.H. (2009). PalyLearn: Supporting Motivation through Gaming in E-Learning. In Markus Hofmann, Mark Deegen, Phelim Murnion (Eds.) Proceedings of the 9th Information Technology and Telecommunication Conference. IT&T (185-190). Ireland.Google Scholar
  20. Holthe, O. (2010). A Multimedia Presentation Framework for Web 3.0 Computer Game Experiences. IEEE Multimedia, 17(4), 70-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holthe, O., Mogstad, O., & Ronningen, L. A. (2009). Geelix LiveGames: Remote Playing of Video Games. In 6th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 1-2.Google Scholar
  22. Hudlicka, E. & Broekens, J. (2009). Foundations for modelling emotions in game characters: Modelling emotion effects on cognition. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1-6.Google Scholar
  23. Hudlicka, E. (2009). Affective game engines: motivation and requirements. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games, Florida, USA, 299-306.Google Scholar
  24. Johns, J., & Woolf, B. (2006). A Dynamic Mixture Model to Detect Student Motivation and Proficiency. Proceeding of AAAI’06 21st national conference on Artificial Intelligence, Boston, Massachusetts, 163-168.Google Scholar
  25. Kahiigi, E.K. et al., (2008). Exploring the e-Learning State of Art. the Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6(2), 77-88.Google Scholar
  26. Keller, J.M., 1987. Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khan, F. A., Graf, S., Weippl, E. R., & Tjoa, A. M. (2009a). An approach for identifying affective states through behavioral patterns in web-based learning management systems. In Gabriele Kotsis, David Taniar, Eric Pardede, Ismail Khalil (Eds.) Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services, iiWAS’09 (pp. 431–435). ACM.Google Scholar
  28. Khan, F. A., Weippl, E. R., & Tjoa, A. M. (2009b). Integrated Approach for the Detection of Learning Styles and Affective States. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2009 (pp. 753–761). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar
  29. Khan, F. A., Graf, S., Weippl, E. R., & Tjoa, A. M. (2010). Implementation of Affective States and Learning Styles Tactics in Web-Based Learning Management Systems. Proceedings of the 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Sousse, Tuneisa 734–735.Google Scholar
  30. Kim, Y.S. et al. (2007). An Intelligent Tutoring System with Motivation Diagnosis and Planning. In 15th International Conference on Computers in Education, Hiroshima, Japan Retrieved from:
  31. Konetes, G.D. (2010). The Function of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Educational Virtual Games and Simulations. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 2(1), 23-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li Yanyan, & Dong Mingkai (2008). Towards a Knowledge Portal for E-Learning Based on Semantic Web. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2008. ICALT. Eighth IEEE International Conference on, Santander, Cantabria, Spain, 910-912.Google Scholar
  33. Little, J.K. & Page, C. (2009). The Educause Top Teaching and Learning Challenges. Educause Review, 44(2), 30-44.Google Scholar
  34. Malone, T. & Lepper, M. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In Erlbaum, 223-253.Google Scholar
  35. McQuiggan, S. W., Mott, B. W., & Lester, J. C. (2008). Modeling self-efficacy in intelligent tutoring systems: An inductive approach. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18(1-2), 81-123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Merrick, K. (2007). Modelling Motivation for Adaptive Non-Player Characters in Dynamic Computer Game Worlds. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 5(4), 32.Google Scholar
  37. Morales Morgado, E. M., Garcia, F., Ruiz, A. B., Rego, H., & Moreira, T. (2008). Learning Objects for eLearning Systems. The open knowledge society, 19, 153-162.Google Scholar
  38. Moreno-Ger, P., Spaniol, M., Löpez Manas, E., Drobek, N., & Fernández-Manjön, B. (2008). Making Sense of Collaboratively Annotated Multimedia Metadata for (Mobile) Digital Story-Telling and Educational Gaming. In R. Klamma, N. Sharda, B. Fernández-Manjön, H. Kosch, & M. Spaniol (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Story-Telling for Educational Gaming(10 pages). Retrieved from
  39. Munoz-Organero, M., Munoz-Merino, P. J., & Kloos, C. D. (2010). Student Behavior and Interaction Patterns With an LMS as Motivation Predictors in E-Learning Settings. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(3), 463-470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pandit, V. R. (2010). E-Learning System Based on Semantic Web. In Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology (ICETET), 2010 3rd International Conference on, 559-564.Google Scholar
  41. Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants- part 2. On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prensky, M. (2009). H. Sapiens Digital:From Digital Immigrants and Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom. Innovate, 5(3), 9.Google Scholar
  44. Qu, L. & Johnson, W.L. (2005). Detecting the Learner’s Motivational States in An Interactive Learning Environment. In Chee-Kit Looi, Gord McCalla, Bert Bredeweg, Joost Breuker, Proceeding of the 2005 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology (pp. 547-554).The Netherlands: IOS Press Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  45. Qu, L., Wang, N. & Johnson, W.L. (2005). Using Learner Focus of Attention to Detect Learner Motivation Factors. In User Modeling 2005,70-73.Google Scholar
  46. Rani, S., Ashok, M., & Palanivel, K. (2009). Adaptive content for personalized E-learning using web service and semantic web. In Intelligent Agent & Multi-Agent Systems, 2009. IAMA 2009. International Conference on Chennai, India, 1-4.Google Scholar
  47. Rebolledo-Mendez, G. (2006). How can video-games deliver educational content in an intelligent fashion? In Proceedings of the 9th HCT postgraduate workshop University of Sussex, UK. Retrieved from:
  48. Rebolledo-Mendez, G., de Freitas, S. & Gaona, A. (2009). A Model of Motivation Based on Empathy for AI-Driven Avatars in Virtual Worlds. In Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications, 2009. VS-GAMES’09. Conference in Coventry, UK, 5-11.Google Scholar
  49. Rego, H., Moreira, T., & García, F. J. (2010). Web-Based Learning Information System for Web 3.0. In Miltiadis D. Lytras, Patricia Ordonez De Pablos, Adrian Ziderman, Alan Roulstone, Hermann Maurer, Jonathan B. Imber (Eds.) Knowledge Management, Information Systems, E-Learning, and Sustainability Research, The World Summit on the Knowledge Society WSKS 2010, Corfu, Greece, (pp.196–201). Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Rego, H., Moreira, T., Morales, E., & Garcia, F. (2010). Metadata and knowledge management driven Web based learning information systems towards web 3.0. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 5(2), 36-44.Google Scholar
  51. Ryan, R. & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Saleena, B., Salini, M., & Venkateswaran, S. (2010). A semantic approach to construct a knowledge portal for e-learning using ontology. In Distance Learning and Education (ICDLE), 2010 4th International Conference on, 214-217.Google Scholar
  53. Shaffer, D.W. et al. (2005). Video games and the future of learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(2), 105–111.Google Scholar
  54. Steinberg, M., & Brehm, J. (2009). Social Educational Games Based on Open Content. In Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, 2009. INCOS’09. International Conference on, Barcelona, Spain, 255-258.Google Scholar
  55. Takemura, Y. et al. (2008). Assessing the Learners’ Motivation in the E-Learning Environments for Programming Education. In H. Leung, F. Li, R. Lau, Q. Li (Eds.) Advances in Web Based Learning–ICWL 2007, (pp. 355–366), Springer.Google Scholar
  56. Torniai, C., Jovanovic, J., Gasevic, D., Bateman, S., & Hatala, M. (2008). E-Learning meets the Social Semantic Web. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2008. ICALT’08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on, Santander, Cantabria,Spain, 389-393.Google Scholar
  57. Torrente, J., Moreno-Ger, P., Martínez-Ortiz, I., & Fernandez-Manjon, B. (2009). Integration and Deployment of Educational Games in e-Learning Environments: The Learning Object Model Meets Educational Gaming. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4), 359–371.Google Scholar
  58. de Vicente, A. & Pain, H. (2002). Informing the detection of the students’ motivational state: an empirical study. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouarderes, F. Paraguacu (Eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, (pp. 79–86). Springer.Google Scholar
  59. de Vicente, A. (2003). Towards tutoring systems that detect students’ motivation: an investigation. Ph.D. Univ. of Edinburg.Google Scholar
  60. Wlodkowski, R.J. (1978). Motivation and Teaching: A Practical Guide., NEA Distribution Center.Google Scholar
  61. Woolf, B. P., Arroyo, I., Muldner, K., Burleson, W., Cooper, D. G., Dolan, R., & Christopherson, R. M. (2010). The Effect of Motivational Learning Companions on Low Achieving Students and Students with Disabilities. In V. Aleven, J. Kay, & J. Mostow (Eds.), Proceeding of the 10 th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, (pp. 327-337).Springer.Google Scholar
  62. Wu Zhaohui, Mao Yuxin, & Chen H. (2009). Subontology-Based Resource Management for Web-Based e-Learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(6), 867-880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ComputingNational College of IrelandDublin 1Ireland

Personalised recommendations