Abstract
Social media is a label for many new Internet technologies that are used for sharing information (pictures, movies, music, and/or expertise) with other people. Examples are Linked-in, Twitter, Yammer, and blogs. Social media can gap the distance between governments and citizens. However, individuals and small groups can also use social media as a powerful mobilization tool for protesting against government policies. In 2007, Dutch students used social media to protest against the so-called 1040-hour norm. This norm refers to the total amount of teaching hours that students are required to follow each year during the first and second years of secondary education. Although required by education inspectors to comply with this norm, many schools were unable to do so, because of teacher shortages. Students complained that they were forced to be at school without taking classes and used social media to mobilize each other for mass demonstrations. At the ministry of Education, Culture and Science policy makers and the Deputy Minister in charge were completely surprised by the scale of the protests and the speed of organization of the protest actions and the mobilization force the Internet provided to the protesting students. As a result of these experiences the ministry of Education, Culture, and Science has developed an online early warning system to signalize relevant discussions about education topics on the Internet. This ‘webmonitoring’ strategy is aimed at reducing ‘strategic surprises’. This chapter analyzes the mobilization process of student protests against the 1040-hour norm in the Netherlands and the communication- and online strategy that the Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science has developed since then.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ansoff, I. & McDonnel, E. (1990). Implanting Strategic Management. New York et al.: Prentice Hall (2nd Edn).
Beer, D. & Burrows, R. (2007). Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some initial considerations. URL http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/17.html.
Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Beunders, H., Edwards, A.R. & Moody, R. (2009). De virtuele lont in het kruitvat. Welke rol spelen de oude en nieuwe media in de micromobilisatie van burgers en hun strijd om politieke aandacht? Den Haag: Uitgeverij Lemma.
Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Straten, G., Edwards, A.R. & Kool, D. de (2011a). Spraakmakende burgers, sociale media en het strategisch vermogen van de overheid. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Edwards, A.R., Moody, R. & Beunders, H. (2011b). New Media, Micromobilization, and Political Agenda Setting: Crossover Effects in Political Mobilization and Media Usage. Public Management Review, 27 (4) 209–219.
Bouckaert, G., Peuter, B. de & Dooren, W. van (2003). Meten en vergelijken van lokale bestuurlijke ontwikkeling: een monitoringsysteem voor het lokaal bestuur in Vlaanderen. Brugge: Die Keure.
Boulos, K.. & Wheelert, S. (2007). The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and healthcare education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24 (1) 2–23.
Chadwick, A. (2006). Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Commissie Dijsselbloem (2008). Tijd voor onderwijs. Den Haag.
Commissie Cornielje (2008). De waarde van een norm: advies van de Commissie Onderwijstijd. Den Haag.
Croll, A. & Power, S. (2009). Complete Web Monitoring. Sebastopol: O’Reilly.
Eggers, W.D. (2007). Government 2.0: using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock, and enhance democracy. Lanham et al.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Heath, R. & Palenchar, M. (2009). Strategic issues management. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583–600.
Kool, D. de (2007). Monitoring in beeld: een studie naar de doorwerking van monitors in interbestuurlijke relaties. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (thesis).
Kool, D. de (2008). Rational, political and cultural uses of performance monitors: the case of the Dutch Urban Policy. In: W. van Dooren & S. van de Wall (Eds), Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is Used (pp. 174–191), New York: Palgrave Macmillan: New York.
Kool. D. de (2010). Ambtenaren en sociale media: kansen, risico’s en dilemma’s, Bestuurskunde, 20 (3), 35–43.
Social Embassy (2011). Social Media Monitor 4. Hilversum.
Sutton, J.N. (2009). Social Media Monitoring and the Democratic National Convention: New Tasks and Emergent Processes, Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 6 (1), article 67.
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications (3rd ed).
Young Works (2008). Digitale media, digitale politiek? Den Haag (evaluation).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Kool, D. (2012). Web Monitoring and Strategic Issue Management: Dutch student protests against the 1040-hour norm. In: Reddick, C., Aikins, S. (eds) Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1447-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1448-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)