Settersten (Chap. 1) describes three hallmarks of young adulthood: the need to manage uncertainty, the need for fluid self-definitions, and the need for interdependence. We discuss the implications that rapidly developing technologies such as cell phones and social networking might have in these three areas. The Internet provides constant access to information but requires skills in use and evaluation that young adults may not have. Social media provide the possibility of niche-seeking, which could increase opportunities or stifle exploration. Cell phones and the Internet offer interdependence after leaving the family of origin, but may also hinder autonomy. Students use social networking to facilitate group behavior with real-world implications, as we show with an example of a student-constructed drinking holiday. Social technologies also have implications for family formation (e.g., meeting partners, establishing intimacy, and maintaining long-distance relationships). These technologies have the potential to widen or narrow the gap between individuals from different backgrounds. Finally, we suggest future research directions, including understanding whether (1) rapidly developing technologies lead to qualitatively new sociodevelopmental phenomena, or simply new forms of well-understood phenomena, (2) existing theories of development and family relationships can accommodate behaviors arising from new forms of social technology, and (3) technology brings with it new relationship forms, and what these forms might mean for development in young adulthood.
- Young Adult
- Cell Phone
- Romantic Relationship
- Social Networking Site
- Social Connectedness
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States, 2010. Retrieved from the Sloan Consortium website. http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/class_differences.pdf .
Pew Internet and American Life Project (2010). Mobile access 2010 [Data file and code book]. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Mobile-Access-2010.aspx.
American Red Cross. (2010, February 11). Red Cross raises more than $32 million via mobile giving program. http://www.redcross.org/portal/site/en/menuitem.94aae335470e233f6cf911df43181aa0/?vgnextoid=43ffe0b8da8b6210VgnVCM10000089f0870aRCRD
Arnett, J. J. (2000). High hopes in a grim world: emerging adults’ views of their futures and of “Generation X”. Youth & Society, 31, 267–286.
Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. The Journal of Political Economy, 81, 813–846.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bossard, J. H. S. (1932). Residential propinquity as a factor in marriage selection. The American Journal of Sociology, 38, 219–224.
Chadwick Martin Bailey. (2010). Recent trends: online dating. http://cp.match.com/cppp/media/CMB_Study.pdf.
Combes, B. (2008). The Net Generation: Tech-savvy or lost in virtual space? Paper presented at the IASL Conference: World Class Learning and Literacy through School Libraries.
Elias, M. (2007, February 7). Gay teens coming out earlier to peers and family. USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-02-07-gay-teens-cover_x.htm?POE=click-refer.
Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.
Facebook. (2010). Company timeline. http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?timeline.
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. W. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: a study of human factors in housing. New York: Harper.
Foderaro, L. W. (2010, September 29). Private moment made public, then a fatal jump. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/nyregion/30suicide.html.
Gabriel, T. (2010, August 22). Students, welcome to college; parents, go home. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/23/education/23college.html.
Haase, A. Q., Wellman, B., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2002). Capitalizing on the Internet: social contact, civic engagement, and sense of community. In B. Wellman & C. Haythronthwaite (Eds.), The internet and everyday life (pp. 291–324). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hampton, K. N. (2010). Internet use and the concentration of disadvantage: globalization and the urban underclass. American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 1111–1132.
Hargittai, E. (2003). The digital divide and what to do about it. In D. C. Jones (Ed.), New economy handbook (pp. 822–841). San Diego: Academic.
Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: differences in young adults’ use of the internet. Communication Research, 35, 602–621.
Harper, G. W., & Schneider, M. (2003). Oppression and discrimination among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered people and communities: a challenge for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 243–252.
Higher Education Research Institute. (2007, September). College freshmen and online social networking sites (HERI research brief). http://www.heri.ucla.edu/PDFs/pubs/briefs/brief-091107-SocialNetworking.pdf.
Hurtado, S., Sax, L. J., Saenz, V., Harper, C. E., Oseguera, L., Curley, J, Arellano, L. (2007). Findings from the 2005 administration of Your First College Year (YFCY): National aggregates. www.heri.ucla.edu/PDFs/2005_YFCY_REPORT_FINAL.pdf
Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., Robinson, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the Digital Youth Project. John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning. http://digitalyouth.ischool.berkeley.edu/files/report/digitalyouth-WhitePaper.pdf.
Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: attachment, roles, and social support. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 253–286). New York: Academic.
Lefkowitz, E. S., Patrick, M., Morgan, N., Bezemer, D. H., & Vasilenko, S. A., (in press). State Patty’s Day: College student drinking and local crime increased on a student-constructed holiday. Journal of Adolescent Research.
Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx.
Lum, L. (2006). Handling “helicopter parents”. Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, 23, 40–42.
Martin, R. D. (1974). Friendship choices and residence hall proximity among freshmen and upper year students. Psychological Reports, 34, 118.
Matei, S., & Ball-Rokeach, S. (2003). The Internet in the communication infrastructure of urban residential communities: macro- or mesolinkage? Journal of Communication, 53, 642–657.
McLean, K. C. (2005). Late adolescent identity development: narrative meaning-making and memory telling. Developmental Psychology, 41, 683–691.
Merolla, A. J. (2010). Relational maintenance during military deployment: perspectives of wives of deployed US soldiers. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 1, 4–26.
Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet: reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 420–435.
Rabby, M. K. (2007). Relational maintenance and the influence of commitment in online and offline relationships. Communication Studies, 58, 315–337.
Rhodes, A. R. (2002). Long-distance relationships in dual career commuter couples: a review of counseling issues. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 10, 398–404.
Rivers, I., & D’Augelli, A. R. (2001). The victimization of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths. In A. R. D’Augelli & C. J. Patterson (Eds.), Lesbian, gay and bisexual identities and youth: psychological perspectives (pp. 199–223). New York: Oxford.
Rosenberg, G. (2010, June 1). France cracks down on pop-up drinking parties. Time. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1992982,00.html.
Small, M., Morgan, N., Abar, C., & Maggs, J. (in press). Protective effects of parent-college student communication during the first semester of college. Journal of American College Health.
Smith, A. (2010, July 7). Mobile access 2010. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Mobile-Access-2010.aspx. Accessed 10 Nov 2010.
Taylor, P., & Keeter, S. (2010). Millennials: a portrait of generation next: Confident, connected, open to change. Pew Research Center. http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1501/millennials_new_survey_generational_personality_upbeat_opennew_ideas_technology_bound.
Udry, J. R. (1971). The social context of marriage (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.
van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2008, May). Measuring digital skills. Performance tests of operational, formal, information and strategic internet skills among the Dutch population. Paper presented at the ICA Conference, Montreal, Canada. http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/2/3/1/0/2/pages231022/p231022-1.php.
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2009). Using the internet: Skill related problems in users’ online behavior. Interacting with Computers, 21, 393–402.
White, W. S. (2005, Dec 16). Students, parents, colleges: drawing the lines. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B16.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lefkowitz, E.S., Vukman, S.N., Loken, E. (2012). Young Adults in a Wireless World. In: Booth, A., Brown, S., Landale, N., Manning, W., McHale, S. (eds) Early Adulthood in a Family Context. National Symposium on Family Issues, vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1436-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1435-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1436-0