The Efficiency of Some Nonparametric Competitors of the t-Test

  • J. L. HodgesJr.
  • E. L. Lehmann
Open Access
Chapter
Part of the Selected Works in Probability and Statistics book series (SWPS)

Summary

Consider samples from continuous distributions F(x) and F(x — θ). We may test the hypothesis θ = 0 by using the two-sample Wilcoxon test. We show in Section 1 that its asymptotic Pitman efficiency, relative to the f-test, never falls below 0.864. This result also holds for the Kruskal-Wallis test compared with the jF-test, and for testing the location parameter of a single symmetric distribution.

A number of alternative notions of asymptotic efficiency are compared in Section 2. In this connection, certain difficulties arise because power is not necessarily a convex function of sample size. As an alternative to the Pitman notion of asymptotic efficiency, we consider in Section 3 one based on the speed with which power at a fixed alternative tends to 1. In particular we obtain, for the sign test relative to the t in normal populations, the limit as n —► ∞ of the sequence of power efficiency functions. It is noted that certain interchanges of limit passages are not always possible.

Keywords

Summing 

References

  1. E. J. G. Pitman, Lecture notes on nonparametric statistical inference, Columbia University, 1949.Google Scholar
  2. G. E. Noether, “On a theorem of Pitman,” Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 26 (1955), pp. 64–68.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. W. Hoeffding and J. Rosenblatt, “The efficiency of tests,” Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 26 (1955), pp. 52–63.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Mood, “On the asymptotic efficiency of certain non-parametric two-sample tests” Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 25 (1954), pp. 514–522.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. F. C. Andrews, “Asymptotic behavior of some rank tests for analysis of variance,” Ann: Math. Stat., Vol. 25 (1&54), pp. 724–735.Google Scholar
  6. S. Saks, Theory of the Integral, Warsaw-Lvov, 1937.Google Scholar
  7. W. Hoeffding, “Optimum* nonparametric tests,” Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press, 1951.Google Scholar
  8. M. E. Terry, “Some rank order tests which are most powerful against specific par-ametric alternatives,” Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 23 (1944), pp. 346–366.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Dwass, “The large sample power of rank order tests in the two-sample problem,” Ann. Math. Stat., this issue.Google Scholar
  10. B. L. van der Waekden, “Ein neuer Test ftir das Problem der zwei Stich proben,” Math. Ann. Vol. 126 (1953), pp. 93–107.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. W. H. Kruskal and W. A. Wallis, “Use of ranks in one-criterion analysis of var-iance,” Jour. Am. Stat. Assoc., Vol. 47 (1952), pp. 583–621.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. J. L. Hodges, Jr. and E. L. Lehmann, “Matching in paired comparisons,” Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 25 (1954), pp. 787–791.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. W. J. Dixon, “Power functions of the sign test and power efficiency for normal alternatives,” Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 24 (1953), pp. 467–473.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. W. J. Dixon, “Power under normality of several nonparametric tests,” Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 25, (1954), pp. 610–614.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. H. Chernoff, “A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations,” Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 23 (1952), pp. 493–507.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. J. V. Uspensky, Introduction to Mathematical Probability, McGraw-Hill Book Comp-any, Inc., 1937, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. W. L. Nicholson, “A computing formula for the power of the analysis of variance test,” Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 25 (1954), pp. 607–610.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. HodgesJr.
    • 1
  • E. L. Lehmann
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations