Advertisement

Buffer Insertion as a Solution to Interconnect Issues

  • Sandeep Saini

Abstract

Over the past 10 years, the source of the critical signal delays has undergone a major transition. With the scaling of active device feature sizes into the deep sub-micron regime, the on-chip interconnect has become the primary bottleneck in signal flow within high complexity, high speed integrated circuits (ICs).The smaller feature size in DSM technology nodes reduces the delay of the active devices, however, the effect on delay due to the passive interconnects has increased rapidly, as described by the 2005 International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (lTRS) [2]. The transition from an IC dominated by gate delays for feature sizes greater than 250 μm to where the interconnects are the primary source of delay is graphically illustrated in Fig. 3.1. As noted in the figure, the disparity between the relative delay of the interconnect and active devices is exacerbated in each successive technology node. The local wire delay decreases with feature size due to a reduction in the distance among the active devices. Special attention must, however, be placed on the global lines, since the overall speed of current ICs is most often limited by the long distance global interconnects.

References

  1. 1.
    Lillis, John, Chung-Kuan Cheng, and Ting-Ting Y. Lin. “Optimal wire sizing and buffer insertion for low power and a generalized delay model.” Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of 31.3 (1996): 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Osada, Toshihiko, and Milt Godwin. “International technology roadmap for semiconductors.” (1999).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Engel, James J., et al. “Design methodology for IBM ASIC products.” IBM Journal of Research and Development 40.4 (1996): 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Banerjee, Kaustav, and Amit Mehrotra. “A power-optimal repeater insertion methodology for global interconnects in nanometer designs.” Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on 49.11 (2002): 2001–2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, Guoqing, and Eby G. Friedman. “Low-power repeaters driving RC and RLC interconnects with delay and bandwidth constraints.” Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, IEEE Transactions on 14.2 (2006): 161–172.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xi, Joe G., and Wayne WM Dai. “Buffer insertion and sizing under process variations for low power clock distribution.” Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference. ACM, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alpert, Charles J., Anirudh Devgan, and Stephen T. Quay. “Buffer insertion for noise and delay optimization.” Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, IEEE Transactions on 18.11 (1999): 1633–1645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xiong, Jinjun, Kingho Tam, and Lei He. “Buffer insertion considering process variation.” Proceedings of the conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe-Volume 2. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garcea, Giuseppe S., Nick P. Meijs, and Ralph HJM Otten. “Simultaneous analytic area and power optimization for repeater insertion.” Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    El-Moursy, Magdy A., and Eby G. Friedman. “Optimum wire sizing of RLC interconnect with repeaters.” INTEGRATION, the VLSI journal 38.2 (2004): 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    El-Moursy, Magdy A., and Eby G. Friedman. “Optimum wire sizing of RLC interconnect with repeaters.” Proceedings of the 13th ACM Great Lakes symposium on VLSI. ACM, 2003.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saini, Sandeep, et al. “An Alternative approach to buffer insertion for delay and power reduction in VLSI interconnects.” VLSI Design, 2010. VLSID’10. 23rd International Conference on. IEEE, 2010.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mohali, C. D. A. C. “CROSSTALK NOISE AND DELAY REDUCTION IN VLSI INTERCONNECTS.”Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saini, Sandeep. A Novel Approach to reduce Delay and Power in VLSI Interconnects. Diss. International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad, INDIA, 2010.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saini, Sandeep, et al. “Schmitt trigger as an alternative to buffer insertion for delay and power reduction in VLSI interconnects.” TENCON 2009-2009 IEEE Region 10 Conference. IEEE, 2009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandeep Saini
    • 1
  1. 1.The LNM Institute of Information TechnologyJaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations