Issues and Trends in Instructional Technology: Lean Times, Shifts in Online Learning, and Increased Attention to Mobile Devices
Comprised of four sections: overall developments; corporate training and development; higher education; and K-12 education, this chapter synthesizes the findings of major annual reports including ASTDs, State of the Industry Report; the, EDUCAUSE Core Data Service Fiscal Year 2008 Summary Report; The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology; Education Week’s, Technology Counts 2010; The New Media Consortium and the Consortium for School Networkings’ The 2010 Horizon Report: K-12 Edition; Project Tomorrow’s Learning in the 21st Century: 2009 Trends Update; and The Kaiser Family Foundation’s Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds. The authors describe the economy’s impact on instructional technology and comment on the importance of online learning mobile devices, the current state of online learning, and the continued interest in and use of Web 2.0 and social networking sites for educational purposes.
- Allen, I. A., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.Google Scholar
- Arroway, P., & Sharma, B. (2009). EDUCAUSE core data service fiscal year 2008 summary report. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/PUB8006.pdf.
- Brown, A., & Green, T. (2009). Issues and trends in instructional technology: Web 2.0, second life, and STEM share the spotlight. In M. Orey, V. J. McClendon, & R. M. Branch (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (Vol. 34, pp. 7–23). Springer.Google Scholar
- Brown, A., & Green, T. (2010). Issues and trends in instructional technology: Growth and maturation of web-based tools in a challenging climate; social networks gain educators’ attention. In M. Orey, S. A. Jones, & R. M. Branch, (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (Vol. 35, pp. 29–44). Springer.Google Scholar
- Brown, A., & Green, T. (2008). Issues and trends in instructional technology: Making the most of mobility and ubiquity. In M. Orey, V. J. McClendon, & R. Branch (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (Vol. 33). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
- Christensen, C. M., & Horn, M. B. (2008). How do we transform our schools. Educationnet, 8(3), 13–19. Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/how-do-we-transform-our-schools/.
- Devaney, L. (2010, February). Economy continues to batter schools. eSchool News, 13(2), 1, 38.Google Scholar
- Education Week. (2010). Ed-tech states. Technology Counts 2010, 29(26), 36–37.Google Scholar
- Elerson, N. (2010). Cliff hanger: How America’s public schools continue to feel the impact of the economic downturn. American Association for School Administrators. Retrieved from http://www.aasa.org/uploadedFiles/Policy_and_Advocacy/files/CliffHangerFINAL(1).pdf.
- Gray, L., Lewis, L., & Tice, P. (2009). Educational technology in public schools: Fall 2008. National Center for Education Statistics: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010003.pdf.
- Griffith, M. (2008). Education policy fellowship program leadership forum. Retrieved from http://ww.ads2008.org/ads/index.php.
- Hightower, A. M. (2009). Tracking U.S. trends: States earn B average for policies supporting educational technology use. Technology Counts, 28(26), 20–33.Google Scholar
- Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R. (2009). The 2009 Horizon Report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
- Johnson, L., Smith, R., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2010). The 2010 Horizon Report: K-12 Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
- Manzo, K. K. (2010a). Tracking trends: Ed-tech stats. Technology Counts 2010, 29(26), 36–37.Google Scholar
- Manzo, K. K. (2010b). Tracking trends: Mobilizing the research. Technology Counts 2010, 29(26), 34–36.Google Scholar
- Paradise, A., & Patel, L. (2009). 2009 state of the industry report: ASTD’s annual review of trends in workplace learning and performance. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training & Development.Google Scholar
- PBS. (2010). Digitally inclined. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/teachers/_files/pdf/annual-pbs-survey-report.pdf.
- Project Tomorrow. (2009). Speak up 2008. Retrieved from http://www.tomorrow.org/SpeakUp/.
- Rich, M. (February, 2010). Textbooks that professors can rewrite digitally. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/22/business/media/22textbook.html.
- Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
- Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
- Robelen, E. K. (2010). Talk bigger than federal funding for STEM projects. Education Week, 29(22), 8.Google Scholar
- Robinson, L. K., Brown, A. H., & Green, T. D. (2010). Security vs. access: Balancing safety and productivity in the digital school. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE): Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
- Smith, S. D., Salaway, G., & Borreson Caruso, J. (2009). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2009. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE.Google Scholar
- Staff Reporters. (2010, April 9). Survey: School budget cuts even worse next year. eSchool News. Retrieved from http://www.eschoolnews.com/2010/04/09/survey-school-budget-cuts-even-worse-next-year/.