Advertisement

Culturally Sensitive Learning Practices

  • Lesley S. J. FarmerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Educational Media and Technology Yearbook book series (EMTY, volume 36)

Abstract

In today’s global world, to provide meaningful education teacher librarians and their students need to become culturally competent: open to learning about other cultures and sharing one’s own culture, able to change personal perspectives, and able to communicate effectively across cultures. Hofstede’s model of cultural dimensions provides a framework for examining culturally sensitive library implications. Specific strategies are suggested to address language barriers, student–teacher relations, choosing resources, learning activities, technical issues, and assessment.

Keywords

Instructional Design Power Distance Distance Culture Online Tutorial Authentic Audience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Biggs, J. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. (2001). The revised 2-factor study process questionnaire R-SP2-2 F. British Journal of Educational Research, 71, 133–149.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, S., & Macredie, R. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Domer, D., & Gorman, G. (2006). Information literacy education in Asian developing countries: Cultural factors affecting curriculum development and programme delivery. IFLA Journal, 32(4), 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans, C. (2007). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lecturers in higher education. Computers and Education, 50, 491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Faiola, A., & Fatei, S. (2005). Cultural cognitive style and web design. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1). Retrieved February 13, 2010, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/faiola.html.
  7. Gurubatham, M. (2005). Cognition, culture and effective e-praxis guiding principles. In P. Nicholson et al. (Eds.), E-training practices for professional organizations (pp. 121–128). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hofstede, J. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Kalyanpur, M., & Harry, B. (1999). Culture in special education: Building a posture of reciprocity in parent-professional relationships. Baltimore: Paul Bookes.Google Scholar
  10. Liaw, S. (2006). E-learning and the development of intercultural competence. Language Learning and Technology, 10(3), 49–64.Google Scholar
  11. Lockett, C., & Harrell, J. (2003). Racial identity, self-esteem, and academic achievement. Journal of Black Psychology, 29(3), 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McMahon, C., & Bruce, C. (2002). Information literacy needs of local staff in cross-cultural development projects. Journal of International Development, 14(1), 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sarkodie-Manash, K. (Ed.). (2000). Reference services for the adult learner. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  14. Teresi, J., Holmes, D., Ramirez, M., Gurland, B., & Lantiqua, R. (2001). Performance of cognitive tests among different racial/ethnic and education groups: Findings of differential item functioning and possible item bias. Journal of Mental Health & Aging, 7(1), 79–89.Google Scholar
  15. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (2006). Library services to immigrants: A report on current practices. Washington, DC: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.Google Scholar
  16. Webster’s ninth new collegiate dictionary. (1985). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
  17. Zhang, L. F. (2000). University students’ learning approaches in three cultures. Journal of Psychology, 134(1), 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSULB/EdPAC, California State University Long BeachLong BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations