Abstract
CyGaMEs is a formalism for instructional game design that aligns an instructional game with targeted content. The CyGaMEs method derives from instructional design, cognitive science analogical reasoning, learning science, and game design theory. The author summarizes the theoretical foundations, introduces the method, describes the CyGaMEs assessment tools, and summarizes research that demonstrates how game-based technologies can be used to authentically assess knowledge growth as it occurs during game-based learning. The author argues that theoretically and empirically sound instructional design methods like CyGaMEs enhance the effectiveness of game-based learning and assessment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The methods diverge when entertainment games privilege gameplay over authenticity.
- 2.
Valve’s portfolio includes Half-Life,® and Valve games “account for over 80% of the PC online action market” (http://www.valvesoftware.com/about.html).
References
Archald, D. A., & Newmann, F. M. (1988). Beyond standardized testing: Assessing authentic academic achievement in the secondary school. Reston: VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1e/2b/75.pdf.
Borgman, C. L., Abelson, H., Johnson, R., Koedinger, K. R., Linn, M. C., Lynch, C. A. et al. (2008). Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge: A 21st century agenda for the National Science Foundation. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08204/nsf08204.pdf?govDel=USNSF_124 .
Bransford, J. D. (2005). Benjamin Cluff Lecture. Provo, UT: David O. McKay School of Education, Brigham Young University. Retrieved from http://education.byu.edu/media/index.html?video=50.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). Creativity, fulfillment, and flow. TED: Ideas worth spreading. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXIeFJCqsPs.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.). (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 526–536.
Fullerton, T., Swain, C., & Hoffman, S. (2004). Game design workshop: Designing, prototyping, and playtesting games. San Francisco: CMP Books.
Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gee, J. P. (2005a). Learning by design: Good video games as learning machines. e-Learning, 2(1), 5–16.
Gee, J. P. (2005b). What would a state of the art instructional video game look like? Innovate, 1(6). Retrieved from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article%26id=80.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong question. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.
Greeno, J. G., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berlinger & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York: Macmillan.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1997). The analogical mind. American Psychologist, 52(1), 35–44.
Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104(3), 427–466.
Jenkins, H. (2002). Game theory. Technology Review. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/cms/People/henry3/publications.htm.
Jenkins, H., Klopfer, E., Squire, K., & Tan, P. (2003). Entering the education arcade. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 1–17.
Jonassen, D. H. (2006). On the role of concepts in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology, Research, & Development, 54(2), 177–196.
Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., & Salen, K. (2009). Moving learning games forward: Obstacles, opportunities, and openness. Boston, MA: The Education Arcade, MIT.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Langhoff, S., Cowan-Sharp, J., Dodson, E., Damer, B., Ketner, B., & Reese, D. D. (2009). Workshop report: Virtual worlds and immersive environments. (NASA/CP–2009-214598). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.
Miller, G. E. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Academic Medicine: Supplement, 65(9), S63–S67.
National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment. J. Pelligrino, N. Chudowsky, R. Glaser (Eds.). Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Carmichael, D. L. (2007). Authentic instruction and assesssment: Common standards or rigor and relevance in teaching academic subjects. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.smallschoolsproject.org/PDFS/meetings/auth_instr_assess.pdf.
Newmann, F. M., Ron, B., & Wiggins, G. (1998). An exchange of views on “semantics, psychometrics, and assessment reform: A close look at ‘authentic’ assessments”. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 19–22.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Reese, D. D. (2006). Foundations of serious games design and assessment. (COTF/LVP/Sep-2006). Wheeling, WV: Center for Educational Technologies, Wheeling Jesuit University.
Reese, D. D. (2007). First steps and beyond: Serious games as preparation for future learning. Journal of Educational Media and Hypermedia, 16(3), 283–300.
Reese, D. D. (2008). GaME design for intuitive concept knowledge. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (Vol. 3, pp. 1104–1126). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
Reese, D. D. (2009a). Replication supports Flowometer: Advancing cyberlearning through game-based assessment technologies. Paper presented at the 2009 international conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Louisville, KY.
Reese, D. D. (2009b). Structure mapping theory as a formalism for instructional game design and assessment. In D. Gentner, K. Holyoak, & B. Kokinov (Eds.), New frontiers in analogy research: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on analogy (Analogy ‘09) (pp. 394–403). Sofia, Bulgaria: New Bulgarian University Press.
Reese, D. D., Diehl, V. A., & Lurquin, J. L. (2009). Metaphor enhanced instructional video game causes conceptual gains in lunar science knowledge. Poster presented at the Association for Psychological Science 21st Annual Convention, San Francisco, CA.
Reese, D. D. (2010). Introducing flowometer: A CyGaMEs assessment suite tool. In R. V. Eck (Ed.), Gaming & cognition: Theories and perspectives from the learning sciences. (pp. 227–254). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Reese, D. D., & Tabachnick, B. G. (2010). The moment of learning: Quantitative analysis of exemplar gameplay supports CyGaMEs approach to embedded assessment [structured abstract]. Paper to be presented at the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness 2010 Annual Research Conference, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.sree.org/conferences/2010/program/abstracts/191.pdf
Schell, J. (2008). The art of game design: A book of lenses. New York: Elsevier.
Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129–184.
Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Spellman, B. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Pragmatics in analogical mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 307–346.
Acknowledgments
Debbie Denise Reese, Research and Evaluation, Center for Educational Technologies, Wheeling Jesuit University.
This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation grant DRL-0814512 awarded to the author and National Aeronautics and Space Association NCC5-451, NNX06AB09G-Basic, NNX06AB09G-Supplement #1, NNX06AB09G-Supplement #2, NNX08AJ71A-Basic and No. NAG-13782 awarded to the NASA-sponsored Classroom of the Future.
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the National Aeronautics and Space Association.
Correspondence regarding this article should be sent to Debbie Denise Reese, Center for Educational Technologies, Wheeling Jesuit University, 316 Washington Ave, Wheeling, WV 26003. E-mail: debbie@cet.edu.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reese, D.D. (2012). An Instructional Design Approach to Effective Instructional Game Design and Assessment. In: Orey, M., Jones, S., Branch, R. (eds) Educational Media and Technology Yearbook. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, vol 36. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1305-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1305-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1304-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1305-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)