Skip to main content

Scientific and Regulatory Considerations for Development and Commercialization of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2860 Accesses

Part of the book series: AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series ((AAPS,volume 3))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) from the scientific and regulatory perspective of the development of poorly water-soluble drugs to provide insights into regulatory filing from Investigational New Drug Application (IND) to New Drug Application (NDA) submission. The chapter includes two primary sections to cover the two regulatory stages for CMC module of filing, IND and NDA. The IND section of the chapter includes the following contents: (1) brief description of general filing requirements as outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and relevant guidances; (2) discussion of potential regulatory issues for developing poorly water-soluble drugs using various pharmaceutical technologies in the IND stage, i.e., solid-form selection, particle-size reduction, lipid formulation, and amorphous solid dispersion. The NDA section of the chapter includes the following: (1) general regulatory filing requirements of an NDA application; (2) potential regulatory issues associated with poorly water-soluble drugs; detailed discussions are carried out on topics including solid-form selection of the drug substance, drug product development using novel pharmaceutical technologies, development of control strategies, etc.; (3) case studies of marketed drug products of poorly water-soluble drugs in various dosage forms; this part uses the public information of the approved products as examples to support the discussions as outlined in part (2); and (4) brief discussion on the concept of Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) in the development of poorly soluble drugs. The book chapter concludes with a brief summary which emphasizes on the link between regulation and science.

This book chapter was written by Zedong Dong and Hasmukh Patel in their private capacity. No official support or endorsement by the Food and Drug Administration is intended or should be inferred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Drug substance means an active ingredient that is intended to furnish pharmacological activity or other direct effect in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease or to affect the structure or any function of the human body, but does not include intermediates use in the synthesis of such ingredient (21 CFR 314.3(b)).

  2. 2.

    Drug product means a finished dosage form, for example, tablet, capsule, or solution, that contains a drug substance, generally, but not necessarily, in association with one or more other ingredients (21 CFR 314.3(b)).

  3. 3.

    Active also refers to drug substance.

References

  • Amidon GL, Lennernaes H, Shah VP et al (1995) A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm Res 12:413–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer J, Spanton S, Henry R et al (2001) Ritonavir: an extraordinary example of conformational polymorphism. Pharm Res 18:859–866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa R (2009) Nanopharmaceuticals for drug delivery – a review. Drug Deliv 3:122–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchardt RT, Kerns EH, Lipinski CA et al (eds) (2004) Pharmaceutical profiling in drug discovery for lead selection. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, Arlington, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain HG (ed) (2009) Polymorphism in pharmaceutical solids, 2nd edn. New York, Informa Healthcare

    Google Scholar 

  • Canon JB (2008) Chemical and physical stability considerations for lipid-based drug formulations. Am Pharm Rev 11(132):134–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemburkar SR, Bauer J, Deming K et al (2000) Dealing with the impact of ritonavir polymorphs on the late stages of bulk drug process development. Org Process Res Dev 4:413–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuine JF (2009) Lipid-based oral drug delivery systems to enhance solubility and absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs. Am Pharm Rev 12:74–83

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dubin CH (2006) Formulation strategies for poorly soluble drugs. Drug Del Technol 6:34–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunitz JD, Bernstein J (1995) Disappearing polymorphs. Acounts Chem Res 28:193–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FDA (1987a) Guideline for submitting supporting documentation in drug applications for the manufacture of drug substances

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (1987b) Guidance for submitting documentation for the manufacture of and controls for drug products

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (1989) Guideline for drug master files. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm122886.htm. Accessed 30 March 2011

  • FDA (1995) Guidance for industry − content and format of investigational new drug applications (INDs) for Phase 1 studies of drugs, including well-characterized, therapeutic, biotechnology-derived products

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (1997a) Guidance for industry − dissolution testing of immediate release solid oral dosage forms

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (1997b) Guidance for industry − extended release oral dosage forms: development, evaluation, and application of in vitro/in vivo correlation

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2000a) Guidance for industry − analytical procedures and methods validation

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2000b) Guidance for industry − Waiver of in vivo bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms based on a biopharmaceutics classification system.

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2001) Guidance for industry − M4Q: the CTD — quality

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2003a) Guidance for industry − INDs for Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls information

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2003b) Guidance for industry − bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug products — general considerations

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2008) Guidance for industry − genotoxic and carcinogenic impurities in drug substances and products: recommended approaches

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2010) The FDA’s drug review process: ensuring drugs are safe and effective. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm143534.htm. Accessed 30 March 2011

  • FDA (2011a) Guidances (Drugs). http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm. Accessed June 20, 2011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2011b) Manual of policies and procedures (CDER). http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDER/ManualofPoliciesProcedures/default.htm. Accessed June 20, 2011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flinn T, Northen J, Fernandes P (2008) New drug development: getting to the optimal physical form. Pharma Chem 7:20–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Florence AJ (2009) Approaches to high-throughput physical form screening and discovery. Drugs Pharm Sci 192:139–184

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fort JJ, Krill SL, Law D et al (2000) Solid dispersion pharmaceutical formulations. US Patent 7,364,752, 10 Nov 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Gift AD, Luner PE, Luedeman L et al (2009) Manipulating hydrate formation during high shear wet granulation using polymeric excipients. J Pharm Sci 98:4670–4683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guarino RA (ed) (2004) New drug approval process, 4th edn. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou T, Xu X (2004) Recent development and application of virtual screening in drug discovery: an overview. Curr Pharm Design 10:1011–1033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Johnston KP, Williams RO III (2004) Nanoparticle engineering processes for enhancing the dissolution rates of poorly water soluble drugs. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 30:233–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ICH (1996) Stability testing: photostability testing of new drug substances and products Q1B

    Google Scholar 

  • ICH (1999) Specifications: test procedures and acceptance criteria for new drug substances and new drug products: chemical substances Q6A

    Google Scholar 

  • ICH (2000) Good manufacturing practice guide for active pharmaceutical ingredients Q7

    Google Scholar 

  • ICH (2003a) Stability testing of new drug substances and products Q1A(R2)

    Google Scholar 

  • ICH (2003b) Evaluation for stability data Q1E

    Google Scholar 

  • ICH (2005) Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2(R1)

    Google Scholar 

  • ICH (2006a) Impurities in new drug substances Q3A(R2)

    Google Scholar 

  • ICH (2006b) Impurities in new drug products Q3B(R2)

    Google Scholar 

  • ICH (2011a) Impurities: guideline for residual solvents Q3C(R5)

    Google Scholar 

  • ICH (2011b) Quality guidelines. http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/article/quality-guidelines.html. Accessed June 20, 2011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Intelence® (etravirine) Tablets full prescribing information (2010) http://www.intelence-info.com/sites/default/files/pdf/INTELENCE_Booklet_Package_Insert_hcp.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2011

  • Kobayashi Y, Ito S, Itai S et al (2000) Physicochemical properties and bioavailability of ­carbamazepine polymorphs and dihydrate. Int J Pharm 193:137–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshman JP, Cao Y, Kowalski J et al (2008) Application of melt extrusion in the development of a physically and chemically stable high-energy amorphous solid dispersion of a poorly ­water-soluble drug. Mol Pharm 5:994–1002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lang M, Kampf JW, Matzger AJ (2002) Form IV of carbamazepine. J Pharm Sci 91:1186–1190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Law D, Schmitt EA, Marsh KC et al (2004) Ritonavir-PEG 8000 amorphous solid dispersions: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. J Pharm Sci 93:563–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehto P, Aaltonen J, Tenho M et al (2009) Solvent-mediated solid phase transformations of ­carbamazepine: effects of simulated intestinal fluid and fasted state simulated intestinal fluid. J Pharm Sci 98:985–996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lipari J, Al-Razzak LA, Ghosh S et al (1997) Pharmaceutical composition. US Patent 6,232,333, 7 Nov 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipinski CA (2000) Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 44:235–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liversidge GG, Cundy KC, Bishop JF et al (1991) Surface modified drug nanoparticles. US Patent 5,145,684, 25 Jan 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe JA, Jones P, Wilson DM (2009) The importance of target validation in drug discovery and development. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 12:581–584

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merisko-Liversidge EM, Liversidge GG (2008) Drug nanoparticles: formulating poorly water-soluble compounds. Toxicol Pathol 36:43–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merisko-Liversidge E, Liversidge GG, Cooper ER (2003) Nanosizing: a formulation approach for poorly-water-soluble compounds. Eur J Pharm Sci 18:113–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer MC, Straughn AB, Jarvi EJ et al (1992) The bioinequivalence of carbamazepine tablets with a history of clinical failures. Pharm Res 9:1612–1616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norvir® Soft Gelatin Capsule prescribing information (2010) http://www.rxabbott.com/pdf/­norpi2a.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2011.

  • O’Neil MJ (ed) (2006) The Merck index: an encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, and biologicals, 13th edn. Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Orange Book: approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations (2011) U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Silver Spring. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/default.cfm. Accessed 31 March 2011

  • Porter CJH, Wasan KM, Constantinides P (2008) Lipid-based systems for the enhanced delivery of poorly water soluble drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:615–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pouton CW (2006) Formulation of poorly water-soluble drugs for oral administration: ­physicochemical and physiological issues and the lipid formulation classification system. Eur J Pharm Sci 29:278–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radomska-Soukharev A (2007) Stability of lipid excipients in solid lipid nanoparticles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59:411–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radomska-Soukharev A, Mueller RH (2006) Chemical stability of lipid excipients in SLN-production of test formulations, characterization and short-term stability. Pharmazie 61:425–430

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rapamune® Oral Solution prescribing information (2010) http://labeling.pfizer.com/showlabeling.aspx?id =  139. Accessed 31 March 2011

  • Rogge MC, Taft DR (eds) (2010) Preclinical drug development, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustichelli C, Gamberini G, Ferioli V et al (2000) Solid-state study of polymorphic drugs: ­carbamazepine. J Pharm Biomed Anal 23:41–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryde NP, Ruddy SB (2000) Solid dose nanoparticulate compositions comprising a synergistic combination of a polymeric surface stabilizer and dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate. US Patent 6,375,986, 21 Sept 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryde T, Gustow EE, Ruddy SB et al (2003a) Nanoparticulate fibrate formulations. US Patent 7,276,249, 23 May 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryde T, Gustow EE, Ruddy SB et al (2003b) Methods of treatment using nanoparticulate ­fenofibrate compositions. US Patent 7,320,802, 27 Oct 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Salyer KL (2009) Preclinical pharmacokinetic models for drug discovery and development. Drugs Pharm Sci 186:659–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Serajuddin ATM (1999) Solid dispersion of poorly water-soluble drugs: early promises, ­subsequent problems, and recent breakthroughs. J Pharm Sci 88:1058–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl PH, Sutter B (2006) Salt selection. In: Hilfiker R (ed) Polymorphism: in the pharmaceutical industry. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang B, Cheng G, Gu JC et al (2008) Development of solid self-emulsifying drug delivery ­systems: preparation techniques and dosage forms. Drug Discov Today 13:606–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian F, Zeitler JA, Strachan CJ et al (2006) Characterizing the conversion kinetics of carbamazepien polymorphs to the dihydrate in aqueous suspension using Raman spectroscopy. J Pharm Biomed Anal 40:271–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tong P, Zografi G (2004) Effects of water vapor absorption on the physical and chemical stability of amorphous sodium indomethacin. AAPS PharmSciTech 5:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USP 33-NF 28 (2011) United States Pharmacopeia 33/National Formulary 28. United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  • Verreck G, Baert L (2006) Antiviral compositions. US Patent 7,887,845, 3 Feb 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Waranis, RP, Leonard TW (1994) Rapamycin formulations for oral administration. US Patent 5,536,729, 9 Sep 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Weuts I, Van Dycke F, Voorspoels J et al (2011) Physicochemical properties of the amorphous drug, cast films, and spray dried powders to predict formulation probability of success for solid dispersions: etravirine. J Pharm Sci 100:260–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang SY (2010) Pharmacophore modeling and application in drug discovery: challenges and recent advances. Drug Discov Today 15:444–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank Drs. Richard Lostritto, Christine Moore, and Stephen Moore for critically reviewing the manuscript and insightful discussions during the preparation of this book chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zedong Dong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dong, Z., Patel, H. (2012). Scientific and Regulatory Considerations for Development and Commercialization of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs. In: Williams III, R., Watts, A., Miller, D. (eds) Formulating Poorly Water Soluble Drugs. AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series, vol 3. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1144-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics