Methods of Electrodermal Recording



The second chapter of the book discusses the different methods used for electrodermal recording. As mentioned in the introduction to Chap. 1, the observation of electrodermal phenomena requires only relatively basic equipment. As a consequence, a variety of recording methods have been proposed.


Electrodermal Recording Electrodermal Phenomena Edelberg Electrode Cream Constant Voltage Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ahlberg, J. H., Nilson, E. N., & Walsh, J. L. (1967). The theories of splines and their applications. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, D. M., Trengove, C., Johnston, P., Cooper, T., August, J. P., & Gordon, E. (2005). Separating individual skin conductance responses in a short interstimulus-interval paradigm. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 146, 116–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almasi, J. J., & Schmitt, O. H. (1974). Automated measurement of bioelectrical impedance at very low frequencies. Computers and Biomedical Research, 7, 449–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, R. K., & Kenney, W. L. (1987). Effect of age on heat-activated sweat gland density and flow during exercise in dry heat. Journal of Applied Physiology, 63, 1089–1094.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Andresen, B. (1987). Differentielle Psychophysiologie valenzkonträrer Aktivierungsdimensionen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  6. Andrew, W., & Winston-Salem, N. C. (1966). Structural alternations with aging in the nervous system. Journal of Chronic Disease, 3, 575–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arena, J. G., Blanchard, E. B., Andrasik, F., Cotch, P. A., & Myers, P. E. (1983). Reliability of psychophysiological assessment. Behavior Research and Therapy, 21, 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Asso, D., & Braier, J. R. (1982). Changes with the menstrual cycle in psychophysiological and self-report measures of activation. Biological Psychology, 15, 95–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bach, D. R., Flandin, G., Friston, K. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2009). Time-series analysis for rapid event-related skin conductance responses. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 184, 224–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bach, D. R., Friston, K. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2010). Analytic measures for quantification of arousal from spontaneous skin conductance fluctuations. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 76, 52–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Balin, A. K., & Pratt, L. A. (1989). Physiological consequences of human skin aging. Cutis, 43, 431–436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Baltissen, R. (1983). Psychische und somatische Reaktionen auf affektive visuelle Reize bei jungen und alten Personen. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
  13. Freixa i Baqué, E. (1982). Reliability of electrodermal measures: A compilation. Biological Psychology, 14, 219–229.Google Scholar
  14. Barabasz, A. F. (1970). Galvanic skin response and test anxiety among Negros and Caucasians. Child Study Journal, 1, 33–35.Google Scholar
  15. Barry, R. J. (1981). Comparability of EDA effects obtained with constant-current skin resistance and constant-voltage skin conductance methods. Physiological Psychology, 9, 325–328.Google Scholar
  16. Becker-Carus, C., & Schwarz, E. (1981). Differentielle Unterschiede psychophysiologischer Aktivierungsverläufe und Kurzzeitgedächtnisleistungen in Abhängigkeit von Persönlichkeitskriterien. In W. Janke (Ed.), Beiträge zur Methodik in der differentiellen, diagnostischen und klinischen Psychologie (pp. 87–103). Königstein: Anton Hain.Google Scholar
  17. Benedek, M., & Kaernbach, C. (2010). Decomposition of skin conductance data by means of nonnegative deconvolution. Psychophysiology, 47, 647–658.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Benjamin, L. S. (1967). Facts and artifacts in using analysis of covariance to “undo” the law of initial values. Psychophysiology, 4, 187–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ben-Shakhar, G. (1985). Standardization within individuals: A simple method to neutralize individual differences in skin conductance. Psychophysiology, 22, 292–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ben-Shakhar, G., Lieblich, I., & Kugelmass, S. (1975). Detection of information and GSR habituation: An attempt to derive detection efficiency from two habituation curves. Psychophysiology, 12, 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Berardesca, E., de Rigal, J., Leveque, J. L., & Maibach, H. I. (1991). In vivo biophysical characterization of skin physiological differences in races. Dermatologica, 182, 89–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bernstein, A. S. (1965). Race and examiner as significant influences on basal skin impedance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 346–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Besthorn, D., Schellberg, D., Pfleger, W., & Gasser, T. (1989). Using variance as a tonic SCR parameter. Journal of Psychophysiology, 3, 419–424.Google Scholar
  24. Biro, V., & Stukovsky, R. (1993). Components of the GSR curve in adult males. Studia Psychologica, 35, 111–117.Google Scholar
  25. Bitterman, M. E., & Holtzman, W. H. (1952). Conditioning and extinction of the galvanic skin response as a function of anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 615–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Blank, I. H., & Finesinger, J. E. (1946). Electrical resistance of the skin. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 56, 544–557.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Blecker, C. R., Kirsch, P., Schaefer, F., & Vaitl, D. (2001). Skin conductance measurement during fMRT scans: A methodology study. Psychophysiology, 38, S27.Google Scholar
  28. Block, J. D., & Bridger, W. H. (1962). The law of initial value in psychophysiology: A reformulation in terms of experimental and theoretical considerations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 98, 1229–1241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Botwinick, J., & Kornetsky, C. (1960). Age differences in the acquisition and extinction of the GSR. Journal of Gerontology, 15, 83–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Boucsein, W. (1988). Elektrodermale Aktivität. Grundlagen, Methoden und Anwendungen. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Boucsein, W. (1992). Electrodermal Activity. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  32. Boucsein, W. (2001). Physiologische Grundlagen und Meßmethoden der dermalen Aktivität. In F. Rösler (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Bereich Psychophysiologie, Band 1: Grundlagen und Methoden der Psychophysiologie (pp. 551–623). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  33. Boucsein, W. (2005). Electrodermal measurement. In N. Stanton, A. Hedge, K. Brookhuis, E. Salas, & H. Hendrick (Eds.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomic methods (pp. 18–1–18–8). CRC: Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  34. Boucsein, W., Baltissen, R., & Euler, W. (1984). Dependence of skin conductance reactions and skin resistance reactions on previous level. Psychophysiology, 21, 212–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Boucsein, W., & Hoffmann, G. (1979). A direct comparison of the skin conductance and skin resistance methods. Psychophysiology, 16, 66–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Boucsein, W., Schaefer, F., & Neijenhuisen, H. (1989). Continuous recording of impedance and phase angle during electrodermal reactions and the locus of impedance change. Psychophysiology, 26, 369–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Boucsein, W., Schaefer, F., & Sommer, T. (2001). Electrodermal long-term monitoring in everyday life. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Progress in ambulatory assessment (pp. 549–560). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  38. Boucsein, W., & Thum, M. (1996). Multivariate psychophysiological analysis of stress-strain processes under different break schedules during computer work. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment (pp. 305–313). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  39. Boucsein, W., & Thum, M. (1997). Design of work/rest schedules for computer work based on psychophysiological recovery measures. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 20, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Boucsein, W., et al. (2012). Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements: An update. Psychophysiology, 49 (in preparation).Google Scholar
  41. Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Sabatinelli, D., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation II: Sex differences in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 300–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Breska, A., Maoz, K., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2011). Interstimulus intervals for skin conductance response measurement. Psychophysiology, 48, 437–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Brown, C. C. (1972). Instruments in psychophysiology. In N. S. Greenfield & R. A. Sternbach (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 159–195). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  44. Bull, R. H. C., & Gale, A. (1971). The relationships between some measures of the galvanic skin response. Psychonomic Science, 25, 293–294.Google Scholar
  45. Bull, R. H. C., & Gale, A. (1973). The reliability of and interrelationships between various measures of electrodermal activity. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 300–306.Google Scholar
  46. Bull, R., & Gale, A. (1974). Does the law of initial value apply to the galvanic skin response? Biological Psychology, 1, 213–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Bundy, R. S., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (1975). Stimulus specificity of electrodermal recovery time: An examination and reinterpretation of the evidence. Psychophysiology, 12, 406–411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Burbank, D. P., & Webster, J. G. (1978). Reducing skin potential motion artifact by skin abrasion. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 16, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Burstein, K. R., Fenz, W. D., Bergeron, J., & Epstein, S. (1965). A comparison of skin potential and skin resistance responses as measures of emotional responsivity. Psychophysiology, 2, 14–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Burton, C. E., David, R. M., Portnoy, W. M., & Akers, L. A. (1974). The application of bode analysis to skin impedance. Psychophysiology, 11, 517–525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Campbell, S. D., Kraning, K. K., Schibli, E. G., & Momii, S. T. (1977). Hydration characteristics and electrical resistivity of stratum corneum using a noninvasive four-point microelectrode method. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 69, 290–295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Catania, J. J., Thompson, L. W., Michalewski, H. A., & Bowman, T. E. (1980). Comparisons of sweat gland counts, electrodermal activity, and habituation behavior in young and old groups of subjects. Psychophysiology, 17, 146–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Christie, M. J., & Venables, P. H. (1971). Basal palmar skin potential and the electrocardiogram T-wave. Psychophysiology, 8, 779–786.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Christie, M. J., & Venables, P. H. (1972). Site, state, and subject characteristics of palmar skin potential levels. Psychophysiology, 9, 645–649.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Clements, K. (1989). The use of purpose-made electrode gels in the measurement of electrodermal activity: A correction to Grey and Smith (1984). Psychophysiology, 26, 495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Conklin, J. E. (1951). Three factors affecting the general level of electrical skin-resistance. The American Journal of Psychology, 64, 78–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Corah, N. L., & Stern, J. A. (1963). Stability and adaptation of some measures of electrodermal activity in children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 80–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Cort, J., Hayworth, J., Little, B., Lobstein, T., McBrearty, E., Reszetniak, S., et al. (1978). The relationship between the amplitude and the recovery half-time of the skin conductance response. Biological Psychology, 6, 309–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Crider, A., & Lunn, R. (1971). Electrodermal lability as a personality dimension. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5, 145–150.Google Scholar
  60. Critchley, H. D., Elliott, R., Mathias, C. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2000). Neural activity relating to generation and representation of galvanic skin conductance responses: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 3033–3040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Curzi-Dascalova, L., Pajot, N., & Dreyfus-Brisac, C. (1973). Spontaneous skin potential responses in sleeping infants between 24 and 41 weeks of conceptional age. Psychophysiology, 10, 478–487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Darrow, C. W. (1937b). The equation of the galvanic skin reflex curve: I. The dynamics of reaction in relation to excitation-background. Journal of General Psychology, 16, 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Davis, T., Love, B. C., & Maddox, W. T. (2009). Anticipatory emotions in decision tasks: Covert markers of value or attentional processes? Cognition, 112, 195–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. De Jongh, G. J. (1981). Porosity of human skin in vivo assessed via water loss, carbon dioxide loss and electrical impedance for healthy volunteers, atopic and psoriatic patients. Current Problems in Dermatology, 9, 83–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Deltombe, T., Hanson, P., Jamart, J., & Clérin, M. (1998). The influence of skin temperature on latency and amplitude of the sympathetic skin response in normal subjects. Muscle & Nerve, 21, 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Docter, R., & Friedman, L. F. (1966). Thirty-day stability of spontaneous galvanic skin responses in man. Psychophysiology, 2, 311–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Edelberg, R. (1964). Independence of galvanic skin response amplitude and sweat production. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 42, 443–448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Edelberg, R. (1967). Electrical properties of the skin. In C. C. Brown (Ed.), Methods in psychophysiology (pp. 1–53). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  69. Edelberg, R. (1970). The information content of the recovery limb of the electrodermal response. Psychophysiology, 6, 527–539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Edelberg, R. (1971). Electrical properties of skin. In H. R. Elden (Ed.), A treatise of the skin (Biophysical properties of the skin, Vol. 1, pp. 519–551). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  71. Edelberg, R. (1972a). Electrical activity of the skin: Its measurement and uses in psychophysiology. In N. S. Greenfield & R. A. Sternbach (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 367–418). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  72. Edelberg, R. (1972b). Electrodermal recovery rate, goal-orientation, and aversion. Psychophysiology, 9, 512–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Edelberg, R. (1993). Electrodermal mechanisms: A critique of the two-effector hypothesis and a proposed replacement. In J.-C. Roy, W. Boucsein, D. C. Fowles, & J. H. Gruzelier (Eds.), Progress in electrodermal research (pp. 7–30). London: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Edelberg, R., Greiner, T., & Burch, N. R. (1960). Some membrane properties of the effector in the galvanic skin response. Journal of Applied Physiology, 15, 691–696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Edelberg, R., & Muller, M. (1981). Prior activity as a determinant of electrodermal recovery rate. Psychophysiology, 18, 17–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Eisdorfer, C. (1978). Psychophysiological and cognitive studies in the aged. In G. Usdin & D. J. Hofling (Eds.), Aging: The process and the people (pp. 96–128). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  77. Eisdorfer, C., Doerr, H. O., & Follette, W. (1980). Electrodermal reactivity: An analysis by age and sex. Journal of Human Stress, 6, 39–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Eisenstein, E. M., Bonheim, P., & Eisenstein, D. (1995). Habituation of the galvanic skin response to tone as a function of age. Brain Research Bulletin, 37, 343–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. El-Sheikh, M. (2007). Children’s skin conductance level and reactivity: Are these measures stable over time and across tasks? Developmental Psychobiology, 49, 180–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Faber, S. (1977). Methodische Probleme bei Hautwiderstandsmessungen. Biomedizinische Technik, 22, 393–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Faber, S. (1980). Hautleitfähigkeitsuntersuchungen als Methode in der Arbeitswissenschaft. Düsseldorf: Fortschritt-Berichte der VDI-Zeitschriften.Google Scholar
  82. Fahrenberg, J., & Foerster, F. (1982). Covariation and consistency of activation parameters. Biological Psychology, 15, 151–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Fahrenberg, J., Foerster, F., Schneider, H. J., Müller, W., & Myrtek, M. (1984). Aktivierungsforschung im Labor-Feld-Vergleich. München: Minerva.Google Scholar
  84. Fahrenberg, J., & Myrtek, M. (1967). Zur Methodik der Verlaufsanalyse: Ausgangswerte, Reaktionsgrößen (Reaktivität) und Verlaufswerte. Psychologische Beiträge, 10, 58–77.Google Scholar
  85. Fahrenberg, J., & Myrtek, M. (Eds.). (1996). Ambulatory assessment. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  86. Fahrenberg, J., & Myrtek, M. (Eds.). (2001). Progress in Ambulatory Assessment. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  87. Fahrenberg, J., Schneider, H.-J., & Safian, P. (1987). Psychophysiological assessments in a repeated-measurement design extending over a one-year interval: Trends and stability. Biological Psychology, 24, 49–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Fahrenberg, J., Walschburger, P., Foerster, F., Myrtek, M., & Müller, W. (1979). Psychophysiologische Aktivierungsforschung: Ein Beitrag zu den Grundlagen der multivariaten Emotions – und Stress-Theorie. München: Minerva.Google Scholar
  89. Fenske, N. A., & Lober, C. W. (1986). Structural and functional changes of normal aging skin. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 15, 571–585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Fisher, L. E., & Kotses, H. (1973). Race differences and experimenter race effect in galvanic skin response. Psychophysiology, 10, 578–582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Fisher, L. E., & Winkel, M. H. (1979). Time of quarter effect: An uncontrolled variable in electrodermal research. Psychophysiology, 16, 158–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Fletcher, R. P., Venables, P. H., & Mitchell, D. A. (1982). Estimation of half from quarter recovery time of SCR. Psychophysiology, 19, 115–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Foerster, F. (1984). Computerprogramme zur Biosignalanalyse. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  94. Forbes, T. W. (1964). Problems in measurement of electrodermal phenomena – choice of method and phenomena – potential, impedance, resistance. Psychophysiology, 1, 26–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Forbes, T. W., & Landis, C. (1935). The limiting A. C. frequency for the exhibition of the galvanic skin (“psychogalvanic”) response. The Journal of General Psychology, 13, 188–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Foulds, I. S., & Barker, A. T. (1983). Human skin battery potentials and their possible role in wound healing. British Journal of Dermatology, 109, 515–522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Fowles, D. C. (1974). Mechanisms of electrodermal activity. In R. F. Thompson & M. M. Patterson (Eds.), Methods in physiological psychology (Bioelectric recording techniques, Part C: Receptor and effector processes, Vol. 1, pp. 231–271). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  98. Fowles, D. C. (1986a). The eccrine system and electrodermal activity. In M. G. H. Coles, E. Donchin, & S. W. Porges (Eds.), Psychophysiology: Systems, processes, and applications (pp. 51–96). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  99. Fowles, D. C., Christie, M. J., Edelberg, R., Grings, W. W., Lykken, D. T., & Venables, P. H. (1981). Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology, 18, 232–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Fowles, D. C., Kochanska, G., & Murray, K. (2000). Electrodermal activity and temperament in preschool children. Psychophysiology, 37, 777–787.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Fowles, D. C., & Rosenberry, R. (1973). Effects of epidermal hydration on skin potential responses and levels. Psychophysiology, 10, 601–611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Fowles, D. C., & Schneider, R. E. (1974). Effects of epidermal hydration on skin conductance responses and levels. Biological Psychology, 2, 67–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Fowles, D. C., & Schneider, R. E. (1978). Electrolyte medium effects on measurements of palmar skin potential. Psychophysiology, 15, 474–482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Francini, F., Zoppi, M., Maresca, M., & Procacci, P. (1979). Skin potential and EMG changes induced by cutaneous electrical stimulation. Applied Neurophysiology, 42, 113–124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Fredrikson, M. (1986). Racial differences in cardiovascular reactivity to mental stress in essential hypertension. Journal of Hypertension, 4, 325–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Fredrikson, M., Furmark, T., Olsson, M. T., Fischer, H., Andersson, J., & Langström, B. (1998). Functional neuoranatomical correlates of electrodermal activity: A positron emission tomographic study. Psychophysiology, 35, 179–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Freedman, R. R., Woodward, S., & Norton, D. A. M. (1992). Laboratory and ambulatory monitoring of menopausal hot flushes: Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic women. Journal of Psychophysiology, 6, 162–166.Google Scholar
  108. Fried, R. (1982). On-line analysis of the GSR. The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 17, 89–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Furchtgott, E., & Busemeyer, J. K. (1979). Heart rate and skin conductance during cognitive processes as a function of age. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 183–190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Furedy, J. J., & Heslegrave, R. J. (1983). A consideration of recent criticisms of the t-wave amplitude index of myocardial sympathetic activity. Psychophysiology, 20, 204–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Galbrecht, C. R., Dykman, R. A., Reese, W. G., & Suzuki, T. (1965). Intrasession adaptation and intersession extinction of the components of the orienting response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 585–597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Gao, Y., Raine, A., Dawson, M. E., Venables, P. H., & Mednick, S. A. (2007). Development of skin conductance orienting, habituation, and reorienting from ages 3 to 8 years: A longitudinal latent growth curve analysis. Psychophysiology, 44, 855–863.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Garwood, M., Engel, B. T., & Kusterer, J. P. (1981). Skin potential level: Age and epidermal hydration effects. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 7–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Garwood, M., Engel, B. T., & Quilter, R. E. (1979). Age differences in the effect of epidermal hydration on electrodermal activity. Psychophysiology, 16, 311–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Gavazzeni, J., Wiens, S., & Fischer, H. (2008). Age effects to negative arousal differ for self-report and electrodermal activity. Psychophysiology, 45, 148–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Gaviria, B., Coyne, L., & Thetford, P. E. (1969). Correlation of skin potential and skin resistance measures. Psychophysiology, 5, 465–477.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Germana, J. (1968). Rate of habituation and the law of initial values. Psychophysiology, 5, 31–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Goldstein, J. M., Jerram, M., Abbs, B., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., & Makris, N. (2010). Sex differences in stress response circuitry activation dependent on female hormonal cycle. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 431–438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Goldstein, J. M., Jerram, M., Poldrack, R., Ahern, T., Kennedy, D. N., Seidman, L. J., et al. (2005). Hormonal cycle modulates arousal circuitry in women using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 9309–9316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Gómez-Amor, J., Martínez-Selva, J. M., Román, F., Zamora, S., & Sastre, J. F. (1990). Electrodermal activity, hormonal levels and subjective experience during the menstrual cycle. Biological Psychology, 30, 125–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Grey, S. J., & Smith, B. L. (1984). A comparison between commercially available electrode gels and purpose-made gel, in the measurement of electrodermal activity. Psychophysiology, 21, 551–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Grimnes, S. (1982). Psychogalvanic reflex and changes in electrical parameters of dry skin. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 20, 734–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Grimnes, S. (1983). Impedance measurement of individual skin surface electrodes. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 21, 750–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Grimnes, S., Jabbari, A., Martinsen, O. G., & Tronstad, C. (2010). Electrodermal activity by DC potential and AC conductance measured simultaneously at the same skin site. Skin Research and Technology, 17, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Grings, W. W. (1974). Recording of electrodermal phenomena. In R. F. Thompson & M. M. Patterson (Eds.), Methods in physiological psychology (Bioelectric recording techniques, Part C: Receptor and effector processes, Vol. 1, pp. 273–296). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  126. Grings, W. W., & Schell, A. M. (1969). Magnitude of electrodermal response to a standard stimulus as a function of intensity and proximity of a prior stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67, 77–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Gruzelier, J. H., & Venables, P. H. (1972). Skin conductance orienting activity in a heterogeneous sample of schizophrenics: Possible evidence of limbic dysfunction. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 155, 277–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Hagfors, C. (1964). Beiträge zur Meßtheorie der hautgalvanischen Reaktion. Psychologische Beiträge, 7, 517–538.Google Scholar
  129. Hare, R. D., Wood, K., Britain, S., & Frazelle, J. (1971). Autonomic responses to affective visual stimulation: Sex differences. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5, 14–22.Google Scholar
  130. Hettema, J. M., Annas, P., Neale, M. C., Kendler, K. S., & Fredrikson, M. (2003). A twin study of the genetics of fear conditioning. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 702–708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Hinton, J., O’Neill, M., Dishman, J., & Webster, S. (1979). Electrodermal indices of public offending and recidivism. Biological Psychology, 9, 297–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Hölzl, R., Wilhelm, H., Lutzenberger, W., & Schandry, R. (1975). Galvanic skin response: Some methodological considerations on measurement, habituation, and classical conditioning. Archiv für Psychologie (Archives of Psychology), 127, 1–22.Google Scholar
  133. Hord, D. J., Johnson, L. C., & Lubin, A. (1964). Differential effect of the law of initial value (LIV) on autonomic variables. Psychophysiology, 1, 79–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Hoyt, C. J. (1941). Note on a simplified method of computing test reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1, 93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Hunt, D. P. (1977). A mathematical model of a simple human galvanic skin response upon its rate topography. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 149–151.Google Scholar
  136. Hupka, R. B., & Levinger, G. (1967). Within subject correspondence between skin conductance and skin potential under conditions of activity and passivity. Psychophysiology, 4, 161–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Hustmyer, F. E., & Burdick, J. A. (1965). Consistency and test-retest reliability of spontaneous autonomic nervous system activity and eye movements. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 20, 1225–1228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Hygge, S., & Hugdahl, K. (1985). Skin conductance recordings and the NaCl concentration of the electrolyte. Psychophysiology, 22, 365–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Iacono, W. G., Lykken, D. T., Haroian, K. P., Peloquin, L. J., Valentine, R. H., & Tuason, V. B. (1984). Electrodermal activity in euthymic patients with affective disorders: One-year retest stability and the effects of stimulus intensity and significance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 304–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Janes, C. L. (1982). Electrodermal recovery and stimulus significance. Psychophysiology, 19, 129–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Janes, C. L., Hesselbrock, V., & Stern, J. A. (1978). Parental psychopathology, age, and race as related to electrodermal activity of children. Psychophysiology, 15, 24–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Janes, C. L., Strock, B. D., Weeks, D. G., & Worland, J. (1985). The effect of stimulus significance on skin conductance recovery. Psychophysiology, 22, 138–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Janes, C. L., Worland, J., & Stern, J. (1976). Skin potential and vasomotor responsiveness of black and white children. Psychophysiology, 13, 523–527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Jänig, W. (1990). Functions of the sympathetic innervation of the skin. In A. D. Loewy & K. M. Spyer (Eds.), Central regulation of autonomic functions (pp. 334–347). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  145. Johnson, L. C. (1963). Some attributes of spontaneous autonomic activity. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 415–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Johnson, L. C., & Corah, N. L. (1963). Racial differences in the skin. Science, 139, 766–767.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Johnson, L. C., & Landon, M. M. (1965). Eccrine sweat gland activity and racial differences in resting skin conductance. Psychophysiology, 1, 322–329.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Johnson, L. C., & Lubin, A. (1972). On planning psychophysiological experiments: Design, measurement, and analysis. In N. S. Greenfield & R. A. Sternbach (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 125–158). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  149. Jones, B. E., & Ayres, J. J. B. (1966). Significance and reliability of shock-induced changes in basal skin conductance. Psychophysiology, 2, 322–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Jorgenson, R. J., Salinas, C. F., Dowben, J. S., & St. John, D. L. (1988). A population study on the density of palmar sweat pores. Birth Defects, 24, 51–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. Juniper, K., & Dykman, R. (1967). Skin resistance, sweat gland counts, salivary flow, and gastric secretion: Age, race, and sex differences, and intercorrelations. Psychophysiology, 4, 216–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Kaelbling, R., King, F. A., Achenbach, K., Branson, R., & Pasamanick, B. (1960). Reliability of autonomic responses. Psychological Reports, 6, 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Katkin, E. S. (1965). Relationship between manifest anxiety and two indices of autonomic response to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 324–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Kaye, H. (1964). Skin conductance in the human neonate. Child Development, 35, 1297–1305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Ketterer, M. W., & Smith, B. D. (1977). Bilateral electrodermal activity, lateralized cerebral processing and sex. Psychophysiology, 14, 513–516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Kimmel, H. D., & Hill, F. A. (1961). A comparison of two electrodermal measures of response to stress. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 54, 395–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Kimmel, H. D., & Kimmel, E. (1965). Sex differences in adaptation of the GSR under repeated applications of a visual stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 536–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Knezevic, W., & Bajada, S. (1985). Peripheral autonomic surface potential: A quantitative technique for recording sympathetic conduction in man. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 67, 239–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Koglbauer, I., Kallus K. W., Braunstingl, R., & Boucsein, W. (2011). Recovery training in simulator improves performance and psychophysiological state of pilots during simulated and real VFR flight. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 21 (in press).Google Scholar
  160. Köhler, T., Vögele, C., & Weber, D. (1989). Die Zahl der aktiven Schweißdrüsen (PSI, Palmar Sweat Index) als psychologischer Parameter. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 24, 89–100.Google Scholar
  161. Kopacz, G. M., & Smith, B. D. (1971). Sex differences in skin conductance measures as a function of shock threat. Psychophysiology, 8, 293–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Korol, B., Bergfeld, G., & McLaughlin, L. J. (1975). Skin color and autonomic nervous system measures. Psychology and Behavior, 14, 575–578.Google Scholar
  163. Korol, B., & Kane, R. (1978). An examination of the relationship between race, skin color and a series of autonomic nervous system measures. The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 13, 121–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 686–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Kryspin, J. (1965). The phoreographical determination of the electrical properties of human skin. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 44, 227–229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Kugelmass, S., & Lieblich, I. (1968). Relation between ethnic origin and GSR reactivity in psychophysiological detection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 158–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Lacey, J. I. (1956). The evaluation of autonomic responses: Toward a general solution. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 67, 125–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Lader, M. H. (1970). The unit of quantification of the G.S.R. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 14, 109–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Lathrop, R. G. (1964). Measurement of analog sequential dependencies. Human Factors, 6, 233–239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. Lawler, J. C., Davis, M. J., & Griffith, E. C. (1960). Electrical characteristics of the skin: The impedance of the surface sheath and deep tissues. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 34, 301–308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Levander, S. E., Schalling, D. S., Lidberg, L., Bartfai, A., & Lidberg, Y. (1980). Skin conductance recovery time and personality in a group of criminals. Psychophysiology, 17, 105–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Leveque, J. L., Corcuff, P., de Rigal, J., & Agache, P. (1984). In vivo studies of the evolution of physical properties of the human skin with age. International Journal of Dermatology, 23, 322–329.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Levey, A. B. (1980). Measurement units in psychophysiology. In I. Martin & P. H. Venables (Eds.), Techniques in psychophysiology (pp. 597–628). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  174. Levinson, D. F., & Edelberg, R. (1985). Scoring criteria for response latency and habituation in electrodermal research: A critique. Psychophysiology, 22, 417–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Lieblich, I., Kugelmass, S., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1973). Psychophysiological baselines as a function of race and ethnic origin. Psychophysiology, 10, 426–430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Lim, C. L., Gordon, E., Rennie, C., Wright, J. J., Bahramali, H., Li, W. M., et al. (1999). Dynamics of SCR, EEG, and ERP activity in an odball paradigm with short interstimulus intervals. Psychophysiology, 36, 543–551.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Lim, C. L., Rennie, C., Barry, J., Bahramali, H., Lazzaro, I., Manor, B., et al. (1997). Decomposing skin conductance into tonic and phasic components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 25, 97–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Lobstein, T., & Cort, J. (1978). The relationship between skin temperature and skin conductance activity: Indications of genetic and fitness determinants. Biological Psychology, 7, 139–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Lockhart, R. A. (1972). Interrelations between amplitude, latency, rise time, and the Edelberg recovery measure of the galvanic skin response. Psychophysiology, 9, 437–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Lowry, R. (1977). Active circuits for direct linear measurement of skin resistance and conductance. Psychophysiology, 14, 329–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Lüer, G., & Neufeldt, B. (1967). Über Zeit- und Höhenmaße der galvanischen Hautreaktion. Psychologische Forschung, 30, 400–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Lüer, G., & Neufeldt, B. (1968). Über den Zusammenhang zwischen Maßen der galvanischen Hautreaktion und Beurteilungen von Reizen durch Versuchspersonen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 15, 619–648.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  183. Lykken, D. T. (1959a). Properties of electrodes used in electrodermal measurement. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52, 629–634.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Lykken, D. T. (1971). Square-wave analysis of skin impedance. Psychophysiology, 7, 262–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Lykken, D. T. (1982). Research with twins: The concept of emergenesis. Psychophysiology, 19, 361–373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Lykken, D. T., Iacono, W. G., Haroian, K., McGue, M., & Bouchard, T. J. (1988). Habituation of the skin conductance response to strong stimuli: A twin study. Psychophysiology, 25, 4–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Lykken, D. T., Miller, R. D., & Strahan, R. F. (1966). GSR and polarization capacity of skin. Psychonomic Science, 4, 355–356.Google Scholar
  188. Lykken, D. T., Miller, R. D., & Strahan, R. F. (1968). Some properties of skin conductance and potential. Psychophysiology, 5, 253–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Lykken, D. T., & Rose, R. (1959). A rat-holder with electrodes for GSR measurement. The American Journal of Psychology, 72, 621–622.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Lykken, D. T., Rose, R., Luther, B., & Maley, M. (1966). Correcting psychophysiological measures for individual differences in range. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 481–484.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Lykken, D. T., & Venables, P. H. (1971). Direct measurement of skin conductance: A proposal for standardization. Psychophysiology, 8, 656–672.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Mahon, M. L., & Iacono, W. G. (1987). Another look at the relationship of electrodermal activity to electrode contact area. Psychophysiology, 24, 216–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Malmo, R. B. (1965). Finger- sweat prints in the differentiation of low and high incentive. Psychophysiology, 1, 231–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Malmstrom, E. J. (1968). The effect of prestimulus variability upon physiological reactivity scores. Psychophysiology, 5, 149–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Maltzman, I., Gould, J., Barnett, O. J., Raskin, D. C., & Wolff, C. (1979). Habituation of the GSR and digital vasomotor components of the orienting reflex as a consequence of task instructions and sex differences. Physiological Psychology, 7, 213–220.Google Scholar
  196. Martin, I., & Rust, J. (1976). Habituation and the structure of the electrodermal system. Psychophysiology, 13, 554–562.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. Martínez-Selva, J. M., Gómez-Amor, J., Olmos, E., Navarro, N., & Román, F. (1987). Sex and menstrual cycle differences in the habituation and spontaneous recovery of the electrodermal orienting reaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Maulsby, R. L., & Edelberg, R. (1960). The interrelationship between the galvanic skin response, basal resistance, and temperature. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 53, 475–479.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Mazurski, E. J., Bond, N. W., Siddle, D. A. T., & Lovibond, P. F. (1996). Conditioning with facial expressions of emotion: Effects of CS sex and age. Psychophysiology, 33, 416–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. McClendon, J. F., & Hemingway, A. (1930). The psychogalvanic reflex as related to the polarization-capacity of the skin. The American Journal of Psychology, 84, 77–83.Google Scholar
  201. McDowd, J. M., & Filion, D. L. (1992). Aging, selective attention, and inhibitory processes: A psychophysiological approach. Psychology and Aging, 7, 65–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. Mednick, S. A., & Schulsinger, F. (1968). Some premorbid characteristics related to breakdown in children with schizophrenic mothers. In S. Kety & D. Rosenthal (Eds.), The transmission of schizophrenia (pp. 267–291). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  203. Miller, L. H., & Shmavonian, B. H. (1965). Replicability of two GSR indices as a function of stress and cognitive activity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 753–756.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Millington, P. F., & Wilkinson, R. (1983). Skin. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  205. Mitchell, D. A., & Venables, P. H. (1980). The relationship of EDA to electrode size. Psychophysiology, 17, 408–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. Mize, M. M., Vila-Coro, A. A., & Prager, T. C. (1989). The relationship between postnatal skin maturation and electrical skin impedance. Archives of Dermatology, 125, 647–650.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. Montagu, J. D. (1958). The psycho-galvanic reflex: A comparison of AC skin resistance and skin potential changes. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 21, 119–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. Montagu, J. D. (1973). The measurement of electrodermal activity: An instrument for recording log skin admittance. Biological Psychology, 1, 161–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. Montagu, J. D., & Coles, E. M. (1968). Mechanism and measurement of the galvanic skin response: An addendum. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 74–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Morimoto, T. (1978). Variations of sweating activity due to sex, age and race. In A. Jarrett (Ed.), The physiology and pathophysiology of the skin (The sweat glands, skin permeation, lymphatics, and the nails, Vol. 5, pp. 1655–1666). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  211. Morkrid, L., & Qiao, Z.-G. (1988). Continuous estimation of parameters in skin electrical admittance from simultaneous measurements at two different frequencies. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 26, 633–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. Muthny, F. A. (1984). Elektrodermale Aktivität und palmare Schwitzaktivität als Biosignale der Haut in der psychophysiologischen Grundlagenforschung. Freiburg: Dreisam.Google Scholar
  213. Muthny, F. A., Foerster, F., Hoeppner, V., Mueller, W., & Walschburger, P. (1983). Skin evaporative water loss (SE) and skin conductance (SC) under various psychophysiological conditions. Biological Psychology, 16, 241–253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. Myrtek, M., & Foerster, F. (1986). The law of initial value: A rare exception. Biological Psychology, 22, 227–237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. Myrtek, M., Foerster, F., & Wittmann, W. (1977). Das Ausgangswertproblem: Theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Untersuchungen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 24, 463–491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  216. Neufeld, R. W. J., & Davidson, P. O. (1974). Sex differences in stress response: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 178–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. Neumann, E. (1968). Thermal changes in palmar skin resistance patterns. Psychophysiology, 5, 103–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Nishiyama, T., Sugenoya, J., Matsumoto, T., Iwase, S., & Mano, T. (2001). Irregular activation of individual sweat glands in human sole observed by a videomicroscopy. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical, 88, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. O’Connell, D. N., Tursky, B., & Evans, F. J. (1967). Normality of distribution of resting palmar skin potential. Psychophysiology, 4, 151–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. O’Gorman, J. G., & Horneman, C. (1979). Consistency of individual differences in non-specific electrodermal activity. Biological Psychology, 9, 13–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. Ödman, S. (1981). Potential and impedance variations following skin deformation. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 19, 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. Paintal, A. S. (1951). A comparison of the galvanic skin responses of normals and psychotics. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 425–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. Pasquali, E., & Roveri, R. (1971). Measurement of the electrical skin resistance during skin drilling. Psychophysiology, 8, 236–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. Patterson, J. C., Ungerleider, L. G., & Bandettini, P. A. (2002). Task-independent functional brain activity correlation with skin conductance changes: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 17, 1797–1806.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. Plouffe, L., & Stelmack, R. M. (1984). The electrodermal orienting response and memory: An analysis of age differences in picture recall. Psychophysiology, 21, 191–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Plutchik, R., & Hirsch, H. R. (1963). Skin impedance and phase angle as a function of frequency and current. Science, 141, 927–928.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. Poh, M. Z., Loddenkemper, T., Swenson, N. C., Goyal, S., Madsen, J. R., & Picard, R. W. (2010b). Continuous monitoring of electrodermal activity during epileptic seizures using a wearable sensor. 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Buenos Aires, Argentina (pp. 4415–4418) IEEE EBMS: Piscataway, NJ.Google Scholar
  228. Poh, M. Z., Swenson, N. C., & Picard, R. W. (2010). A wearable sensor for unobtrusive, long-term assessment of electrodermal activity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 57, 1243–1252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. Pollack, S. V. (1985). The aging skin. The Journal of the Florida Medical Association, 72, 245–248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  230. Potts, R. O., Buras, E. M., & Chrismas, D. A. (1984). Changes with age in the moisture content of human skin. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 82, 97–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. Prokasy, W. F., & Kumpfer, K. L. (1973). Classical conditioning. In W. F. Prokasy & D. C. Raskin (Eds.), Electrodermal activity in psychological research (pp. 157–202). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  232. Purohit, A. P. (1966). Personality variables, sex differences, GSR responsiveness and GSR conditioning. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1, 165–179.Google Scholar
  233. Quiao, Z. G., Morkrid, L., & Grimnes, S. (1987). Simultaneous measurement of electrical admittance, blood flow and temperature at the same skin site with a specially designed probe. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 25, 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  234. Rachman, S. (1960). Reliability of galvanic skin response measures. Psychological Reports, 6, 326.Google Scholar
  235. Raine, A., & Lencz, T. (1993). Brain imaging research on electrodermal activity in humans. In J.-C. Roy, W. Boucsein, D. C. Fowles, & J. H. Gruzelier (Eds.), Progress in electrodermal research: From physiology to psychology (pp. 115–135). London: Plenum.Google Scholar
  236. Raine, A., Reynolds, G. P., & Sheard, C. (1991). Neuroanatomical correlates of skin conductance orienting in normal humans: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychophysiology, 28, 548–558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. Raine, A., & Venables, P. H. (1984). Electrodermal nonresponding, antisocial behavior, and schizoid tendencies in adolescents. Psychophysiology, 21, 424–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  238. Rickles, W. H., & Day, J. L. (1968). Electrodermal activity in non-palmar skin sites. Psychophysiology, 4, 421–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  239. Román, F., García-Sánchez, F. A., Martínez-Selva, J. M., Gómez-Amor, J., & Carrillo, E. E. (1989). Sex differences and bilateral electrodermal activity: A replication. The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 24, 150–155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  240. Rutenfranz, J. (1955). Zur Frage einer Tagesrhythmik des elektrischen Hautwiderstandes beim Menschen. Internationale Zeitschrift für angewandte Physiologie einschließlich Arbeitsphysiologie, 16, 152–172.Google Scholar
  241. Rutenfranz, J. (1958). Der Widerstand der Haut gegenüber schwachen elektrischen Strömen. Der Hautarzt, 9, 289–299.Google Scholar
  242. Rutenfranz, J., & Wenzel, H. G. (1958). Über quantitative Zusammenhänge zwischen Wasserabgabe, Wechselstromwiderstand und Kapazität der Haut bei körperlicher Arbeit und unter verschiedenen Raumtemperaturen. Internationale Zeitschrift für angewandte Physiologie einschließlich Arbeitsphysiologie, 17, 155–176.Google Scholar
  243. Sagberg, F. (1980). Dependence of EDR recovery times and other electrodermal measures on scale of measurement: A methodological clarification. Psychophysiology, 17, 506–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  244. Salter, D. C. (1979). Quantifying skin disease and healing in vivo using electrical impedance measurements. In P. Rolfe (Ed.), Non-invasive physiological measurements (Vol. 1, pp. 21–64). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  245. Sato, F., Owen, M., Matthes, R., Sato, K., & Gisolfi, C. V. (1990). Functional and morphological changes in the eccrine sweat gland with heat acclimation. Journal of Applied Physiology, 69, 232–236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  246. Scerbo, A. S., Freedman, L. W., Raine, A., Dawson, M. E., & Venables, P. H. (1992). A major effect of recording site on measurement of electrodermal activity. Psychophysiology, 29, 241–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  247. Schaefer, F. (1993). A new approach to circumventing the conductance-resistance choice: Phase angle between alternating-current and -voltage. In J. C. Roy, W. Boucsein, D. C. Fowles, & J. H. Gruzelier (Eds.), Progress in electrodermal research (pp. 43–48). London: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  248. Schaefer, F., & Boucsein, W. (2000). Comparison of electrodermal constant voltage and constant current recording techniques using phase angle between alternating voltage and current. Psychophysiology, 37, 85–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  249. Schliack, H., & Schiffter, R. (1979). Neurophysiologie und Pathophysiologie der Schweißsekretion. In E. Schwarz, H. W. Spier, & G. Stüttgen (Eds.), Handbuch der Haut – und Geschlechtskrankheite (1/4A, Vol. Normale und pathologische Physiologie der Haut II, pp. 349–458). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  250. Schneider, R. L. (1987). A mathematical model of human skin conductance. Psychophysiology, 24, 610.Google Scholar
  251. Schneider, R. E., & Fowles, D. C. (1978). A convenient, non-hydrating electrolyte medium for the measurement of electrodermal activity. Psychophysiology, 15, 483–486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  252. Schneider, R., Schmidt, S., Binder, M., Schaefer, F., & Walach, H. (2003). Respiration-related artifacts in EDA recordings: Introducing a standardized method to overcome multiple interpretations. Psychological Reports, 93, 907–920.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  253. Schönpflug, W., Deusinger, I. M., & Nitsch, F. (1966). Höhen – und Zeitmaße der psychogalvanischen Reaktion. Psychologische Forschung, 29, 1–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  254. Schulter, G., & Papousek, I. (1992). Bilateral electrodermal activity: Reliability, laterality and individual differences. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 13, 199–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  255. Schwan, H. P. (1963). Determination of biological impedances. In W. L. Nastuk (Ed.), Physical techniques in biological research (Vol. 6, pp. 323–407). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  256. Shackel, B. (1959). Skin-drilling: A method of diminishing galvanic skin potentials. The American Journal of Psychology, 72, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  257. Shapiro, D., & Leiderman, P. H. (1954). Studies on the galvanic skin potential level: Some statistical properties. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 7, 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  258. Shmavonian, B. M., & Busse, E. W. (1963). Psychophysiologic techniques in the study of the aged. In R. Williams, C. Tibbits, & W. Donahue (Eds.), Processes of aging (pp. 160–183). New York: Atherton.Google Scholar
  259. Shmavonian, B. M., Miller, L. H., & Cohen, S. I. (1968). Differences among age and sex groups in electrodermal conditioning. Psychophysiology, 5, 119–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  260. Shmavonian, B. M., Yarmat, A. J., & Cohen, S. I. (1965). Relationship between the autonomic nervous system and central nervous system in age differences in behavior. In A. T. Welford & J. E. Birren (Eds.), Aging and the nervous system (pp. 235–258). Springfield: Thomas.Google Scholar
  261. Silver, A., Montagna, W., & Karacan, I. (1965). The effect of age on human eccrine sweating. In W. Montagna (Ed.), Advances in biology of skin (Vol. 6, pp. 129–150). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  262. Silverman, A. J., Cohen, S. I., & Shmavonian, B. M. (1958). Psychophysiologic response specificity in the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 5, 443.Google Scholar
  263. Silverman, A. J., Cohen, S. I., & Shmavonian, B. M. (1959). Investigation of psychophysiological relationships with skin resistance measures. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 4, 65–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  264. Silverman, J. J., & Powell, V. E. (1944). Studies on palmar sweating: I. A technique for the study of palmar sweating. American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 208, 297–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  265. Simon, W. R., & Homoth, R. W. G. (1978). An automatic voltage suppressor for the measurement of electrodermal activity. Psychophysiology, 15, 502–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  266. Simpson, A., & Turpin, G. (1983). A device for ambulatory skin conductance monitoring. Psychophysiology, 20, 225–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  267. Sokolov, E. N. (1963a). Higher nervous functions: The orienting reflex. Annual Review of Physiology, 25, 545–580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  268. Sokolov, E. N. (1963b). Perception and the conditioned reflex. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  269. Spinks, J. A., Dow, R., & Chiu, L. W. (1983). A microcomputer package for real-time skin conductance response analysis. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 15, 591–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  270. Steigleder, G. K. (1983). Dermatologie und Venerologie. Stuttgart: Thieme.Google Scholar
  271. Stemmler, G. (1984). Psychophysiologische Emotionsmuster. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  272. Stemmler, G. (1987). Standardization within subjects: A critique of Ben-Shakhar’s conclusions. Psychophysiology, 24, 243–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  273. Stephens, W. G. S. (1963). The current-voltage relationship in human skin. Medical, Electronics and Biological Engineering, 1, 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  274. Stern, R. M., & Anschel, C. (1968). Deep inspirations as stimuli for responses of the autonomic nervous system. Psychophysiology, 5, 132–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  275. Stern, J. A., & Walrath, L. C. (1977). Orienting responses and conditioning of electrodermal responses. Psychophysiology, 14, 334–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  276. Sternbach, R. A., & Tursky, B. (1965). Ethnic differences among housewives in psychophysical and skin potential responses to electric shock. Psychophysiology, 1, 241–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  277. Surwillo, W. W. (1965). Level of skin potential in healthy males and the influence of age. Journal of Gerontology, 20, 519–521.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  278. Surwillo, W. W. (1967). The influence of some psychological factors on latency of the galvanic skin reflex. Psychophysiology, 4, 223–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  279. Surwillo, W. W. (1969). Statistical distribution of volar skin potential level in attention and the effects of age. Psychophysiology, 6, 13–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  280. Surwillo, W. W., & Quilter, R. E. (1965). The relation of frequency of spontaneous skin potential responses to vigilance and to age. Psychophysiology, 1, 272–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  281. Sutarman, & Thomson, M. L. A. (1952). A new technique for enumerating active sweat glands in man. Journal of Physiology, 117 , 51–52. Google Scholar
  282. Swartzman, L. C., Edelberg, R., & Kemmann, E. (1990). The menopausal hot flush: Symptom reports and concomitant physiological changes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 13, 15–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  283. Tassinary, L. G., Geen, T. R., Cacioppo, J. T., & Edelberg, R. (1990). Issues in biometrics: Offset potentials and the electrical stability of Ag/AgCl electrodes. Psychophysiology, 27, 236–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  284. Thetford, P. E., Klemme, M. E., & Spohn, H. E. (1968). Skin potential, heart rate, and the span of immediate memory. Psychophysiology, 5, 166–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  285. Thews, G., Mutschler, E., & Vaupel, P. (1985). Human anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  286. Thiele, F. A. J. (1981a). The functions of the atrichial (human) sweat gland. In G. Stüttgen, H. W. Spier, & E. Schwarz (Eds.), Handbuch der Haut – und Geschlechtskrankheiten (Normale und pathologische Physiologie der Haut III, Vol. 1/4B, pp. 2–121). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  287. Thom, E. (1988). Die Hamburger EDA-Auswertung. In W. Boucsein (Ed.), Elektrodermale Aktiviät. Grundlagen, Methoden und Anwendungen (pp. 501–514). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  288. Thomas, P. E., & Korr, I. M. (1957). Relationship between sweat gland activity and electrical resistance of the skin. Journal of Applied Physiology, 10, 505–510.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  289. Thompson, M. L. (1954). A comparison between the number and distribution of functioning eccrine sweat glands in Europeans and Africans. The Journal of Physiology, 123, 225–233.Google Scholar
  290. Toyokura, M. (1999). Waveform variation and size of sympathetic skin response: Regional difference between the sole and palm recordings. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 765–771.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  291. Toyokura, M. (2006). Sympathetic skin responses: The influence of electrical stimulus intensity and habituation on the waveform. Clinical Autonomic Research, 16, 130–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  292. Traxel, W. (1957). Über das Zeitmaß der psychogalvanischen Reaktion. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 161, 282–291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  293. Tregear, R. T. (1966). Physical functions of skin. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  294. Tronstad, C., Johnsen, G. K., Grimnes, S., & Martinsen, O. G. (2010). A study on electrode gels for skin conductance measurements. Physiological Measurement, 31, 1395–1410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  295. Turpin, G., & Clements, K. (1993). Electrodermal activity and psychopathology: The development of the palmar sweat index (PSI) as an applied measure for use in clinical settings. In J.-C. Roy, W. Boucsein, D. C. Fowles, & J. H. Gruzelier (Eds.), Progress in electrodermal research: From physiology to psychology (pp. 49–60). London: Plenum.Google Scholar
  296. Turpin, G., Shine, P., & Lader, H. (1983). Ambulatory electrodermal monitoring effects of ambient temperature, general activity, electrolyte media, and length of recording. Psychophysiology, 20, 219–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  297. Uncini, A., Pullman, S. L., Lovelace, R. E., & Gambi, D. (1988). The sympathetic skin response: Normal values, elucidation of afferent components and application limits. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 87, 299–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  298. Van Boxtel, A. (1977). Skin resistance during square-wave electrical pulses of 1 to 10 mA. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 15, 679–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  299. Venables, P. H. (1955). The relationships between P.G.R. scores and temperature and humidity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 7, 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  300. Venables, P. H. (1978). Psychophysiology and psychometrics. Psychophysiology, 15, 302–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  301. Venables, P. H., & Christie, M. J. (1973). Mechanisms, instrumentation, recording techniques, and quantification of responses. In W. F. Prokasy & D. C. Raskin (Eds.), Electrodermal activity in psychological research (pp. 1–124). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  302. Venables, P. H., & Christie, M. J. (1980). Electrodermal activity. In I. Martin & P. H. Venables (Eds.), Techniques in psychophysiology (pp. 3–67). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  303. Venables, P. H., & Fletcher, R. P. (1981). The status of skin conductance recovery time: An examination of the Bundy effect. Psychophysiology, 18, 10–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  304. Venables, P. H., Gartshore, S. A., & O’Riordan, P. W. (1980). The function of skin conductance response recovery and rise time. Biological Psychology, 10, 1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  305. Venables, P. H., & Martin, I. (1967a). Skin resistance and skin potential. In P. H. Venables & I. Martin (Eds.), A manual of psychophysiological methods (pp. 53–102). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  306. Venables, P. H., & Martin, I. (1967b). The relation of palmar sweat gland activity to level of skin potential and conductance. Psychophysiology, 3, 302–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  307. Venables, P. H., & Mitchell, D. A. (1996). The effects of age, sex and time of testing on skin conductance activity. Biological Psychology, 43, 87–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  308. Venables, P. H., & Sayer, E. (1963). On the measurement of the level of skin potential. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 251–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  309. Waid, W. M. (1974). Degree of goal-orientation, level of cognitive activity and electrodermal recovery rate. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 38, 103–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  310. Walschburger, P. (1975). Zur Standardisierung und Interpretation elektrodermaler Messwerte in psychologischen Experimenten. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 22, 514–533.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  311. Walschburger, P. (1976). Zur Beschreibung von Aktivierungsprozessen: Eine Methodenstudie zur psychophysiologischen Diagnostik. Freiburg: Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Albert-Ludwig-Universität.Google Scholar
  312. Ward, N. G., & Doerr, H. O. (1986). Skin conductance: A potentially sensitive and specific marker for depression. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 553–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  313. Ward, N. G., Doerr, H. O., & Storrie, M. C. (1983). Skin conductance: A potentially sensitive test for depression. Psychiatry Research, 10, 295–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  314. Waters, W. F., Koresko, R. L., Rossie, G. V., & Hackley, S. A. (1979). Short-, medium-, and long-term relationships among meteorological and electrodermal variables. Psychophysiology, 16, 445–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  315. Weigand, D. A., Haywood, C., & Gaylor, J. R. (1974). Cell layers and density of Negro and Caucasian stratum corneum. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 62, 563–568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  316. Weisz, J., & Czigler, I. (2006). Age and novelty: Event-related brain potentials and autonomic activity. Psychophysiology, 43, 261–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  317. Wenger, M. A., & Cullen, T. D. (1962). Some problems in psychophysiological research: III. The effects of uncontrolled variables. In R. Roessler & N. S. Greenfield (Eds.), Psychophysiological correlates of psychological disorder (pp. 106–114). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  318. Westerink, J., Ouwerkerk, M., de Vries, G.-J., de Waele, S., van den Eerenbeemd, J., & van Boven, M. (2009, 10–12 Sept). Emotion measurement platform for daily life situations. International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  319. Wieland, B. A., & Mefferd, R. B. (1970). Systematic changes in levels of physiological activity during a four-month period. Psychophysiology, 6, 669–689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  320. Wilcott, R. C. (1958). Correlation of skin resistance and potential. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 51, 691–696.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  321. Wilcott, R. C. (1963). Effects of high environmental temperature on sweating and skin resistance. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 778–782.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  322. Wilcott, R. C. (1964). The partial independence of skin potential and skin resistance from sweating. Psychophysiology, 1, 55–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  323. Wilcott, R. C., & Hammond, L. J. (1965). On the constancy-current error in skin resistance measurement. Psychophysiology, 2, 39–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  324. Wilder, J. (1931). Das”Ausgangswert-Gesetz” – ein unbeachtetes biologisches Gesetz; seine Bedeutung für Forschung und Praxis. Klinische Wochenschrift, 41, 1889–1893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  325. Wilhelm, F. H., & Roth, W. T. (1996). Ambulatory assessment of clinical anxiety. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 317–345). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  326. Wilhelm, F. H., Roth, W. T., & Sackner, M. (2003). The LifeShirt: An advanced system for ambulatory measurement of respiratory and cardiac function. Behavior Modification, 27, 671–691.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  327. Williams, L. M., Brammer, M. J., Skerrett, D., Lagopolous, J., Rennie, C., Kozek, K., et al. (2000). The neural correlates of orienting: An integration of fMRI and skin conductance orienting. Neuroreport, 11, 3011–3015.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  328. Williams, L. M., Brown, K. J., Das, P., Boucsein, W., Sokolov, E. N., Brammer, M. J., et al. (2004). The dynamics of cortico-amygdala and automatic activity over the experimental time course of fear perception. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 114–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  329. Williams, L. M., Phillips, M. L., Brammer, M. J., Skerrett, D., Lagopoulos, J., Rennie, C., et al. (2001). Arousal dissociates amygdala and hippocampal fear responses: Evidence from simultaneous fMRI and skin conductance recording. NeuroImage, 14, 1070–1079.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  330. Wyatt, R., & Tursky, B. (1969). Skin potential levels in right- and left-handed males. Psychophysiology, 6, 133–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  331. Yamamoto, T., & Yamamoto, Y. (1976). Dielectric constant and resistivity of epidermal stratum corneum. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 14, 494–500.Google Scholar
  332. Yamamoto, Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1978). Technical note: Dispersion and correlation of the parameters for skin impedance. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 16, 592–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  333. Yamamoto, Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1979). Technical note: Dynamic system for the measurement of electrical skin impedance. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 17, 135–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  334. Yamamoto, Y., Yamamoto, T., Ohta, S., Uehara, T., Tahara, S., & Ishizuka, Y. (1978). The measurement principle for evaluating the performance of drugs and cosmetics by skin impedance. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 16, 623–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  335. Yokota, T., & Fujimori, B. (1962). Impedance change of the skin during the galvanic skin reflex. The Japanese Journal of Physiology, 12, 200–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  336. Zahn, T. P. (1976). On the bimodality of the distribution of electrodermal orienting responses in schizophrenic patients. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 162, 195–199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  337. Zelinski, E. M., Walsh, D. A., & Thompson, L. W. (1978). Orienting task effects on EDR and free recall in three age groups. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 239–245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  338. Zimmer, H. (2000). Frequenz und mittlere Amplitude spontaner elektrodermaler Fluktuationen sind keine austauschbaren Indikatoren psychischer Prozesse. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 47, 129–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  339. Zipp, P. (1983). Impedance controlled skin drilling. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 21, 382–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  340. Zipp, P., & Faber, S. (1979). Rückwirkungsarme Ableitung bioelektrischer Signale bei arbeitswissenschaftlichen Langzeituntersuchungen am Arbeitsplatz. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 42, 105–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  341. Zipp, P., Hennemann, K., Grunwald, R., & Rohmert, W. (1980). Bewertung von Kontaktvermittlern für Bioelektroden bei Langzeituntersuchungen. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 45, 131–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WuppertalWuppertalGermany

Personalised recommendations