Presence in a Collaborative Science Learning Activity in Second Life

  • Ioannis Vrellis
  • Nikiforos M. Papachristos
  • Antonis Natsis
  • Tassos A. Mikropoulos
Chapter

Abstract

Multi-user virtual environments (MUVEs) are surrounded by hype regarding their impact on and potential in education. Many issues regarding the educational affordances of MUVEs and the learning experience of users are still under research. Presence is an important phenomenon users experience when interacting with and via virtual environments and seems to play an important role in learning. This chapter presents empirical data gathered from an exploratory study regarding a problem-based physics learning activity in Second Life (SL). Our aim is to gain knowledge and experience about the sense of presence (spatial and social) that emerges while students collaborate in MUVEs. Students (n = 30) collaborated “in-world” to solve a problem. Data were gathered using the Temple Presence Inventory questionnaire. Results indicate higher scores of social presence than spatial presence. Correlations were found between dimensions of presence, subjective computer expertise, and tendency to become involved in activities.

References

  1. Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005).  Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biocca, F. (1997). The Cyborg’s dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2), Retrieved 1 November 2010 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/biocca2.html.
  3. Biocca, F., & Harms, C. (2002). Defining and measuring social presence: Contribution to the Networked Minds Theory and Measure. In F. Gouveia & F. Biocca (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Annual International Workshop PRESENCE 2002 (pp. 7–36). Porto, Portugal: Universidade Fernando Pessoa.Google Scholar
  4. Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calgone, C., & Hiles, J. (2008). Blended Realities: A virtual tour of education in Second Life. Retrieved 3 January 2010 from http://edumuve.com/blended/BlendedRealitiesCalongneHiles.pdf.
  6. Campusin3D.com. (n.d.). Second Life. Retrieved 3 January 2010 from http://www.campusin3d.com/en/second-life.
  7. Dede, C. (2002). Vignettes about the future of learning technologies. In D. Evans & R. Paige (eds.), 2020 visions: Transforming education and training through advanced technologies (pp. 18–25). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, E., Elliott, J., & Bruckman, A. (2001). AquaMoose 3D: Math learning in a 3D multi-user virtual world. In M. Beaudouin-Lafon & R. Jacob (eds.), ACM CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 259–260). Seattle, Washington, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(2), 262–271.Google Scholar
  10. Ijsselsteijn, W. A., Ridder, H. d., Freeman, J., & Avons, S. E. (2000). Presence: concept, determinants, and measurement. In B. Rogowitz, T. Watson. & T. Pappas (eds.), Proceedings of the SPIE, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging (pp. 520–529). San Jose: SPIE.Google Scholar
  11. Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology: Toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34, 34–37.Google Scholar
  12. Ketelhut, D. J. (2007). The impact of student self-efficacy on scientific inquiry skills: An exploratory investigation in River City, a multi-user virtual environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2), Retrieved 1 November 2010 from: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/lombard.html.
  14. Lombard, M., Ditton, T. B., Crane, D., Davis, B., Gil-Egui, G., Horvath, K., Rossman, J., & Park, S. (2000). Measuring presence: A literature-based approach to the development of a standardized paper-and-pencil instrument. Paper presented at the Third International Workshop on Presence. Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  15. Lombard, M., Ditton, T. B., & Weinstein, L. (2009). Measuring presence: The Temple Presence Inventory (TPI). Retrieved 20 November 2009 from http://astro.temple.edu/~tuc16417/papers/Lombard_et_al.pdf.
  16. Mikropoulos, T. A. (2006). Presence: A unique characteristic in educational virtual environments. Virtual Reality, special issue ‘Using Virtual Reality in Education’, 10(3–4), 197–206.Google Scholar
  17. Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., & Regenbrecht, H. (2001). The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10, 266–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Selverian, M. E. M., & Lombard, M. (2010). Telepresence: A ‘real’ component in a model to make human-computer interface factors meaningful in the virtual learning environment.  Themes in Science and Technology Education, 2(1–2), 31–58.Google Scholar
  19. Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Steed, A. (1994). Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 3, 130–144.Google Scholar
  20. Vrellis, I., Papachristos, N. M., Bellou, J., Avouris, N., & Mikropoulos, T. A. (2010). Designing a collaborative learning activity in Second Life: An exploratory study in physics. In J. Mohamed, Kinshuk, D. Sampson & M. Spector (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 210–214). Sousse, Tunisia: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  21. Witmer, B., & Singer, M. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Winn, W. D., & Windschitl, M. (2000). Learning science in virtual environments: the interplay of theory and experience. Themes in Education, 1(4), 373–389.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ioannis Vrellis
    • 1
  • Nikiforos M. Papachristos
    • 1
  • Antonis Natsis
    • 1
  • Tassos A. Mikropoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Primary School EducationUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece

Personalised recommendations