Teaching Electric Circuits by Guided Inquiry in Virtual and Real Laboratory Environments

  • Athanasios Taramopoulos
  • Dimitris Psillos
  • Evripides Hatzikraniotis


For years, several researchers and teachers support that involving students in laboratory-based activities in science contributes not only to the construction of conceptual knowledge but also to the development of a scientific way of thinking. However, research studies suggest that during experimentation based on hands-on experiments, students are frequently preoccupied with handling equipment setups and taking measurements, which questions the effectiveness of laboratory based on hands-on experiments as only one of its kind environment for promoting scientific understanding (Psillos and Niedderer 2002; Niedderer et al. 2003). With the advance of ICT technology, virtual laboratories have emerged as powerful environments as well. Virtual laboratories simulate real science laboratories on a computer screen, in a visual and functional manner, by exploiting modern multimedia technology and especially user interaction, immediate and realistic variable change, and equipment handling (Kocijancic and O’Sullivan 2004). For example, using simulations to model a phenomenon or process, students can perform experiments by changing variables (e.g., resistances in a circuit) and then observe the effects of their changes (e.g., the current). In this way, students may investigate the properties of the underlying model (Ohm’s law).



The development of OLLE has been funded by the Research Academic Institution of Computer Technology (RACTI) and the Greek Ministry of Education, Lifelong Learning and Religious Affairs in the framework of the Chrysallides project.


  1. Antoniou, N., Demetriadis, P., Kambouris, K., Papamihalis, K., & Papatsimpa, L. (2008). Physics. Third grade junior high school Physics textbook. Organization for Publishing Educational Books (OEDB), Athens (in Greek).Google Scholar
  2. Bisdikian, G., Psillos, D., Hatzikraniotis, E., & Barbas, A. (2006). An Open Laboratory and Learning Environment (OLLE) in optics. In V. Dagdilelis & D. Psillos (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Panhellenic Conference of ICT in Education (pp. 188-195). Thessaloniki, Greece (in Greek).Google Scholar
  3. Chang, K., Liu, S., & Chen, S. (1998). A testing system for diagnosing misconceptions in DC electric circuits. Computers & Education, 31, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Evagelou, F., & Kotsis, K. (2009). The qualities of researches of international literature with regard to the comparison of using virtual and real experiments in the teaching and learning of Physics. In P. Kariotoglou, A. Spirtou & A. Zoupidis (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Panhellenic Conference on Science Education and New Technologies in Education (pp. 335–342) Florina, Greece (in Greek), Retrieved 15 September 2010 from
  5. Finkelstein, N.D., Adams, W.K., Keller, C.J., Kohl, P.B., Perkins, K.K., Podolefsky, N.S., Reid, S., & LeMaster, R. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 1, 1–8.Google Scholar
  6. Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: a six-thousand- student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.Google Scholar
  7. Harms, U. (2000). Virtual and remote labs in physics education. Paper presented at the 2nd European Conference on Physics Teaching in Engineering Education (PTEE 2000), 14–17 June 2000, Budapest. Retrieved 25 June 2005 from
  8. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jaakola, T., & Nurmi, S. (2008). Fostering elementary school students’ understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Jong, T. (2006). Computer simulations: technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312, 532–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keller, C. J., Finkelstein, N. D., Perkins, K. K., & Pollock, S. J. (2005). Assessing the effectiveness of a computer simulation in conjunction with tutorials in introductory physics in undergraduate physics recitations. In P. Heron, L. McCullough & J. Marx (eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 Physics Education Research Conference (pp. 109–112). Melville NY: AIP Press.Google Scholar
  12. Keramidas, K., & Psillos, D. (2004). Questionnaire development and students’ misconceptions study in the field of electric circuits. In V. Tselfes, P. Kariotoglou & M. Patsadakis (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Panhellenic Conference on Science Education and New Technologies in Education (pp. 414–421). Athens, Greece (in Greek).Google Scholar
  13. Klahr, D., Triona, L.M., & Williams, C. (2007). Hands on what? the relative effectiveness of physical versus virtual materials in an engineering design project by middle school children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kocijancic, S., & O’Sullivan, C. (2004). Real or Virtual laboratories in science teaching. Is this actually a dilemma?. Informatics in Education, 3(2), 239–249.Google Scholar
  15. Lefkos, I, Psillos, D., Hatzikraniotis, E., & Papadopoulos, A. (2005). A suggestion on laboratory teaching thermal radiation with the combined use of ICT. In A. Gialama, N. Jimopoulos & A. Chloridou (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Panhellenic Teachers’ Conference on ICT in Education (pp. 114–120). Siros, Greece (in Greek).Google Scholar
  16. Lefkos, I., Psillos, D., & Hatzikraniotis, E. (2011). Designing experiments on thermal interactions by secondary students in a simulated laboratory environment. Research in Science and Technological Education, 29(2), 189–204.Google Scholar
  17. Lenaerts, J., Wieme, W., & van Zele, E. (2003). Peer instruction: a case study for an introductory magnetism course. European Journal of Physics, 24, 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marshall, J.A., & Young, E.S. (2006). Preservice teachers’ theory development in physical and simulated environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 907–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McDermott, L.C., & Shaffer, P.S. (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 60(11), 994-1003.Google Scholar
  20. McDermott, L.C., & Shaffer, P.S. (2002). Tutorials in Introductory Physics, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  21. Niedderer H., Sander F., Goldberg F., Otero V., Jorde D., Slotta J., Stroemme A., Fisher H.E., Hucke L., Tiberghien A., & Vince J. (2003), Research about the use of information technology in Science Education. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, E. Hatzikraniotis, G. Fassoulopoulos & M. Kallery (eds.), Science Education Research in the Knowledge Based Society (pp. 300–312). Dordrecht Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Psillos, D. (1997). Teaching introductory electricity. Connecting Research in Physics Education with Teacher Education, Retrieved 22 July 2009 from
  23. Psillos, D., & Niedderer H. (2002). Issues and questions regarding the effectiveness of labwork. In D. Psillos & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in the Science Laboratory (pp. 21–30). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  24. Psillos, D., Taramopoulos, A., Hatzikraniotis, E., Barbas, A., Molohides, A., & Bisdikian, G. (2008). An Open Laboratory and Learning Environment (OLLE) in the field of electricity. In H. Aggeli & N. Valanidis (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Panhellenic Conference of ICT in Education (pp. 384–391). Limasol, Cyprus (in Greek).Google Scholar
  25. Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2009). The development of dynamic inquiry performances within an open inquiry setting: A comparison to guided inquiry setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1137–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shipstone, D.M. (1984). A study of children understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 185–198.Google Scholar
  27. Steinberg, R. (2003). Effects of computer-based laboratory instruction on future teachers’ understanding of the nature of science. Journal of Computer in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 22, 185–205Google Scholar
  28. Triona, L.M., & Klahr, D. (2003). Point and click or grab and heft: Comparing the influence of physical and virtual instructional materials on elementary school students’ ability to design experiments. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing Understanding. The Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar
  30. Wieman, C., & Perkins, K. (2005). Transforming physics education. Physics Today, 58, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zacharia, Z.C., & Anderson, O.R. (2003). The effects of an interactive computer-based simulation prior to performing a laboratory inquiry-based experiment on students’ conceptual understanding of physics. American Journal of Physics, 71(6), 618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zacharia, Z.C., (2007). Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 120–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zacharia, Z.C., Olympiou, G., & Papaevripidou, M. (2008). Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students’ conceptual understanding in heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 1021–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Athanasios Taramopoulos
    • 1
  • Dimitris Psillos
    • 1
  • Evripides Hatzikraniotis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Elementary EducationAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations