Obstetric Anesthesiology

  • Ray L. Paschall


Obstetric anesthesiology gained noble notoriety when Prince Albert requested Dr. John Snow to provide analgesia for Queen Victoria during the birth of Prince Leopold. This unique beginning is reflected by the continuing uncommon nature of the practice [1].


Cesarean Delivery Disseminate Intravascular Coagulation Epidural Catheter Placenta Previa Placental Abruption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Marcucci L. Queen Victoria’s labor anesthesia. Inside Surgery. May 12 2006.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bucklin BA, Hawkins JL, Anderson JR, Ullrich FA. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey. Twenty year update. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:645–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carvalho JCA. Ultrasound-facilitated epidurals and spinals in obstetrics. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;26(1):145–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kopacz DJ, Neal JM, Pollock JE. The regional anesthesia “learning curve”. What is the minimum number of epidural and spinal blocks to reach consistency? Reg Anesth. 1996;21:182–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Oliveria Filho GR. The construction of learning curves for basic skills in anesthesia procedures: an application for the cumulative sum method. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:411–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Melzack R. The myth of painless childbirth (the John J Bonica lecture). Pain. 1984;19:321–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ACOG committee opinion #295: pain relief during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:213.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ACOG. ACOG practice bulletins: clinical management guidelines for obstetricans-gynecologists number 36, July 2002: obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:177–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:843–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cunningham F, et al. Maternal adaptations to pregnancy. In: Seils A, Noujaim S, Davis K, editors. Williams obstetrics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 167–200.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee W, Cotton DB. Cardiorespiratory changes during pregnancy. In: Clark S, Cotton DB, Hankins GDV, Phelan JP, editors. Critical care obstetrics. Boston: Blackwell; 1991. p. 2–34.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gordon MC. Maternal physiology in pregnancy. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, editors. Obstetrics. Normal and problem pregnancies. 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. p. 63–91.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gaiser R. Physiologic changes of pregnancy. In: Chestnut DH, Polley LS, Lawrence CT, Wong CA, editors. Chestnut’s obstetric anesthesia principles and practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2009. p. 13–36.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aarnoudse JG, Oeseburg G, Kwat A, et al. Influence of variations in pH and pCO2 on scalp tissue oxygen tension and carotid arterial oxygen tension in the fetal lamb. Biol Neonate. 1981;40:252–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sangoul F, Fox GS, Houle GL. Effect of regional analgesia of maternal oxygen consumption during the first stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;212:1080–90.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jouppila P, Jouppila R, Hollmen A, et al. Lumbar epidural analgesia to improve intervillous blood flow during labor in severe preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;59:158–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramos-Santos E, Devoe LD, Wakefield ML, et al. The effects of epidural anesthesia on the Doppler velocimetry of umbilical and uterine arteries in normal and hypertensive patients during active term labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:20–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cascio M, Pygon B, Bernett C, Ramanathan S. Labor analgesia with intrathecal fentanyl decreases maternal stress. Can J Anesth. 1997;44:605–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shnider SM, Abboud T, Artal R, et al. Maternal catecholamines decrease during labor after lumbar epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;147:13–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lederman RP, Lederman E, Work B, et al. Anxiety and epinephrine in multiparous labor: relationship to duration of labor and fetal heart rate pattern. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;153:870–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thalme B, Raabe N, Belfrage P. Lumbar epidural analgesia in labour. II. Effects on glucose, lactate, sodium chloride, total protein, haematocrit and haemoglobin in maternal, fetal and neonatal blood. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1974;53:113–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moir DD, Willocks J. Management of incoordinate uterine action under continuous epidural analgesia. Br Med J. 1967;3:396–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yancey MK, Pierce B, Schweitzer D, Daniels D. Observations on labor epidural analgesia and operative delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:353–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Health Affairs. Geographic Variations in the Appropriate Use of Cesarean Delivery. 2006;25:355–67.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Halpern SH, Leighton BL. Epidural analgesia and the progress of labor. In: Halpern SH, Douglas MJ, editors. Evidence-based obstetric anesthesia. Oxford: Blackwell; 2005. p. 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wong CA, Scavone BM, Peaceman AM, et al. The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:655–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hiltunen P, Raudaskoski T, Ebeling H, Moilanen I. Does pain relief during delivery decrease the risk of postnatal depression? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:257–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eidelman AI, Hoffman NW, Kaitz M. Cognitive deficits in women after childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:764–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Juhan D. Job’s body: a handbook for bodywork. New York: Station Hill Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wager TD, Rilling JK, Smith EE, Sokolik A, Casey KL, Davidson RJ. Placebo-induced changes in fMRI in the anticipation and experience of pain. Science. 2004;303:1162–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wright M, McCrea H, Stringer M, Murphy-Black T. Personal control in pain relief during labor. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:1168–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lowe NK. The nature of labor pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:S16–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Datta S, Lambert DH, Gregus J, et al. Differential sensitivities of mammalian nerve fibers during pregnancy. Anesth Analg. 1983;62:1070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Johnson RF, Herman NL, Johnson HV, et al. Effects of pH on local anesthetic transfer across the human placenta. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:608–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bernards CM. Understanding the physiology and pharmacology of epidural and intrathecal opioids. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2002;16:489–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hogan Q. Epidural catheter tip position and distribution of injectate evaluated by computed tomography. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:964–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cousins MJ, Veering BT. Epidural neural blockade. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO, editors. Neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and management of pain. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p. 242–321.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, Wilson DJ, Gawne-Cain M, Russell R. Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:1122–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chakraveerty R, Pynsent P, Issacs K. Which spinal levels are identified by palpation of the iliac crests and the posterior superior iliac crests? J Anat. 2007;210:232–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Windisch G, Ultz H, Feigl G. Reliability of Tuffier’s line evaluated on cadaveric specimens. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009;31:627–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Reynolds F. Damage to the conus medullaris following spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2008;56:238–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Panni MK, Columb MO. Obese parturients have lower epidural local anaesthetic requirements for analgesia in labour. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96:106–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Polley LS, Columb MO, Naughton NN, Wagner DS, van de Ven CJ. Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor: implications for therapeutic indexes. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:944–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tsen LC, Thue B, Datta S, Segal S. Is combined spinal-epidural analgesia associated with more rapid cervical dilation in nulliparous patients when compared with conventional epidural analgesia? Anesthesiology. 1999;91:920–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Eltzschig HK, Liberman ES, Caman WR. Regional anesthesia for labor and delivery. New Engl J Med. 2003;384:319–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Halpern SH, Carvalho B. Patient controlled analgesia for labor. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:921–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liao JB, Buhimschi CS, Norwitz ER. Normal labor: mechanism and duration. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2005;32:145–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;56:1–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    ACOG committee opinion 395. Surgery and patient choice. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:243–7.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ng K, Parsons J, Cyna AM, Middleton P. Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):CD003765.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tagaloa LA, Butwick AJ, Carvalho B. A survey of perioperative and postoperative anesthetic practices for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2009;article ID 510642:1–7.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal acid–base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2005;60(7):636–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Tan PE, et al. Placental transfer and fetal metabolic effects of phenylepherine and ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2009;111(3):506–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Minzter BH, Johnson RF, Paschall RL, et al. The diverse effects of vasopressors on the fetoplacental unit of the dual perfused human placenta. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:857–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Riley ET. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: keep the pressure up and don’t spare the vasoconstrictors. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:459–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. National Institute of child health and human development maternal–fetal medicine units network. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:6–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Tuffnell DJ, Wilkinson K, Beresford N. Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section–are current standards achievable? Observational case series. BMJ. 2001;322:1330–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hillemanns P, Strauss A, Hasbargen U, et al. Crash emergency cesarean section: decision to delivery interval less than 30 min and its effect on Apgar and umbilical artery pH. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;273:161–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pragger H, Hampl KF, Aeschbach A, et al. Combined effects of patient variables on sensory level after spinal 0.5% plain bupivacaine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42:430–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Carvalho B, Cohen SE, Lipman SS, et al. Patient preferences for anesthesia outcomes associated with cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:1182–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ben David B, Miller G, Gavriel R, Gurevitch A. Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25:235–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ogun CO, Kirgiz EN, Duman A, et al. Comparison of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine-morphine and ropivacaine-morphine for Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90:659–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ginosar Y, Mirikatani E, Drover DR, et al. ED50 andED95 of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine co-administered with opioids for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:676–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ginosar Y, Mirikatani E, Drover DR, et al. ED50 andED95 of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine co-administered with opioids for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:676–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Raffaeli W, Marconi G, Fanelli G, Taddei S, Borghi GB, Casati A. Opioid-related side effects after intrathecal morphine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind dose response study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23:605–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Price ML, Reynolds F, Morgan BM. Extending epidural blockade for emergency caesarean section: evaluation of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1991;1:13–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Regan KJ, O’Sullivan G. The extension of epidural blockade for emergency caesarean surgery: a survey of current UK practice. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:136–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Abboud TK, Kim KC, Noueihad R, et al. Epidural bupivacaine, chloroprocaine, or lidocaine for cesarean section. Maternal and neonatal effects. Anesth Analg. 1983;62:914–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lucas DN, Ciccone GK, Yentis SM. Extending low-dose epidural analgesia for emergency caesarean section: a comparison of three solutions. Anaesthesia. 1999;54:1173–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Halpern SH, Soliman A, Yee J, et al. Conversion of epidural labour analgesia to an anaesthesia for caesarean section: a prospective study of the incidence and determinants of failure. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:240–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Davies JM, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW, Domino KB. Liability associated with obstetric anesthesia a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:131–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Rosen MA. Paracervical block for labor analgesia: a brief historic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:S127–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    King JC, Sherline DM. Paracervical and pudendal block. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1981;24:587–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Yantis S, Hirsch N, Smith G. Anesthesia and intensive care. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier; 2004.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Rafi AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:1024–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Salinas FV. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block for abdominal surgery. ASRA Newsl. May 6–8 2009.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    McDonnell JG, O’Donnell BD, Curley G, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:193–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Hebbard P. Audit of “rescue” analgesia using TAP block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:617–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    McDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:186–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Moore DC. Intercostal nerve block for post operative somatic pain following surgery of the thorax and upper abdomen. Br J Anaesth. 1975;47(Suppl):284–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Bunting P, McGeachie JF. Intercostal nerve blockade producing analgesia after appendectomy. Br J Anaesth. 1988;61:169–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Salinas FV, Liu SL, Scholz AM. Ion channel ligands/sodium channel blockers/local anesthetics. In: Evers AS, Maze M, editors. Anesthetic pharmacology. Physiologic principles and clinical practice. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2004. p. 507–38.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Reynolds F. Maximum recommended doses of local anesthetics: a constant cause of confusion. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005;30:314–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Rosenberg PH, Veering BT, Urmey WF. Maximum recommended dose of local anesthetics: a multifactorial concept. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;29:564–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Mukhtar K. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. J NYSORA. 2009;12:28–33.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Tran TMN, Ivanusic JJ, Hebbard P, et al. Determination of spread of injectate after ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: a cadaveric study. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(1):123–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Rozen WM, Tran TMN, Ashton MW, et al. Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves: a new understanding of the innervation of the anterior abdominal wall. Clin Anat. 2008;21:325–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ruppen WM, Derry S, McQuay HDM, Moore RA. Incidence of epidural hematoma, infection, and neurologic injury in obstetric patients with epidural analgesia/anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:394–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Carpenter RL, Hogan QH, Liu SS, et al. Lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid volume is the primary determinant of the sensory block extent and duration during spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:24–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Carvahlo B, Durbin M, Riley E, et al. The Ed50 and Ed95 of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine with opioids for C/S delivery. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:606–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Norris MC. Patient variables and the subarachnoid spread of hyperbaric bupivacaine in the term parturient. Anesthesiology. 1990;72:478–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Ben-David B, Vaida S, Gaitini L. The influence of high spinal anesthesia on the sensitivity to midazolam sedation. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:525–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Tanaka M, Balki M, Parkes R, Carvalho JCA. ED95 of phenylephrine to prevent spinal-induced hypotension and/or nausea at elective cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18:125–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Neal JM, Bernards CM, Butterworth JF, et al. ASRA practice advisory on local anesthetic systemic toxicity. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:152–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Weinberg GL. Treatment of local anesthetic toxicity. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:186–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Harrington BE. Meningeal puncture headache. In: Neal JM, Rathmell JR, editors. Complications in regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. p. 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Bernards C. Sophistry in the epidural space. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005;30:55–66.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Lybecker H, Djernes M, Schmidt JF. Postdural puncture headache: onset, duration, severity and associated symptoms: an analysis of 75 consecutive patients with PDPH. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995;39:605–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Rowlingson JC, et al. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy. American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (third edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:64–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Kindle CH, Seeberger MD, Staender SE. Epidural abscess complicating epidural anesthesia and analgesia: an analysis of the literature. Act Anesth Scand. 1998;42:614–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Reishaus E, Waldbauer H, Seeling W. Spinal epidural abscess: a meta analysis of 915 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2000;23:175–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Auroy Y, Narchi P, Messiah A, et al. Serious complications related to regional anesthesia: results of a prospective survey in France. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:479–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Cook TM, Counsell D, Wildsmith JAW. Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:179–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Zakowski M. Postoperative complications associated with regional anesthesia in the parturient. In: Norris M, editor. Obstetric anesthesia. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Scott DB, Hibbard BM. Serious non-fatal complications associated with extradural block in obstetric practice. Br J Anaesth. 1990;64:537–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Scott DB, Tunstall ME. Serious complications associated with epidural/spinal blockade in obstetrics: a two-year prospective study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1995;4:133–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Holdcroft A, et al. Neurological complications associated with pregnancy. Br J Anaesth. 1995;75:522.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Graham JG. Neurological complications of pregnancy and anaesthesia. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1982;9:333–50.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    MacArthur AJ, MacArthur C, Weeks S. Is epidural anesthesia in labor associated with chronic back pain? A prospective cohort study. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:1066–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Howell CJ, Dean T, Lucking L, Dziedzic K, Jones PW, Johanson RB. Randomised study of long term outcome after epidural versus non-epidural analgesia during labour. BMJ. 2002;325:357–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Rice I, Wee MY, Thomson K. Obstetric epidurals and chronic adhesive arachnoiditis. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:109–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Hawkins JL, Koonin LM, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP. Anesthesia related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States 1979–1990. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:277–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Kee N. Confidential enquiries into maternal deaths: 50 years of closing the loop. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:413–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    McDonnell NJ, Paech MJ, Clavisi OM, Scott KL, The Anzca Trials Group. Difficult and failed intubation in obstetric anesthesia: an observational study of airway management and complications associated with general anesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2008;17:292–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Zhang J, Merkle S, Trumble A. Severe maternal morbidity associated with hypertension disorders in pregnancy in the U.S. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2003;22:203–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Magpie Trial Collaborative Group. Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1877–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Joint commission: preventing maternal death. Sentinel Event Alert, Issue 44, Jan 26 2010.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Parekh N, Husani SWU, Russsell IF. Cesarean section for placenta previa: a retrospective study of anesthetic management. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84:725–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Sundaran R, Brown AG, Koteeswaran SK, Urquahart G. Anesthetic implication of uterine artery embolization in management of massive ob hemorrhage. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:248–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Tourne G, Collet F, Seffert L, Vegret C. Place of uterine artery embolization in management of post partum hemorrhage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;110:29–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Herbert WNP, Afalo WC. Management of postpartum hemorrhage. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1984;27:139–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Bucklin B. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1444–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Gunter OL, Au BK, Isbell JM, Mowery NT, Young PP, Cotton BA. Optimizing outcomes in damage control resuscitation identifying blood product ratios associated with improved survival. J Trauma. 2008;65:527–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Cotton BA, Au BK, Nunez TC, Gunter OL, Robertson A, Young PP. Predefined massive transfusion protocols are associated with reduction in organ failure and post injury complications. J Trauma. 2009;66:41–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations