Skip to main content

Abstract

In 1901, René Le Fort published his experimental findings of facial fracture patterns. His studies involved subjecting cadaver skulls to various forces of impact and analyzing the fractures that resulted. He described that fractures tended to occur in characteristic locations, which he noted corresponded to relatively weak areas of the facial skeleton [1]. With these findings, he introduced the term “pillars of resistance,” which represent the strongest areas of the facial skeleton, and the fracture patterns he found occurred between these pillars. His report outlined three patterns of fractures with each bearing his name followed by a number, I, II, or III, depending on their location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Le Fort R. Ètude expérimentale sur les fractures de la mâchoire supériure. Rev chir paris 1901;23:208, 227, 360, 379, 479–507. Reprint translated by Tessier P. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972;50:600–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sicher H, Tandler J. Anatomie fur Zahnarazte. Vienna: Springer; 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donat TL, Endress C, Mathog RH. Facial fracture classification according to skeletal support mechanisms. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:1306–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rudderman RH, Mullen RL. Biomechanics of the facial skeleton. Clin Plast Surg. 1999;19(1):105–13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. American College of Surgeons. Advanced trauma life support. www.facs.org/dept/trauma/atls/index.html.

  6. Derdyn C, Persing JA, Broaddus W, et al. Craniofacial trauma: an assessment of risk related to the timing of surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;50:1264–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smoot EC, Jernigan JR, Kinsley E, et al. A survey of operative airway management practices for midface fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 1997;8(3):157–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bahr W, Stoll P. Nasal intubation in the presence of frontobasal fractures: a retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:445–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rhee KJ, Muntz CB, Donald PJ, et al. Does nasotracheal intubation increase complications in patients with skull base fractures? Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:1145–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yerit KC, Enislidis G, Schooper C, et al. Fixation of mandibular fractures with biodegradable plates and screws. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94(3):294–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bell RB, Kindsfater CS. The use of biodegradable plates and screws to stabilize facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64(1):31–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Evans GR, Clark N, Manson PN, Leipziger LS. Role of mini- and microplate fixation in fractures of the midface and mandible. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;34(5):453–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haug RH, Adama JM, Jordan RB. Comparison of the morbidity associated with maxillary fractures treated by maxillomandibular and rigid internal fixation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;80:629–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für osteosynthesefragen/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation. www.aofoundation.org. Aug 2010.

  15. Shaw RC, Parsons RW. Exposure through a coronal incision for initial treatment of facial fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;56(3):254–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Frodel JL, Marentette LJ. The coronal approach anatomic and technical considerations and morbidity. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:201–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Markowitz BL, Manson PN. Panfacial fractures: organization of treatment. Clin Plast Surg. 1989;16(1):105–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marciani RD. Management of middle third facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;51(5):535–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gruss JS, Bubak PJ, Egbert MA. Craniofacial fractures: an algorithm to optimize results. Clin Plast Surg. 1992;19(1):195–206.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haug RH, Foss J. Maxillofacial injuries in the pediatric patient. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90:126–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Frodel JL, Rudderman R. Facial soft tissue resuspension following upper facial skeletal reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma. 1996;2:24–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gina M. Rogers M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rogers, G.M., Allen, R.C. (2012). Le Fort Fractures. In: Black, E., Nesi, F., Calvano, C., Gladstone, G., Levine, M. (eds) Smith and Nesi’s Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0971-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0971-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0970-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0971-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics