Skip to main content

Collaborative Adaptation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 683 Accesses

Part of the book series: Analog Circuits and Signal Processing ((ACSP))

Abstract

As was stated in Sect. 1.3, cognitive radio can be viewed as a autonomous agent. An agent is an entity that perceives its environment through sensors and acts upon that environment through actuators in order to satisfy its goals (Russell and Norvig 2003) (see Fig. 3.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. rd Generation Partnership Project 2 (3GPP2) (2000) cdma2000 high rate packet data air interface specification, 3GPP2 C.S0024-A version 2.0. URL http://www.3gpp2.org/public_html/specs/C.S0024_v2.0.pdf

  2. Albus JS, Pape CL, Robinson IN, Chiueh T-C, McAulay AD, Pao Y-H (1992) RCS: a reference model for intelligent control. IEEE Comput 25:56–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amanna A, Reed J (2010) Survey of cognitive radio architectures. In: Proceedings of the IEEE SoutheastCon 2010. IEEE, pp 292–297

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ambler SW (2004) The object primer: agile model driven development with UML2. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson JR, Bothell D, Byrne MD, Douglass S, Lebiere C, Qin Y (2004) An integrated theory of the mind. Psychol Rev 111:1036–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Antsaklis PJ, Passino KM (1992) Introduction to intelligent control systems with high degrees of autonomy. In: Passino KM, Antsaklis PJ (eds) Introduction to intelligent and autonomous control. Kluwer Academic, Norwell

    Google Scholar 

  7. Åström KJ (1989) Adaptive control. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Austin JL (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beaulieu A (2009) Learning SQL, 2nd edn. O’Reilly, Sebastopol

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bell DA (1962) Information theory and its engineering applications, 3rd edn. Pitman, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Blossom E (2004) GNU radio: tools for exploring the radio frequency spectrum. Linux J 2004:4. URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=993247.993251

  12. Boyd J (1987) A discourse on winning and losing. Technical report, Maxwell AFB

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bray T, Paoli J, Maler E, Yergeau F, Sperberg-McQueen CM (2008) Extensible markup language (XML) 1.0 (fifth edition). W3C recommendation, W3C, retrieved September 24, 2012, from http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/

  14. Clark DD, Partrige C, Ramming JC, Wroclawski JT (2003) A knowledge plane for the internet. In: Proceedings of the SIGCOMM 2003, pp 25–29

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cognitive Radio Working Group (2007) SDRF cognitive radio definitions (SDRF-06-R-0011-V1.0.0). Technical report, The Wireless Innovation Forum, Retrieved on September 24 2012, from URL http://groups.winnforum.org/d/do/1585, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://groups.winnforum.org/d/do/1585

  16. Cognitive Radio Working Group (2008) Cognitive radio definition and nomenclature (SDRF-06-P-0009-V1.0.0). Technical report, The Wireless Innovation Forum, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.sdrforum.org/pages/documentLibrary/documents/SDRF-06-P-0009-V1_0_0_CRWG_Defs.pdf

  17. Communications Research Centre Canada (2011) SCARI: software communication architecture reference implementation. Retrieved September 24, 2012, from https://www.crc.gc.ca/en/html/crc/home/research/satcom/sdr/products/scari_suite/scari_suite

  18. Denker G, Elenius D, Wilkins D (2009) Cognitive radio policy language and policy engine. In: Fette BA (ed) Cognitive radio technology. Elsevier, Burlington (Chap 17)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dolwin C, Zhong S (2007) Functional description language. Technical report, E2R II White Paper

    Google Scholar 

  20. Durfee EH, Lesser VR, Corkill DD (1990) Cooperation through communication in a distributed problem-solving network. In: Cognition, computing, and cooperation. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport (Chap 7)

    Google Scholar 

  21. DYSPAN P19001 Working Group (2008) IEEE standard definitions and concepts for dynamic spectrum access: terminology relating to emerging wireless networks, system functionality, and spectrum management. Technical report, IEEE, Piscataway

    Google Scholar 

  22. Endsley M, Garland D (2000) Situation awareness, analysis and measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahway

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ferdinand M, Zirpins C, Trastour D (2003) Lifting XML schema to OWL. Intell Syst Spec Issue Agents Mark 18(6):32–38

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fette BA (2009) History and background of cognitive radio technology. In: Fette BA (ed) Cognitive radio technology. Elsevier, Burlington (Chap 1)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fette BA, Kokar MM, Cummings M (2008) Next-generation design issues in communications. Portable Des Mag 3:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  26. Finin T, Weber J, Wiederhold G, Genesereth M, Fritzson R, Mckay D, McGuire J, Pelavin R, Shapiro S, Beck C (1993) Draft specification of the KQML agent-communication language. Technical report, The DARPA Knowledge Sharing Initiative External Interfaces Working Group, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  27. FIPA (2002a) FIPA ACL message structure. Technical report, FIPA, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00061/SC00061G.pdf

  28. FIPA (2002b) FIPA brokering protocol specification. Technical report, FIPA, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00033/SC00033H.pdf

  29. FIPA (2002c) FIPA communicative act library specification. Technical report, FIPA, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00037/SC00037J.pdf

  30. FIPA (2002d) FIPA contract net protocol specification. Technical report, FIPA, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00029/SC00029H.pdf

  31. FIPA (2002e) FIPA iterated contract net interaction protocol specification. Technical report, FIPA, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00030/SC00030H.pdf

  32. FIPA (2002f) FIPA propose interaction protocol specification. Technical report, FIPA, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00036/SC00036H.pdf

  33. FIPA (2002g) FIPA query interaction protocol specification. Technical report, FIPA, URL http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00027/SC00027H.pdf, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00027/SC00027H.pdf

  34. FIPA (2002h) FIPA recruiting protocol specification. Technical report, FIPA, URL http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00034/SC00034H.pdf, retrieved on September 24, 2012, http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00034/SC00034H.pdf

  35. FIPA (2002i) FIPA request interaction protocol specification. Technical report, FIPA, URL http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00026/SC00026H.pdf, retrieved on September 24, 2012, http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00026/SC00026H.pdf

  36. FIPA (2002j) FIPA request when protocol specification. Technical report, FIPA, URL http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00028/SC00028H.pdf, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00028/SC00028H.pdf

  37. FIPA (2002k) FIPA SL content language specification. Technical report, FIPA, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00008/

  38. FIPA (2002l) FIPA subscribe interaction protocol specification. Technical report, FIPA, URL http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00035/SC00035H.pdf, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00035/SC00035H.pdf

  39. Franklin S, Graesser A (1997) Is it an agent, or just a program? Intell Agents 3:21–36

    Google Scholar 

  40. Genesereth MR, Fikes RE (1992) Knowledge interchange format version 3.0 reference manual. Technical report, Computer Science Department at Stanford University, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/knowledge-sharing/papers/kif.ps

  41. Giacomoni J, Sicker DC (2005) Difficulties in providing certification and assurance for software defined radios. In: First IEEE international symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks, DySPAN. IEEE, Baltimore, pp 526–538

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gil Y, Ratnakar V (2002) A comparison of (semantic) markup languages. In: 15th international FLAIRS conference. The Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society

    Google Scholar 

  43. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Group IPW (2011) IEEE standard for policy language requirements and system architectures for dynamic spectrum access systems. IEEE Std 1900.5TM-2011

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gudgin M, Hadley M, Mendelsohn N, Lafon Y, Moreau JJ, Karmarkar A, Nielsen HF (2007) SOAP version 1.2 part 1: Messaging framework, 2nd edn. W3C recommendation, W3C, retrieved September 24, 2012, from http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-part1-20070427/

  46. Haykin S (2005) Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 23:201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. He A, Gaeddert J, Bae KK, Newman TR, Reed JH, Morales L, Park CH (2009) Development of a case-based reasoning cognitive engine for ieee 802.22 wran applications. SIGMOBILE Mob Comput Commun Rev 13:37–48. DOI http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1621076.1621081, URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1621076.1621081

  48. Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  49. IEEE P19005 Working Group (2011) Policy language requirements and system architecture for dynamic spectrum access systems. Technical report, IEEE P1900.5 Working Group, Piscataway

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jennings N (1996) Coordination techniques for distributed artificial intelligence. In: O’Hare G (ed) Foundations of distributed artificial intelligence. Wiley, New York (Chap 6)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kokar MM, Lechowicz L (2009) Language issues for cognitive radio. Proc IEEE 97(4):689–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kokar MM, Baclawski K, Eracar YA (1999) Control theory-based foundations of self-controlling software. IEEE Intell Syst 14(3):37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kokar MM, Hillman D, Li S, Fette B, Marshall P, Cummings M, Martin T, Strassner J (2008) Towards a unified policy language for future communication networks: a process. In: 3rd IEEE symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks, DySPAN. IEEE, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kokar MM, Brady D, Baclawski K (2009) The role of ontologies in cognitive radios. In: Fette BA (ed) Cognitive radio technology. Elsevier, Burlington, (Chap 13)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kolodzy P (2009) Communications policy and spectrum management. In: Fette BA (ed) Cognitive radio technology. Elsevier, Burlington (Chap 2)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Laird JE, Newell A, Rosenbloom PS (1987) Soar: an architecture for general intelligence. J Artif Intell 33:1–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Langley P, Laird E John, Rogers S (2009) Cognitive architectures: research issues and challenges. Cogn Syst Res 10(2):141–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Le B, Rodriguez FAG, Chen Q, Li BP, Ge F, ElNainay M, Rondeau TW, Bostian CW (2007) A public safety cognitive radio node. In: Proceedings of the 2007 SDR forum technical conference, SDRF

    Google Scholar 

  59. Li S, Kokar MM (2010) Description of cognitive radio ontology (WINNF-10-S-0007). Technical report, The Wireless Innovation Forum, Retrieved on September 24 2012, from URL http://groups.winnforum.org/d/do/3370, retrieved on September 24 2012, from http://groups.winnforum.org/d/do/3370

  60. Li S, Kokar MM, Moskal J (2008) Policy-driven ontology-based radio: A public safety use case. In: Software defined radio technical conference SDR’08. The Software Defined Radio Forum, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  61. Li S, Kokar MM, Moskal J (2011) An implementation of collaborative adaptation of cognitive radio parameters using an ontology and policy based approach. Analog Integr Circuits Signal Process 69(2-3):283–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Mahmud QH (2007) Cognitive networks: towards self-aware networks. In: Mahmud QH (ed) Cognitive Networks: towards self-aware networks. Wiley, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  63. Mannion P (2006) Smart radios stretch spectrum. Technical report, Electronic Engineering Times (EETimes), retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4057092/Smart-radios-stretch-spectrum

  64. Markosian N (2000) What are physical objects. Philos Phenomenol Res 61:375–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Marshall P (2009) Spectrum awareness and access considerations. In: Fette BA (ed) Cognitive radio technology. Elsevier, Burlington (chap 5)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Masolo C, Borgo S, Gangemi A (2009) Dolce: a descriptive ontology for linguistic and cognitive engineering. Technical report, Institute of Cognitive Science and Technology, Italian National Research Council

    Google Scholar 

  67. Matheus CJ, Kokar MM, Dionne R (2008) A demonstration of formal policy reasoning using an extended version of basevisor. In: IEEE workshop on policies for distributed systems and networks policy 2008. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  68. Merriam-Webster (2011) Merriam Webster. URL http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/aware

  69. Mitola J (2000) Cognitive radio: an integrated agent architecture for software defined radio. Ph.D. thesis, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  70. Mitola J (2009a) Cognitive radio policy languages. In: IEEE ICC conference. IEEE, Dresden, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  71. Mitola J (2009b) Preface. In: Fette BA (ed) Cognitive radio technology. Elsevier, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  72. Mitola J, G Q Maguire J (1999) Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal. IEEE Pers Commun 6:13

    Google Scholar 

  73. Mizoguchi R (n.d.) On property: property vs. attribute. ISIR, Osaka University, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.ei.sanken.osaka-u.ac.jp/main/documents/OnProperty.pdf

  74. Moskal J (2011) Interfacing a reasoner with heterogeneous self-controlling software. Ph.D. thesis, Northeastern University, Boston, USA

    Google Scholar 

  75. Moskal J, Kokar MM, Li S (2010) Interfacing a reasoner with an SDR using a thin, generic API: a GNU radio example. In: Software defined radio technical conference SDR’10. The Software Defined Radio Forum, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  76. Moy C (2010) High-level design approach for the specification of cognitive radio equipments management APIs. J Netw Syst Manag 18(1):64–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. National Communications System Technology & Standards Division (1996) Telecommunications: Glossary of telecommunication terms. Technical report, General Services Administration Information Technology Service. URL http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/fs-1037/fs-1037c.htm, retrieved on September 24, 2012, http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/fs-1037/fs-1037c.htm

  78. Neel JO, Reed JH, MacKenzie AB (2009) Cognitive radio performance analysis. In: Fette BA (ed) Cognitive radio technology. Elsevier, Burlington (Chap 15)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Object Mangement Group (2007) OMG unified modeling language (OMG UML), superstructure (v2.1.2). Retrieved September 24, 2012, from http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.1.2/Superstructure/PDF/

  80. Perich F, Morgan E, Ritterbush O, McHenry M, D’Itri S (2010) Efficient dynamic spectrum access implementation. In: Proceedings of the 2010 military communications conference. IEEE, pp 11427–11432

    Google Scholar 

  81. Polson J (2009) Cognitive radio: the technologies required. In: Fette BA (ed) Cognitive radio technology. Elsevier, Burlington (chap 4)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Priestnall G (2010) Introduction to variable message format (vmf). Technical report, Military Communications and Information Systems Conference MiLCIS 2010, Canberra, AU. Retrieved on Sep 24 2012, from URL http://www.milcis.com.au/milcis-final-program-2010.htm#_2.5a_Tutorial:_Variable, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.milcis.com.au/milcis-final-program-2010.htm

  83. Radiocommunication Study Groups (2011) Software-defined radio in the land mobile, amateur and amateur satellite services (source: Document 5a/TEMP/302(rev.1), subject: Question ITU-R 230-2/5 ). Technical report, International Telecommunications Union. URL http://www.itu.int/md/dologin_md.asp?lang=en&id=R07-WP5A-C-0703!N20!MSW-E, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.itu.int/md/dologin_md.asp?lang=en&id=R07-WP5A-C-0703!N20!MSW-E

  84. Raymer D, Strassner J, Lehtihet E, van der Meer S (2006) End-to-end model driven policy based network management. In: 7th IEEE international workshop on policies for distributed systems and networks (POLICY 2006). IEEE, pp 67–70

    Google Scholar 

  85. RDF Working Group (2004) Resource description framework (RDF). W3C, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.w3.org/RDF/

  86. Rhyne J, Hand E, Patton S, Sperl F (2002) XML implementation of variable message format. In: IEEE software technology conference (STC). IEEE, Salt Lake City. URL http://sstc-online.org/2002/pres637.cfm

  87. Robert M (2009) The software-defined radio as a platform for cognitive radio. In: Fette BA (ed) Cognitive radio technology. Elsevier, Burlington (Chap 3)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Rondeau TW (2007) Application of artificial intelligence to wireless communications. Ph.D. thesis, Viginia Tech

    Google Scholar 

  89. Russell SJ, Norvig P (2003) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  90. Sayin H (2003) Proposal for tactical messaging and usage of extensible markup language message text formats in the tactical command control and information systems. Master’s thesis, The Middle East Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  91. Schreiber G, Dean M (2004) OWL web ontology language reference. W3C recommendation, W3C, retrieved September 24, 2012, from http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/

  92. Sloman A (2001) Varieties of affect and the CogAff architecture schema. In: Proceedings of the AISB’01 symposium on emotions, cognition, and affective computing. The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour

    Google Scholar 

  93. Smith JM (2009) Cognitive techniques: three types of network awareness. In: Fette BA (ed) Cognitive radio technology. Elsevier, Burlington (Chap 9)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Snyder J, McNair B, Edwards S, Dietrich C (2011) OSSIE: An open source software defined radio platform for education and research. In: International conference on frontiers in education: computer science and computer engineering (FECS’11). World congress in computer science, Computer engineering and applied computing. Las Vegas, NV

    Google Scholar 

  95. Stewart D (2009) Military and public safety dsa policy use case. Technical report, IEEE SCC 41 Working Group, IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  96. Studer R, Benjamins VR, Fensel D (1998) Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data Knowl Eng 25(1–2):161–197

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  97. Stuntebeck E, O’Shea T, Hecker J, Clancy T (2006) Architecture for an open-source cognitive radio. In: Proceedings of the SDR forum technical conference 2006, SDRF

    Google Scholar 

  98. Tanenbaum AS (2002) Computer networks, 4th edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  99. Taylor JH, Sayda AF (2005) An intelligent architecture for integrated control and asset management for industrial processes. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international symposium on intelligent control. IEEE, pp 1397–1404

    Google Scholar 

  100. Thompson HS, Maloney M, Beech D, Mendelsohn N (2004) XML schema part 1: structures, 2nd edn. W3C recommendation, W3C, retrieved September 24, 2012, from http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028/

  101. Transceiver Interface Task Working Group (2009) Transceiver facility specification (SDRF-08-s-0008-v1.0.0). Technical report, The Software Defined Radio Forum, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.sdrforum.org/pages/documentLibrary/documents/SDRF-08-S-0008-V1_0_0_Transceiver_Facility_Specification.pdf

  102. Tsui E (2004) What are adaptive, cognitive radios? Technical report, Berkeley Wireless Research Center, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/php/pubs/pubs.php/649/ACR%20E%20Tsui.ppt

  103. US Joint Program Executive Office (2011) Software communications architecture (SCA). Retrieved September 24, 2012, from http://www.public.navy.mil/jpeojtrs/sca/Pages/default.aspx

  104. Vasudevan V (1998) Comparing agent communication languages. Technical report, OBJS Technical Note, URL http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/people/douglass/Douglass/Douglass/Agents/TopicPapers/KQML/9807-comparing-ACLs.pdf, retrieved on September 24,2012, http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/people/douglass/Douglass/Douglass/Agents/TopicPapers/KQML/9807-comparing-ACLs.pdf

  105. W3C (2006) Sparql query language for rdf. Retrieved September 24, 2012, from http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-rdf-sparql-query-20060406/

  106. W3C OWL Working Group (2009) OWL 2 web ontology language document overview. Technical report, W3C, retrieved on September 24, 2012, from http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-overview-20091027/

  107. Walmsley P, Fallside DC (2004) XML schema part 0: Primer second edition. W3C recommendation, W3C, retrieved September 24, 2012, from http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-0-20041028/

  108. Wang J, Brady D, Kokar M, Lechowicz L (2003) The use of ontologies for the self-awareness of the communication nodes. In: Software defined radio technical conference SDR’03

    Google Scholar 

  109. Wang J, Kokar M, Baclawski K, Brady D (2004) Achieving self-awareness of sdr nodes through ontology-based reasoning and reflection. In: Software defined radio technical conference SDR’04. The Software Defined Radio Forum, Phoenix

    Google Scholar 

  110. Wilkins D, Denker G, Stehr MO, Elenius D, Senanayake R, Talcott C (2007) Policy-based cognitive radios. IEEE Wireless Commun 14(4):41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Willink ED (2000) Fm3tr decompostion (p6957-11-005). Technical report, DERA

    Google Scholar 

  112. Willmott S, Faltings B, andS Macho-Gonzalez MC, Belakhdar O, Torrens M (1999) Constraint choice language (CCL) language specification v2.01. Technical report, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya

    Google Scholar 

  113. Xuan P, Lesser V, Zilberstein S (2001) Communication decisions in multi-agent cooperation: model and experiments. In: The fifth international conference on autonomous agents. Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Li, S., Kokar, M.M. (2013). Collaborative Adaptation. In: Flexible Adaptation in Cognitive Radios. Analog Circuits and Signal Processing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0968-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0968-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0967-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0968-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics